Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix 3 - Stormwater quality management plan

of 42

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Original PDF page 19, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
 

 

PROPOSED BIORETENTION
GARDEN ‘A’ (MIN. 15m?)
FSL APPROX RL 1.30

INDICATES EXISTING
STORMWATER DRAINAGE
SYSTEM TO BE
DECOMMISSIONED.

 

PROPOSED STORMWATER JUNCTION

PIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED OVER

EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE.
VY

STORMWATER OVERFLOW PIPE
FROM RAINWATER TANKS IS.
TO BE CONNECTED INTO THE
BIORETENTION AREA.

 

 

Si

INDICATES EXISTING
STORMWATER PIPE AND PIT
TO BE DECOMMISSIONED,

 

PROPOSED RAINWATER
TANKS (15kL STORAGE a " S|
CAPACITY) Z © |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

[— INDICATES PROPOSED
SEDIMENT FOREBAY AT
PIPE OUTLETS.

 

 

 

 

 

yy

BP SERVICE
STATION

INDICATES PROPOSED FULL
RETENTION SEPARATOR SUCH
AS CLEREFLO FORECOURT
SEPARATOR OR EQUIVALENT.

 

 

ELEC

 

 

 

 

 

 

L

 

 

_WSio

       

 

 

CoH LT UO

2
FALL |S _FALL

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

INDICATES PROPOSED
SEDIMENT FOREBAY AT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pie oyruer. i;
7~ PROPOSED BIORETENTION
GARDEN ‘B’ (MIN. 20m?)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDICATES PROPOSED 55,000L
FUEL STORAGE TANKS.

PROPOSED
PETROL
BOWSERS

 

 

1 tT

  

 

       
        

INDICATES PROPOSED
CANOPY ABOVE FUEL
i BOWSERS.

 

 

    

PIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON
EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE
(APPROX IL 0.740).

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

LEGEND

PROPOSED LANDSCAPING

PROPOSED HARDSTAND

PROPOSED BIORETENTION
GARDEN

 

HANDRAIL OR BALUSTRADING TO
ARCHITECTS SPEC. AROUND
RECESSED BIORETENTION AREA

PROPOSED STORMWATER

 

 

(SIZES TBA)
FALL PROPOSED HARDSTAND FALL
— DIRECTION
—._©0G_____ PROPOSED CHANGE OF GRADE
_ EXISTING STORMWATER
—— FLEC —— EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE

EXISTING WATER MAIN SHOWN
NOMINALLY

EXISTING SEWER MAIN

EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATION
SERVICE SHOWN NOMINALLY

GENERAL NOTES

1. CONTACT EMPIRE ENGINEERING TO DISCUSS
ADDITIONAL OPTIONS FOR DIMENSION AND SETOUT.

 

2. SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY INSITE SJC
(REFERENCE GC15-137 D1).

 

 

 

INDICATES PROPOSED JUNCTION

TO

WARNING

THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SERVICES (E.G. TELSTRA|]
ELECTRICITY, SEWERAGE, WATER & GAS) ARE SHOWN
SCHEMATICALLY ON THE DRAWINGS. PRIOR TO AND
DURING CONSTRUCTION OBTAIN THE PRECISE LOCATION OF

ALL SERVICES (UNDERGROUND & OVERHEAD) FROM THE

RELEVANT AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SERVICE

SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING SERVICES WHETHER SHOWN
ON THE DRAWINGS OR NOT.

 

 

PROJECT NORTH SCALES

1125 at Alo
1:250 at A3

125° 2.5 3.75

———

STATUS
5 6.25m

CONCEPT

 

(TES

 

1. This is the property of the engineer, and may not be
used, copie, oF reproduced wholly, erin part without

the express pernission of the engineer. Infringement

in any way may result in legal action.

Figured dimensions take precedence over scaled.

3. Verity all dimensions on site.

 

 

Date | oft

‘Amendment

 

 

BUNDABERG

GLADSTONE

 

WESSEL PETROLEUM

Project: SERVICE STATION REDEVELOPMENT
CORNER OF MARY ST AND WEYBA RD
NOOSAVILLE

 

(Designed: TLH [Drawn: TLH
‘Approved:

(Gient: [ checked: RAW

 

SUNSHINE COAST

    

 

 

 

 

ROSS WEGNER / RPEQ: 8042

CONCEPT SITE DRAINAGE PLAN

Date: NOVEMBER 2016 |Scate: AS SHOWN

 

Job Ref No: Drawing No: | Issue

 

CC-3668 CONO1 | DRS

 

 

 

 

 
Log in to download the original file

Appendix 3 - Stormwater quality management plan.pdf · 3.9 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.