Council archive · source document
20517 App O.pdf [As Published] · 132007.1259
nosau WAYS Consultants applied to the provision of access to and from all common access and recreation areas to all the residences and to the principal public entry points. In particular Savage SC observed the practice, which he referred to as “notorious”, of “community title schemes on the Gold and Sunshine Coasts and in Brisbane itself” being “commonly let to holiday makers and permanent tenants for parts of the year.” Savage SC found for the complainant and required the Body Corporate compensate the complainant as well as provide the required access from and into all common recreation spaces (including the pool) from both the principal public entrance and the complainant’s apartment. Savage SC also considered that as the average apartment sold for around $700,000 that a defence of economic hardship by the respondent was not appropriate. Whilst the identity of the Complainant and Respondent are the subject of a Confidentiality Agreement, my understanding is that the Building in question is one of the newer high rise apartment buildings (BCA Class 2) at Kangaroo Point in Brisbane. This ruling of the Commission has certainly created some interest amongst Body Corporate Managers and Developers involved in this sector and has implications for this project. The people using these premises will have a range of differing abilities. The Design Issues raised in this Report, will need to be explored and addressed as the design is developed to ensure the final built outcome will minimise the risk of complaint under Disability Discrimination Law. It should be noted that compliance with the Building Code of Australia and it’s referenced Australian Standards does not guarantee that the building will be lawful under State and Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Law. 2 Project Brief The Project Brief agreed to with the client is to provide a disability access assessment of the proposed development, a design guidance report and advice as required to access issues for people with disabilities identified in the above project and specifically as they relate to State and Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Law and to conduct these reviews in an environment framed within the Queensland Building Act. Typical of this type of project, some of the key issues which will be resolved through this consultancy include wayfinding, amenity, access, egress and connections to the external environment. This review examines the referenced drawings and identifies elements of the proposed design which provide potential for complaint by people with disabilities. The Design Issues will be further assessed as the project develops if the client extends the consultancy through the design development and construction phases. The advice in this report is only relevant to the referenced drawings and this project and is not transferable to other projects. 3 Project Drawings/Details Referenced Dwg No acl Dwg No Rev Page: 2 of 23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
20517 App O.pdf [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.