Council archive · source document
07/2398 - Revised Noise Report and cover letters to referral agencies [As Published] · 132007.2398
Shop 6 Esk Colonial Plaza L arry Kum Ss ko Vv 139 Ipswich Street, Esk Q 4312 PO Box 228 Esk Q 4312 ij BRTP (Hons) MPIA Cert CE i, own Planning and Development Consultant Phone: 0754 242 652 —[email protected] Certified Practising Planner Fox: 0754 242653 www.kumskov.com.au PlanTech Town Planners Pty Ltd ABN 21 076 885 599 8 August 2008 Sunshine Coast Regional Council Noosa Office PO Box 141 Tewantin Q 4565 41 AUG 2008 ATTENTION: Tracy Jones ~ 2 Jewantin Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Development Application 2007/2398 RSL Care — Cooroy Please find attached a copy of the cover letters to the referral agencies as advised in the Acknowledgement Notice. Enclosed please find six copies of the revised noise report which should be inserted after the Attachment 5 tab in the submitted reports. The noise assessment has revealed the need to change some of the unit types adjoining the main road and include a new unit type as shown in Figure 9 of the ANE report. A duplex unit based on the revised floor plan is currently being prepared. A copy will be forwarded to the Council when it is completed. The site concept plan will need to be revised to show the new unit mix. However this can be done as part of the response to the information request likely to be provided by the Council. Also enclosed is a CD with a PDF copy of the submitted plans and reports. Yours faithfully, N\ cannot read cD. u fg [2 Fe Larry Kumskov PlanTech Town Planners
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 92 pages
Page 2
‘Larry Kumskov BRTP (Hons) MPIA Cert CE ‘., lown Planning and Development Consultant Certified Practising Planner PlanTech Town Planners Pty Led ABN 21 076 885 599 8 August 2008 Queensland Transport GPO Box 213 Brisbane Q 4001 Dear Sir/Madam, Shop 6 Esk Colonial Plaza 139 Ipswich Street, Esk Q 4312 PO Box 228 Esk Q 4312 Phone: 0754 242 652 larry¥@kumskov.com.au Fox: 0754242653 www.kumskov.com.au Re: Development Application 2007/2398 RSL Care — 19 Trading Post Road and 4 Lamonts Road, Cooroy Please find enclosed a copy of the revised development application lodged with the Sunshine Coast Regional Council (Noosa). -RSL Care acquired an adjoining lot and has revised the development plans to include that land. All reports have been updated to include the additional land. Your file reference with regard to the previous application was 890/01159 BRIS-1321 P26124. Please note that the matters addressed in the earlier request for information and the responses from your Department have been carried over to the revised development plans. Yours faithfully, Te Larry Kumskov PlanTech Town Planners
Page 3
[Larry Kumskov i BRTP (Hons) MPIA Cert CE 3,, Town Planning and Development Consultant Certified Practising Planner PlanTech Town Planners Pty Ltd ABN 21 076 885 599 8 August 2008 Department of Main Roads PO Box 183 Gympie Q 4570 Dear Sir/Madam, Shop 6 Esk Colonial Plaza 139 Ipswich Street, Esk Q 4312 PO Box 228 Esk Q 4312 Phone: 0754 242 652 [email protected] Fax: 0754 242 653 ~www.kumskov.com.au Re: Development Application 2007/2398 RSL Care — 19 Trading Post Road and 4 Lamonts Road, Cooroy Please find enclosed a copy of the revised development application lodged with the Sunshine Coast Regional Council (Noosa). [have enclosed for your information a copy of the DMR response to the previous application. RSL Care acquired an adjoining lot and has revised the development plans to include that land. All reports have been updated to include the additional land. Yours faithfully, Fe Larry Kumskov PlanTech Town Planners
Page 4
Queensland x8 Government 16 January 2008 Department of Main Roads - RSL Care C/- Larry Kumskov PO Box 820 Indooroopilly Qld 4068 Dear Sir Raced If- of-o8 Concurrence agency’s response ~ conditions Noosa Shire Cooroy Connection Road Local Government application number 2007/2398 Main Roads number 7950 by RSL Care Lot 1 RP215922 situated at 19 Trading Post Road, Cooroy Enclosed is a copy of a letter to the Assessment Manager, Noosa Shire Council, providing Queensland Department of Main Roads' response in respect of the above application. The response Tequires that Council include specified conditions in any approval of the subject application. Your attention is drawn to Section 3.3.17(1) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 which provides that a concurrence agency may only change its response before the application is decided by the assessment manager. Should a request to change or cancel a condition be proposed then your attention is drawn to Sections 3.5.9, 3.5.10 and 3.5.33 which are relevant. The contact officer for this application is Mr Les Hudson. Yours faithfully a G S Dawson Manager (Network Planning and Performance) Delegate of the Director-General Department of Main Roads Office of the Deputy Director-General / Districts Our ref 92/145/077950.0 A f2 lah8031 North Coast-Hinterland Yourref ~— 50 River Road Enquires Mrles Hudson rke PO Box 183 Telephone +61 7 5482 0333 Gympie Queensland 4570 Facsimile +61 7 5482 0465 ABN 57 636 727 711 Website — www.mainroads.qid.gov.au Emali www. [email protected]
Page 5
Queensland Government Department of Main Roads 16 January 2008 Mr Bruce Davidson € © (> Vy Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565 Dear Mr Davidson Concurrence agency’s response - conditions Noosa Shire Cooroy Connection Road Local Government application number 2007/2398 Main Roads number 7950 by RSL Care Lot 1 RP215922 situated at 19 Trading Post Road, Cooroy The above application has been assessed by the Queensland Department of Main Roads as a Concurrence Agency. The assessment has had regard to the potential impact of the proposed development on the State- controlled road network. Pursuant to Section 3.3.16 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 the Queensland Department of Main Roads requires that Council include the attached conditions in any approval of the application. A Statement of Reasons in respect of these conditions is also provided in the attachment. Council is considered to be the appropriate authority to address requirements for minor works such as footpaths, kerb and channel and so on. Should Council choose to impose such requirements then the applicant is required under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, to make further application to Main Roads to carry out the works. Office of the Deputy Olrector-General / Districts Our ref 92/145/D7950.0 A f2 lah8030 North Coast-Hinterland Yourref 2007/2398 50 River Road . Enquiries MrLes Hudson = rke PO Box 183 Telephone +61 7 5462 0333 Gympie Queensland 4570 Facsimile +61 7 5482 0465 ABN 57 836 727 711 Website — www.mainroads.qid.gov.au Email www. [email protected]
Page 6
A copy of this letter and attachment has been sent to the applicant. Please forward a copy of Council's decision notice to this office. The contact officer for this application is Mr Les Hudson. Yours sincerely GS Dawson Manager (Network Planning and Performance) Delegate of the Director-General Department of Main Roads *Enc (Attachment 1 - Conditions and Statement of Reasons)
Page 7
Main Roads CONDITIONS AND STATEMENT OF REASONS Application type: Material change of use Councit: Noosa Shire Main Roads File No: 92/145/D7950 Council Ref: 2007/2398 Road: Cooroy Connection Road Development Number: 7950 Response Date: 16 January 2008 ISSUES / CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR | THE REASONS, INFORMATION, CONCERNS THE SUBJECT APPLICATION STUDIES, FINDINGS, USED IN SETTING OF CONDITIONS INCLUDED: Management of access to a State-controlled Toad. There shall be no direct access to Cooroy Connection Road, All access is to be via Pearsons Road or Lamonts Road. By minimising the number of points of access to the State-controlled road network, safety and efficiency are maximised. Works within the State- controlled road reserve. The applicant is to upgrade the Cooroy Connection Road / Pearsons Road intersection to incorporate a channelised right tum lane (Type CHR) as shown on Figure 13.60 of Main Roads' document, "Road Planning and Design Manual". The applicant is to upgrade the Cooroy Connection Road / Lamonts Road intersection to a Type BAR standard as shown on Figure 13.58 of Main Roads’ document, "Road Planning and Design Manual". Prior to the commencement of any works within the State-controlled road, the applicant must arrange for detailed engineering plans and specifications for the proposed works to be submitted to Main Roads for assessment and be approved. The engineering design, plans and specifications submitted must be certified by an appropriate Registered Professional Engineer Qld (RPEQ). Note: Further approvals will be required for construction in accordance with the requirements of section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994. Main Roads’ Road Planning and Design Manual, Chapter 13 — Intersections at Grade. Traffic study submitted by McConmick - Rankin Cagney. Works to be in accordance with Main Roads Technical Manuals, Policies and Guidelines together with relevant State and National Standards. Cost of works. All works associated with this proposal, including relocation of services, lighting, etc. must be carried out at no cost to Main Roads. The works are required to enable the development to proceed without compromising the safety and efficiency of the State-controlled road network.
Page 8
ISSUES / CONCERNS CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUBJECT APPLICATION THE REASONS, INFORMATION, STUDIES, FINDINGS, USED IN SETTING OF CONDITIONS INCLUDED: Noise assessment. The applicant is responsible for achieving the acoustic quality objectives of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Tequirements of Main Roads document, Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice. Main Roads will not be responsible for the provision of any buffers or noise attenuation Measures necessary to maintain an appropriate level of amenity for residential or other noise sensitive uses. The applicant is to provide these noise attenuation facilities which are to be located clear of the State-controlled road Teserve. Environmental Protection Act 1994. Main Roads document, “Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice”.
Page 9
Department of Main Roads Road Planning and Design Manual Wr= Ve Note: # Qouble barrier line not to be used thie side of the istand Design Speed of Lateral Movement Length A Desirable Major Road (m) Radius R Approach (km/h) W7=3.5m W7=3.0m (m) 50 50% 40% 110 oo 60 so 175 70 70 60 240 80 80 65 280 90 90 75 350 100 100 85 425 110 110 95 500 120 120 100 600 (1) Based on a diverge rate of 1m (sec). If the through road is on a tight horizontal curve, increase lateral movement length so that a minimal decrease in speed is required for the through movement. (2) Where Type 2 Road Trains are required minimum A = 60.0m Nominal through lane width (m) (incl. widening for curves). For a new intersection on an existing road, the width is to be in accordance with the current link strategy. Nominal width of turn lane (m) (incl. widening for curves based on the design turning vehicle). Desirable minimum = W, absolute minimum = 3m. Tota! tength of auxiliary lane including taper, diverge/deceleration and storage (m). Diverge/deceleration length including taper - refer to Table 13.11 (adjust for grade using the ‘Correction to Grade' table in Figure 13.42). Storage length (m), greater of: 1. The length of one design turning vehicle 2. (calculated car spaces —1) x 8m (refer to Appendix 13A of use computer program eg. aaSIDRA) Taper length (m) = 0,33 x iT 3.6 Design speed of major road approach (km/h) Distance based on design vehicle turning path - typically 10 — 15m. 1, An alternative to the double white line on the offside edge of the right tum slot is a 1.0m painted median. The 1.0m median is particularly useful when the major road is on a tight horizontal curve and oncoming vehicles track across the centreline, Provision of this median will require the dimension ‘A’ to be increased. 2. A raised concrete median on the minor road may be used with this treatment to minimise ‘comer cutting’, particularly for higher turing volumes. Figure 13.60 Channelised Right Turn (CHR) on a Two Lane Rural Road October 2006 13-99 Chapter 13 intersections at Grede
Page 10
Department of Main Roads Road Planning and Design Manual 13.7.10 Right Turn Treatments - Rural Conditions There are two fundamental types of right turn treatments for rural areas given in this section: * Type BAR shoulder widening (minimum treatment); © Type CHR pavement widening with a right turn bay. A subset of this type is the CHR(S). © Chapter 13 intersections at Grade Generally these treatments are applied to two-lane two-way rural roads. 13.7.10.1 Basic Right Turn Treatment (BAR) on a Two- Lane Rural Road This is the minimum treatment for right tum movements from a through road to side roads and local access points. It is detailed in Figure 13.58. $11 bs preferred that the widened shouider le seated, uninea the shoulder can be: Mainteined with @ pound and evan surface. A 10.0m 3s x 13,0m, A rc L W= Nominal through lane width (m) (including widening for curves). Width to be continuous through the intersection. C= Onstraights - 6.5m minimum + 7.0m minimum for Type 1 & Type 2 Road Trains On curves + widths as above + curve widening (based on widening for the design turning vehicle plus widening for the design through vehicle) A= QOS5xVxF 3.6 Increase length A on tighter curves. Where the design through vehicle is larger than or equal to a 19m semi- trailer, the minimum speed used to calculate A is 80ksm/h. V= Design speed of major road approach Qanv/h) = Formation/carriageway widening (m) S= Storage length to cater for one design turning vehicle (m) (minimum length 12.5m) X= Distance based on design vehicle turning path, typically 10 - 15m Figure 13.68 Basic Right Turn Treatment (BAR) on a Two Lane Rural Road October 2006 13-96
Page 11
RSL Care PROPOSED RSL RETIREMENT VILLAGE, COOROY - ROAD AND RAIL NOISE ASSESSMENT (REVISED) August 2008 Prepared by: AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD 3/4 Tombo Street Capalaba, Queensland 4157 07 3245 7808 (ph) 07 3245 7809 (fax) Web: www.ane.com.au £-mail: [email protected]
Page 12
= RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — Project Reference: 1750 Document Title: Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Client: RSL Care Document Reference: /Network/Projects/1750/Reporting/2008 Revision/1750report04.odt Version: Description: Date: Author: Checked by: Approved by: Signature: 00 Oraft for internal review 08/07/08 | Samuel Wong } Craig Beyers - i 01 Draft for client review 11/07/08 | Samuel Wong | Craig Beyers Craig Beyers i 02 Revised draft for internal review | 04/08/08 | Samuel Wong | Cralg Beyers - ir 03 | Revised draft for client review | 06/08/08 | Samuel Wong | Cralg Beyers CMR fis Mike 03 Final for Client 07/08/08 | Samuel Wong | Craig Beyers CMR ka o, lata. Copyright: Air Noise Environment retains ownership of the copyright to all reports, drawings, designs, plans, figures and other work produced by Air Noise Environment Pty Ltd during the course of fulfilling a commission. The client named on the cover of this document shall have a licence to use such documents and materials for the purpose of the subject commission provided they are reproduced in full or, alternatively, in part with due acknowledgement to Air Noise Environment. Third parties must not reproduce this document, in part or in full, without obtaining the prior permission of Air Noise Environment Pty Ltd. Disclaimer: This document has been prepared with all due care and attention by professional environmental practitioners according to accepted practices and techniques. This document is issued in confidence and is relevant only to the issues pertinent to the subject matter contained herein. Air Noise Environment Pty Ltd holds no responsibility for misapplication or misinterpretation by third parties of the contents of this document. If this document does not contain an original signature, it is not an authorised copy. Unauthorised versions should not be relied upon for any purpose by the client, regulatory agencies or other interested parties. Where site inspections, testing or fieldwork have taken place, the report is based on the information made available by the client or their nominees during the visit, visual observations and any subsequent discussions with regulatory authorities. The validity and comprehensiveness of supplied information has not been independently verified and, for the purposes of this report, it is assumed that the information provided to Air Noise Environment Pty Ltd is both complete and accurate. It is further assumed that normal activities were being undertaken at the site on the day of the site visit(s). AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/M750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page ii
Page 13
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) a CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 14 SCOPE OF STUDY 1.2 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.3 TASKS UNDERTAKEN 1.4 THIS REPORT 2 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 21 RAIL NOISE 2.2 ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE 2.3 DEVELOPMENT SITE NOISE 3 BASELINE NOISE MONITORING 3.1 SELECTION OF MONITORING POSITION 3.2 METHODOLOGY FOR NOISE MONITORING 3.3 EXISTING NOISE SOURCES 3.4 RESULTS OF NOISE MONITORING 3.5 DERIVED NOISE CRITERIA 4 RAIL NOISE ASSESSMENT 41 NOISE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY 4.2 POTENTIALLY IMPACTED RECEPTORS 4.3 ASSESSMENT OF MONITORING RESULTS 4.4 RAIL NOISE MITIGATION 4.4.1 Acoustic Barrier And Construction Material Requirements 4.4.2 Alternate Construction Materials 6 ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 5.1 NOISE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY 5.2 POTENTIALLY IMPACTED RECEPTORS 5.3 TRAFFIC DATA 5.4 MODELLING ASSUMPTIONS 5.5 NOISE PREDICTIONS 5.5.1 Introduction -$ouon © DOD OaOaneoeeFmeaa#&a&tk we wewen Nb = 2 4 2 Ul 8! lk tk on aa oH = = an AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page iii
Page 14
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) 5.5.2 6.5.3 5.6 5.6.1 5.6.2 5.6.3 5.6.4 6.1 6.2 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 7 7A 7.2 7.3 Model Validation Predicted Noise Levels MITIGATION OPTIONS Construction Material Requirements Construction Category Requirements Alternative Design ILU Layouts For Reducing Construction Requirements Open Space NOISE IMMISSIONS ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Fixed Plant Loading Dock Noise Traffic Accessing/Leaving The Site CONCLUSION RAIL NOISE ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE NOISE IMMISSIONS APPENDIX A: FIGURES APPENDIX B: ACOUSTIC GLOSSARY APPENDIX C: PLATES APPENDIX D: METEOROLOGICAL DATA APPENDIX E: NOISE LOGGER DATA AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page iv
Page 15
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) => 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE OF STUDY Air Noise Environment was commissioned by RSL Care Pty Ltd to undertake a noise impact study for a proposed RSL retirement village in Cooroy. The assessment takes into account the acoustic impacts associated with the following sources: = road traffic and rail noise; « development noise (e.g. mechanical! fixed plant) impacting sensitive receptors (on-site and off- site); and « traffic accessing and leaving the site via Lamonts Road. Modelling of road and rail noise has been completed to determine areas potentially affected by the Cooroy Connection Road and the Cooroy rail corridor. Where exceedances are predicted acoustic controls are considered for the development in accordance with the requirements of the Queensland Department of Main Roads* and the Noosa Shire Council. Noise emissions from the proposed development including services and fixed plant have been assessed in accordance with the Noosa Shire Planning Scheme (2006)?. Air Noise Environment has previously completed an acoustic impact assessment for the proposed development (ref: 175Ofinal.doc’). This revised report takes into consideration an updated site layout and addresses issues raised by the Noosa Shire Council (in response to the original acoustic impact assessment report). 1.2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development site comprises an undeveloped lot and is located at the corner of the Cooroy Connection Road and Pearsons Road in Cooroy (see Figure 1). The Cooroy rail corridor is located on the western side of the Cooroy Connection Road, which borders the south-western boundary of the development. The proposed retirement village will comprise the following features: an aged care facility; an apartment block comprising of 20 units; 159 single storey Independent Living Units (ILUs); and multi-purpose community village centre. Figure 2 presents the proposed lot layout for the development. Figures 3 to 6 present building layouts and elevations. 1 Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice, Main Roads, 2000. Noosa Shire Planning Scheme, Noosa Shire Council, 2006. 3 Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy — Road and Rail Noise Assessment, 31 October 2007. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/M1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 1
Page 16
=—~ RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) 1.3. TASKS UNDERTAKEN The tasks undertaken for the project are as follows: a existing noise monitoring; ® prediction of future traffic noise levels using the Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CoRTN) Methodology; a prediction of potential rail noise impacts; = identification of any acoustic attenuation measures necessary to reduce road traffic and rail noise; and a assessment of potential impacts of site traffic, services and fixed plant at the retirement village. 1.4 THIS REPORT This report summarises the methodology, results and conclusions of the assessment. All figures referenced in this report are presented in Appendix A and an acoustic glossary is presented in Appendix B to assist the reader. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 2
Page 17
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) 2 2.1 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA RAIL NOISE The Noosa Shire Council has specified an internal average Lame noise criteria of 50 dB(A) and 55 dB(A) for sleeping and living areas respectively. This criteria has been used for the assessment of rail noise from the Cooroy Rail Corridor located to the west of the development site. 2.2 ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE The Queensland Department of Main Roads through its Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice (2000) specifies noise criteria for new and existing roads. Criteria for proposed residential developments from the Code of Practice specify the requirements for the current and future noise conditions as follows. Criteria for residential development (Temporary or Permanent Occupancy) requires that: Residential (Temporary or Permanent Occupancy) ‘Habitable Floors 60 dB(A) Lio (18 Hour) or less, where existing levels measured at the local government deemed-to—comply dwelling setback distance are greater than 40 dB(A) Loo (8-Hour) between 10 pm and 6 am; or 57 dB(A) Lio (18 hour) or less, where existing levels measured at the local government deemed-to—comply dwelling setback distance are less than or equal to 40 dB(A) Loo (8-hour) between 10 pm and 6 am Where the above criteria cannot be met, intemal maximum design criterion levels specified in table, AS 2107-1987. Note: All extemal levels stated are free-field with the expectation that additional 2.5 dB(A) increase is applied for the facade correction when the building is constructed. This will achieve a level of less than 63 dB(A) and 60 dB(A), respectively, 1 metre from the most exposed facade of a building.’ Specific guidance is also provided by the DMR for outdoor areas at developments: ‘Balconies and formal external open areas 60 dB(A) Lio (18 Hour) or less, where existing levels measured at the local government deemed-to—comply dwelling setback distance are greater than 45 dB(A) Loo (18-Hour); or 57 dB(A) Lio (18 hour) or less, where existing levels measured at the local government deemed-to-comply dwelling setback distance are less than or equal to 45 dB(A) Ls0(18- hour).’ The above criteria has been considered for the purposes of this noise assessment. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 3
Page 18
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —- 2.3 DEVELOPMENT SITE NOISE The following noise limits for fixed plant and equipment have been specified by the Noosa Shire Council: » Daytime and evening (7 am — 10 pm): Lamaxag equal to or less than Lago + 5 dB(A); » Night (10 pm —7 am): Lamexeq equal to or less than Lass + 3 dB(A). This criteria has been used to assess the impacts of development noise on on-site and off-site sensitive receptors. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 4
Page 19
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) == 3 BASELINE NOISE MONITORING 3.1 SELECTION OF MONITORING POSITION Two attended noise monitoring positions were chosen for the purposes of the assessment. The first monitoring position was located at the development site boundary adjacent to the Cooroy Connection Road. The noise monitoring position has a direct line of sight to the railway and road, hence was unobstructed from vehicular and train noise emissions. Attended noise measurements were also completed at this location for determining maximum noise levels associated with passing trains. The second monitoring position was located at the rear of the development site, at the end of Trading Post Road. The purpose of the noise monitoring was to determine to typical background noise levels experienced by nearby residents which have a potential to be impacted by the proposed retirement village. The monitoring locations are depicted on Figure 1 in Appendix A and Plate 1 in Appendix C. 3.2 METHODOLOGY FOR NOISE MONITORING Noise measurements were made using an Acoustic Research Laboratories environmental noise logger (ARL215). The serial number and calibration information for each instrument is presented in Table 3.1. An averaging time of 15 minutes was adopted and measurements were made over at least a 24-hour period as detailed below. The microphone was positioned at a height of 1.2 m above ground level and fitted with a windshield throughout the measurements. TABLE 3.1: BACKGROUND NOISE MONITORING NATA Field Field Instrument Serial Calibration Calibration Calibration Date of Number Current Until Pre-Check Post-Check Monitoring Level Level ARL noise logger 04/07/2007 - (Monitoring Position 1) 94520 27/09/2008 94.0 dB(A) 94.0 dB(A) 05/07/2007 ARL noise logger 05/07/2007 — (Monitoring Position 2) 94520 27/09/2008 94.0 dB(A) 94.6 dB(A) 09/07/2007 Noise measurements for trains passing by the development site were also completed by Air Noise Environment during a site visit on 4 July, 2007. Measurements were made using a Type 2 Svantek 943AE sound level meter (Serial Number 5163) and calibrator (Serial Number 358). Details of the NATA certified calibrations of these instruments are presented in Table 3.2. AJR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 5
Page 20
= RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — TABLE 3.2: ATTENDED NOISE MONITORING Serial Date of NATA Calibration | Field Calibration | Field Calibration Post- Number Monitoring Current Until Pre-Check Level Check Level 943A 05/07/07 27/11/07 94.0 dB(A) 94.0 dB(A) 358 - 17/10/2007 - - 3.3. EXISTING NOISE SOURCES The noise sources identified during site visits included traffic noise from the Cooroy Connection Road, insects, birds and train noise along the Cooroy Railway Corridor. Road traffic noise from the Cooroy Connection Road was noted to be the dominant noise source at both attended noise monitoring positions. 3.4 RESULTS OF NOISE MONITORING Appendix E presents in full the results of the background noise monitoring. Tables 3.3 and 3.4 presents a summary of the unattended noise monitoring measurements. TABLE 3.3: POSITION 1 - MEASURED NOISE LEVELS (dB(A)) Maximum | Maximum | Single Event Date Lato, enour | Laso, 18-hour | Lago, s-nour | Leg, 24-hour Lamax (train Laca, t-nour Lato, t-nour passby) ~ | 04/07/07 — 05/07/07 64.5 47.1 33.5 61.6 64.7 67.6 95.0 TABLE 3.4: POSITION 2 - MEASURED NOISE LEVELS (dB(A)) Date Period Lamax Lar Lato Laso Log 5/07/07 Evening 61.1 56.7 50.6 39.0 48.7 Night 61.0 55.6 47.5 36.0 48.9 6/07/07 Day 67.2 61.7 56.1 48.5 55.5 Evening 62.6 59.0 §3.5 40.9 50.7 Night 62.2 57.0 49.1 34.9 49.9 7107107 Day 63.8 57.0 50.6 42.3 49.3 Evening 62.3 58.1 50.8 37.1 49.1 Night 55.6 50.5 45.1 31.9 43.1 8/07/07 Day 65.8 58.3 51.6 42.5 50.5 Evening 59.8 56.0 50.0 36.2 47.9 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD /NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 6
Page 21
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) <= Date Period Lamax Las Lato Laso Laeg Night 57.9 52.6 46.5 35.8 46.2 Hatf-hourly meteorological data from the meteorological station at Tewantin showed that the weather conditions were both calm and dry. Hence, all measured noise data is valid for use in the noise assessment. 3.5 DERIVED NOISE CRITERIA The 8-Hour Laso of 33.5 dB(A) indicates that a noise level criteria of 57 dB(A) Lato.1e-nou (free field) is applicable to the development (refer to Section 2) for assessment of road traffic noise impacts. For private open space, the 60 dB(A) Lato,1enow (free field) criterion is applicable. Based on the average background Laso noise level of 35 dB(A) (between 10 pm and 7 am) and 43 dB(A) (between 7 am and 10 pm), fixed plant noise criteria of 38 dB(A) and 48 dB(A) applies for the nighttime and daytime respectively. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.00T Page 7
Page 22
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) 4 RAIL NOISE ASSESSMENT 4.1. NOISE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY The potential impact of rail noise on the proposed development has been determined using the baseline noise monitoring data set. Typically, noise contour data is provided by Queensland Rail (QR) identifying the setback distance required for achieving compliance with the Lama 87 dB(A) criteria. Upon discussion with OR, it was determined that there was no existing noise contour data available for the relevant section of the Cooroy Railway Corridor, hence the need to rely on the monitoring data for this assessment. In order to determine the impacts of train noise and potential mitigation options, modelling of train noise was completed using the proprietary software package Cadna (Computer Aided Noise Abatement Model), developed by DataKustik. Cadna incorporates the influence of meteorology, terrain, ground type and air absorption in addition to source characteristics to predict noise impacts at receptor locations. The noise modelling also allows investigation of possible noise management solutions, in the event that non-compliance with the assessment criterion is predicted. The following section discusses the noise levels at potentially impacted receptors and recommended noise mitigation options. 4.2. POTENTIALLY IMPACTED RECEPTORS Hypothetica! receptor positions with a potential to be impacted by noise from rail noise were selected from current plans of the proposed development. Receptors were placed at worst-case locations for all buildings. Receptor positions are summarised as follows: » 5 worst-case receptor positions for each ILU were selected to represent various facades: Bedroom 1; Bedroom 2; Sliding Door opening to Terrace; Side facade of ILU enclosing the Living/Dining and Kitchen Areas; and Front facade of ILU enclosing the Living Area. = 4 worst-case receptor positions (South-East, South-West, North-East and North-West wing) for the Aged Care Facility at ground and first floor levels; ® 1 worst-case receptor position for the 20 Unit Apartment at ground and first floor; and « 1 worst-case receptor position for the Community Village building. Figure 7 presents the ILU building numbers considered in the noise modelling and receptor positions of all other buildings. As identified on Figure 2, the retirement village is proposed to have both single-storey and two-storey residential housing or apartments. Noise level predictions assume a receptor height of 2.0 m and 5.0 m above the existing ground level for ground floor and first floor housing respectively. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.OOT Page 8
Page 23
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) 4.3 ASSESSMENT OF MONITORING RESULTS Table 4.1 presents the Lama noise levels measured by Air Noise Environment at the site boundary adjacent to the Cooroy Connection Road (see Figure 1). TABLE 4.1: MAXIMUM NOISE LEVELS AT THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BOUNDARY FRONTING THE COOROY CONNECTION ROAD (dB(A)) Source of Data Lamax (Free-Fletd) Continuous unattended monitoring 87 (Average) Attended noise monitoring of train noise 89 The attended noise measurements at the boundary of the site have determined that the average Lamax Noise level of a passing trains is approximately 87 dB(A). Hence, the internal criteria (average Lamax) is predicted to be exceeded by up 40 dB(A) and 35 dB(A) for sleeping and living areas respectively. The noise levels indicated in Table 4.1 were measured at the site boundary, at a distance of 40 m from the passing trains. Mitigation options for reducing noise levels to within the Noosa Shire Council internal criteria are presented in the following sections. 4.4 RAIL NOISE MITIGATION 4.4.1. Acoustic Barrier and Construction Material Requirements Further noise calculations have been completed to determine the effectiveness of an acoustic barrier, as identified on Figure 8. The acoustic barrier is suitable for providing attenuation for both toad traffic noise (as discussed in Section 5.6) and rail noise. It is assumed that the barrier is constructed of a material with a mass density of 12 kg/m? and is continuous with no air gaps. Tables 4.2 and 4.3 present predicted Lama noise levels associated with train noise. TABLE 4.2: PREDICTED WORST-CASE Lamax NOISE LEVELS (FACADE-CORRECTED) FOR ILU BUILDINGS Worst-Case Predicted Lams Noise Levels dB(A) ILU No.' Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 1 74 83 77 75 82 2 73 83 76 73 80 3 82 80 71 71 80 4 82 85 76 74 83 5 71 82 75 72 81 6 80 80 74 72 81 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 9
Page 24
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —— =— =—— = — Worst-Case Predicted Lamax Noise Levels dB(A) ILU No.’ Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade | Facade Facade | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 7 79 79 73 75 80 8 74 85 76 77 82 9 76 83 75 75 81 10 79 83 71 72 80 11 80 78 73 73 79 12 T4 80 73 72 79 13 78 78 70 72 79 14 80 77 76 80 79 15 79 79 74 76 80 16 82 79 79 82 81 17 79 79 72 80 83 18 78 78 75 80 83 19 79 78 71 81 83 20 76 78 71 80 82 21 77 75 73 79 82 22 76 78 70 77 81 23 76 78 76 81 81 24 79 74 75 80 80 25 78 78 71 73 70 26 78 78 76 73 68 27 76 78 77 76 69 28 78 77 74 76 68 29 81 80 78 75 69 30 81 81 78 78 70 31 79 81 78 78 70 32 78 81 78 78 70 33 80 80 76 78 70 34 7 73 71 79 79 35 75 76 71 78 79 36 77 73 76 79 79 37 78 74 77 79 79 38 77 78 69 79 79 39 76 73 80 80 80 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD: JNETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 10
Page 25
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — Worst-Case Predicted Laux Noise Levels dB(A) ILU No." Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 40 76 75 68 77 80 41 74 77 68 77 79 42 76 76 68 77 78 43 76 77 75 75 68 44 77 77 75 75 68 45 77 77 76 76 67 46 78 77 76 75 72 47 76 79 75 75 68 48 7 77 72 74 69 49 75 77 74 75 67 50 78 77 73 74 66 51 74 77 72 74 66 52 78 7 73 73 66 53 70 77 71 71 64 54 72 76 72 72 66 55 81 79 75 81 81 56 75 79 71 77 80 57 78 75 70 80 80 58 75 73 67 75 78 59 7 74 71 68 74 60 70 78 73 72 72 61 77 78 67 73 73 62 78 78 69 72 76 63 75 80 76 75 74 64 81 80 78 80 77 65 78 80 72 75 80 66 69 80 69 71 76 67 73 76 76 78 78 68 68 76 67 72 76 69 68 73 66 72 75 70 69 72 73 76 77 71 75 74 71 69 74 72 74 72 67 67 75 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD /NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 11
Page 26
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Worst-Case Predicted Laws. Noise Levels dB(A) ILU No." Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 73 77 76 68 70 75 74 76 78 67 71 75 75 78 79 76 72 75 76 80 79 75 80 77 77 81 78 74 81 80 78 77 74 70 74 79 79 75 75 74 78 78 80 68 76 67 70 73 81 66 73 66 63 71 82 77 77 76 76 77 83 67 78 71 73 69 84 79 79 79 79 80 85 73 73 73 73 74 86 80 79 76 76 78 87 80 81 73 74 78 88 80 73 70 80 80 89 73 78 71 75 80 90 75 79 72 74 79 91 75 78 72 76 79 92 73 74 73 76 73 93 83 85 80 81 73 94 85 85 81 81 72 95 81 84 78 80 74 96 85 84 81 82 75 97 85 84 81 81 73 98 84 84 80 79 73 99 85 85 80 80 73 100 85 85 81 81 74 101 85 83 80 82 78 102 79 83 80 78 75 103 85 85 82 82 75 104 85 84 82 82 72 105 85 84 81 81 74 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 12
Page 27
RSL Care
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised)
=
Worst-Case Predicted Lan. Noise Levels dB(A)
ILU No." Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade
Facade Facade | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living)
106 80 85 78 78 70
107 84 83 81 78 70
108 84 83 80 78 70
109 84 84 78 80 71
110 81 84 79 81 72
111 81 84 79 80 73
112 84 84 78 79 72
113 80 84 78 80 74
114 78 83 78 77 74
115 79 83 78 77 75
116 83 82 80 78 77
117 74 81 74 74 77
118 79 79 78 78 77
119 79 79 77 78 72
120 79 79 71 75 71
121 79 77 75 77 71
122 81 80 78 79 73
123 79 80 70 74 69
124 79 79 70 74 69
125 78 78 75 76 69
126 77 78 68 73 67
' {LU Building numbers are identified on Figure 7
TABLE 4.3: PREDICTED WORST-CASE Lamax NOISE LEVELS (FACADE-CORRECTED) FOR
ALL OTHER BUILDINGS
Receptor’ Worst-Case Predicted Lams. Nolse Level dB(A)’
Ground Floor First Floor
Aged Care Facility (SW Wing) 79 80
Aged Care Facility (NW Wing) 76 79
Aged Care Facility (NE Wing) 66 74
Aged Care Facility (SE Wing) 78 80
20 Unit Apartment 75 77
Community Village Centre 78
' Receptor Positions are identified on Figure 7
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
/INETWORK/PROJECTS/750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT
Page 13
Page 28
=
RSL Care ==
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) =——=
According to Tables 4.2 and 4.3, the internal noise criteria is predicted to be exceeded by up to
35 dB(A) for the ILU buildings. Exceedances are also predicted for the Aged Care Facility, 20 Unit
Apartment and Community Village Centre by up to 30 dB(A).
4.4.2 Alternate Construction Materials
The Noosa Shire Council has specified internal noise criteria for passing trains. Construction
material requirements for achieving the recommended internal noise levels are discussed in
conjunction with the findings of the road noise assessment in Section 5.6.1.
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
{NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT Page 14
Page 29
—_= RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) 5 ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 5.1. NOISE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY The methodology adopted for the assessment is as required by the Queensland Department of Main Roads (2000) guideline, Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice. As detailed in this procedure, predictions for a 10 year traffic horizon from the proposed completion date of the expansion project were undertaken. For the purposes of the assessment predictions were undertaken in accordance with the methodology described in the United Kingdom, Department of Transport (1988) procedure, Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CORTN 88). The noise predictions for the proposed development were completed using the proprietary software package Cadnaa (Computer Aided Noise Abatement Model), developed by DataKustik. The noise modelling involved prediction of potential receptor noise levels at the proposed development utilising the CoRTN method of catculation. The methodology gives consideration to various elements of the road design including traffic flows, traffic vehicle composition, road gradient, acoustic shielding by other buildings, and road surface type. The method predicts Lato,1s nour NOISE levels which are the noise levels exceeded 10 % of the time between the hours of 6 am and midnight. The road surface type utilised in the predictions was a 10 mm chip seal (3.0 dB(A) correction) for the Cooroy Connection Road. A photograph showing the road surface is presented on Plate 2 in Appendix C. §.2. POTENTIALLY IMPACTED RECEPTORS Hypothetical receptor positions with a potential to be impacted by noise from road traffic were selected from current plans of the proposed development. Receptors were placed at worst-case locations for all buildings. Receptor positions are summarised as follows: = 5 worst-case receptor positions for each ILU were selected to represent various facades: «® Bedroom 1; Bedroom 2; Sliding Door opening to Terrace; Side facade of ILU enclosing the Living/Dining and Kitchen Areas; and Front facade of ILU enclosing the Living Area. « 4 worst-case receptor positions (South-East, South-West, North-East and North-West wing) for the Aged Care Facility at ground and first floor levels; = 1 worst-case receptor position for the 20 Unit Apartment at ground and first floor; and ® 1 worst-case receptor position for the Community Village building. Figure 7 presents the ILU building numbers considered in the noise modelling and receptor positions all other buildings. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/M1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 15
Page 30
RSL Care — Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — 5.3. TRAFFIC DATA The Queensland Department of Main Roads has provided 2006 traffic data for the Cooroy Connection Road, north of Pearsons Road. The 2005-2006 growth rate for the Cooroy Connection Road is 5.35 %. This growth rate has been applied to predict 2007, 2008 and 2018 AADT counts. Table 5.1 presents a summary of the traffic data used for the assessment. TABLE 5.1: AADT DAILY PREDICTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Cooroy Connection Road Year % Heavy Vehicles AADT 2006 10 6,180 2007 10 6,511 2008 10 6,859 2018 10 11,554 §.4 MODELLING ASSUMPTIONS As identified on Figure 2, the retirement village is proposed to have both single-storey and two- storey buildings. Noise level! predictions assume a receptor height of 2.0 m and 5.0 m above the existing ground level for ground floor and first floor housing respectively. For outdoor private open spaces, noise contours have been modelled at 1.5 metres above existing ground levels. A noise source height of 0.5 m is adopted for vehicles on the Cooroy Connection Road. Variations in speed (and therefore traffic noise) were determined by the model in accordance with the corrections described in CoRTN (1988) based on the road gradient and percentage of heavy vehicles in the fleet being considered. 5.5 NOISE PREDICTIONS §.5.1. Introduction Noise predictions were undertaken for 2018 as required by the Queensland Department of Main Roads. The following sections discuss in detail the results of the noise modelling and the predicted compliance. 5.5.2 Model Validation Comparison of the monitoring results with the predicted receptor noise levels for existing traffic levels indicates that the modelling is over-predicting by up to 1.8 dB(A), as shown in Table 5.2 below. This prediction is within the 2 dB(A) variation specified in the DMR’s Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice. Hence the noise model has been considered valid for the purposes of this acoustic assessment. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT Page 16
Page 31
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —= TABLE 5.2: VALIDATION OF CALCULATIONS Receptor 2007 Predicted 2007 Measured Accuracy Monitoring 66.3 64.5 +18 5.5.3 Predicted Noise Levels Tabies 5.3a and 5.3b present a summary of predicted noise levels for 2008 predicted traffic levels. Tables 5.4a and 5.4b present a summary of predicted noise levels for 2018 predicted traffic levels. The road traffic noise modelling takes into account the recommended acoustic barrier as discussed in Section 4.4.1 and shown on Figure 8. TABLE 5.3a: 2008 PREDICTED FACADE NOISE LEVELS (FREE-FIELD) FOR ILU BUILDINGS WITH AN ACOUSTIC BARRIER ILU No.’ 2008 Worst-Case Predicted Lato,s-nouwr Noise Level dB(A)? Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 1 54 58 56 54 58 ; 2 53 57 54 53 56 3 56 56 51 51 55 4 59 61 55 55 58 5 51 58 53 52 55 6 56 55 53 52 55 7 54 55 52 53 54 8 56 61 55 55 59 9 55 59 54 53 57 10 54 58 51 50 56 11 55 53 52 50 55 12 52 54 52 50 54 13 53 53 49 48 54 14 54 53 §2 55 53 15 54 55 52 53 55 16 57 54 55 57 56 17 55 54 52 55 57 18 55 55 54 56 57 19 55 54 51 56 58 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 17
Page 32
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = ILU No.' 2008 Worst-Case Predicted Lato,ts-nous Noise Level dB(A)? Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 20 53 54 51 56 57 21 54 53 53 56 57 22 54 54 51 54 56 23 53 55 54 56 56 24 54 51 53 56 56 25 54 54 49 50 47 26 54 54 53 52 49 27 54 54 54 53 50 28 54 54 52 53 49 29 55 55 53 50 49 30 56 56 54 54 49 31 54 56 54 54 50 32 54 55 54 54 49 33 55 55 52 53 49 34 51 48 47 53 53 35 50 51 48 53 53 36 52 49 51 53 54 37 53 49 52 54 54 38 53 53 48 53 54 39 52 51 54 54 54 40 52 51 47 53 54 41 50 51 47 52 53 42 51 52 48 52 53 43 51 51 50 50 47 44 51 52 $1 51 46 45 §2 52 51 51 47 46 53 52 §2 51 47 47 51 53 51 51 47 48 52 52 49 50 48 49 50 52 50 50 47 50 52 52 50 50 46 51 49 52 49 49 47 52 52 52 50 50 47 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 18
Page 33
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = ILU No. 2008 Worst-Case Predicted Lato1s-nour Noise Level dB(A)? Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 53 48 51 49 49 45 54 49 51 50 49 47 55 56 55 54 56 57 56 §2 54 51 54 55 57 54 52 50 55 55 58 52 49 48 50 53 59 52 51 49 47 51 60 51 53 51 49 51 61 53 53 49 49 52 62 §3 54 50 49 53 63 53 55 54 52 54 64 57 55 54 57 55 65 56 57 53 55 56 66 51 55 51 51 53 67 53 54 53 54 54 68 49 53 48 50 52 69 49 50 48 50 52 70 49 51 51 52 52 71 51 51 50 48 51 72 51 50 48 46 51 73 53 52 49 47 51 74 52 54 49 48 §2 75 54 55 54 $1 53 76 57 55 53 56 54 77 57 55 54 57 55 78 54 52 51 53 54 79 53 52 52 54 54 80 48 52 48 48 51 81 48 49 48 48 50 82 51 51 51 51 52 83 47 53 50 49 49 84 54 54 54 54 55 85 49 49 49 49 “§2 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT Page 19
Page 34
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) SS ILU No.’ 2008 Worst-Case Predicted Lato.senow Noise Level dB(A)’ Bed1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 86 55 55 54 53 55 87 55 57 53 53 55 88 55 51 51 56 57 89 54 54 52 54 56 90 53 55 52 51 54 91 52 55 51 51 54 92 49 52 51 51 54 93 62 63 57 58 54 94 63 62 58 57 52 95 60 62 56 58 55 96 63 63 59 58 53 97 62 61 59 68 54 98 62 63 56 58 55 99 63 62 57 57 53 100 60 61 58 68 55 101 60 68 55 58 55 402 57 59 57 56 54 103 61 62 58 59 55 104 62 61 59 59 55 105 63 63 63 68 55 106 59 63 57 57 54 107 63 61 58 57 54 108 63 61 57 57 53 109 63 63 54 56 53 110 61 63 68 60 54 111 60 63 58 58 54 112 62 62 56 57 53 113 61 63 58 69 56 114 58 62 56 57 54 115 60 63 55 57 55 116 62 61 59 58 54 117 56 60 §2 55 55 118 58 58 57 56 54 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD JNETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04,.0DT Page 20
Page 35
RSL Care
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised)
ILU No." 2008 Worst-Case Predicted Lato,1s-n0ur Noise Level dB(A)?
Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade
Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living)
119 60 59 55 58 53
120 58 59 51 54 52
121 58 56 54 56 51
122 57 56 54 56 51
123 55 55 49 50 49
124 55 55 49 50 49
125 54 53 52 53 49
126 53 53 47 48 47
TILU Building numbers are identified on Figure 7
? Bold represents exceedance in the noise criteria
TABLE 5&.3b: 2008 PREDICTED FACADE NOISE LEVELS (FREE-FIELD) FOR ALL OTHER
BUILDINGS WITH AN ACOUSTIC BARRIER
Receptor 2008 Worst-Case Predicted Lato,1s.nour Noise Level! dB(A)
Ground Floor First Floor
Aged Care Facility (SW Wing) 54 56
Aged Care Facility (NW Wing) 52 55
Aged Care Facility (NE Wing) 45 50
Aged Care Facility (SE Wing) 52 53
20 Unit Apartment 48 50
Community Village Building §2 -
' Receptor positions are identified on Figure 7
? Bold represents exceedance in the noise criteria
TABLE 5.4a: 2018 PREDICTED FACADE NOISE LEVELS (FREE-FIELD) FOR ILU BUILDINGS
WITH AN ACOUSTIC BARRIER
1 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Laiossnou. Noise Level dB(A)?
ILU No. Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade
Facade Facade Door) {Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living)
1 56 60 58 56 60
2 55 59 57 55 58
3 58 58 53 54 57
4 61 63 58 57 60
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
/NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 21
Page 36
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = ILU No.’ 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Latorenour Noise Level dB(A)* Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 5 53 61 56 55 57 6 58 68 56 54 57 7 56 §7 54 55 57 8 58 64 57 57 62 9 58 61 56 56 60 10 57 60 53 53 58 11 58 56 54 52 57 12 55 57 54 52 56 13 55 55 51 51 56 14 87 55 54 57 55 15 57 57 54 55 . 57 16 59 56 57 69 68 17 58 57 54 57 59 18 57 57 56 69 60 19 58 56 54 58 60 20 56 57 53 68 59 21 57 56 56 68 59 22 56 56 53 57 69 23 56 57 57 68 58 24 57 54 56 68 58 25 56 56 52 52 50 26 56 56 55 54 51 27 56 56 56 55 53 28 57 56 54 55 51 29 68 57 55 53 51 30 68 58 56 56 52 31 57 58 56 56 52 32 56 57 56 56 52 33 57 57 55 56 51 34 54 51 50 55 55 35 §2 53 50 55 56 36 54 51 54 55 56 37 55 52 54 56 56 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD /NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 22
Page 37
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — = = = — ILU No." 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Lato,1s-nour Noise Level dB(A)? Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 38 55 55 50 55 56 39 54 53 56 57 56 40 54 53 50 55 56 41 53 54 50 54 56 42 54 54 51 54 55 43 53 54 §3 §2 49 44 54 54 53 53 48 45 54 54 54 54 49 46 55 54 54 54 50 47 54 56 53 53 50 48 54 54 52 53 50 49 52 54 53 53 49 50 54 54 52 52 48 §1 52 54 52 52 49 §2 54 54 52 52 49 53 50 54 51 §1 48 54 51 53 52 51 49 55 58 57 56 69 69 56 54 57 53 56 68 57 56 55 53 57 57 58 54 51 50 52 56 59 55 53 52 49 53 60 53 55 54 52 54 61 55 55 51 $1 54 62 56 56 52 52 55 63 56 57 56 55 56 64 59 87 56 59 57 65 §8 59 56 57 58 66 53 68 53 53 56 67 55 56 56 56 56 68 51 55 51 53 55 69 51 52 51 52 54 70 51 53 54 54 54 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 23
Page 38
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = ILU No.’ 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Lato1s-rou. Noise Level dB(A)? Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 71 53 53 53 50 53 72 53 53 50 48 53 73 55 54 51 49 54 74 55 56 §1 51 54 75 56 57 56 54 55 76 59 57 56 59 56 77 59 57 56 $9 58 78 56 54 54 55 56 79 55 55 54 56 56 80 51 54 50 50 53 81 50 62 50 50 52 82 53 54 54 54 54 83 50 55 §2 51 51 B4 56 56 56 56 57 85 51 51 51 51 55 86 57 57 56 56 57 87 57 59 55 55 57 88 57 54 53 58 59 89 56 57 55 56 58 90 55 57 54 53 56 91 54 57 54 53 56 92 51 54 53 53 56 93 64 65 59 61 56 94 65 64 60 60 54 95 63 64 58 60 §7 96 66 65 61 62 55 97 64 64 61 61 56 98 64 65 59 61 57 99 65 65 59 60 55 100 63 64 60 60 57 101 62 60 58 60 57 102 59 61 69 58 56 103 64 64 60 61 57 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 24
Page 39
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) == ILU No.! 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Lato1a-ncur Noise Level dB(A)’ Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace (Sliding Side Facade Front Facade Facade Facade Door) (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 104 65 63 61 61 57 105 65 64 60 61 57 106 61 65 59 59 57 107 65 63 60 60 56 108 66 63 60 59 §5 109 65 66 56 59 55 110 63 65 60 62 56 111 62 65 60 60 57 112 65 65 59 59 56 113 63 65 60 62 58 114 60 64 69 69 57 115 62 65 58 59 57 116 64 63 61 61 57 117 58 62 54 57 57 118 60 60 53 58 56 119 62 61 58 61 56 120 61 61 54 56 54 121 60 59 56 58 53 422 59 58 56 58 54 123 57 58 51 52 §2 124 57 57 51 52 51 125 §7 56 54 55 51 126 55 56 49 50 49 TILU Building numbers are identified on Figure 7 ? Bold represents exceedance in the noise criteria TABLE 5.4b: 2018 PREDICTED FACADE NOISE LEVELS (FREE-FIELD) FOR ALL OTHER BUILDINGS WITH AN ACOUSTIC BARRIER 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Lato,1enour Noise Level dB(A) Receptor Ground Floor First Floor Aged Care Facility (SW Wing) 56 68 Aged Care Facility (NW Wing) 55 57 Aged Care Facility (NE Wing) 47 52 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD JNETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 25
Page 40
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) ——— Receptor 2018 Worst-Case Predicted Laro,1s-nour Noise Level dB(A) Ground Floor First Floor Aged Care Facility (SE Wing) 55 55 20 Unit Apartment 51 52 Community Village Building 54 - ' Receptor positions are identified on Figure 7 ? Bold represents exceedance in the noise criteria According to the results presented in Tables 5.3 to 5.4, a significant portion of the site is predicted to exceed the DMR criterion. An exceedance of up to 6 dB(A) and 9 dB(A) is predicted for 2008 and 2018 traffic levels respectively. For the Aged Care Facility, compliance is predicted at all rooms, except for those located on the first floor in the South Western Wing. The DMR criterion is predicted to be exceeded by up to 1 dB(A). Compliance is predicted for the 20 Unit Apartment and Community Village Centre located to the rear of the development. 5.6 MITIGATION OPTIONS 5.6.1 Construction Material Requirements Construction material requirements for reducing road and rail noise to within the relevant internal criteria has been determined in accordance with AS 3671 Road Traffic Noise Intrusion — Building Siting and Construction. AS 3671 specifically addresses road noise however, the methodology outlined is also appropriate for determining construction material requirements associated with rail noise. The following information is required for determining construction material requirements according to AS 3671: = recommended internal noise criteria; = noise reduction (NR) required for achieving the internal noise criteria; and = building/room dimensions. The Noosa Shire Council has specified the following internal noise criteria: = internal Lamax for rail noise - 50 dB(A) and 55 dB(A) for sleeping and living areas respectively; and = internal Lacgtnou for road traffic noise - 35 dB(A) and 40 dB(A) for sleeping and living areas respectively. Based on the noise monitoring data, a plus 0.2 dB(A) correction has been applied to predicted Lato,1ehour Noise levels to approximate to Laeq,-nour- As the external traffic noise predictions generated estimated free-field noise levels a correction to these levels must first be made to predict facade noise levels. Typically a +2.5 dB(A) correction is applied to free-field noise levels to approximate to facade levels. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT Page 26
Page 41
=>
RSL Care ==
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —=
It should be noted that the Department of Main Roads references recommended internal noise
levels specified in AS 2107 Acoustics — Recommended Design Sound Levels and Reverberation
Times. For houses and apartments near major roads, a 30 to 40 dB(A) and 35 to 45 dB(A) internal
Leg Noise criteria is required for sleeping and living areas, respectively.
Tables 5.5 to 5.6 below specifies the noise reduction requirements for achieving the relevant
internal noise criteria. Noise reduction requirements are typically different for rail and road noise
given the difference in noise parameters and internal noise criteria used in the the assessment of
potential impacts. Tables 5.5 and 5.6 present worst-case noise reduction requirements only, after
comparison of the road and rail noise predictions.
TABLE 5.5: ILU NOISE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR ACHIEVING INTERNAL NOISE
CRITERIA
{LU No.! Required Noise Reductions for Achieving Internal Noise Levels
o Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade
Facades | Facades | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living)
1 24 33 22 20 27
2 23 33 21 18 25
3 32 30 16 16 25
4 32 35 21 19 28
5 21 32 20 17 26
6 30 30 19 17 26
7 29 29 18 20 25
8 24 35 21 22 27
9 26 33 20 20 26
10 29 33 16 17 25
11 30 28 18 18 24
12 24 30 18 17 24
13 28 28 15 17 24
14 30 27 21 25 24
15 29 29 19 21 25
16 32 29 24 27 26
17 29 29 17 25 28
18 28 28 20 25 28
19 29 28 16 26 28
20 26 28 16 25 27
21 27 25 18 24 27
22 26 28 15 22 26
23 26 28 21 26 26
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 27
Page 42
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) ——_ = — ILU No.’ Required Noise Reductions for Achieving Internal Noise Levels 9 Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facades | Facades | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) | 24 29 24 20 25 25 25 28 28 16 18 15 26 28 28 21 18 13 27 26 28 22 21 14 28 28 27 19 21 13 29 31 30 23 20 14 30 31 31 23 23 15 31 29 31 23 23 15 32 28 31 23 23 15 33 30 30 21 23 15 34 27 23 16 24 24 35 25 26 16 23 24 36 27 23 21 24 24 37 28 24 22 24 24 38 27 28 14 24 24 39 26 23 25 25 25 40 26 25 13 22 25 41 24 27 13 22 24 42 26 26 13 22 23 43 26 27 20 20 13 44 27 27 20 20 13 45 27 27 21 21 12 46 28 27 21 20 17 47 26 29 20 20 13 48 27 27 17 19 14 49 25 27 19 20 12 50 28 27 18 19 11 51 24 27 17 19 11 52 28 27 18 18 14 53 20 27 16 16 9 54 22 26 17 17 11 55 31 29 20 26 26 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 28
Page 43
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) ——S ILU No.! Required Noise Reductions for Achieving Internal Noise Levels . Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facades | Facades | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 56 25 29 16 22 25 57 28 25 15 25 25 58 25 23 12 20 23 59 27 24 16 13 19 60 20 28 18 17 17 61 27 28 12 18 18 62 28 28 14 17 21 63 25 30 21 20 19 64 31 30 23 25 22 65 28 30 17 20 25 66 19 30 14 16 21 67 23 26 21 23 23 68 18 26 12 17 21 69 18 23 11 17 20 70 19 22 18 21 22 71 25 24 16 14 19 72 24 22 12 12 20 73 27 26 13 15 20 74 26 28 12 16 20 75 28 29 21 17 20 76 30 29 20 25 22 77 31 28 19 26 25 78 27 24 15 19 24 79 25 25 19 23 23 80 18 26 12 15 18 81 16 23 11 14 16 82 27 27 21 21 22 83 17 28 16 18 14 84 29 29 24 24 25 85 23 23 18 18 19 86 30 29 21 21 23 87 30 31 18 19 23 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/M750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 29
Page 44
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) == ILU No." Required Noise Reductions for Achieving Internal Noise Levels No. Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facades | Facades | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 88 30 23 15 25 25 89 23 28 16 20 25 90 25 29 17 19 24 91 25 28 17 21 24 92 23 24 18 21 24 93 33 35 25 26 18 94 35 35 26 26 17 95 31 34 23 25 19 96 35 34 26 27 20 97 35 34 26 26 18 98 34 34 25 24 18 99 35 35 25 25 18 100 35 35 26 26 19 101 35 33 25 27 23 102 29 33 25 23 20 103 35 35 22 27 20 104 35 34 27 27 17 105 35 35 30 26 19 106 30 35 22 23 17 107 34 33 25 23 16 108 34 33 25 23 15 109 34 34 23 25 16 110 31 34 21 26 17 411 31 34 24 25 18 112 34 34 23 24 17 113 30 34 23 25 19 114 28 33 23 22 19 116 29 33 23 22 20 116 33 32 25 23 22 117 24 31 19 19 22 118 29 29 23 23 22 119 30 29 22 23 17 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 30
Page 45
= RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —— ILU No.’ Required Noise Reductions for Achieving Internal Noise Levels o Bed 1 Bed 2 Terrace Side Facade Front Facade Facades | Facades | (Sliding Door) | (Living/Dining/Kitchen) (Living) 120 29 29 16 20 16 121 29 28 20 22 16 122 29 28 22 22 18 123 28 29 15 18 14 124 28 28 15 18 14 125 28 27 20 21 14 126 27 27 13 18 12 TILU Building numbers are identified on Figure 7 TABLE 5.6: CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL OTHER BUILDINGS Noise Reduction Requirements for Construction Materials Receptor Ground Floor First Floor ACF-SW 29 30 ACF-NW 26 29 ACF-NE 16 24 ACF-SE 28 30 Apartment 25 27 Village 23 - 1 Receptor positions are identified on Figure 7 6.6.2 Construction Category Requirements AS 3671 classifies a Noise Reduction of > 10 dB up to 25 dB as a Category 2 construction: ‘Category 2. Standard construction except for lightweight elements such as fibrous cement or metal cladding or all-glass facades. Windows, doors and other openings must be closed. TNR of approximately 25 dB(A) is expected.’ AS 3671 classifies a Noise Reduction of > 25 dB up to 35 dB as a Category 3 construction: ‘Category 3. Special construction, chosen in accordance with Clause 3.4. Windows, doors and other openings must be closed. TNR of approximately 25 and 35 dB(A) is expected.’ Based on the required noise reductions presented in Tables 5.5 and 5.6, all proposed buildings require either Construction Category 2 or 3 specifications. Air conditioning units should be provided for all rooms requiring category 2 or 3 construction to allow adequate ventilation for occupants while maintaining acoustic performance. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT Page 31
Page 46
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Given the required construction category, AS 3671 provides typical STC information for standard construction types. STC (Sound Transmission Class) is a commonly referenced descriptor of the effectiveness of a material to reduce the noise energy transmitted through that material. The Noise Reduction must be adjusted to give the STC, according to the following equation (as outlined in AS 3671): « Required STC for construction material = TNR + 10 x logrol[(S/S1) x 3/h x 2.Tso x C] + 6 =» where: TNR = Traffic Noise Reduction S. = area of component (m?) $= area of ceiling/floor (m?) h = height of ceiling (m) Teo = reverberation time of room (s) C = number of components The required STC has been calculated based on the required noise reductions presented in Tables 5.5 and 5.6 and unit layouts provided by the client. Tables 5.7 and 5.8 presents the required STCs for various building components for the proposed development site. TABLE 5.7: REQUIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPONENT STC FOR ILU UNITS Unit STC Requirements for Construction Materials 1 1 1 30 36 30 25 31 29 45 45 2 1 28 36 29 24 29 27 45 45 3 3 38 37 21 25 34 26 46 46 4 3 39 39 26 29 37 30 50 50 5 1 26 35 28 23 29 27 45 45 6 2 33 35 28 23 31 28 42 42 7 3 35 36 22 28 33 26 44 44 8 1 31 38 29 28 30 28 48 48 9 1 31 36 27 26 30 28 45 45 10 3 35 39 21 26 34 27 47 47 41 2 33 34 27 25 30 27 43 43 12 1 29 33 26 23 27 25 43 43 13 3 35 35 20 25 32 25 43 43 14 4 35 35 24 31 29 24 43 43 15 3 36 36 24 30 34 26 44 44 16 4 38 36 27 33 32 26 45 45 17 1 35 32 25 31 31 29 41 41 18 4 34 35 23 31 34 27 41 41 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 32
Page 47
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = Unit STC Requirements for Construction Materials 1 in ILU No. Type wot! 1 wit 2 (ig iiehen ae Nee os “Phot Extom 21} Root 19 1 35 31 24 31 31 29 42 42 20 2 29 34 24 31 32 29 40 40 21 4 33 32 21 30 32 25 40 40 22 4 32 31 24 28 30 28 40 40 23 2 29 34 23 32 31 28 41 41 24 4 35 31 23 31 31 24 42 42 25 3 35 34 21 27 24 20 43 43 26 4 33 35 24 24 20 17 41 41 27 1 32 31 29 26 19 22 40 40 28 3 35 33 24 30 23 23 43 43 29 4 36 34 26 25 20 18 44 44 30 3 38 37 28 32 24 25 46 46 31 1 34 34 31 29 19 25 43 43 32 1 34 34 31 29 19 25 43 43 33 3 37 37 26 32 24 25 45 45 34 1 32 26 24 30 28 26 39 39 35 2 28 32 24 29 29 26 38 38 36 3 33 30 26 32 33 26 41 41 37 3 35 31 27 32 33 26 43 43 38 1 33 31 22 29 28 26 40 40 39 4 32 31 28 31 30 24 39 39 40 1 31 28 21 28 28 26 38 38 41 2 27 33 21 28 30 27 39 39 42 1 32 29 21 28 27 25 39 39 43 1 32 30 28 26 16 22 39 39 44 2 30 33 29 27 18 23 39 39 45 1 33 30 29 27 16 23 40 40 46 4 34 35 24 26 22 19 41 41 47 4 31 32 28 26 17 22 41 41 48 3 34 33 22 28 23 21 42 42 49 1 31 30 27 25 15 21 39 | 39 50 2 31 33 26 26 16 22 40 40 51 1 29 30 25 24 15 20 40 40 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 33
Page 48
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = Unit STC Requirements for Construction Materials 1 n DUNO"! Type | Bed |Ba2y| (Slane | Kichon is | Yerom | Pwot | PMT! Root 52 2 30 33 27 25 17 21 40 40 53 1 26 30 24 22 14 18 39 39 54 1 27 29 25 23 16 19 39 39 55 4 37 36 23 32 32 25 44 44 56 1 30 32 24 28 28 26 a1 41 57 4 33 33 18 34 30 24 a1 41 58 2 28 28 21 26 29 26 37 37 59 2 30 30 24 19 24 21 39 39 60 1 26 31 26 23 20 18 40 40 61 3 34 34 18 26 26 19 43 43 62 3 34 35 19 26 29 22 43 43 63 1 31 33 29 26 23 22 42 42 64 4 36 37 26 30 28 24 43 43 65 3 35 36 23 29 33 26 45 45 66 1 26 33 24 22 25 23 42 42 67 4 29 33 24 28 29 22 39 39 68 1 24 29 24 23 24 22 39 39 69 1 24 26 21 23 24 22 36 36 70 4 24 29 24 27 27 20 35 35 71 1 30 27 24 20 23 21 37 37 72 2 27 28 21 18 25 22 36 36 73 2 30 31 22 21 25 22 39 39 74 3 33 34 18 24 29 22 43 43 75 1 34 32 29 23 23 21 42 42 76 4 35 37 23 31 28 24 43 43 77 4 37 35 22 32 30 25 44 | 44 78 2 30 30 25 25 29 26 39 39 79 4 31 32 22 29 29 22 38 38 80 1 24 29 20 20 22 20 38 38 81 1 23 26 20 19 20 18 36 36 82 4 32 35 24 27 28 24 40 40 83 1 23 31 23 24 18 20 41 4 84 4 35 37 27 30 30 23 42 42 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 34
Page 49
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = Unit STC Requirements for Construction Materials 1 n BONO!) Type | gftldy | etc | (Slane | Micnen (sae | front” | “prot | Aer) Root 85 1 28 26 26 24 22 20 35 35 86 2 33 35 29 27 28 25 42 42 87 3 36 38 23 28 31 24 46 46 88 4 35 31 19 31 31 24 43 43 89 3 31 34 22 28 33 26 43 43 90 4 31 32 25 25 28 26 42 42 91 1 30 31 25 26 28 26 41 41 92 1 28 27 25 27 28 26 36 36 93 4 39 38 33 32 23 28 48 48 94 4 41 42 29 31 22 24 48 48 95 1 36 37 31 30 23 26 46 46 96 2 38 40 35 34 25 30 47 47 97 4 40 41 29 31 24 24 48 48 98 1 40 37 33 30 24 26 47 47 99 2 38 40 33 31 23 27 47 47 100 1 40 38 34 31 24 27 47 47 101 4 40 40 28 33 29 26 48 48 102 4 34 36 33 29 24 25 46 46 103 2 38 41 35 34 26 30 48 48 104 4 41 42 30 33 25 26 48 48 105 4 41 42 29 32 26 25 48 48 106 1 35 38 31 29 23 25 47 47 107 4 40 41 29 29 25 22 47 47 108 4 40 41 28 29 24 22 47 47 109 3 41 41 27 34 26 27 49 49 110 1 37 37 31 32 23 28 46 46 111 1 36 37 32 31 23 27 46 46 112 2 37 39 32 31 24 27 46 46 113 1 37 37 31 31 24 27 46 46 114 4 33 36 30 28 23 24 45 45 115 1 35 36 31 28 24 24 45 45 116 4 38 40 28 29 28 22 45 45 417 1 31 34 27 25 26 24 43 43 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 35
Page 50
= RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Unit STC Requirements for Construction Materials 1 In BONO) Type ity | tdci | aes | Kician(Giae | ont | “Phat | yy | Roo 118 4 35 37 26 29 28 22 42 42 119 4 35 37 25 29 24 22 43 43 120 3 35 35 21 29 25 22 44 44 121 4 34 35 23 27 22 20 42 42 122 4 36 37 26 30 24 23 43 43 123 3 36 36 19 27 23 20 45 45 124 3 35 36 20 27 23 20 44 44 125 4 34 35 23 27 20 20 41 41 126 3 34 34 18 26 21 19 42 42 TILU building numbers are identified on Figure 7 ? Glazing refers to either glass windows or sliding doors as identified on unit layouts on Figures 3 to 6 TABLE 5.8: REQUIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPONENT STC FOR ALL OTHER BUILDINGS STC Requirements for Construction Materials Receptor’ Windows External Walls Roof Ground Floor ACF-SW 28 40 - ACF-NW 25 37 - ACF-NE 16 27 - ACF-SE 28 39 - Apartment 26 37 - Village 30 27 33 First Floor ACF-SW 31 42 41 ACF-NW 30 41 40 ACF-NE 25 35 35 ACF-SE 31 42 4 Apartment 29 40 38 ' Receptor positions are identified on Figure 7 6.6.3 Alternative Design ILU Layouts for Reducing Construction Requirements Based on the proposed plans and unit layouts, a number of facades require STC values greater than 37. It is generally difficult to achieve the required sound reduction when windows or glass facades require STCs of greater than 37. The provision of alternative unit layouts is a possible AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 36
Page 51
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —- solution for reducing construction material requirements. After review of the predicted modelling results, consideration has been given to the following: = replace ILU Buildings 3, 4, 30 with Type 1 ILU layouts; » construction of ILU Buildings 93 to 118 with alternative layouts in which living areas face the Cooroy Connection Road and bedroom areas are located to the rear (see Figure 9 for potential single unit tayout); and = construction of an acoustic barrier extending at least 1 metre from the Bedroom 2 wall (for the alternative unit). The barrier should be 1.8 metres above finished floor levels and be located adjacent to the Bedroom 2 window (see Figure 9). A potential unit layout appropriate for replacing Type 1, 2 and 3 ILU unit buildings located adjacent to the Cooroy Connection Road is presented on Figure 9. Table 5.9 and 5.10 presents predicted STC requirements based on the above design alterations. TABLE 5.9: STC REQUIREMENTS FOR ILU BUILDINGS 1 TO 92 AND 118 TO 126 STC Requirements for Construction Materiais Terrace | Livi nin Living Area | Entrance Ne) Type: |hkcwy) adda | Sia | Kitchen Gio | Yeront | “Phot | PRS! | Root 1 1 30 36 30 25 31 29 45 45 2 1 28 36 29 24 29 27 45 45 3 1 33 35 29 25 27 25 45 45 4 1 28 35 29 24 30 28 47 47 5 1 26 34 26 23 29 27 44 44 6 2 33 35 27 24 31 28 42 42 7 3 35 35 22 28 34 26 44 44 8 1 31 36 29 28 30 28 46 46 9 1 31 36 27 25 30 28 45 45 10 3 35 36 21 25 34 27 45 45 11 2 33 34 26 23 30 27 42 42 12 1 29 33 26 22 27 25 42 42 13 3 35 34 19 25 32 25 43 43 14 4 35 35 23 31 29 24 43 43 15 3 36 36 23 29 33 26 44 44 16 4 34 36 26 33 31 26 42 42 17 1 34 31 25 30 31 29 41 41 18 4 34 35 23 31 33 26 41 41 19 1 35 31 24 31 31 29 42 42 20 2 29 34 24 31 32 29 40 40 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD JNETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 37
Page 52
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = STC Requirements for Construction Materials Terrace | Living/Dinin: Living Area | Entrance ee) Type (qnttow| tac | tins | Kitchen (id | Eran | “vee | Pars! | Root 21 4 33 31 21 30 32 25 40 40 22 1 31 30 24 28 30 28 39 39 23 2 29 34 29 32 31 28 40 40 24 4 34 30 22 31 31 24 42 42 25 3 34 34 20 27 23 20 43 43 26 4 33 35 24 23 19 7 40 40 27 1 31 30 29 26 19 22 39 39 28 3 34 33 24 29 22 22 43 43 29 4 36 34 26 25 20 18 43 43 30 1 35 33 30 28 19 24 43 43 31 1 34 33 30 29 18 25 43 43 32 1 33 34 30 28 18 24 43 43 33 3 36 37 26 32 25 25 45 45 34 1 32 26 23 30 28 26 39 39 35 2 28 31 24 29 30 27 38 38 36 3 33 30 25 32 33 26 41 41 37 3 35 31 27 33 33 26 43 43 38 1 33 31 22 29 28 26 40 40 39 4 32 30 28 31 30 24 39 39 40 1 31 28 20 28 28 26 38 38 41 2 26 33 20 28 29 26 39 39 42 1 32 28 21 28 27 25 39 39 43 1 31 30 27 26 16 22 39 39 44 2 29 33 28 27 18 23 39 39 45 1 33 30 28 27 16 23 40 40 46 4 34 35 24 26 22 19 41 41 47 1 31 32 27 25 16 21 41 41 48 3 33 33 21 28 22 21 41 41 49 1 30 30 26 25 15 21 39 39 50 2 31 33 26 25 16 21 40 40 51 1 29 30 24 24 15 20 40 40 52 2 30 33 26 24 17 20 40 40 53 1 26 30 23 22 14 17 39 39 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD JNETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 38
Page 53
== RSL Care === Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — STC Requirements for Construction Materials Terrace | Livi inin: Living Area | Entrance eee Type |vitdcn| Stan | (tine | Kitchen Gio | "ert | Phat | GTS | Root 54 4 27 29 25 23 16 19 39 39 55 4 33 35 22 32 32 25 41 41 56 1 30 32 23 27 28 26 41 41 57 4 33 32 18 31 30 24 40 40 58 2 28 28 21 25 28 25 37 37 59 2 29 28 23 18 24 21 38 38 60 1 26 30 25 22 20 18 40 40 61 3 33 34 18 26 26 19 42 42 62 3 34 35 19 26 29 22 43 43 63 1 30 32 28 25 23 21 42 42 64 4 36 37 25 30 28 24 45 45 65 3 35 35 23 28 33 26 44 44 66 1 26 31 23 23 25 23 41 41 67 4 29 33 23 28 29 22 39 39 68 1 24 29 21 22 24 22 39 39 69 1 24 26 21 22 23 - 21 36 36 70 4 24 29 21 26 27 20 35 35 71 1 30 26 24 19 23 21 37 37 72 2 26 28 21 18 26 23 36 36 73 2 30 31 22 21 25 22 39 39 74 3 33 | 36 18 24 29 22 43 43 75 1 34 32 28 22 22 20 41 41 76 4 36 37 24 31 27 24 43 43 77 4 37 35 23 32 30 25 44 44 78 2 30 30 25 25 29 26 39 39 79 4 31 32 22 29 29 22 38 38 80 1 24 29 20 20 22 20 38 38 81 1 23 26 20 19 19 17 36 36 82 4 32 35 24 26 27 21 40 40 83 1 23 31 23 24 18 20 41 41 84 4 35 37 27 30 30 23 42 42 85 1 28 26 26 24 22 20 35 35 86 2 33 35 29 27 28 25 42 42 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 39
Page 54
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) STC Requirements for Construction Materials Terrace | Living/Dinin: Living Area | Entrance eee) Type | abtem| cake | tina | Kitchen Sie | tron | “pwot” | Eyer! | Roo 87 3 36 37 23 28 31 24 45 45 88 4 35 30 19 31 31 24 42 42 89 3 31 34 22 28 33 26 43 43 90 1 30 32 25 24 28 26 41 41 91 1 30 31 25 26 28 26 41 41 92 1 28 26 25 27 28 26 36 36 118 4 35 37 26 28 26 21 42 42 119 4 35 37 24 29 24 22 43 43 120 3 35 35 21 29 25 22 44 44 121 4 34 35 23 27 22 20 42 42 122 4 36 37 26 30 24 23 43 43 123 3 36 36 19 27 23 20 45 45 124 3 35 35 19 27 23 20 44 44 125 4 34 35 23 27 20 20 41 41 126 3 34 34 17 26 21 19. 43 43 TILU building numbers are identified on Figure 7 ? Glazing refers to either glass windows or sliding doors as identified on unit layouts on Figures 3 to 6 TABLE 5.10: POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FOR BUILDINGS 93, 95, 96, 98 TO 100, 102, 103, 106, 109 TO 115 AND 117 WITH ALTERNATIVE SINGLE UNIT LAYOUT STC Requirements for Construction Materials . Bed 1 Living/Stu Kitchen KU No winaow) ewindow) (window) co windows) Ree (Stiding 93 29 31 34 32 35 34 28 95 29 32 35 30 34 34 23 96 28 32 36 30 34 34 22 98 28 30 34 32 34 34 26 99 27 29 34 32 34 34 27 100 29 28 33 31 34 34 26 102 31 28 31 26 32 32 29 103 30 32 37 31 35 34 22 106 27 29 32 28 34 34 23 109 29 32 35 30 33 33 25 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/17S50REPORTO4.0DT Page 40
Page 55
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy ~- Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = STC Requirements for Construction Materials 1 Bed 1 Living/Stu Kitchen ILU No. rem, Bed 4 (sie wont 2 vst. " weit Rear (Biking iting 110 29 31 34 29 33 33 25 111 30 31 34 29 33 33 24 112 28 30 32 29 33 33 24 113 28 31 32 29 33 33 24 114 30 27 29 25 32 32 27 115 29 27 29 26 32 32 27 417 32 26 27 23 30 29 27 TILU building numbers are identified on Figure 7 As identified on Tables 5.9 and 5.10, STC requirements for glass windows can be reduced to 37 or below provided that alternative ILU layouts are provided. Currently, no alternative layouts have been made available to replace the Type 4 double units (Buildings 94, 97, 101, 104, 105, 107, 108, 116 and 118) located near the Cooroy Connection Road. If double units are provided by combining two mirrored atternative single units, window STC values of 37 are likely be achieved for these buildings. However, if alternative designs to those presented in Figure 9 are proposed, an acoustic assessment of these units would be required to determine the required construction materials. Table 5.11 presents potential construction materials suitable for achieving the predicted STC requirements. TABLE 5.11: POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS stc Component Range Examples of Construction Sheet metal roof with 50 mm Bradford Anticon insulation over 50 battens, ceiling lined with 2 x 10 mm Gyprock Soundchek plasterboard and filled with 130 Comfortseal R3.0W insulation Ceiling / Roof (CSR Redbook). Sheet metal roof with 50 mm Bradford Anticon insulation over 38 battens, ceiling lined with 13 mm and 16 mm Gyprock Fyrchek plasterboard (CSR Redbook). 50 Masonry veneer wall with timber studs, lined internally with 10 Gyprock Plasterboard CD (CSR Redbook). External Walls External cladding material on battens, vapour barrier, 16 mm 36 Gyprock Fyrchek MR plasterboard, timber studs, lined internally with 10 mm Gyprock Fyrchek Plasterboard CD (CSR Redbook). AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 41
Page 56
—_—= RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — stTc Component Range Examples of Construction 37 43.52 mm laminated, awning with acoustic seals (Bradnams) 34 10.38 mm laminated, awning with acoustic seals (Bradnams) Windows 29 6.38 mm laminated, sliding with acoustic seals or 6 mm awning (Bradnams) 25 4 mm sliding (Bradnams) 34 13.52 laminated, with acoustic seals (Bradnams) Sliding Doors 30 6.38 laminated, with acoustic seals (Bradnams) 25 4 mm glazing (Bradnams) 30 42-mm solid-core plywood door, soft plastics gasket around sides and top and drop seal at base (AS 3671). Pivot Doors 27 35-mm solid-core plywood door, soft plastics gasket around sides and top and drop seal at base (AS 3671). Before any construction material is chosen for the proposed buildings, STC information should be sought from the suppliers to ensure that the minimum STC’s are achievable. In order to achieve design STC ratings it is essential that the acoustically treated areas be constructed in a manner conducive to maximising sound attenuation. For example, there must be no air gaps around windows or at the eaves, which could act as noise pathways. 5.6.4 Open Space Figure 10a presents predicted ground Lato1enour noise contours across the whole site. Figures 10b to 10f present predicted ground contours for the ILUs adjacent to the Cooroy Connection Road. As identified on these figures, compliance with the DMR criterion for private open space is predicted across the majority of the development. Noise levels at private terrace areas are predicted to exceed the criteria for a number of ILU buildings located adjacent to the Cooroy Connection Road (ILU buildings 94, 97, 104, 107, 108, 115 and 116). However, as indicated on Figures 10b to 10f, a large proportion of compliant area is provided in the shadow region of each ILU building. Hence, compliance with the DMR criterion is predicted provided that private open space is designated in the shadow zone of these ILU buildings. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD JNETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.00T Page 42
Page 57
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = 6 NOISE IMMISSIONS ASSESSMENT 6.1. INTRODUCTION Noise with a potential to impact on sensitive receptors off-site and on-site are expected to come from the following sources: waste collection services for all ILUs and care facility buildings; s delivery of goods including refrigerated food to the care facility building; = air conditioning units for all ILUs and care facility buildings; = refrigeration condensers for care facility buildings; and ® = site traffic accessing/leaving the site via Lamonts Road (potential impacts on Lot 1 residential house). The following sections provide an assessment of the potential impacts from the development site. 6.2 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS 6.2.1 Fixed Plant 6.2.1.1 Independent Living Units Currently the detailed design of fixed plant items proposed for the retirement village have not been finalised by the design team. Continuous noise sources at the site are likely to include air conditioning and/or refrigeration plant for ILU and care facility buildings. As discussed in Section 5.6.2, all units at the site are predicted to require Construction Category 2 specifications. Hence, air-conditioning will be required for ILU buildings. The air conditioning units adopted for the development would be similar to those of typical residential developments (whether split system or ducted). Given the small size of the unit(s) likely to be required for these buildings impacts on surrounding uses (which predominantly include other ILUs) is expected to be minimal. To minimise any potential impacts, however, it is recommended that all condenser units for the [LU air conditioning systems be located as far as practicably possible from sleeping areas for adjacent ILUs. Furthermore, it is recommended that, where practical, all condenser units are located adjacent to the wall of the buildings such that there is no angle of view to the condenser unit from any bedrooms of adjacent ILU buildings. 6.2.1.2 Aged Care Facility and Community Village Building For the aged care facility and multi-purpose community village building, the design of the fixed plant noise sources is not known at this stage. Given this the potential impact cannot be predicted and a design noise limit for the plant must be specified instead. The design limit for any continuous fixed plant at the proposed aged care facility and community AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 43
Page 58
RSL Care
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised)
=
village has been calculated on the basis of the following information and assumptions:
= Day and evening criteria (7 am — 10 pm): Lamexes 48 AB(A) (Laso + 5 dB(A));
= Night (10 pm — 7 am) criteria: Lamaxeq 38 dB(A) (Laso + 3 dB(A));
® a minimum source to receptor distance of 11 m for the aged care facility and 27 m for the
community village building; and
= all plant are located in direct line of sight of the nearest neighbouring property (ie, they are not
shielded by the roofline or other structures or topographic features).
Table 6.1 indicates maximum allowable noise source levels for fixed plant equipment at the aged
care facility and community village building.
TABLE 6.1: FIXED PLANT NOISE LIMITS
Noise Source Nearest Sensitive | Maximum Allowable Sound Power Level dB(A)
Location Receptor
Day (7 am -10 pm) Night (10 pm — 7 am)
Aged Care Facility {LU 77 67
Community Village ILU 85 75
Building
If all noise sources are shielded from the nearest receptors a maximum allowable sound power
level 10 dB(A) higher than those presented in Table 6.1 may be acceptable depending on the
height of the sources relative to the acoustic screening and the type of structure involved.
The above specified sound power levels are based on worst-case locations and do not take into
account potential shielding from building structures. It is recommended that continuously operating
plant are located as far as possible from potentially sensitive development. More specific acoustic
specifications can be established once finalisation of mechanical plant design and location has
been completed.
6.2.2. Loading Dock Noise
The proposed site layout has an area designated for service access associated with the aged care
facility, as shown on Figure 2. The regular services associated with the aged care facility will most
likely include refrigerated food trucks and waste disposal services. All deliveries are expected to
occur between 7 am and 6 pm. Based on site survey plans, the minimum distance to the nearest
sensitive receptors is 33 m (ILU located north-west of the proposed service area).
Given the short-term nature of the above noise sources, the appropriate criterion to use for
assessing the acoustic impact is a background Lai plus 3 dB(A) noise level. Noise monitoring
Position 2 indicates an average Lato noise level for the period between 7 am to 6 pm to be
56.1 dB(A). Hence, a 59 dB(A) criterion is adopted. The 56 dB(A) noise level was measured during
a weekday, when the majority of service vehicles are expected to make deliveries.
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
INETWORK/PROJECTS/M750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 44
Page 59
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Table 6.2 presents Lama noise source measurement data for rubbish collection and refrigerated trucks completed previously by Air Noise Environment personnel. Table 6.2 presents a summary of maximum predicted receptor noise levels for each source. TABLE 6.2: NOISE SOURCE DATA Noise Frequency Spectra (SWL Linear) SPL@im Source | 31.5] 63 125 | 260 | S00 | 1000 | 2000/ 4000 | sooo | dB(A) Reftigerated 76.2 | 100.9 | 97.7 | 98.4 | 96.1 | 93.4 | 92.2] 87.9 | 81.8| 942 Rubbish Collection | 90-9 | 95:9 | 87.3 | 86.8 | 86.7 | 103.3 | 88.3 | 81.2 | 78.7 95.6 TABLE 6.3: LOADING DOCK SOURCE NOISE LEVELS Predicted Lamx Noise Levels dB(A) Closest Sensitive Receptors Refrigerated Truck Rubbish Collection’ ILU No. 88 Bed 2 55 60 ILU No. 126 Bed 1 58 63 Residential House to the West 49 55 Noise Criteria La1o 59 AB(A) Boid represents exceedance in the noise criterion As indicated by Table 6.2, noise levels associated with refrigerated truck deliveries are predicted to comply with the Lai noise criterion for the residential house located to the west on Lot 1. Noise levels at the nearest ILUs are predicted to exceed the criteria by up to 63 dB(A). Given the predicted noise attenuation provided by recommended construction materials for road and rail noise mitigation, the impact on internal Lame noise levels at the nearest ILUs is predicted to be minimal. As identified on Table 5.5, the recommended noise reduction for construction materials for Bedroom 1 of ILU No. 88 and Bedroom 2 of ILU No. 126 are 23 and 27 respectively. Hence, an internal Lamax noise level of 37 dB(A) (ILU No. 88) and 36 dB(A) (ILU No. 126) is predicted. 6.2.3 Traffic Accessing/Leaving the Site Access points for vehicles are proposed along Lamonts Road at the north-west corner of the site. The access point is proposed to be used by service vehicles (e.g. delivery trucks and rubbish collection trucks) and by residences occupying the residential buildings (ie. ILUs and 20 Unit Apartment). The Noosa Shire Council has requested that potential noise impacts on the residential house on Lot 1 be assessed. Traffic data provided by the client indicates that the peak AM and PM vehicles movements are AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 45
Page 60
=> Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) predicted to be 33 vehicles per hour and 42 vehicles per hour respectively. For the purpose of assessing potential noise impacts associated with accessing vehicles, the Lai 59 dB(A) criterion as discussed in the previous section is considered appropriate. Predictions have been based on noise source levels of 86 dB(A) at 1 metre for small cars and 93 dB(A) at 1 metre for a service truck. Noise associated with small cars have been modelled as a line source to consider the continuity of vehicles during peak hours. Service vehicles have been modelled as point sources, given that service vehicles are expected to access the site only once a day. Lamex noise levels have also been considered as a conservative approach. Table 6.5 presents predicted noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptor. TABLE 6.5: PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS FOR ACCESSING VEHICLES Nolse Source Predicted Lamax Noise Levels dB(A) Passenger Car 56 Service Vehicle 58 Noise Criteria Lato 59 AB(A) Based on the noise predictions, the impact of accessing vehicles on the Lot 1 residential house is predicted to be minimal. It should be noted that the ILU buildings along the access road provide significant shielding for the residential house. Furthermore, it is possible that traffic along the Cooroy Connection Road (particularly heavy vehicles) will remain the dominant noise source compared to vehicles accessing the site (which will also be travelling at low speeds). AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 46
Page 61
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — 7 CONCLUSION 7.1 RAIL NOISE Impacts of noise associated with the Cooroy Railway Corridor have been investigated by the assessment of unattended and attended noise monitoring data completed at the proposed development site. Based on the noise monitoring results, it is predicted that train noise levels passing by the proposed retirement village will exceed the relevant internal Lama noise criterion by up to 40 dB(A). Compliance with the internal noise criteria is likely to be achieved provided the following mitigation options are implemented: ® an acoustic barrier is constructed at the boundary of the devetopment site along the Cooroy Connection Road (as shown on Figure 8). The acoustic barrier should have a mass density of 12 kg/m? and be continuous with no air gaps; = all rooms requiring a noise reduction of greater than 10 dB (as identified on Tables 5.5 and 5.6) should be provided with air-conditioning; and = the Care Facility, Apartment and Village centre should be constructed of materials which meet the required STCs as specified in Tables 5.8. Based on the predicted noise levels and proposed tayouts, STC requirements for a number of (LU windows are predicted to be above 40 (as shown in Table 5.7). In order to reduce the STC requirements for [LU buildings to those presented in Tables 5.9 and 5.10, the following options should be considered: = replace ILU Buildings 3, 4, 30 with Type 1 ILU layouts; = construction of ILU Buildings 93, 95, 96, 98 to 100, 102, 103, 106, 109 to 115 and 117 with an alternative layout as presented on Figure 9; = for the alternative design, an acoustic barrier extending at least 1 metre from the Bedroom 2 wall should be constructed. The barrier should be 1.8 m above the finished floor level and be located adjacent to the Bedroom 2 window (see Figure 9); and = replace Type 4 double unit ILU Buildings 94, 97, 101, 104, 105, 107, 108, 116 and 118 with an alternative design. Bedroom areas should be provided furthest from the Cooroy Connection Road. This is likely to involve the provision of living areas to the rear of the ILU building. Currently, no alternative layouts have been made available to replace the Type 4 double units (Buildings 94, 97, 101, 104, 105, 107, 108, 116 and 118) located near the Cooroy Connection Road. If double units are provided by combining two mirrored alternative single units, window STC values of 37 are likely be achieved for these buildings. However, if alternative designs to those presented in Figure 9 are proposed, an acoustic assessment of these units would be required to determine the required construction materials. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page 47
Page 62
= RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —— 7.2. ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE The modelling of road traffic noise for a 10 year horizon from construction of the proposed aged care development has been completed. According to the modelling results, the Department of Mains Roads criteria is predicted by up to 9 dB(A). Compliance with the relevant noise criteria is predicted to be achieved by implementing the Mitigation options for rail noise impacts (as summarised in Section 7.1). Noise levels at private terrace areas are predicted to exceed the criteria for a number of ILU buildings located adjacent to the Cooroy Connection Road (ILU buildings 94, 97, 104, 107, 108, 115 and 116). However, a large proportion of compliant area is provided in the shadow region of each ILU building (see Figures 10b to 10f). Hence, compiiance with the DMR criterion is predicted provided that private open space is designated in the shadow zone of these ILU buildings. 7.3. NOISE IMMISSIONS The assessment has considered the potential impacts of services and fixed plant including waste collection, air conditioning and refrigeration units on surrounding sensitive land uses including both on and off-site receptors. In addition, the impact of traffic leaving and accessing the site via Lamonts Road has also been considered. The following findings have been determined regarding the acoustic impact of the development on off-site and on-site sensitive receptors: = all fixed air conditioning and refrigeration plant installed at the proposed care facility and community village centre is located as far as practicable from surrounding sensitive land uses; = the total sound power level for fixed plant installed at the proposed care facility and community village should not exceed those presented in Table 6.1 in Section 6.2.1.2. The allowable sound power level has the potential to be higher depending on the final location of fixed plant and whether additional shielding or acoustic enclosures are provided; and « noise associated with deliveries at the Aged Care Facility and traffic accessing/leaving the site via Lamonts Road is predicted to be minimal and comply with the retevant criteria. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD . INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page 48
Page 63
=> RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) —— APPENDIX A AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT
Page 64
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Kennedys Rg rms 3 2? Attended é Monitoring Position 2 z 3 PN Cite] Monitoring Position 1 Background Monitoring Position ot t 6 2 a 5 co Sonny \ 3 eg % : f owen’ by £. if a 0 Figure 1: Site Location and Noise Monitoring Positions AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD /INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page A1
Page 65
| Zv abeq 100°v01L4Od3x0S2 1 /NOISIAZY 800Z/ONILYOd3w/0SZ1/SLOSlOUd/MYOML3N/
G11 Ald LNSWNOUIANS SSION YIV
yoke ayig pasodoig :z aunbi4
(Ae0\s-Z)
Buiping
juawpede jun OZ - @4]U89
Aylunuuwu0o
(Aas0}S-2) abe\iia
gouapIsel
aueo pabe peq OZ
dpeastea sr
OoupecI pre eaten
cence \auoaced co
antamis p06
Semoun sun Buia ate
5 juapusdepu! 6S 1
(pesiney) juewssessy asioy jiey pue peoy - Aasoog ‘abeyi, Juewauey TSY pesodad
a8) 1SY
Page 66
Ay
100°P01LYOdSNOSZNOISIASY 800Z/ONLLHOdAN/0SZ /SLOAPONdAIMOMLAN!
G11 Ald LNSWNOWIANS SSION uly
suoyjeag|y pue ynode7 17 edAy Bulpying :¢ eunbyy
NOILVAI13 HLYON
aH)
Ho
{ Tt 4
to IRS
ie
Lu rH
at
NOILVAI13 HiNOS
ce
NOWLVAITI LSW3
NOILVAI13 153M
(pesiaey) juawssessy esioy jay pue peoy - Aqsoo_D ‘ebeyip juowaoy TSY pesodalg
e185 1SY
Page 67
ally vvebeg
100'F0LYOd3HOSZL/NOISIAZY 8COZ/ONLLYOdSH/0SZL/SLOSPOUdMUOML3EN!
G11 Ald INSWNOWIANA SSION Yi¥
suonjeag|y pue ynoAe7 ZZ adAy Bulpying :p en6y4
NOWVYAI13 HLYON
HE
i
|
cH
NOLLVAI13 HLNOS
iL
if |
Lemna
NOMYAI13 1S¥3
O
[1
—Tins
NOULYAIT3 1S3M
— Tu 2
\_
dlH - N¥1d/ 40074
=
as
tat
Co
(pesiney) juewssessy asioyy fey pue peoy - Ao100D ‘ebeyi, juawaey TSY Pesodad
eed 1S
Page 68
G11 Aid LNZWNOUIANS SSION Bl¥
all sv ebeg 1G0°v0LHOdau0SZL/NOISIAZY 800Z/ONLLYOdSH/0S2 WSLOSPOUd/MYOMLAN/
suojjeaa|y pue ynoAe] eZ dA) Suipying :g aiunBy4
4008 diH - NWid 40014
NOILVA313 HLBON
i al
ae { +7
4 |
jal I
de I
NOILVAIT3 HLNOS e 5
Ele |
3 | Hs | 1) ie
Ea | |
Tee |
+ |
(e sy | at
fe | 4
NOULVAII 153M | a
i ele |
aa] \ L und el
5 | 5 4
sae ILL SSL FS +, me:
(pesiney) juewissessy asioy fey pue peoy - Aal00D ‘ebeyi, jueuaijey 1Sy pescdaig
48D TSY
Page 69
{ } gv ebed 1GO'POLYOdSYOSZL/NOISIAAY B00Z/ONLLYOd3Y/0S41/SLOSPOUdMYOMLSNI
: G11 Ald LNSWNOXIANS SSION IY
SuOeAgy pue ynoAe7 yz adA1 Bulpying :9 eun6y4
4004 di @ 378V9 - NOILYAITI HLYON
Hoo Oo o H
— Ans
4008 diH_ 3 318¥9 - NOMVAII3 HINOS
i
4008 dH 3 318V9 - NOILVAIII ISI
olo CT)
bath, ™
pm te
75
e
a
300U dH 3 F18¥9 - NOL
YAI13 193M |
i
'
(pesiney) juawssessy esion jiey pue peoy - AqiooD ‘aber, juewaimey TSy pesodad
8489 7SY
Page 70
RSL Care
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised)
159 independent
living units
village
community
LEGEND centre
A Noise Receptor Positions
© ILU Building Numbers for Noise Model
*5 worst-case receptor positions have been considered
for each ILU (Bed 1, Bed 2, Sliding Door at Terrace Area,
Side Facade of Living/Dining/Kitchen Area, Front Facade
of Living Area)
residence
20 unit apartment
building
120 bed aged care
Figure 7: ILU Building Numbers and Noise Modelling Receptor Positions
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT
)
Page 71
QL1 Ald LNANNOUIANS SSION Yiv il av ebeg LOO POLYOdSYOSZL/NOISIASY S00Z/ONILYOdSH/0SZ L/S LOAPOUdMYOMLIN/ S4BjeH pue u0]}e907 Jae BSNODYy pepuswWOreY :g ainBig Tm \ AY Jewweg oWsneoy W¢'Z ——— y \ JoWeg ONSNOOY WE'Z = = € x SN , aNz931 \ om enon FM) ° oc SUN JO ajNpeyos Wi 3 vorrseuye (pesiaey) jueUISSaSSY aston [fey pue PROY - AqsooD ‘ebeyiA juaWAINEY TSY pesodaig abd 1S
Page 72
{ | 6 v ebeg L100 POLYOdAHOS.L/NOISIARY 800Z/ONILHOdSu/0S2L/SLOSPOUd INOMLAN!
G11 Ald LNSWNOUIANA 3SION uly
LEEPUE SLL 03 GOL ‘904 ‘EOL ‘ZOL ‘001 9} 86 ‘96 ‘6 ‘eG SHUlpIINg eDe|dey 03 noe] YUN NTI eBuIS eANeuseyy :¢ aunBly
laren wars pew,
wa
+ ar + OS
wa ait “ef
rer Omen orac _ceie ee
_ = AP ! 2 ae Oe ont "22 V
ants + iil He z r
0 See
Zee] A aHREE i
£8 a
ours fl (uBiou
nae, ONOUYASTA § 8 f || so0y puna erage
a Hf ayjaw g's ‘yiBuo) w |)
= 5 souueg onsnooy
te] ith
il fi
ie
5 Bek
g|
| | §
le
®
ale
aL
+ 5 T
samc a*
Z
aa] aa ty OME Ore
pap He ‘
btoatactintal om ren Wr ont |p
eat area aif fae
or “bst oaor* or
(pasiaoy) juauissassy asioyy ey pue peoy - AasooD ‘abe, juawaljay 7S pesodalg
ee 1S
Page 73
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) ui LEGEND > 60 aB(A) GE) < 60 dB(A) (Compliant) Figure 10a: Predicted Ground Level Lato,1snou. Noise Levels AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD /NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page A10
Page 74
| | LL v e6eq 100°?01LYOd3x0SZI/NOISIAZY 800Z/ONILYOdSH/0S21/SLOSPOUd/MYOMLAN/
G11 Ald LNSWNOUIANS 3SION IV
peoy UoNIaUUOD A0J00D ay} 0} JUaIe{pe Bulpling 7] 404 S}aAe7 ASION “°° *!0lv> JaAe7] puNOID peyoipesg :qoQ} aunbi4
(queydwoo)(yjapo9>
(viepoo< Si
an3z931
(pasiney) juewssessy asioy ley pue peoy - Aasoog ‘abeyip, juawaijay 7SY pesodag
aed 1SY
Page 75
| | 21 v e6eq 100'v01LHOd3x0SZIL/NOISIASY 800Z7/DNILYOdau/0SZ1/SLOAPOUd/MYOMLAN/
G11 Ald LNSWNOUIANS SSION Iv
peoy Uo2eUUOD A010095 ay} 0} juade[pe Bulpjing 77] 405 sjaAe7] asION “V5 JaAa7 puNOID pazoipesg 90) eunBi4
(weydwoo)(y)apog>
(veroo< Hi
QN3937
(pasinay) juewssessy asion jley pue peoy - AasooD ‘abe, juewanay 7Sy pesodaig
ae 1SY
Page 76
es
100°v0LYOd3H0SZL/NOISIASY 800Z/DNILYOdSuH/0SZ1/S 193° ONd/MYOMLAN/
G11 Ald LNSWNOUIANS SSION Yi
peoy UoJDeUUOD A01005 a4} 0} JUBIe[pe Bulpjing F771] 105 SjaAe7] aSoN °° *O1V> pana] puNOID pa}oipasg :po} ounbi4
(uendwoo) (yap o9>
(wepoo< fi
GN3937
(pesinay) juewssessy asin [Jey Pue peoy - Aa100D ‘abeII/A JUEWAIEY TSY PEsodold
aed 1S
Page 77
100°v0LYOd3H0SZI/NOISIAZY 800Z/ONILYOd3H/0S21/SLOSFONd/MYOMLAN/
G11 Ald LNSWNOUIANS SSION IV
peoy Uuo2eUUOD A0J005 ay} 0} }Uade{pe Bupying 771] 405 sjaAe7 as|ON “*°*!lv> jana] puNOID pe}o|paig :a0} eunbi4
(queydwoo) (y)apog>
(viepoo< Hi
QNn3937
(pasiney) JuawSsassy asion jiey pue peoy - AqlooyD ‘abel, JUaWAIEY TSY Pesodoald
aed 1S
Page 78
( Sig abeq 100°v0LYOdSxHOSZL/NOISIASY 800Z/DNILYOdaW/0SZ1/SLOSPOUd/MYOMLAN/
G11 Ald LNSWNOUXIANS SSION IY
'
Ppeoy UOIEUUOD A0s009 ay} 0} Juade{[pe Hulpjing 171 405 sjaAe7] ASION “"°¥OV> Jana] pUNOID payoipesd :j0} aunBi4
(weudwo>) (yap oo>
a |
ONn39371
(pesinay) jJuewssessy asioy jiey pue peoy - Aqioog ‘abbey, juawasjay 7SY pesodalg
ae 1SY
Page 79
= RSL Care => Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — APPENDIX B ACOUSTIC GLOSSARY AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/M1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT
Page 80
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTIC TERMINOLOGY A-Weighting dB (decibel) dB(A) Facade Noise Level Free Field Hertz (Hz) L ‘Aeq Equivalent Continuous Sound Level bnso.r bas 0,7 Lato, T bwa A response provided by an electronic circuit which modifies sound in such a way that the resulting level is similar to that perceived by the human ear. This is the scale on which sound pressure level is expressed. It is defined as 20 times the logarithm of the ratio between the root-mean-square pressure of the sound field and the reference pressure (0.00002N/m?). This is a measure of the overall noise level of sound across the audible spectrum with a frequency weighting (i.e. ‘A’ weighting) to compensate for the varying sensitivity of the human ear to sound at different frequencies. Refers to a sound pressure level determined at a point close to an acoustically reflective surface (in addition to the ground). Typically a distance of 1 metre is used. Refers to a sound pressure level determined at a point away from reflective surfaces other than the ground with no significant contribution due to sound from other reflective surfaces; generally as measured outside and away from buildings. A measure of the frequency of sound. It measures the number of pressure peaks per second passing a point when a pure tone is present. This is the equivalent steady sound level in dB(A) containing the same acoustic energy as the actual fluctuating sound level over the given period. For a steady sound with small fluctuations, its value is close to the average sound pressure level. This is the dB(A) level exceeded 90% of the time, T. This is the dB(A) level exceeded 10% of the time, T. This is the dB(A) level exceeded 50% of the time, T. The A-weighted sound power level in dB. AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/17S0REPORTO4.ODT Page B1 =
Page 81
== RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) <— APPENDIX C PLATES AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTO INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT
Page 82
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Plate 1: Noise Monitoring Position (View to Road) Plate 2: Cooroy Connection Road Surface Adjacent to Proposed Site AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD /NETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page C1
Page 83
— RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) — APPENDIX D METEOROLOGICAL DATA AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT
Page 84
RSL Care == Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) APPENDIX D: METEOROLOGICAL DATA Station number: 040908 Station name: Tewantin Precipitation Wind . DateTime |'since Sam) speed Me een | Serre ates (nt 4/07/2007 13:00 0 9 290 18 4107/2007 14:00 0 11 300 18 4107/2007 15:00 0 11 330 21 4107/2007 16:00 0 13 350 21 4107/2007 17:00 0 11 10 17 4/07/2007 18:00 0 11 360 15 4/07/2007 19:00 0 9 350 15 4107/2007 20:00 0 8 340 9 410712007 21:00 0 9 340 17 4107/2007 22:00 0 8 300 11 4/07/2007 23:00 0 9 320 13 §/07/2007 0:00 0 11 330 17 §107/2007 1:00 0 8 330 11 5/07/2007 2:00 0 8 300 13 5/07/2007 3:00 0 8 330 9 5/07/2007 4:00 0 8 310 9 5/07/2007 5:00 0 8 350 9 5/07/2007 6:00 0 8 330 9 5/07/2007 7:00 0 2 340 8 5/07/2007 8:00 0 2 20 5 5/07/2007 9:00 0 11 280 22 §107/2007 10:00 0 9 280 18 5/07/2007 11:00 0 11 280 22 5/07/2007 12:00 0 11 270 22 5/07/2007 13:00 0 18 270 35 5/07/2007 14:00 0 11 290 24 5107/2007 15:00 0 13 290 24 5/07/2007 16:00 0 11 290 24 5/07/2007 17:00 0 14 280 21 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page D1
Page 85
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = Date/Time Prec pitation speed wind direction in Speed of maximum wingust (mm) (km/h) grees true in last 10 minutes (km/h) 5/07/2007 18:00 0 8 310 13 5/07/2007 19:00 0 5 350 8 5/07/2007 20:00 0 5 300 9 5/07/2007 21:00 0 2 20 5 5/07/2007 22:00 0 0 0 0 5/07/2007 23:00 0 0 0 4 6/07/2007 0:00 0 2 310 9 6/07/2007 1:00 0 5 260 17 6/07/2007 2:00 0 5 270 11 6/07/2007 3:00 0 5 260 9 6/07/2007 4:00 0 5 260 9 6/07/2007 5:00 0 0 0 5 6/07/2007 6:00 0 5 230 11 6/07/2007 7:00 0 9 230 18 6/07/2007 8:00 0 13 260 22 6/07/2007 9:00 0 11 250 21 6/07/2007 10:00 0 13 250 24 6/07/2007 11:00 0 13 230 28 6/07/2007 12:00 0 17 250 31 6/07/2007 13:00 0 15 260 26 6/07/2007 14:00 0 13 260 26 6/07/2007 15:00 0 13 250 24 6/07/2007 16:00 0 9 240 22 6/07/2007 17:00 0 8 250 13 6/07/2007 18:00 0 4 250 9 6/07/2007 19:00 0 9 250 15 6/07/2007 20:00 0 4 70 8 6/07/2007 21:00 0 0 0 0 6/07/2007 22:00 0 2 100 8 6/07/2007 23:00 0 2 160 9 7107/2007 0:00 0 5 80 1 7107/2007 1:00 0 4 290 8 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page D2
Page 86
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = Precipitation Wind catering "snc | sens |G tce”| Wan omits 7107/2007 2:00 0 0 0 0 7107/2007 3:00 0 8 300 9 7107/2007 4:00 0 8 290 11 7107/2007 5:00 0 0 0 0 7107/2007 6:00 0 8 350 13 7107/2007 7:00 0 0 0 0 7107/2007 8:00 0 0 0 0 7107/2007 9:00 0 4 40 5 7107/2007 10:00 0 15 190 24 7107/2007 11:00 0 15 190 24 7107/2007 12:00 0 15 180 21 7107/2007 13:00 0 1 140 18 7107/2007 14:00 0 9 70 15 7107/2007 15:00 0 13 40 17 7/07/2007 16:00 0 5 60 9 7107/2007 17:00 0 2 60 5 7107/2007 18:00 0 0 0 0 7107/2007 19:00 0 0 0 0 7/07/2007 20:00 0 0 0 5 7107/2007 21:00 0 0 0 0 710712007 22:00 0 0 0 0 7107/2007 23:00 0 8 360 9 8/07/2007 0:00 0 4 340 5 8/07/2007 1:00 0 2 350 8 8/07/2007 2:00 0 4 330 8 8/07/2007 3:00 0 5 320 9 8/07/2007 4:00 0 4 290 8 8/07/2007 5:00 0 5 340 9 8/07/2007 6:00 0 5 20 8 8/07/2007 7:00 0 4 330 8 8/07/2007 8:00 0 8 320 1 8/07/2007 9:00 0 4 330 9 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT Page 03
Page 87
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) S Precipitation Wind purine |"Sae gam’ | aones (Waceucricn”| singe 8/07/2007 10:00 0 8 320 11 8/07/2007 11:00 0 8 280 11 8/07/2007 12:00 0 9 270 17 8/07/2007 13:00 0 8 270 18 8/07/2007 14:00 0 9 300 15 8/07/2007 15:00 0 13 260 18 8/07/2007 16:00 0 9 260 17 8/07/2007 17:00 0 8 260 11 8/07/2007 18:00 0 2 250 5 8/07/2007 19:00 0 2 250 5 8/07/2007 20:00 0 0 0 0 8/07/2007 21:00 0 4 290 8 8/07/2007 22:00 0 5 300 9 8/07/2007 23:00 0 8 300 9 9/07/2007 0:00 0 5 290 15 9/07/2007 1:00 0 5 310 9 9/07/2007 2:00 0 4 350 9/07/2007 3:00 0 8 30 9/07/2007 4:00 0 9 330 13 9/07/2007 5:00 0 8 280 15 9/07/2007 6:00 0 8 260 13 9/07/2007 7:00 0 9 300 13 9/07/2007 8:00 0 11 270 22 9/07/2007 9:00 0 8 270 11 9/07/2007 10:00 0 11 250 21 9/07/2007 11:00 0 13 240 28 9/07/2007 12:00 0 13 240 33 9/07/2007 13:00 0 13 240 26 9/07/2007 14:00 0 13 250 28 9/07/2007 15:00 0 11 240 30 9/07/2007 16:00 0 11 260 24 9/07/2007 17:00 0 8 230 13 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.ODT Page 04
Page 88
RSL Care = Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) Precipitation Wind DateTime |'since Sam’) speed |W oasetericn | Slate tb minutes emt) 9/07/2007 18:00 0 11 220 24 9/07/2007 19:00 0 9 240 18 9/07/2007 20:00 0 9 250 13 9/07/2007 21:00 0 11 250 18 9/07/2007 22:00 0 8 240 13 9/07/2007 23:00 0 8 230 13 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD JNETWORK/PROJECTS/M1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page DS
Page 89
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) APPENDIX E NOISE LOGGER DATA AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.0DT
Page 90
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = — — APPENDIX E: NOISE LOGGER DATA Date Time |Lmax} 11 L6S | L10 | L50 |} L90 | L95 | L99 Lmin Leq 4/07/2007 | 12:45| 77.5 | 72.5 | 67.0 | 65.0 | 58.5 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 44.5 | 41.0 61.5 4/07/2007 | 13:00} 76.0 | 71.0 | 65.5 | 64.0 | 54.0 | 45.0 | 43.0 | 40.5 39.0 60.0 4/07/2007 | 13:15 | 85.5 | 71.0 | 65.0 | 64.0 | 55.5.) 46.5 | 44.5 | 40.5 39.5 61.0 4/07/2007 | 13:30] 79.0 | 70.5 | 66.0 | 64.5 | 56.0 | 49.0 | 47.5 | 41.5 39.0 60.5 4/07/2007 | 13:45} 80.0 | 72.5 | 67.5 | 65.0 | 56.0 | 47.5 | 45.5 | 43.5 | 42.0 61.5 4107/2007 | 14:00) 75.0 | 69.5 | 64.5 | 62.5 | 56.0 | 49.0 | 47.0 } 42.0 | 40.0 59.0 4107/2007 | 14:15] 79.5 | 71.5 | 66.5 | 64.0 | 56.5 } 47.5 | 44.0 | 40.5 39.5 61.0 4/07/2007 | 14:30 | 80.0 | 73.5 | 66.5 | 64.5 | 58.0 | 49.0 | 47.0 | 46.0 44.5 62.0 4/07/2007 | 14:45 | 76.0 | 70.5 | 65.0 | 63.5 | 56.5 | 47.0 | 46.0 | 42.0] 40.5 60.0 4/07/2007 | 15:00 | 89.0 | 76.0 | 70.5 | 67.0 | 59.0 | 49.5 | 47.5 | 45.5 | 42.5 65.5 4/07/2007 | 15:15 | 76.5 | 72.5 | 68.0 | 66.0 | 58.5 | 52.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 46.0 62.5 4/07/2007 | 15:30) 81.5 | 74.0 | 70.5 | 67.0 | 60.5 | 54.0 | 52.0 | 47.5 | 45.5 64.0 4/07/2007 | 15:45 | 74.0 | 70.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 59.0 | 51.5 | 48.5 | 44.5 | 43.0 61.5 4/07/2007 | 16:00} 78.0 | 71.0 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 60.0 | 52.0 | 50.0 | 47.0 | 45.0 62.5 4/07/2007 | 16:15 | 80.0 | 74.5 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 61.5 | 53.0 | 51.0 | 47.5 | 45.5 64.5 4/07/2007 | 16:30 | 79.0 | 72.5 | 69.5 | 67.0 | 61.0 | 54.5 | 53.5 | 48.5 | 46.5 63.5 4/07/2007 | 16:45} 73.5 | 69.0 | 67.0 | 66.0 | 60.5 | 54.5 | 52.0 | 49.0 | 46.5 62.5 4/07/2007 | 17:00) 74.5 | 70.0 | 67.0 | 66.5 | 61.5 | 54.5 | 51.5 | 47.6 | 46.0 63.0 4/07/2007 | 17:15] 85.5 | 77.0 | 72.0 | 67.5 | 62.5 | 56.0 | 54.0 | 51.0 | 48.5 66.5 4/07/2007 | 17:30] 72.5 | 69.0 | 67.5 | 66.5 | 62.5 | 56.0 | 54.0 | 51.5 | 49.5 63.0 4/07/2007 | 17:45 | 74.5 | 72.5 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 63.0 | 56.5 | 55.5 | 50.5 | 48.5 64.5 4/07/2007 | 18:00 | 76.0 | 71.0 | 68.5 | 67.0 | 62.5 | 55.0 | 52.5 | 45.5 | 42.5 63.5 4/07/2007 | 18:15 | 72.5 | 69.0 | 67.0 | 66.5 | 61.5 | 53.5 | 51.0 | 45.5 | 42.5 62.5 4/07/2007 | 18:30) 74.0 | 69.5 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 59.5 | 52.5 | 50.0 | 48.0] 46.5 62.0 4/07/2007 | 18:45 | 77.0 | 74.0 | 69.5 | 66.5 | 60.5 | 53.0 | 52.0 |; 50.5 | 49.0 63.5 4/07/2007 | 19:00} 73.5 | 69.5 | 66.5 | 65.5 | 59.0 | 48.5 | 46.5 | 41.5 39.0 61.5 4/07/2007 | 19:15] 81.0 | 74.5 | 68.0 | 67.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 45.5 | 44.0 64.0 4/07/2007 | 19:30 | 71.5 | 68.5 | 66.5 | 65.5 | 57.5 | 45.0 | 42.0 | 35.5 33.5 60.5 4107/2007 | 19:45 | 73.5 | 68.0 | 65.5 | 63.0 | 54.0 | 42.5 | 41.0 | 39.5 38.0 58.5 4/07/2007 | 20:00} 80.0 | 69.5 | 64.0 | 61.0 | 52.0 | 40.0 | 39.0 | 37.0 36.0 58.0 4107/2007 | 20:15] 81.0 | 69.5 | 65.0 } 62.0 | 52.5 | 38.5 | 37.5 | 35.0 33.0 60.0 4/07/2007 | 20:30) 73.0 | 67.5 | 63.5 | 60.5 | 50.5 | 38.5 | 37.0 | 34.0 32.0 56.5 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTO INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.00T Page E1
Page 91
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) = Date | Time |Lmax| L1 L5 | Lio | L50 | L90 | L95 | L99 | Lmin Leq 4/07/2007 | 20:45 | 73.0 | 66.5 | 62.5 | 59.0 | 44.5 | 35.0 | 33.5 | 32.5 31.0 55.0 4/07/2007 | 21:00| 77.0 | 74.0 | 64.0 | 60.5 | 43.5 | 36.0 | 35.0 | 34.0 33.0 58.5 4/07/2007 | 21:15 | 68.5 | 65.0 | 60.5 | 58.5 | 41.0 | 35.0 | 34.0 | 33.0 32.0 53.5 4107/2007 | 21:30| 70.0 | 66.5 | 64.0 | 61.5 | 46.0 | 33.5 | 31.5 | 305 |] 29.5 56.5 4/07/2007 | 21:45] 69.0 | 66.5 | 63.5 | 60.5 | 40.0 | 31.5 | 30.5 | 30.0 29.5 55.0 4/07/2007 | 22:00 | 78.0 | 75.5 | 66.0 | 61.5 | 46.0 | 34.5 | 33.5 | 32.0 | 30.5 61.5 4/07/2007 | 22:15 | 71.5 | 67.5 | 63.5 | 60.5 | 51.5 | 38.5 | 37.0 | 35.0 33.0 57.0 4/07/2007 | 22:30 | 82.5 | 77.5 | 69.0 | 62.5 | 43.0 | 35.0 | 34.0 | 33.0 32.0 64.0 4/07/2007 | 22:45 | 70.0 | 66.5 | 62.5 | 60.0 | 48.0 | 37.5 | 35.0 | 32.5 31.5 55.5 4/07/2007 | 23:00 | 75.5 | 72.5 | 69.5 | 63.0 | 44.0 | 32.0 | 31.5 | 30.5 29.5 60.0 4/07/2007 | 23:15 | 72.5 | 67.0 | 63.5 | 60.0 | 42.5 | 32.5 | 31.5 | 30.5 29.5 §5.5 4/07/2007 | 23:30] 70.0 | 65.5 | 61.5 | 58.0 | 36.5 | 32.0 | 31.5 | 30.5 | 29.5 53.5 4107/2007 | 23:45 | 72.0 | 66.5 | 62.0 | 58.0 | 38.5 | 31.0 | 30.5 | 29.5 29.0 54.5 5/07/2007 | 0:00 } 72.0 | 65.5 | 58.0 | 54.0 | 37.5 | 32.0 | 31.0 | 30.0 | 29.5 51.5 §/07/2007| 0:15 | 71.5 | 63.5 | 57.5 | 52.5 } 35.0 | 29.5 | 29.5 | 28.5 | 28.0 50.5 5/07/2007 | 0:30 | 69.5 | 65.0 | 61.5 | 57.5 | 36.5 | 33.5 | 32.5 | 31.5 | 30.5 53.0 5/07/2007 | 0:45 | 70.5 | 63.5 | 52.5 | 44.5 | 34.5 | 30.5 } 30.0 | 29.5) 285 48.5 5/07/2007| 1:00 | 71.0 | 66.0 | 59.0 | 53.5 | 35.0 | 30.5 | 30.0 | 29.5 | 29.0 52.0 6/07/2007} 1:15 | 51.5 | 45.0 | 41.5 | 40.0 | 32.5 | 30.5 | 30.0 | 29.5 29.0 36.0 5/07/2007 | 1:30 | 68.0 | 63.5 | 54.5 | 49.5 | 37.0 | 34.0 | 32.5 | 31.5 | 30.5 49.0 §/07/2007| 1:45 | 65.0 } 55.0 | 43.0 | 38.5 | 34.0 | 30.5 | 30.5 | 29.5 29.5 42.0 5/07/2007 | 2:00 | 81.0 | 75.5 | 64.0 | 52.0 | 365.5 | 32.0 | 31.5 | 31.0 30.0 61.5 5/07/2007 | 2:15 | 77.0 | 73.5 | 69.0 | 57.0 | 37.5 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 29.0 28.0 59.5 5/07/2007 | 2:30 | 70.5 | 61.5 | 47.5 | 39.5 | 33.0 | 30.5 | 30.5 | 29.5 29.5 48.0 §/07/2007 | 2:45 | 71.5 | 65.0 | 55.0 | 46.0 | 34.5 | 30.5 | 30.0 | 29.5 28.5 50.0 5/07/2007 | 3:00 } 70.0 | 62.0 | 42.5 | 39.5 | 33.5 | 30.5 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 29.0 46.5 5/07/2007 | 3:15 | 45.5 | 40.5 | 38.5 | 37.0 | 33.5 | 31.0 | 30.5 | 29.5 29.0 34.5 5/07/2007 | 3:30 | 73.5 | 67.5 | 57.0 | 51.0 | 37.0 | 32.0 | 31.5 | 31.0 | 30.0 53.0 5/07/2007 | 3:45 | 70.0 | 64.5 | 54.0 | 50.0 ; 38.0 | 33.5 | 32.0 | 30.5 29.5 50.0 5/07/2007 | 4:00 | 69.0 | 60.0 | 41.0 | 39.5 | 34.0 | 30.5 | 30.0 | 29.5 |} 29.0 45.5 5/07/2007} 4:15 | 71.5 | 66.5 | 58.0 | 49.0 | 35.5 | 32.0 | 31.5 | 30.5 29.5 52.0 5/07/2007 | 4:30 | 95.0 | 81.0 | 74.0 | 63.5 | 40.0 | 32.5 | 32.0 | 31.5 | 305 69.0 5/07/2007 | 4:45 | 80.0 | 75.5 | 70.5 | 65.5 | 43.5 | 38.0 | 37.0 | 35.5 34.0 62.5 5/07/2007 | 5:00 | 72.5 | 69.0 | 65.0 | 60.5 | 41.0 | 34.5 | 34.0 | 33.0 32.0 56.5 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORT04.0DT Page E2
Page 92
RSL Care Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised) a Date Time |Lmax| L1 L6& L10 | L50 | L90 | L95 | L99S Lmin Leq 5/07/2007} 5:15 | 76.5 | 71.0 | 67.5 | 65.0 | 50.5 | 39.0 | 37.5 | 36.0 34.5 60.0 5/07/2007} 5:30 | 75.0 | 70.5 | 68.0 | 65.5 | 51.5 | 41.0 | 39.5 | 37.5 36.0 60.0 5/07/2007 | 5:45 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 66.0 | 55.0 | 42.0 | 40.5 | 38.5 36.0 61.0 5/07/2007 | 6:00 | 75.0 | 71.0 | 68.0 | 67.0 | 54.5 | 42.5 | 41.0 | 39.0 37.5 61.5 §/07/2007| 6:15 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 54.5 | 44.5 | 42.0 | 39.0 37.5 60.0 5/07/2007 | 6:30 | 73.5 | 70.0 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 59.0 | 48.5 | 47.0 | 44.0 | 42.5 61.5 §/07/2007 | 6:45 | 81.0 | 74.5 | 70.0 | 68.5 | 62.0 | 53.5 | 51.5 | 49.0 | 45.0 65.0 5/07/2007 | 7:00 | 78.5 | 76.5 | 71.5 | 69.5 | 62.0 | 56.0 | 54.5 | 50.5 | 48.0 66.0 §/07/2007| 7:15 | 74.5 | 71.5 | 68.5 | 66.0 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 45.0 | 43.0 62.0 §/07/2007| 7:30 | 77.5 | 71.0 | 68.0 | 66.5 | 59.0 | 51.5 | 49.5 | 48.0 | 46.0 62.0 §/07/2007| 7:45 | 81.0 | 72.5 | 68.0 | 66.5 | 59.0 | 51.5 | 50.5 | 47.0 | 45.0 63.0 5/07/2007| 8:00 | 74.5 | 71.5 | 67.5 | 66.5 | 60.0 | 51.5 | 49.5 | 47.0} 45.0 62.5 5/07/2007} 8:15 | 77.0 | 71.5 | 68.0 | 66.5 | 59.5 | 49.5 | 47.0 | 44.0 | 42.5 62.5 5/07/2007 | 8:30 | 94.0 | 82.5 | 68.0 | 66.5 | 59.0 | 51.0 | 49.5 | 47.5 | 455 68.0 5/07/2007} 8:45 | 83.0 | 76.0 | 67.5 | 65.5 | 57.5 | 48.5 | 47.0 | 42.5 | 41.0 63.0 5/07/2007] 9:00 | 77.0 | 71.5 | 67.0 | 66.0 | 59.5 | 52.0 | 50.5 | 48.0} 46.0 62.0 §/07/2007 | 9:15 | 73.5 | 70.0 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 58.0 | 49.5 | 48.0 | 46.0) 42.5 81.5 §/07/2007| 9:30 | 82.5 | 79.5 | 69.0 | 67.5 | 61.0 | 54.0 | 52.5 | 49.5 | 47.5 66.0 §/07/2007| 9:45 | 84.0 | 77.0 | 73.5 | 67.5 | 60.0 | 52.5 | 51.5 | 48.5 | 46.0 66.0 5/07/2007 | 10:00} 74.5 | 70.0 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 59.5 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 47.0] 45.0 62.0 5/07/2007 | 10:15} 80.0 | 71.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 59.5 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 46.5 | 44.0 62.0 5/07/2007 | 10:30} 77.5 | 71.0 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 59.5 | 52.0 | 49.5 | 46.0 | 44.5 62.5 5/07/2007 | 10:45] 79.0 | 71.5 | 66.5 | 65.5 | 57.5 | 50.5 | 47.5 | 45.0 | 43.0 61.5 5/07/2007 | 11:00| 76.5 | 71.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 57.5 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 46.0 | 44.0 61.5 §/07/2007 | 11:15 | 81.5 | 71.5 | 67.0 | 65.0 | 57.5 | 49.5 | 48.5 | 46.5 | 45.0 61.5 §/07/2007 | 11:30} 77.0 | 71.5 | 68.0 | 66.0 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 47.0 | 45.0 | 44.0 62.0 5/07/2007 | 11:45 | 72.5 | 69.0 | 66.5 | 65.0 | 57.0 | 48.0 | 47.0 | 45.5 | 44.0 60.5 5/07/2007 | 12:00) 75.5 | 70.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 59.0 | 52.5 | 51.5 | 47.0 | 45.0 61.5 5/07/2007 | 12:15] 84.5 | 74.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 57.5 | 49.5 | 48.0 | 46.5 | 45.0 63.5 §/07/2007 | 12:30] 74.5 | 70.0 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 59.5 | 53.5 | 52.0 | 50.6 | 48.0 61.5 5/07/2007 | 12:45; 80.0 | 75.0 | 69.0 | 67.0 | 61.0 | 54.5 | 52.5 | 50.5 | 49.0 64.0 5/07/2007 | 13:00) 74.0 | 69.0 | 66.5 | 65.0 | 57.5 | 51.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 46.0 60.5 5/07/2007 | 13:15 | 80.0 | 73.0 | 67.0 | 65.0 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 46.0 | 44.0 62.0 5/07/2007 | 13:30 | 85.0 | 79.0 | 74.5 | 67.0 | 59.0 | 53.0 | 52.0 | 49.5 | 47.5 66.5 AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD INETWORK/PROJECTS/M1750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT Page E3
Page 93
RSL Care
Proposed RSL Retirement Village, Cooroy - Road and Rail Noise Assessment (Revised)
=
Date Time |Lmax| L1 L5 L10 | L60 | L9O0 | L9S | LOS Lmin Leq
5/07/2007 | 13:45] 76.0 | 69.5 | 66.0 | 65.0 | 57.5 | 51.0 | 49.5 | 48.0 | 46.0 61.0
5/07/2007 | 14:00} 76.5 | 70.0 | 66.5 | 65.0 | 58.0 | 50.5 | 48.5 | 45.5 | 44.0 61.0
5/07/2007 | 14:15 | 83.0 | 72.5 | 67.0 | 65.5 | 59.5 | 52.5 | 51.0 | 48.0 | 45.5 62.5
5/07/2007 | 14:30 87.5 | 71.5 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 59.0 | 51.5 | 505 | 48.5 | 47.5 63.5
5/07/2007 | 14:45 | 77.5 | 74.5 | 71.0 | 67.0 | 59.0 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 48.0) 46.5 63.5
5/07/2007 | 15:00 | 75.0 {| 71.5 | 67.5 | 66.0 | 59.0 | 52.0 | 50.5 | 48.0 45.5 62.5
5/07/2007 | 15:15} 74.5 | 70.0 | 67.0 | 66.0 | 59.0 | 51.5 | 50.0 | 46.5 | 44.0 61.5
5/07/2007 | 15:28] 78.0 | 61.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 22.0 | 21.5 | 21.0 | 21.0 20.0 49.0
AIR NOISE ENVIRONMENT PTY LTD
INETWORK/PROJECTS/M750/REPORTING/2008 REVISION/1750REPORTO4.ODT
Page E4
Used in these records
07/2398 - Revised Noise Report and cover letters to referral agencies [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.