06/0823 - Change to Development Approval [As Published] · 132006.823.03

Page 2

 

IDAS REFERRAL AGENCIES TRIGGERS (Most frequent referrals)
Please refer to IDAS Checklist for complete list .

YES

COMMENT

 

Please tick
v

 

Department of Main Roads (Concurrence or Advice)
e State Controlled Road

 

Dept Natural Resources & Water

e Acid sulphate soils (Advice)
e Clearing of native vegetation on freehold land (Concurrence)

 

Environmental Protection Agency (Concurrence)

* Contaminated land
"Environmental Management/Contaminated Land Register
= UXO
= Land recently used as a ‘notifiable activity’
« Industrial land changed to sensitive uses (eg school)
« Coastal related development.
« Koala habitat
e Wetlands (Advice only)

« Environmentally Relevant Activity (for non-devolved Council as EPA)

 

Queensland Transport (Concurrence)
° Railway
° Public Passenger Transport

 

Energex or other responsible entity (Advice)

° Electricity Easements/Substations

 

OUM (Concurrence)
. SEQ Regional plan

 

VARIOUS «< .
. Conservation estate (Advice)

 

OTHER STATE AGENCIES + TRIGGERS

 

 

OWNER’S CONSENT (State land)

 

Department of Natural Resources and Mines

EPA

 

 

 

 

For further clarification refer to IDAS Guides prepared by Department of Infrastructure & Planning.

NSC g:Manduse\administrative processes\application checklist.doc

 

Page 3

VIRIDIAN NOOS:
7.07 5455 4440

     

Lz

SAINTS

RESORT & SPA
NOOSA HEADS

1™ July 2008

   

2 JUL 2008
SGriv-

Front Counter

      
 

Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Tewantin Office

PO Box 141

TEWANTIN Q 4565

Dear Sir / Madam,

RE: Development Permit for Resort situated at 5 Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads
described as Lot 889 on SP 203086 (formally Lot 888 on SP 186498), Parish of
Weyba: Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd : (Council Ref # 2006/0823)

Please find enclosed an application for a Request to Change of Modify an Existing Approval for
the above site.

Included in this submission are:
¢ Town Planning Report summarising the proposal changes and providing supporting
justification;
¢ Proposal! Plans detailing the existing approval and the changes sought,
e Relevant IDAS application forms;
¢ Copies of notification posted to the applicable referral agencies; and

« Cheque for $1,775.00 which has been advised by Council officers as the applicable fee for
the development application.

With regard to the quoted assessment fee of $1,775.00 we wish to formally note that we do not
concur with Council’s consideration of the current application as a ‘more substantial matter’. In
this regard it is noted that the proposed changes seek to increase the population density of the
site by a mere 0.4 persons, and reduce the overall GFA by 31m?

Given the payment of an assessment fee substantially greater than that appropriate for the level
of assessment required, we trust that Council will be able to undertake this process within an
efficient time period. Please contact me on (07) 5455 4440 or 0425 335 089 should you have
any further queries in relation to this project.

Yours faithfully,

ML

Hannah Blue
Development Manager
Leighton Properties Pty Ltd

A PTY LTD 33 VIEWLAND DRIVE NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567

PO BOX
£07 5447 2384 [email protected] 2360 NO

OSA
WWW.VIRIDIANNOOS, co, HEADS Qy

D
M.AU 4567

ACN. 104 525 195

Page 4

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1987 Form 2, Version 4.1, 3 March 2008

Femme Development Appleton 2 tes
Request to change an
existing approval

Details of person making the request

 

   

 

  

 

14. Who is making the request?

 

 

Company or organisation name (if appicable) Vicidian Noo Sa Pi L+el

 

Individual appticant/Contact person (if there is more than one appicard, provide additional appiicant details on an attachment to this form)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title] [Vy [Firstname | be OQan ah ras Blue
Postaaddress| PDQ Box ZSCO , Nowsa Head&S’ Q 4567
Contact telephone number | St GS 444.9 Mobile phone numbe|O4F2G 33S 089
Facsimile number 53447 2384 e-mail address hannah . lve G Ipnaosa.com.av
Details of the existing approval
2. What are the details of the approval sought to be changed?
t eps 5 Assessment manager
ype of approval Identification number Date issued (if request not made fo the
7 Development Permit
O Preliminary Approval 2006 /op2 Ss 27-2-0% aja

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identification of the premises

 

 

3. Can any part of the premises be identified by a street address or lot on plan description?
[1 No ~ Answer Q3(a)

3(a) Does the application only involve a mobile and temporary environmentally relevant activity (ERA)?

 

C1 No-Gotoa4 O Yes — Complete Table A stating the nature of the mobile and temporary ERA and each tocal
government area to which the approval applies. Then go fo Q6.
Table A Nature of mobile and temporary ERA Name of each local government

 

 

 

 

Yves — Complete Table B and Q3(b)

 

 

 

 

Table B
Street address Loton plan description | seal government area (eg
Unt | Steet Street Name end officiel suburbviocaity name Poe torn] Pan ype and Logan, Cams)
1. 5 Maocwong Drive 1 lace1|809| S? Ganshiy e
Nossq Heads 203086 Coast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1

Page 5

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Form 2, Version 4.1, 3 March 2008
3(b) Can the address be further described by shop/tenancy number or storey/evel?

ho 1 Yes~ Complete Table C
Table C; — Shopfienancy number Storeyflevel
1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Can the premises best be identified by coordinates (e.g. for development proposed in waters, or on a site within a large rurat lt)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No (1 Yes — Complete Table 0
Table D
Coordinates
(Note: place each set of coonfinates in a separce row) R fone Datum saeat (elilvel tala
Easting Northing Latitude Longitude F
1. ( cpass (1) wese4
LD Other
5.  Whatis the total area that makes up the premises (.e. the area covered by the appication)?
Area of land above high water marW/outside watercourse Area in a water body or watercourse
S. 336 Time [fecares (rick apptcable nip | Cm | __tares (Tick apptcable unip
Owner's consent and resource ow owner's agreement . _ __ _
6. 1s the person making the request the owner of the land to which the approval attaches?
Yes (0 No ~- Complete Table E - provide detaits for each owner on a separate row, or an an attachment fo this form if applicable. Note: Advice
provided at the end of this form detais when owner's consent is not required.
Table E Details of the premises owned , Date consent
Owner's name/s and postal address (street or ioton plan intion) Signature* was obtai

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. _ If an application for the existing approval were being made now (i.e. af the time of making this request), would evidence be required to
support the application because it involved taking or interfering with a State-owned resource prescribed by schedule 10 of the
fed Planning Regulation 1998 (IP Reg) or any other regulation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No (1 Yes — Complete Table F and submit, with the application, written agreement to the request.
Table F Date written agreement of the chief
Nature of State-owned resource Relevant State Govemment Department executive was obtained
1.
Nature of the request

8. W What is the nature of the request for change? (Tick the epptcatie pox/es)
(| Anextension of the period before an approval lapses (under IPA, section 3.5.22)
To change the development approval other than a change of condition (under IPA, section 3.5.24)
(2 To change or cancel a condition of approval (under IPA, section 3.5.33) - Go to Q11
(1 Tochange conditions of a rezoning approval given under the Local Goverment (Planning and Environment) Act 1990 (under IPA,
section 6.1.35) - Go to Q12

9. Were one or more concurrence agencies involved in the approval?

* Owner's signature can not be provided on the form if you intend to submit the application electronically. Owner's consent must be provided to the assessment manager on
an attachment containing appropriate written documentation of the owner's consent. If the owner is a company the company must sign as owner. $127 of the
Corporations Act 2001 (Cwealth) details how a company may execute a document.

Page 2

Page 6

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING Wve Form 2, Version 4.1, 3 March 2008
OJ No Yes — Complete Table G. Submit, with the application, a copy of the notice required fo be sent fo each agency under
IPA sections 3.5.22(1)(a) and 3.5.24(1)(b).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Each coneutence agency Date notice sent
Table G {use a separate row for each agency}
1.
Eee  % Deer NR | July 200%
10. Does the request for change relate to an aspect of the approval that involved a building referral agency?
No (1 Yes — Complete Table H. Submit, with the application, a copy of the notice required to be sent to each agency under
IPA section 3,5.24(1){b).
Each building referral agency Date notice sent
Table H {use a separate row for each agency} {notice only required for request to change a
development approval)
1.

 

 

 

 

 

Details and reasons or justification for the request
11. What are the details of the requested change and the reasons or justification for the change? Use a different row for each change if more

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

than one.
Details of requested change (inckafing extension of the period if relevant) Reasons or justification for the requested change
1.
fefer twa planaing refer town planaing
fepoct feport

Mandatory attachments and information
12. What are the mandatory attachments and supporting information accompanying this application?

 

 

Description of attachment or information Tile and date ( applicable) Method of delivery to assessment
(e.g. notice fe concurrence /buikiing referral agencies, owner's (e.g. James Street Traffic Report) manager
consent, resource owner's agreement, drawings, reports)
1. .
Natce to referral 1. 7.08 by hanol

 

 

 

 

 

 

agencies

2- Town flannng Report

Crctuding prope Sal
pions )

s. Cheque Gr assessment 30: b6- 08 h
fee

1-08 “4

 

OFFICE USE ONLY

 

433062

Date received Reference numbers ‘Cost Code (applicable to EPA only) (ERAs)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advice for completing Form 2
Page 3

Page 7

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Form 2, Version 4.1, 3 March 2008

 

General advice
» Form 2 may be used for any one of the four types of request for changing an existing approval -
« — anextension of the period before an approval lapses (under IPA, section 3.5.22)
* — to.change or cancel a condition of approval (under IPA, section 3.5.33)
+ — tochange the development approval other than a change af condition (under (PA, section 3.5.24)
. fo change conditions of a rezoning approval given under the Local Government (Planning and Environment} Act 1990 (P&E Act) (under IPA,
section 6.1.35A)
. Form 2 is not an approved form under the IPA. The assessment manager, concurrence agency or court may have their own form for the purpose
of making a request to change an approval. In the case of a request to change conditions of a rezoning approval, the P&E Act establishes the
process to be followed and provides for the local government to determine the required form.
« The entity that shoutd receive the request is:
for an extension of the period before an approval lapses - the assessment manager (even if the approval was granted by the court (IPA,
section 3.5.22(9))

 — to.change or cancel a condition of approval ~- the entity that decided or required the condition (i.e. the assessment manager, a concurrency
agency or the court)

* — tochange the development approval - the assessment manager

© — to.change conditions of a rezoning approval - the local govemment

* — When paying fees to the Environmental Protection Agency by electronic funds transfer (EFT) for requests relating to environmentally relevant
activities (ERAs) or coastal development, use the process from the information sheet Electronically paying fees fo the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and attach the form Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) payment notification to the request

 

ai Any person may make a request to change an approval. However, in the case of a development approva! for building work or operational
work for the supply of community infrastructure on land designated for the community infrastructure, only the person supplying the
infrastructure may make a request (IPA, section 3.5.33(3A)).

 

 

Q2 If the request is made to a concurrence agency or the court, notice of any subsequent change or cancellation of 2 condition must be given
to the assessment manager (IPA, section 3.5.33(9)).
06 Ifthe person making the request is not the owner of the land to which the approval attaches, the request must be accompanied by the

owner's consent. (IPA, sections 3.5.22(3), 3.5.24(3), 3.5.33(3)).
» However, owner's consent is not required if the approval is for:
« —amobile and temporary ERA; or
building work or operational work for the supply of community infrastructure on land designated for community infrastructure
(IPA, section 3,5.33(3A)).

 

 

Q7 The request must also be accompanied by the written agreement of the chief executive from whom evidence of resource allocation or
entitlement would be required if an application for approval were being made. (IPA, sections 3.5.22(5), 3.5.24(5), 3.5.33(3C))
ag For a request to extend the period before an approval lapses, or to change a development approval, each concurrence agency for the

approval must be given written notice of the request (IPA, sections 3.5.22(1), 3.5.24(1)).

 

 

aio For a request to change a development approval, if the subject of the request involved a building referral agency, that agency also needs to
be given notice of the request (IPA, section 3.5.24(1)). For a request to change conditions the opinion of a relevant building referral agency
must be given regard to by the entity deciding the request (IPA, section 3.5.33(9)).

 

 

 

Page 4

Page 8

1* July 2008

 

RESORT & SPA
NOOSA HEADS

2 hy:
Department eSources & Water
GPO B 2°

GYMP)

Dear Sir / Madam,

RE: Request to Change an Existing Approval for Resort situated at 5 Morwong
Drive, Noosa Heads and described as Lot 888 on SP 186498 (formally Lot 113
on SP 188650), Parish of Weyba

t write with regard to the above site and the recently issued Compiled Decision Notice
(2006/0823) issued by Sunshine Coast Regional Council for a Material Change of Use. In
accordance with Section 3.5.24(1)(b) of the Integrated Planning Act please be advised that
the applicant seeks permission to undertake a change to the approved development located
at 5 Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads and known as ‘Stage 3 - Viridian Noosa’.

The proposed minor changes are summarised as follows:

Building |
e Inclusion of an additional one bedroom unit;
* Conversion of an existing two bedroom unit to a three bedroom unit,

Building V
¢ Deletion of the third level staff room within Building V.

The attached report summaries the changes sought and their impact upon the planning
parameters of the approved development. Further it identifies the specific conditions of the
Negotiated Decision Notice which require amendment resulting from the minor modifications.

The report concludes that the proposed amendments are able to be supported as they do not
impact upon the approved external appearance of the development, its impact upon
neighbouring amenity and all comply with the necessary planning limitations of the site.

Please contact me on (07) 5455 4440 should you have any further queries regarding the
changes sought.

Yours Faithfully,

Ken

Hannah Blue
Development Manager
Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd

Encl.
AN NOOSA PTY LTD 33 VIEWLAND DRIVE NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567

VIRIDI
F. 07 5447 2384 [email protected]

+07 5455 4440

   

Page 9

1 July 2008

 

RESORT & SPA

NOOSA HEADS

Environm N.. Agency
GPO Box -
BRISB: Q 4001

Dear Sir / Madam,

RE: Request to Change an Existing Approval for Resort situated at 5 Morwong
Drive, Noosa Heads and described as Lot 889 on SP 203086 (formally Lot 888
on SP 186498) : Your Reference 27809 Part 10

| write with regard to the above site and the recently issued Complied Decision Notice
(2006/0823) issued by Sunshine Coast Regional Council for a Material Change of Use. In
accordance with Section 3.5.24(1)(b) of the Integrated Planning Act please be advised that
the applicant seeks permission to undertake a change to the approved development located
at 5 Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads and known as ‘Stage 3 - Viridian Noosa’.

The proposed minor changes are summarised as follows:

Building |
e Inclusion of an additional one bedroom unit;

e Conversion of an existing two bedroom unit to a three bedroom unit,

Building V
e Deletion of the third level staff room within Building V.

The attached report summaries the changes sought and their impact upon the planning
parameters of the approved development. Further it identifies the specific conditions of the
Negotiated Decision Notice which require amendment resulting from the minor modifications.

The report concludes that the proposed amendments are able to be supported as they do not
impact upon the approved external appearance of the development, its impact upon
neighbouring amenity and all comply with the necessary planning limitations of the site.

Please contact me on (07) 5455 4440 should you have any further queries regarding the
changes sought.

Yours Faithfully,

Oa

Hannah Blue
Development Manager
Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd

Encl.
NNOOSAPTY LTD 33 VIEWLAND DRIVE NOOSA HEADS Qip 4567

VIRIDIA
F. 07 5447 2384 [email protected]

7,07 5455 4440

PO BOX 2360 NO,

Osa
WWW.VIRIDIANNOOSA co HEADS qin 4567

M.AU

      
   

   

Page 10

 

Regional Council

 

Sunshine Coast ‘TANDUSE SECTION FEES

RECEIPT TYPE
SALE OF DOCUMENTS
Superseded Planning Scheme Documentation 520
Copy of Permit/Approval Letter 110
The Noosa Plan Documentation 111
APPLICATION FEES
Material Change of Use - Code/Impact
Consistent 521
Inconsistent 521
Assessment under Superseded Planning Scheme 521

Modification to a Development Permit

L77s 521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Extension of a Currency Period §21
Operational Works - Landscaping 521
Bldg Work assessable against the Planning Scheme : 521
PRE LODGEMENT REVIEW
Half Hour §22
One Hour §22
ADVERTISING
Purchase Advertised Applications 523
JETTIES
Jetty Application Fee - 524
‘ Jetty Bond . 51
: , (Category 4)
BONDS
’ Performance Bond 51
(Category 9)
SIGNS /
Registration Fee . 222
SEARCH FEE
Search of Land Use Section file 112
Liquor Licensing Request 113
TOTAL $ (Vas
NAME: Vurw eka Nose.
ADDRESS: fo Bene 2B ho
Mees A HSEAAS sb]
FILENO: o6/f2> DATE: Zfalor
RECEIPT NO: “LOB 32S _ Signature of TP Officer: > Ce
AUTHORITY NO: Nn }
7

03 zoo] 23/5

Page 11

Zz

4°
July 2008 RESORT & SPA

NOOSA HEADS

Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Tewantin Office

PO Box 141

TEWANTIN Q 4565

Dear Sir / Madam

RE: Development Permit for Resort situated at 5 Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads
described as Lot 889 on SP 203086 (formally Lot 888 on SP 186498), Parish of
Weyba: Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd : (Council Ref # 2006/0823)

| write with respect to the above development application for which Council issued a Complied
Development Permit for a Material Change of Use dated 27 February 2008.

The applicant now submits a development application to Sunshine Coast Regional Council
under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 for a Request to Change or Modify an Existing
Approval. The following minor changes are sought:

e including an additional one bedroom unit within Building |;
* convert an existing two bedroom unit to a three bedroom unit within Building |; and
e deleting the third tevel staff room within Building V.

This letter provides a summary of both minor amendments and details the planning
implications of these changes. It is noted that the population density planning provision of the
site relates to the area zoned Attached Housing. Accordingly a Survey Plan of this area has
been prepared and is included as Attachment 1. This plan confirms the portion of the site
zoned as Attached Housing has an area of 5.336ha.

Previous Minor Changes Approval

A previous request for a Minor Change was lodged with Noosa Council 13” November 2007,
with a Complied Decision Notice supporting the proposed changes issued 27" February 2008.
Acore element of this Development Application was the inclusion of additional units within the
development, resulting in an increase in Population Density and change to Gross Floor Area.

It is noted that the reported Population Density (Section 2.1) contained in Council’s recent
Planning Report does not accurately reflect the proposed development. In this regard, the
following table summarises the approved population density on an individual building basis:

VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY LTD 33 VIEWLAND DRIVE NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567

PO BOx
F. 07 5447 2384 [email protected] 2360 NOOSA

4440
7.07 5455 IDIANNOOSa con Au

WWW.VIR MEADS QLD asgy

    
   

BN. 104 525 135

Page 12

®@ Page 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

BUILDINGS
A B C DB E F G H | J Total # = Total Total
Units Population Population
Density
1 Bed @ 46 19 39 104 104 x 1.7 =
1.7 persons 176.8
2 Bed @ 8 2 16 12 11 49 49x24
2.4 persons =1176
3 Bed @ 4 3 8 8 8 7 7 45 45x33
3.3 persons = 148.5
198 442.9 442.91
§.336ha

 

POPULATION PER HA 83 persons

Additional Unit — | Block

Outrigger Hotels & Resort have advised that the proposed Lobby area located on the 2™ floor of
Building | is an unnecessary inclusion in the building design. Based upon their experience with other
international hotels and resorts, it has been advised that this area will not be activity used and result in
a ‘dead space’ within the building. The location of the existing lobby is included as Attachment 2.

Accordingly, it is proposed to introduce an additional 1 bedroom unit within this space. A proposal
plan is included as Attachment 2. The impact of this additional unit upon the Planning Parameters of
the development is summarised as follows:

e The Noosa Plan allows a maximum of 100 persons per héctare within the area of the site
zoned Attached Housing (5.336ha).

« As discussed above, the approved population density is 83 persons / hectare.

¢ The proposed 1 bedroom unit will increase the population density to 83.3 persons / hectare.
This remains considerably less than the allowable maximum population density.

e The unit does not alter the site cover of Building | as it replaces an existing lobby within the
same development footprint.

* The unit results in a decrease of the total GFA of Building | by 2m’.

« The unit does not result in any increase in building height in metres or storeys, nor does it
significantly alter the external visual appearance of the building.

¢ The unit triggers the requirement for an additional car space. It is noted that the previous
Changes Application saw the inclusion of an additional car parking space on the site,
increasing it from 319 to 320. This increase was not required by the changes sought at that
time. Accordingly the provision of this additional space compensates for the current
requirement.

Extension of Existing Unit — Building |

A lobby area located on the 3" floor of Building | has also been identified by Outrigger Hotels &
Resorts as redundant space. A plan of this area is included as Attachment 3.

Accordingly, it is proposed to increase the floor area of the adjoining 2 bedroom unit and changes this
to a 3 bedroom unit. A proposal plan is included as Attachment 3. The impact of this increased unit
size upon the Planning Parameters of the development is summarised as follows:

e The Noosa Plan allows a maximum of 100 persons per hectare within the area of the site
zoned Attached Housing (5.336ha).

e Taking into account the additional 1 bedroom unit identified above, the change from a 2
bedroom to a 3 bedroom unit will increase the population density to 83.4 persons / hectare.
This remains considerably less than the allowable maximum population density.

Page 13

e The additional unit area does not increase the Site Cover of Building | as it is wholly contained
within the roof line of this building.

¢ The additional unit area increases the GFA of Building | by 11m?, however is off-set by
changes proposed in Building V as summarised below.

* The unit does not result in any increase in building height in metres or storeys, nor does it
significantly alter the external visual appearance of the building.

Changes to Building V

Given the certification issues associated with the provision of a three storey building versus that of a
two storey building, the provision of a third level staff room in Building V has been deleted.
Accordingly this provides the project with an additional 40m? of approved GFA. Plan detailing this
change are included as Attachment 4.

Previous Public Notification

It is understood that in order for changes to a development approval to be considered as ‘Minor
Changes’ it must be concluded that these changes would not “cause a person to make a properly
made submission objecting to the proposal”. In this regard the following points are provided for
reference:

e A total of six (6) properly made submissions were received during the public notification period
of the current development approval. It is noted that three (3) of these submissions were
duplicates.

e The issues identified in the submissions are summarised as follows:
o Traffic flow along Morwong Drive;
o Height and size of villas;
o Impact of the development upon the adjacent heritage property,
o Impact of the development upon the acoustic & visual amenity enjoyed by users of
other premises;
Impact of the development upon the natural environment
Impact of the development upon the urban character of the locality; and
o Visual impact of car parking.

00

e A response to these issues prepared by Martoo Consulting and dated 9 October 2006 is
included as Attachment 5.

¢ No submissions commented upon the number of accommodation units. Accordingly it is
considered that the changes as proposed would not cause further submissions objecting to
the proposal.

Condition Changes

The proposed changes necessitate the amendment of a small number of conditions. Following is a
suggestion of the proposed amendments. It is noted that given the length of certain conditions, only
the relevant sections have been identified.

Condition 1
1. The development permit for Material Change of Use of Premises is issued for an integrated Resort
comprising:

1.1. Visitor Accommodation- Type 4 Conventional! (Resort),
1.1.1. Resort residential buildings —199 Dwelling Units comprising:
4.1.1.1. 105 by 1 bedroom dwelling units;
1.1.1.2. 47 by 2 bedroom dwelling units;

Page 14

@ Page 4

4.1.4.3. 46 by 3+ bedroom dwelling units; and
1.1.1.4. 1x Manager's Residence.
1.1.2. Ancillary resort reception and resort facilities as indicated on the approved plans.
1.2. Entertainment & Dining — Type 1 Food & Beverages (Conference Room & Restaurant),
1.3. Retail Business — Type 2 Shop & Salon (Shop),
1.4. Commercial Business — Type 2 Medical (Health Spa).

Condition 2

2. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved
plans of development. The approved plans as may be amended by these conditions are prepared by
JMA Architects; and dated; and numbered as listed in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan No. Plan Title Version Date
1013-DA-03-V-01 VV BLOCK - Floor Plans 6 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-02 VV BLOCK - Area Calculations 5 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-03 NV BLOCK - Elevations 5 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-04 MV BLOCK - Sections 5 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-05 \V BLOCK - Refuse Truck In 5 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-06 \V BLOCK - Refuse Truck Out 5 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-07 MV BLOCK - Detail Sections for Refuse 5 2/11/2006
4013-DA-03-V-08 NV BLOCK - Kitchen plan 5 2/11/2006
1013-DA-03-V-09 V BLOCK — Waste Management Area 5 2/11/2006
As amended by:

PDA3 MV BLOCK 1/7 — Site Plan 01/07/08
IPDA1 3/02 IBUILDING V — Lower Level 05/11/07
PDA3 \V BLOCK 2/7 — Street Level 01/07/08
PDAS. WV BLOCK 3/7 — Roof 01/07/08
IPDA3 NV BLOCK 4/7 - Elevations 1 & 2 01/07/08
PDAS VV BLOCK 5/7 ~ Elevations 3 & $ 01/07/08
PDA3 \V BLOCK 6/7 — Section D & 1 01/07/08
IPDA3 BLOCK 7/7 - Section 3 & 4 01/07/08
1013-DA-03-1-01 | BLOCK - Floor Plans 4 30/08/2006
1013-DA-03-I-02 | BLOCK - Floor Plans 4 30/08/2006
1013-DA-03-1-03 | BLOCK - Area Calculations 4 30/08/2006
1013-DA-03-1-04 | BLOCK - Elevations 4 30/08/2006
1013-DA-03-1-05 | BLOCK - Section 4 30/08/2006
As amended by:

IPDA1 2/01-01 GAMES ROON - Site Plan 05/11/07
IPDA1 2/01-02 (GAMES ROOM - Building Plan 05/11/07
PDA1 2/01-03 IGAMES ROOM - Section 6 05/11/07
IPDA1 2/01-04 IGAMES ROOM - Floor Plan 06/11/07
PDA3 1/7 ISITE PLAN 17/06/08
IPDA3 2/7 IBUILDING PLAN — Level 2 17/06/08
PDA 3/7 IBUILDING PLAN — Level 3 17/06/08
PDA 4/7 ELEVATION 1 - 2 17/06/08
IPDA 5/7 SECTION B & 3. 17/06/08
PDA 6/7 JUNIT 9-318 17/06/08
PDA 7/7 UNIT 9-417 17/06/08

Condition 20

20. The Development shall be undertaken strictly in accordance with the development parameters
specified below, except where otherwise specified in these conditions:

 

 

 

V Block

Development Parameter Required Standard
Building Height (Storeys) 2 storeys maximum
Building Height not to exceed RL 41.3

 

 

 

 

Page 15

@ Page 5

 

Development Parameter

Required Standard

 

Site Cover

not to exceed the site cover for V Block as shown
on the Approved Plans

 

Gross Floor Area

not to exceed the gross floor area for V Block as
shown on the Approved Plans

 

Building Colours

external colours as specified in these conditions will
be selected to integrate with the colours of the
natural environment

 

Building Materials

 

colorbond roofs, aluminium window frames,
predominately concrete slab on ground with
masonry construction with render texture finish

 

LBlock

 

Development Parameter

Required Standard

 

Building Height (Storeys)

3 storeys maximum

 

Building Height

not to exceed RL 39.0

 

Site Cover

not to exceed the site cover for D Block as shown
on the Approved Plans

 

Gross Floor Area

not to exceed the gross floor area for D Block as
shown on the Approved Plans

 

Building Colours

external colours as specified in these conditions will
be selected to integrate with the colours of the
natural environment

 

Building Materials

colorbond roofs, aluminium window — frames,
predominately concrete slab on ground with
masonry construction with render texture finish

 

Configuration of Units

 

 

51 Units comprising
40 x 1 Bedroom Units
410 x 2 Bedroom Units
4x3 Bedroom Units

 

The abovementioned development parameters shall be contained in the community management statement of

any or all relevant bodies corporate having control of any part of the Site.

Building heights above shall be measured to exclude any variation resulting from the requirements of Condition 5.
The range of building materials above are indicative with the intents that Blocks A, B, C, E, F & J are to be of light-

weight material construction whereas the other blocks include masonry with light-weight infill as required.

Conclusion

The proposed changes have resulted from the involvement of Outrigger Hotels & Resorts in the
planning and development of the subject site. It is considered that the minor amendments sought are
able to be supported by Council as they do not significantly alter the visual appearance of the

development, nor its impact upon the amenity of surrounding residents.

Furthermore, all changes sought accord with the approved Planning Parameters of the site.

It is formally requested that Council issue a Complied Decision Notice reflecting the updated proposal

plans and condition changes where identified as necessary.

Yours faithfully

Hannah Blue
Development Manager
Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd

 

Page 16

@ Page6

Attachments

 

Attachment 1 - Survey Plan of Attached Housing Zone

Page 17

NOTES

(1) This plan was prepared for the purpose and exclusive use of
VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY LTO.

to accompany an application to NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL

for a Dsvalopmant Permit to Reconfigure the tend described in the plan
‘and is aot ta ba used for any cthar purpose o¢ by any othar person oF
corporation.

JONES FLINT & PIKE PTY. LTO. accapts no respons-bilty for any loss or
damage suffered hawsoaver arising fo any person or corporation who
may use of rely on this plan in contravention to the terms of this clause or
clauses 2, 3 or 4 erect.

(2) The cimansions, areas, size, location, and location of improvements,
flood information (i shown) and nurriber of lots and easaments shown on
‘this plan are approximate only and may vary. The areas of the proposed
leis are approximate only and wil be determined by survay.

 

‘The southam boundary of lat 901 is located appraximately 2.5 metres
orth of the base of the wall hat forma pari of Alma Way.

Easement R is locatad over tha pavement area of the buggy path.
Easement R wil be registard when loi 90% is registered,

Easernert S is located aves part of proposed alignment of the internal
‘spine road through the Resort. Easement S wit be registered after the
lesemal spine road is constructed. Access nights prior to the registration of
Easement S wil bo granted by a fcarsa.

Easement Tis 2 Restricted Easoment, fis 3.0 matres wida and extends

constructed. Access rights prior to Une ragistration of Easamant T wil be
granted bya Sconse.

(4) This plan may not be reproduced unlass these notes ars inchuded.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOT 888 ON SP186498
PARISH OF WEYBA
COUNTY OF MARCH
TOTAL AREA 7.006 ha

_.. LEGEND
2) 'c) PROPOSED BUILDING

(At) 1:1000 _(A3) 1.2000

MORWONG DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS
VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY LTD

RECONFIGURATION PLAN

 

Page 18

@ Page 7

Attachments

 

Attachment 2 — Additional 1 Bedroom Unit

Page 19

 

 

SITE PLAN
| BLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to

change foliowing design development and a 1] A\
particular requirements of any relevant 4 Y, Y aa
authority

. ; : JOHN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES
Copyright © This drawing remains property of

JMAARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD. ARCHITECTS
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden.

1:1500 on A3

 

 

| BLOCK
Site Plan

PDA3 1/7

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Page 20

  

 

K”_ APPROVED UNIT > ADDITIONAL UNT}}
|

 

 

 

LEVEL 2
IBLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to
change following design development and
particular requirements of any relevant
authority

Copyright © This drawing remains property of
JMAARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD.
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden.

      
      
     
     
   

it RL 36.0 - LEVEL 3
— rah RL 33.0 - LEVEL 2
i RL 30.0 - LEVEL 1
. i i RL 27.0 - BASEMENT
ve Pregr cas on eda 4
"Otenmmady | ot ho roy i -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|
4 Z |
~ WIL | 4
4 Game
=e Ci 4!
ese tl +
eee i fe
te J all
td ve
rail gl] = i:
fan ek

 

     
        
    

iy HEE

 

 

 
  

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 
 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

9-307s || 9-306s | , screen || Be Hif9-301 eat

re : ea Re Wi
irri 7 |
| “4 |

| |

| | |

a Van a

1:200 on A3

| BLOCK
Building Plan - Level 2

PDA3 2/7

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

JM A

JOHN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS

 

Page 21

 

K APPROVED UNIT

TYPE U & TYPE K
| BLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to

change following design development and » i} A\
particular requirements of any relevant é 4 Ya
authority

. . . HN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES
Copyright © This drawing remains property of 40

JMAARCHITECTS QLO PTY LTD.
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden. ARCHITECTS

 

x ADDITIONAL UNIT >

 

 

 

 

 

Balcony 2

aad

 

 

 

uft

 

1:100 on A3

 

| BLOCK
UNIT 9.318 Plans

PDA3 6/7

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Page 22

@ Page 8

Attachments

 

Attachment 3 — Reconfigured 3 Bedroom Unit

Page 23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R o
FOR FURTHER DETAILS.

aa 9=16TS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

rE ST

 

 

 

ere

 

 

 

—le==-4

 

 

 

a =p4

 

 

 

 

ta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RL 36.0 - TEVEL 3
| B LOC K RL 33.0 - LEVEL 2

RL 30.0 - LEVEL 1

RL 27.0 - BASEMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

art us
L
c

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AA.
LEVEL 3 1:200 on A3
| BLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to

change following design development and » A\
particular requirements of any relevant J d Y\ t"
authority

JOHN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES

ARCHITECTS

Copyright © This drawing remains property of
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD.
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. An

 

 

| BLOCK
Building Plan - Level 3

PDA3 3/7

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Page 24

 

 

K PROPOSED CHANGES >

   
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
  

R300 OS
RECONFIGURED
UNIT
LEVEL3 _—.
RL 36.00

ADDITIONAL
UNIT

LEVEL 0
RL 27.00

WHT
IBLOCK

| BLOCK
These plans are indicative only and subject to
change following design development and » A\
particular requirements of any relevant ‘ / Y, ,
authority

;OCIATES

Copyright © This drawing remains property of JOHN MAINWARING & ASS!
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD. ARCHITECTS

Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden.

~ ELEVATION 2

   
   
  
   
  
 

OT "Re = 7 ™ - =a SF Ir  T RL3800
Bow , RECONFIGURED
UNIT
: LEVEL 3
, , : RL 36.00
AODITIONAL

UNIT
LEVEL 2

ae = et ~ TRL33.00

 

 

 

LEVEL 1

 

_—.—_ Ih a) oo = 4 : — * “RL30.00

EVEL 0 BASEMENT
RL 27.00

      

  
 

  
    
 
 

  
 

ea
33

Be se oe :
1:200 o

Siicass

 
 

nA3

 

| BLOCK

Elevation 1-2
PDA3 4/7

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Page 25

 

 

SECTION b
IBLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to
change following design development and
particular requirements of any relevant
authority

Copyright © This drawing remains property of
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD.
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden.

 

 

 

 

WM oKSSCS*~CSC
| BLOCK

J mM A

JOHN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS

ae

 

SECTION 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

K PROPOSED CHANGES

   

y
in

   

 

 

 

  

 

PROPOSED CHANGES

Te = ay RE39.00
AV ae RECONFIGURED

; 4 UNIT
‘ G02, if M . —_— LEVEL 3
ia coe RL36.00

Ef GY ADDITIONAL

} UNIT
YW CVE?
= = 7 RL 33.00
__.__ |. LEVEL 4
4 RL 30.00
ad tv
— RL 27.00

 

| An

   

Y
g
Z)

    

=
RECONFIGURED
UNIT

|

ADDITIONAL
UNIT

  
  
 
  

 
  

| BLOCK

Section B & 3
PDA3 5/7

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Page 26

8002 eunr 2} ‘Aepsany “uapplqioy $1 wed 10 BfOYM Ul UOTONpo:day
LIL €WQd SLOALIHOYYV ‘O11 Aid G1 SLO3LIHOUY Wr
SALVISOSSY 2 ONINYMNIVW NHOr 40 Avodord suieuras Buymesp [email protected]

u eld Z Lv 6 il N nN ‘a Ww C queagjas Aue jo syuawauinbey sejnoqied
y 9 O1 qg | | ¥ ( pue juawdojaaap ufisap Gulmoljo) aBueuo

0) Pafgns pue Ajuo aaneoipul ase sued esau

4OO718! mes
Vv UO COOL} AadAL

 
   

Agueg
‘SpreW

 

K “LINN GaYNDIINODSY >

Page 27

@ Page 9

Attachments

 

Attachment 4 — Deletion of Upper Level in V Block

Page 28

SITE PLAN
V BLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to
change following design development and ) 4
particular requirements of any relevant J M /A\
authority

HN MAINWARING & ASSO«
Copynght © This drawing remains property of =
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden

ARGHITEE€ETS

 

 

V BLOCK

1/7 Site Plan
PDA3

Tuesday, 1 July 2008

Page 29

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
     

 

 

 

 

a
CONFERENCE
ONERFLOW =
, = CONFERENCE
ii
. = . : Restaurant 3
= ss [ee Recycleables
— —_
BAR
fw. fiw.
RESTAURANT / RESTAURANT /
OUTDOOR LOUNGE OUTDOOR DINING Paeesaweoratel
- — iT
Th-= ee ae - - -
a +
Weatherproot Curlilage = = i —s
ENTRY TO
BASEMENT BELOW
STREET LEVEL
V BLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to

change following design development and » 4
particular requirements of any relevant . V7 t
authority

OHN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES
Copyright © This drawing remains property of :
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden

ARCHITECTS

V BLOCK
2/7 Building Plan - Street Level

PDA3

Tuesday, 1 July 2008

Page 30

 

8002 Ainr | Aepsany
€Vdd S29 30 Ho wv al
sooy - ue|q Bulpjing Z/¢ SSivi00ssy 8 oNIEvMNIyWNHor 70 H89
M9018 A ¥Y Wer,
4OO18\ es

NV 1d 4004

 

GLY

|
|
SIM |
Sy W |

ST aiNS Sopes WOT OT Jedered puored-senuTUOD salen — Ror seddr mopsq FayNB KOI” —— — I

 

 

—— —— — aris oe] fepns xoq_—- |

 

 

——_—_—X——

| Fy ———|
SC IMA
|

sa | |

 

Page 31

 

 

 

 

 

Wie |
WHA

 

ELEVATION 1
V BLOCK

 

 

ELEVATION 2
V BLOCK

 

 

V BLOCK

4/7 Elevations 1 & 2

wn
be
oO
WW
e
oa
oO
x
<

PDA3

Tuesday, 1 July 2008

 

Page 32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ELEVATION 3

 

 

 

V BLOCK
nT Vt il lh | a |
AN | if
ELEVATION 4
cr
Fiese plone:areindloive ordyarlgutledt ie V BLOCK
5/7 Elevations 3 & 4

  
 
   

eens owing design dev
r requirements of any re’

ope oe M A
cs PDA3

WARING & ASSOCIATES
Tuesday, 1 July 2008

 

Copynght © This drawing remains property of
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD
Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden

ARCHITECTS

Page 33

8002 Ainr | ‘Aepsony

€Vdd
L8 qd yol}ses 2/9

MIO A

0018 A hare
| uoneS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90198 A
 uoHoag

 

 

 

 

 

 

La

        

Page 34

 

 

 

 

 

Section 3
V BLOCK

 

 

 

Section 4

 

V BLOCK

These plans are indicative only and subject to V B LO CG K

change following design development and oS MW 4

particular requirements of any relevant . Taal ;

authority 7IT Section 3 & 4
HN MAINWARING & ASSOCIATES

Copyright © This drawing remains property of PDA3
JMA ARCHITECTS QLD PTY LTD ARCHITECTS
C Tuesday, 1 July 2008

 

Reproduction in whole or part is forbidden

Page 35

© Page 10

Attachments

 

Attachment 5 —- Summary of Public Submissions

Page 36

Council's Reference: 2006/0823
Our Reference: 00644 LOS HB

9 October 2006

The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council

PO Box 141

Tewantin Q 4565

Attention: Land Use Section — Nick Cooper
Dear Nick

RE: Development Permit for Material Change of Use of Premises for Visitor
Accommodation Type 4 - Conventional (Resort); Entertainment & Dining Type 1 —
Food & Beverages (Conference Room & Restaurant); Retail Business Type 2 —
Shop & Salon (Shop) & Commercial Business Type 2 — Medical (Health Spa) at 5
Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads described as Lot 113 on SP188650: Viridan Noosa Pty
Ltd

| refer to the above development application and recently completed public notification. It
is understood a total of six (6) properly made submissions were received, however three
of these (3) were duplicates.

Following is a summary of the points raised in each submission (omitting duplicates) and
the applicants response to these. Please note that submitters issues are shown in italics,
and the applicants response is provided immediately following. Attachments 1 to 3
contain each submission as numbered below.

Submission 1 - received 3" October 2006

1. Traffic Flow — The existing road infrastructure in the Hastings Street precinct is
under severe pressure during peak holiday seasons. This proposal will introduce
additional traffic to that precinct and, in particular, Park Street and Morwong Drive.
In addition to the small vehicle traffic, there will be an increase in service vehicle
traffic such as buses and trucks.

Given the nature if the proposed development, a lot of these service vehicles will
require access at night or early moming which owners believe will detract both
from the value of their asset and the ability to achieve maximum rental income.

A Resort comprising 192 keys is currently approved on the subject site. The subject
proposal does not seek to increase this figure. It is noted that due to the proximity of the
subject site to Hastings Street, it is anticipated that once guests arrive at the site, their use
of private cars will be minimal, as direct pedestrian linkages are provided between the
Resort and the Hastings Street and National Park precincts.

Page 37

@ Page 2 December 5, 2007

Furthermore, it is noted that a condition of approval of the current Court Approved
Scheme (CAS) required all service vehicles to access the site via Viewland Drive. The
applicant has indicated a similar condition may be recommended for the subject proposal.

Submission 2 ~ received 5" October 2006

1. Inappropriate height and size of the proposed villas — The villas at the sea end of
Sheoake Street. Although these are stated to be three stories high in comparison
to the top living of our villa they will be six storeys higher. This is because the
ground level is three stories above our top floor. This close proximity of the
building will deprive us of our moming sun. Because of its size and height and
forward position the building will [be] seen from many positions including Hastings
Street. The position of the building should be moved away from our villa or its
height should be restricted to one storey.

Based upon the description provided, the submitter appears to be referring to the Resort
Villa described as ‘ Building A’. The Site Plan provided below details the comparative
building footprints and maximum Reduced Levels of ‘Top of Roof for this building under
the CAS and current proposal. It is further noted that the submitters villa is also mapped
in this figure.

 

  
 
   
 

 

 

Submitters Villa

 

 

 

 

Building A

 

s
2

As can be seen, the current proposal is located no closer to the submitters villa that the
currently approved CAS, in fact the actual building line of Building A is setback further
than the CAS approval, with open balconies extending the length of the facade facing
towards the garage of the submitters villa.

Page 38

@ Page 3 December 5, 2007

This figure also details that the maximum height of Building A is no greater than the CAS.
Reference is made to Section 3.0 of the Visual Amenity Considerations Report prepared
by Chenoweth Environmental Planning & Landscape Architecture submitted as part of
Volume Iil - Consultants’ Reports. This section states:

The proposed Stage 3 development is in a semi-seciuded valley and will be almost
completely screened by topography and existing vegetation from Hastings Street, Main
Beach, Noosa Sound and other extemal public viewpoints. While the upper parts of three
northem buildings (Buildings B, C & D) (Buildings A, B & C] will be glimpsed, the extent of
their visibility will be no greater than the CAS.

Reference is also made to Sections 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6 of the Architectural Design Report
prepared by JMA Architects submitted as part of Volume Ill — Consultants’ Reports.
These sections detail the roof design and building colours proposed to be utilised for the
all buildings. Specifically it is noted that it is proposed to incorporate:

Roof “Lids” with a maximum pitch of 5 degrees (2 degrees to Unit and apartment
buildings) and extensive overhangs are proposed as a means of avoiding adverse visual
impact created by the development...in fact, like the Stage 2: Viridian Residences, the
buildings have ‘non-roofs” which don't dominate the landscape. The colouring and
patterning of the elevations is the main method of “environmental urban camouflage”.

The photos below detail the roof form and colour scheme used for the Viridian
Residences (the basis for the current proposal) ensures that any buildings within the view
lines from the groynes, beach front or Hastings Street (whilst considered to be minimal)
will disappear into the landscape.

 

 

 

With regards to the submitters concerns regarding overshadowing, diagrams prepared by
JMA are included as Attachment 4. These overshadowing pians detail the shadowing
impacts of Buildings A & J on the Viridian Residences at the following times:

+ Yam on 22™ September (equinox); and

+ Yam on 22” December (summer sottice).
These times have been nominated as they represent a sunlight spectrum, from an
average sunlight access senario (equinox) through to a worst case senario (summer
soltice) in relation to the Viridian Residences. These diagrams clearly indicate that the
proposed development will not cause a detrimental amenity impact due to
overshadowing.

Page 39

@ Page 4 December 5, 2007

It is also critical to appreciate that Building A is located approximatly 20m from the living
area of the nearest Viridan Residence, and that the living area of the closest residence is
orientated in the opposite direction, with only a small glazed door facing the proposed
Resort.

Furthermore it is noted that at the Annual General Meeting of the Viridian Residences, a
proposed boundary realignment (as detailed in Item 45 of the Information Request
Response) increasing the setback of Building A from the common boundary between the
Viridian Residences the subject site was supported. A copy of the Viridian Noosa
Residences Boundary Realignment Deed between Vindian Noosa Pty Ltd and Body
Corporate for Viridian Noosa Residences Community Title Scheme 34034 is included as
Attachment 5.

As part of this future application to Council it was agreed that additional screening
vegetation would be established along this boundary. Attachment 5 includes the agreed
landscaping concept, however it is noted that the chairman of the Body Corporate (Dr
Morris) has requested the five (5) Cupaniopsis anacardiodes be replaced with three (3)
Podocarpus alatus and two (2) Macadamia integrifolia.

2. Traffic Flow — it is proposed that the traffic will be routed through Alma Street
between the hours of 7pm and 7am. This is a mistake for the following reasons.
Alma St is a narrow road five metres wide. The adjacent houses are close without
a footpath separating them from the road. There will be a large number of
vehicles passing next to my villa in the early hours of the moming. This will
include staff working at the resort. Many of these will be young and have old
noisy vehicles. There will be service trucks and rubbish trucks. Although the
developers may state these will only be allowed during working hours how are the
trucks to be stopped. The only way for this to happen would be for a 24 hour
attendant to be stationed at Morwong Drive and this is not proposed at present.
Buses will be dropping and picking up people before 7am and after 7pm. These
will include large tour buses and Fraser Island 4 wheel drive buses. Although
there is no access via Morwong Drive during the day, many vehicles will no
realize [sic] this and drive up Alma St having to do a u-tum in from of my unit.
Again a traffic attendant would be necessary. With the staffs vehicles, client's
vehicles, buses and trucks traffic movements will exceed several hundred
vehicles per night.

It is for these reasons that if the resort is to be developed then 24 hour traffic
access is required from Viewland Drive.

The proposal to restrict traffic access along Morwong Drive to hours between 7pm and
7am is based upon a condition of approval of the CAS. Accordingly, it is considered that
this ‘restricted’ usage of Morwong Drive is an acceptable strategy.

With reference to the submitters concerns regarding the management of the Morwong

Drive entry and potential access of large tour buses it is noted that Items 32 and 33 of the
Information Request Response address both these concerns.

Submission 3 — received via fax 5 October 2006

 

1. Further development of the adjoining property by Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd will
impact on the [deleted] heritage property.

It is noted that a Resort comprising 192 keys is already approved on the subject site. It is
not considered the proposal will degrade the heritage significance of the adjoining guest
house greater than the existing and approved development.

Page 40

@ Page 5 December 5, 2007

2. Further development of the adjoining property by Viridian Noosa Pty Ltd will
impact on the [deleted] hentage property. It is noted that the overall outcome
sought for the Noosaville Locality is to-

+ Avoid adverse significant impacts on the amenity enjoyed by users of
other premises, including acoustic and visual qualities;

+ Avoid significant adverse effects on the natural environment;

+ Substantial sites are protected where they focus on cultural values;

+ The mixed urban character of Noosaville is maintained through the
retention of old building forms and the introduction of new buildings which
complement old building forms;

+ Areas of native remnant or regrowth vegetation including their bio-diversity
and habitat values are protected and retained in their natural state.

{t is considered the proposed development compties with the Overall Outcomes
applicable to the subject site:

For the Attached Housing Zone — residents and visitors are accommodated in predominately multiple
housing forms that —

i, offer a high level of residential amenity, design quality and safety; and

ii respect the domestic scale of the streetscape and surrounding development.

The proposed larger accommodation buildings and resort villas demonstrate a high level
of residential amenity and design quality as all buildings incorporate a mixture of
lightweight building materials, natural muted earth tones and open verandahs and building
articulation.

The proposal has been designed with respect to the surrounding development,
incorporating significant distances between the accommodation buildings and existing
adjacent uses:
+ Building J is approximately 70 metres from the buildings behind Halse
Lodge;
+ Buildings A and J are approximately 20 metres from the nearest Viridian
Residence;
+ Building | is approximately 80 metres from the closest residence on
Attunga Heights;
Building G is approximately 70 metres from the closest residence on
Angler Street; and
+ Building F is approximately 80 metres from the closest residence on
Viewland Drive.

It is noted that the proposed Resort has been designed by the same architect responsible
for the nearby Viridian Residences, further ensuring its sympathetic relationship with
existing development in the immediate locale.

3. The Noosa Local Plan also recognises that further development must-
+ Respect the existing residential amenity of visitors and residents within
and surrounding the development;
+ Is designed to ensure carparking does not visually dominate street
frontages.

As detailed above, due to the significant setbacks and sympathetic design, the proposed
development respects the existing amenity of the surrounding residential and visitor
accommodation. Almost all parking will be provided within enclosed garages or
basement parking areas, and therefore will not be visible from either the surrounding
public streets or private internal road network. The small number of at-grade parking
spaces provided for short-term parking will be focussed within the Little Hastings Street

Page 41

@ Page 6 December 5, 2007

precinct, and are designed to foster a ‘European Village’ feel for the main thoroughfare. It
is noted that these spaces will not be visible from the surrounding public roadways.

4. In lodging this submission, it is requested that the heritage significance of [deleted]
and grounds not be impacted and overshadowed by further density and
development such as proposed in the Application.

The location of the proposed development does not abut nor adjoin the heritage building.
As such there will be no adverse visual impact of the proposal upon this site. It is noted
that the proposal complies with the height requirements of the Attached Housing Zone
contained within The Noosa Plan.

4, Hentage listed as important landmark in Noosa Heads, [deleted] would be
overshadowed by the construction of this dominating two storey commercial
building unsympathetic in architectural design to the adjoining heritage listed
property.

It is noted that the proposed development is designed by JMA Architects, an architectural
firm widely recognised as one of Australia’s leading design companies. The proposal
incorporates lightweight building materials, muted natural earth tones, minimal earthworks
and a design reflective of both the surrounding residential development and natural bush
setting. Accordingly it is not considered the proposal will dominate the heritage listed
property not only due to its sympathetic design but also its considerable distance from the
building.

The following image illustrates the separation of the resort development site and the
heritage listed property.

“Google

 

Page 42

@ Page7 December 5, 2007
| trust that this response provides assistance in the decision making process and look
forward to receiving a Development Permit for the proposed development shortly.

Yours faithfully

Hannah Blue
Senior Planner
Martoo Consulting

Page 43

@ Page 8 December 5, 2007

Attachments

 

Submission 1 — received 3" October 2006

Page 44

@ Page 9 December 5, 2007

Attachments

 

Submission 2 — received 5" October 2006

Page 45

@ Page 10 December 5, 2007

Attachments

 

Submission 3 — received via fax 5" October 2006

Page 46

@ Page 11 December 5, 2007

Attachments

 

Overshadowing Studies

Page 47

@ Page 12 December 5, 2007

Attachments

 

Realignment Deed & Preliminary Landscape Concept