Council archive · source document
RFI - Engineering Response · MCU26/0001
The hydraulic consultant will be responsible for the design and implementation of
the tank, with overflow connected to the stormwater drainage system.
ACCESS
• Item 11 – Footpath / Driveway Grade
Items have been addressed - refer to amended Civil Engineering drawings included
in Appendix A. The location of the existing footpath (immediately behind the kerb)
is non-standard and arguably is used for bin collection rather than a pedestrian
thoroughfare. Regardless, to achieve compliance for the frontage of the proposed
development, a new footpath is proposed on a standard alignment which crosses
the driveway crossover maintaining a maximum 2.5% crossfall. Temporary infill
triangles of concrete are proposed to taper the footpath back to the existing
alignment on both sides of the development, thus allowing future direct connection
as each adjoining property if developed.
PARKING
• Item 11 – Forward Gear Manoeuvring
Items have been addressed - refer to amended Civil Engineering drawings included
in Appendix A. The architectural design proposes the use of a vehicle turntable,
which will be designed and documented by others. Utilising this, vehicle swept path
assessments have been undertaken to demonstrate that the vehicle can enter and
leave the site in a forward gear for all parking spaces in accordance with the
AS2890.1.
Should you have any queries with respect to the above, please contact the
undersigned.
Yours Sincerely,
TIM BURKE
RPEQ (25245)
For and on behalf of:
BARLOW SHELLEY PTY LTD
2613 – 17 Bottlebrush Ave, Noosa Heads – RFI Response Letter –15.05.2026 4
TB
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Engineering Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 489 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.