Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Appendix F - Ecological and Bushfire Management Response
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (27.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Information Request Response Report - Ecology
Noosa Civic Expansion
2 Response
2.1 Bushfire
2.1.1 Request Item 56
56. An amended Bushfire Assessment addressing the following:
> An assessment of the Potential Bushfire Intensity likely to affect the proposed development using the
methodology contained in the State Planning Policy, released in December 2013. The assessment of the
Potential Bushfire Intensity should take into account the site connectivity to larger areas of hazardous
vegetation such as Noosa National Park, vegetation along Eenie Creek, Vegetation within the Noosa Airport
and open space dedicated to Council as part of the Noosa Business Centre.
> Depending on the levels of Potential Bushfire Intensity determined for the site and the surrounding area, a
set of bushfire hazard mitigation and management actions be proposed which address the determined
potential bushfire intensity levels. This may include a fire management plan or a bushfire mitigation plan.
> Provide further information with regard to the safe movement of vehicles along existing and proposed
roadways given their location to areas of retained hazardous vegetation and where smoke and flame
hazards might impact of drivers.
> The bushfire mitigation plan may update or replace the bushfire management plan (The Consultancy
Bureau, 2004) which should include all areas within the Noosa Business Centre site that may not be
affected by the proposed development in terms of vegetation clearing.
> Provide additional information on the proposed management of fuels within Covenant area J as well as
area identified in the Shire Business Centre (Map SBC) as E2, E6, E7 and Covenant area L.
2.1.2 Response to Item 56
A response to all issues raised by Noosa Council and relating to bushfire is provided within the table overleaf.
An amended Bushfire Assessment (Version 2) has been prepared and is provided as the Noosa Civic
Expansion Bushfire Assessment Report (23/04/15). The requested information is provided as follows:
1. addressed in Section 3.2 of the Bushfire Assessment Report Version 2;
2. addressed in Section 4 and Section 6 of the Bushfire Assessment Report Version 2;
3. addressed in Section 4.5 of the Bushfire Assessment Report Version 2;
4. an updated Bushfire Management Plan is provided as Appendix D to the Bushfire Assessment Report
Version 2; and
5. addressed in Section 5 of the Bushfire Assessment Report Version 2 and the Bushfire Management
Plan provided as Appendix D.
Response to Bushfire Issues
Issue - Bushfire Response
The Bushfire Assessment report applies The bushfire hazard assessment was prepared in general accordance with
a medium bushfire hazard level, which is the requirements of the Noosa Plan Natural Hazards Overlay Code, which
considered to underestimate the likely requires a site specific bushfire hazard assessment to be prepared in
bushfire risk. A vegetation hazard score accordance with Appendix 3 of the SPP Guidelines: Mitigating the Adverse
of 10 ought to be used, given the state Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide.
of the vegetation, the fuel loads
available, and the sites existing and
continuing proximity to larger areas of The medium hazard level assigned to the vegetation is based on an
highly flammable and hazardous accepted methodology and is consistent with the hazard level assigned in
vegetation to the east and south. Bushfire & Acid Sulfate Soils Overlay (Map OM8.4) of the Noosa Plan.
The vegetation hazard score of 8 that was applied in the assessment is
considered appropriate as that score is based on the type of vegetation
present and available fuel loads. When applying the SPP 1/03 Guideline
methodology, the extent of vegetation is not an appropriate basis for
28 April 2015 Cardno 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.