Original source · versioned page text
2018-03-06 S&O Agenda - Attachment 1 to Item 2 - Public Interest Test Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Noosa Council - Public Interest Test Report: Proposed Local Law No. 7 (Waste
Management) 2017
11
Stakeholder Impacts
improper waste disposal practices). This is a low negative impact;
(d) Council will not be able to ensure that persons who generate general waste have
access to appropriate collection containers and are serviced at an appropriate
frequency and that potential health impacts associated with improper waste
disposal and collection are minimised. This is a low negative impact.
If Chapter 5A and section 7 expire and Council makes the proposed local law, the public
health, safety and amenity relating to waste management of owners and occupiers of
premises used for domestic purposes at which general waste is generated will be
preserved by the enforcement of the proposed local law by Council.
In summary, the analysis of the costs and benefits of moving to the alternative
arrangement, that is, not making the proposed local law, would result in a low
negative impact for this stakeholder.
If Chapter 5A and section 7 expire and Council does not make the proposed local law:-
Owners and
occupiers of (a) the public health, safety and amenity relating to waste management of owners
commercial and occupiers of commercial premises at which general waste is generated may
premises at not be preserved. This is a low negative impact;
which general
waste is (b) Council anticipates an increase in the number of waste collection vehicle
generated movements within high density precincts and limited scope for Council to control
the timing of the delivery of these services, creating a range of impacts on
residents and tourists relating to traffic congestion, amenity (noise), and
safety This is a low negative impact;
(c) Council anticipates an increased prevalence of inappropriate (or insufficient)
waste containers being used, presenting potential health risks (including
improper waste disposal practices). This is a low negative impact;
(d) some occupiers of commercial premises (most likely businesses considered
attractive to private waste collection contractors due to the volume and/or nature
of waste generated) may enjoy reduced service costs under increased
competition, but for remaining occupiers utilising Council’s service, service costs
would inevitably increase because the same level of fixed costs would need to
be recovered from a smaller collections base. This is a low positive impact;
(e) Council will not be able to ensure that persons who generate general waste have
access to appropriate collection containers and are serviced at an appropriate
frequency and that potential health impacts associated with improper waste
disposal and collection are minimised. This is a low negative impact;
(f) waste collection contractors other than Council’s contracted waste collection
contractor may only offer specific services, for example, recycling services for
cardboard and paper which are more profitable which could undermine any
existing recycling practices currently adopted by the owners and occupiers of
premises used for commercial purposes. This is a low negative impact;
(g) owners and occupiers of premises which generate limited general waste may
not be effectively serviced for a reasonable price and may pay considerably
higher charges to get waste containers serviced in contrast to Council’s service
under which all waste generators pay the same for the same collection service,
regardless of the location of the premises. This is a low negative impact.
If Chapter 5A and section 7 expire and Council makes the proposed local law, the public
health, safety and amenity relating to waste management of the owners and occupiers
of commercial premises at which general waste is generated will be preserved by the
enforcement of the proposed local law by Council.
In summary, the analysis of the costs and benefits of moving to the alternative
arrangement, that is, not making the proposed local law, would result in a low
negative impact for this stakeholder.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.