Original source · versioned page text
2018-03-06 S&O Agenda - Attachment 1 to Item 2 - Public Interest Test Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Noosa Council - Public Interest Test Report: Proposed Local Law No. 7 (Waste
Management) 2017
9
Stakeholder Impacts
movements within high density precincts and limited scope for Council to control
the timing of the delivery of these services, creating a range of impacts on
residents and tourists relating to traffic congestion, amenity (noise), and safety.
This is a low negative impact;
(e) Council anticipates an increased prevalence of inappropriate (or insufficient)
waste containers being used, presenting potential health risks (including
improper waste disposal practices). This is a low negative impact;
(f) there would be challenges associated with managing waste collection in an area
with a large number of mixed-use and high rise residential developments if
multiple waste collection service providers operate in that environment. This is a
low negative impact;
(g) Council’s ability to meet waste diversion targets and actions developed to meet
statutory obligations established by the State would be significantly reduced as
recycling responsibility shifts from Council led to consumer led. In particular,
given the nature of recycling, where the costs are incurred privately, but the
benefits are realised publicly, the level of demand is expected to be lower than
what would be deemed efficient. This is a low negative impact;
(h) Council anticipates an increase in complaints, for example:-
• waste collection occurring at commercial premises before 5.00am
multiple times a week;
• improper waste disposal, including overflowing bins, bin lids being left
open, broken bins, waste being left next to bins, and strong odours from
bins; and
• bins placed out for collection well ahead of collection times and days or
not retrieved following collection.
This is a low negative impact;
(i) if Council is not able to directly or indirectly limit the number of waste collection
contractors serving a designated area, Council will not be able to:-
• manage the number of waste vehicle collections that occur within the
area and directly control the hours of operation of the collections; or
• control noise issues for residents and tourists as effectively by
• limiting the times during which service providers may undertake waste
collection activities; or
• prescribe appropriate collection containers and the frequency of
collection (with a view to ensuring that any potential health impacts
associated with improper waste disposal and overflowing containers are
minimised and that service standard requirements are met); or
• adequately control Council’s ability to meet targets and undertake
actions set out in the Solid Waste Strategy 2024 in line with statutory
obligations established by the Queensland Government under the
Waste Reduction and Recycling Act 2011.
This is a low negative impact;
(j) it is not clear that the undertaking of waste collection services by additional waste
collection contractors will drive savings given the cost structure of waste
collection services, which is dominated by fixed costs, and hence lends itself to
the benefits of scale. The current tendering process applied by Council in
selecting a waste collection contractor already generates a high level of
competition in relation to cost. This is a low negative impact;
(k) waste management is a highly capital intensive industry with significant
investment in assets. The cost structure gives rise to economies of scale,
whereby the average cost to perform a collection will decline as the number of
properties serviced increases. The ability of Council to tender a large number of
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.