Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach MCU13/0092
Very large file (12.8 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
"
~
t&1t
his 2007 publication"Up Rose An Emu" observed that
"Additional licensed premises, the growth and expansion of
the Surf Club, a drop in patronage, and the overall interest in
other community facilities by the general public may well see
its (The Peregian Beach Bowls Club) demise" how prophetic -
this may turn out to be.
E.S 12 The critical question for the majority of residents of the local
community is are they prepared to forego a local supermarket
(and accept that considerable escape expenditure will leave
the Peregian Beach community) and travel to Peregian
Springs/Coolum Beach/Noosa Junction and elsewhere for their
normal daily and weekly convenience goods, and if not, is the
proposal’s conflict with the Noosa Plan provisions so major that
there are not sufficient grounds to justify approval, despite the
conflict. Such questions grow in significance with the ageing of
the local community, increased fuel costs, and the need to
ensure that needs of future generations of Peregian Beach are
not overlooked.
Information request response
Each issue (and heading) itemised by Council has been provided
below in the same sequence as Council’s Information Request,
with the applicant’s response provided underneath each issue.
As part of this response four (4) amended drawings by Cater Hood
Architects are included at Attachment A. The four plans are listed
in the Table below.
Drawing Number Description
7044-0 dated 02 AUG 13/DA SITE PLAN
7044-0 dated 02 AUG 13/DA GROUND FLOOR PLAN
7044-0 dated 02 AUG 13/DA BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND
SECTION
7044-0 dated 02 AUG 13/DA BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PRELIMINARY ADVICE
Whist the Planning advice from the Pre-lodgement Meeting did
refer to serious conflict, because speciality shops are an
a
inconsistent use in the Noosa Plan’s Open Space Recreation zone,
our subsequent site and locality specific research and detailed
town planning analysis which forms part of our town planning
report, found that the conflict is not considered serious, for the
reasons provided at Section 1.0 (pages 5 and 6) and Section 9.0 of
our town planning report.
2/08/13 Multi Span Australia -
IR response Page 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.