MCU22/0118 – DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE – SHORT-TERM ACCOMMODATION AT 94 & 142 NOOSA DR, NOOSA HEADS · Report

Page 2

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING                                      7 NOVEMBER 2023


  SEQRP Designation             Urban Footprint

  Zone                          Tourist Accommodation
                                Environmental Management & Conservation

  Precinct                      Not applicable

  Local Plan Area               Noosa Heads

  Overlays                      Acid Sulfate Soils
                                         •   5m AHD or Below
                                         •   Above 5m AHD to 20m AHD
                                Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands
                                         •   Area of Biodiversity Significance
                                         •   MSES Environmental Values
                                         •   Riparian Buffer Area
                                Bushfire Hazard
                                         •   High Potential Bushfire Intensity
                                         •   Potential Impact Buffer
                                Flood Hazard
                                         •   Flooding and Inundation Extent
                                Landslide Hazard
                                         •   High Hazard Area
                                         •   Moderate Hazard Area

  Assessment Type               Impact

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides an assessment of an application seeking approval for a Material Change of
Use for Short-Term Accommodation at 94 & 142 Noosa Dr, Noosa Heads. The proposed
development is an extension to the existing RACV Noosa Resort, comprising of 15 self-
contained accommodation units, a new lagoon pool within the existing resort complex, an
additional 18 car parks and alterations to the existing access.
The site is subject to split zoning, being Tourist Accommodation Zone and Environmental
Management & Conservation Zone, with a total area of approximately 5.18 hectares. The
development is proposed to be located primarily over Lot 3 (142 Noosa Drive), with cabins 2 –
15 being located wholly within Lot 3, whilst cabin 1 and the proposed parking partly extending
into the existing RACV Noosa Resort on Lot 203 (94 Noosa Drive). Lot 0, whilst forming part of
the existing resort development and the subject land as a whole, does not include any proposed
development.
The assessment of the application found that whilst the nature of the use is considered
consistent and expected within the Tourist Accommodation zoned portion of the land, however
the proposal to develop land zoned as Environmental Management and Conversation, and

Page 3

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING                                       7 NOVEMBER 2023


outside of the mapped urban boundary is not consistent with Noosa Plan 2020 or community
expectations of development within the region.
The proposed development would result in an unacceptable loss of vegetation in a locality which
is ecologically important and environmentally sensitive, serves as an important ecological
linkage, and the proposed development is considered an overdevelopment of the land at the
expense of the sites natural values.
The proposed development has failed to demonstrate a significant planning need to develop
outside of Noosa Plan 2020's urban boundary, noting the density and intensity proposed and
the inconsistency with the local landscape character. Nor has any overriding community benefit
been demonstrated, which would justify approval despite its conflict with the planning scheme.
Approval of the proposed development would not be in the public interest as reflected in the
provisions of Noosa Plan 2020 referred to in these reasons for refusal.
The application is therefore recommended for refusal.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment Committee
Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application No. MCU22/0118 for a Development Permit
for Material Change of Use - Short-term accommodation, situated at 94 & 142 Noosa Dr, Noosa
Heads and:
A.   Refuse the application for the following reasons:
      1. The proposed development has failed to demonstrate a significant planning need to
      develop outside of Noosa Plan 2020's urban boundary, particularly at the density and height
      proposed and is inconsistent with the local landscape character. No overriding community
      benefit been demonstrated, which would justify approval despite its conflict with the planning
      scheme.


      2. Valid planning grounds have been raised by submitters that the proposal will result in an
      unacceptable impact on the biodiversity of the locality. Further, the development exceeds what
      a community member could reasonably expect to be developed outside of the Urban Boundary
      and within the Environmental Management and Conservation Zone.


      3.   The proposed development of the subject land is inappropriate, in circumstances where:
            (a) The proposed development seeks to expand the existing resort complex in
            circumstances where part of that land is located outside of the urban boundary in Noosa
            Plan 2020;
            (b) The proponent seeks to utilise the land for Short-term accommodation, which is an
            inconsistent use in the Environmental Management and Conservation zone;
            (c) The proposed development is an overdevelopment of the land at the expense of
            the natural values of the land, as the proposal would result in unacceptable clearing of
            vegetation in an ecologically important and environmentally sensitive area, including
            proposed development located on mapped Areas of Biodiversity Significance, Matters
            of State Environmental Significance (MSES) Environmental Values and Riparian Buffer
            Area under the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay and mapped Core Koala
            Habitat area;
            (d) The stormwater treatment proposed is not of a sufficient size to achieve the water
            quality objectives and protection of biodiversity areas required under the Water Quality
            and Drainage Code.

Page 4

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING                                             7 NOVEMBER 2023


             (e) The built form of the proposed development is unacceptable, being slightly over
             height in metres in the Tourist Accommodation zone and substantially over height in
             metres and storeys in the Environmental Management and Conservation zone.


           In respect of the above, the proposed development is inconsistent with the following
           provisions of Noosa Plan 2020:
             (i)     Strategic Framework – 3.2.2, 3.2.5, 3.3.1(b) and 3.3.4(b)(p);
             (ii) Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code – 8.2.2.2(2)(a), (b), (c), (d),
             (e), (f), (g), (h) and (i) Table 8.2.23 PO1, PO3, PO6 and PO11;
             (iii)    Water Quality and Drainage Code – 9.4.82(2)(a) and (b) and Table 9.4.8.3 PO6;
             (iv) Noosa Heads Local Plan Code – Overall Outcomes (2)(b)(d)(e) and (ad) and Table
             7.2.5.3 PO4, PO5, PO6 and PO26;
             (v) Environmental Management and Conservation Zone Code – Overall Outcomes
             (2)(a) and (b), Table 6.7.1.3 PO1, PO5, PO7, PO8, PO9, PO11 and PO13;
             (vi) Tourist Accommodation Zone Code - Table 6.3.4.3 PO9 and PO10.


      4. When read as a whole, the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017 (SEQRP) does
      not lend support to the proposed use of the land, as:
             4.1. the SEQRP sets a long term, 50-year vision, establishing aspirations for the region
             up to 2067. Given this, the timing and sequencing of urban development occurring within
             the Urban Footprint is a finer grained detail, the planning for which is implemented
             through local government planning schemes;
             4.2. the designation of land as being within the Urban Footprint does not imply that all
             that land with that designation can be developed for urban purposes; and
             4.3. when assessed against Noosa Plan 2020, the proposed development is not
             suitable for urban development.


      5.    The following relevant matters support refusal:
             5.1. The proposed development will involve an unacceptable loss of vegetation in a
             locality which is an ecologically important and environmentally sensitive and serves as
             an important ecological linkage,
             5.2. There is no planning, economic or community need for the proposed development
             on the subject land.
             5.3. Approval of the proposed development would not be in the public interest as
             reflected in the provisions of Noosa Plan 2020 referred to in these reasons for refusal.


B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.