Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Town Planning Report - Adams & Sparkes · RAL26/0023

of 11

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 Town Planning Report



                 Development Application for Reconfiguration of a lot - Boundary Realignment
                 (2 lots into 2 lots)


                 139 & 145 Musa Vale Rd, Cooroy QLD 4563
                 Lot 1 on RP184583 & Lot 2 on SP269273



                 Prepared for
                 James Brown & Emma Eidem


                 August 2026


                 Our Ref: 260720




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                  PAGE 1 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026
Full text of the other 10 pages

Page 2

                 Applicant Details
                 The applicants are James Brown and Emma Eidem. It is requested that all project correspondence is provided
                 to James Brown and Emma Eidem, care of ADAMS + SPARKES. As the subject land comprises two lots in separate
                 ownership, the written consent of the registered owner of each lot accompanies this application.


                 Contact Details and Project Team
                   Specialty Field                    Company                            Contact Person

                   Town Planning                      ADAMS + SPARKES                    Pete Sparkes
                   (Project Manager)                                                     [email protected]

                   Surveyor                           Bennett + Bennett Surveyors        Corey James
                                                                                         [email protected]



                 Document Control and Verification
                 This Town Planning Report has been prepared and reviewed by the identified key personnel, in accordance with
                 the requirements of the Planning Act 2016.


                 ADAMS + SPARKES is led by Directors Cameron Adams and Pete Sparkes, who have a combined experience of
                 over 43 years in both public and private sectors. ADAMS + SPARKES have extensive experience in the
                 management of development applications including residential, commercial, retail and mixed-use
                 developments, industrial projects and mining and infrastructure projects.


                  Project Manager                      Project Assistant
                  Pete Sparkes                         Joseph Taylor
                  Director                             Planning Assistant


                 Confidentiality
                 All information contained within this document is provided in strict commercial confidence and is the property
                 of ADAMS + SPARKES. This document and the information are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and
                 this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which
                 it was supplied by ADAMS + SPARKES. ADAMS + SPARKES makes no representation, undertakes no duty and
                 accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document or the information. This
                 document is not to be disclosed or reproduced in part or in full, without express written authority from ADAMS
                 + SPARKES.


                 © ADAMS + SPARKES TOWN PLANNING




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                 PAGE 2 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 3

                 Contents
                 1      Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4
                 2      Site Details and Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 5

                 3      Proposed Development.................................................................................................................... 6
                        3.1          Proposal Overview .............................................................................................................................. 6

                 4      Statutory Framework ....................................................................................................................... 7
                        4.1          State Planning Policy ........................................................................................................................... 7
                        4.2          South East Queensland Regional Plan 2023 ....................................................................................... 8

                 5      Noosa Plan 2020............................................................................................................................... 8
                        5.1          Assessment of Development Application ........................................................................................... 8
                        5.2          Cooroy Local Plan Code....................................................................................................................... 9
                        5.3          Rural Zone Code .................................................................................................................................. 9
                        5.4          Reconfiguring a Lot Code .................................................................................................................... 9
                                     5.5               Overlay Codes .................................................................................................................... 9

                 6      Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................................................ 11


                 Tables
                 Table 1 Site Details .................................................................................................................................................................... 5
                 Table 2 Statutory Framework Mapping Layers .......................................................................................................................... 7
                 Table 3 Planning Scheme Particulars ......................................................................................................................................... 8


                 Figures
                 Figure 1 Aerial photo of sites (Source: Qld Globe 2026) ............................................................................................................ 5
                 Figure 2 Proposed Boundary Realignment Plan (Source: Bennett + Bennett Surveyors) .......................................................... 6




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                                                                                    PAGE 3 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 4

                 1      Introduction
                 1.     This Town Planning Report has been prepared in support of a code assessable development application
                        for Reconfiguring a Lot – Boundary Realignment (2 lots into 2 lots). This documentation has been
                        prepared by ADAMS + SPARKES Town Planning (hereafter; ‘ADAMS + SPARKES’) for and on behalf of the
                        applicants, James Brown and Emma Eidem, over land at 139 & 145 Musa Vale Road, Cooroy, legally
                        described as Lot 1 on RP184583 & Lot 2 on SP269273.

                 2.     The local government which applies to the subject site is Noosa Shire Council. In accordance with
                        Schedule 8 of the Planning Regulation 2017, Noosa Shire Council is the Assessment Manager for the
                        development application.

                 3.     The applicable planning scheme is the Noosa Plan 2020 (hereafter ‘the planning scheme’).

                 4.     This Town Planning Report will describe the site, the proposed development, and address the relevant
                        town planning matters associated with the proposal. This report should be read in conjunction with the
                        following supporting documentation:

                               Appendix 1      Proposed Boundary Realignment Plan prepared by Bennett + Bennett




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                  PAGE 4 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 5

                 2      Site Details and Characteristics
                 5.     This section will provide details of the subject site and describe the land uses surrounding the subject site.

                        Table 1 Site Details

                          Address                      139 Musa Vale Rd & 145 Musa Vale Rd, Cooroy 4563

                          Property Description         Lot 1 on RP184583 & Lot 2 on SP269273

                          Site Area                    Lot 1 – 6,252m2
                                                       Lot 2 – 4.883ha
                          Registered Landowner         139 Musa Vale: James Brown & Emma Eidem
                                                       145 Musa Vale: William Grove & Robin Purvis
                          Registered Easements         Nil

                          Tenure                       Freehold


                 6.     The site comprises two (2) rural lots on separate titles with both containing existing dwelling houses and
                        associated structures (see Figure 1). The site is situated within the rural hinterland of Cooroy and is
                        characterised by undulating topography. Vehicular access is provided via Musa Vale Road, with the sites
                        located in close proximity to the Cooroy town centre. The site is predominantly surrounded by dispersed
                        residential development on large rural residential allotments.

                 7.     Consistent with its rural setting, the site is serviced by electricity and telecommunications, with on-site
                        water supply, on-site effluent disposal and existing internal drainage servicing the existing dwellings. Both
                        lots will retain sufficient area to accommodate existing and future on-site servicing, and no additional
                        infrastructure is required as no additional lots are created. An aerial photograph of the site is provided in
                        Figure 1 below.




                        Figure 1 Aerial photo of sites (Source: Qld Globe 2026)




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                        PAGE 5 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 6

                 3      Proposed Development
                 3.1    Proposal Overview
                 8.     This application requests a Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot (Boundary Realignment – 2 Lots
                        into 2 Lots). The proposed lot layout is shown on the Proposed Boundary Realignment Plan prepared by
                        Bennett + Bennett Surveyors (Plan No. 261149_001_PROP, Revision A, dated 20 August 2026) contained
                        in Appendix 1 and shown in Figure 2 below.

                 9.     The proposed lot sizes and configurations are consistent with the established subdivision pattern of the
                        surrounding area. The existing lots have areas of 6,252m2 (Lot 1 on RP184583) and 4.883ha (Lot 2 on
                        SP269273), and the realignment does not create any additional lots or alter the total land area. The
                        proposed areas and dimensions are as follows:


                             •      Proposed Lot 1: 1.498ha with a total frontage of 159.41 metres to Musa Vale Road (comprising
                                    two segments of 95.06 metres and 64.35 metres)
                             •      Proposed Lot 2: 4.011ha with a frontage of 28.661 metres to Musa Vale Road

                 10.    Both lots will retain direct access from Musa Vale Road. No changes are proposed to the existing dwellings
                        on either site. All existing dwellings, outbuildings, on-site effluent disposal areas and services will remain
                        wholly contained within the reconfigured lot they serve and will continue to comply with the boundary
                        setback requirements of the Rural Zone Code.




                        Figure 2 Proposed Boundary Realignment Plan (Source: Bennett + Bennett Surveyors)




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                        PAGE 6 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 7

                 4      Statutory Framework
                 11.    This section of the Town Planning Report describes the statutory planning framework applicable to the
                        proposed development.

                 12.    Table 2 below identifies the applicable State designations and mapping and details whether the
                        application requires referral to any referral agencies.


                        Table 2 Statutory Framework Mapping Layers
                          State Planning Policy (SPP)                 Agriculture
                                                                         o Important agricultural areas
                                                                      Biodiversity
                                                                         o MSES – Regulated Vegetation (intersecting a
                                                                           watercourse)
                                                                         o MSES – High ecological value waters (wetland)
                                                                         o MSES - High ecological value waters (watercourse)
                                                                         o MSES – Regulated vegetation (category R)
                                                                      Water Quality
                                                                         o High ecological value water areas
                                                                      Natural Hazards Risk and Resilience
                                                                         o Flood hazard area – local government mapping
                                                                         o Bushfire prone area
                          Regional Plan                               South East Queensland Regional Plan 2023
                                                                         o Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area

                          SARA DA Mapping                             Water Resources
                                                                         o Water Resource Planning Area Boundary

                          Referrals                                A review of the Planning Regulation 2017 has determined that
                                                                   the application does not trigger any referrals.


                 4.1    State Planning Policy
                 13.    The State Planning Policy (SPP) defines the Queensland Government’s policies about matters of State
                        interest in land use planning and development. The SPP only applies to development assessment if the
                        planning scheme has not yet appropriately integrated the SPP. Under Chapter 2, Part 1, Section 8, Item
                        4(a) of the Planning Act 2016, where there is an inconsistency between the SPP and a local government
                        planning instrument, the SPP applies to the extent of the inconsistency. The State interests mapped over
                        the site (agriculture, biodiversity, water quality and natural hazards) have been appropriately integrated
                        into the Noosa Plan 2020 through the corresponding overlays and are addressed in Section 5 of this
                        report. As the proposal involves no vegetation clearing, no earthworks and no additional lots, the State
                        interests are not adversely affected.




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                     PAGE 7 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 8

                 4.2    South East Queensland Regional Plan 2023
                 14.    The site is located within the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area under the South East
                        Queensland Regional Plan 2023. The proposal does not fragment rural land or increase the number of
                        lots, and the total land area remains unchanged. The realignment is therefore consistent with the intent
                        of the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area. Schedule 12A of the Planning Regulation 2017
                        applies to new residential subdivisions in certain zones where new or extended roads are proposed.
                        Schedule 12A does not apply to the proposed development as new or extended roads are not proposed.

                 5      Noosa Plan 2020
                 15.    Table 3 below provides a breakdown of the planning scheme particulars that relate to the subject site and
                        the proposed development.


                        Table 3 Planning Scheme Particulars
                          Planning Instrument                 Noosa Plan 2020

                          Zone                                Rural

                          Overlays                                   Agricultural Land Conservation Area
                                                                     Area Subject to Riparian Buffer Overlay waterways
                                                                          o   MSES Regulated Vegetation – intersecting a
                                                                              watercourse
                                                                          o   Riparian Buffer Area
                                                                     Bushfire Hazard
                                                                          o   Potential Impact Buffer
                                                                     Landslide Hazard Area
                                                                          o   Moderate hazard area
                                                                          o   High hazard area


                 5.1    Assessment of Development Application
                 16.    In accordance with the planning scheme tables of assessment, the following codes are required to be
                        addressed:
                                  Cooroy Local Plan
                                  Rural Zone Code
                                  Reconfiguring a Lot Code
                                  Applicable Overlay Codes (Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands; Bushfire Hazard;
                                   Landslide Hazard; and Agricultural Land Conservation Area)

                 17.    A review of the above codes confirms that the proposed development complies with the applicable
                        assessment benchmarks. The following sections address the benchmarks relevant to the proposed
                        reconfiguration. Where a benchmark is not addressed, it is not considered relevant to a boundary
                        realignment of this nature and no further assessment is warranted.




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                         PAGE 8 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 9

                 5.2    Cooroy Local Plan Code
                 18.    The site is within the Cooroy local plan area and located in the rural hinterland outside the Cooroy urban
                        boundary. The proposal does not extend urban development beyond that boundary, creates no
                        additional lots and leaves the total land area unchanged, consistent with overall outcome (2)(b) of the
                        Cooroy Local Plan Code.

                 19.    The balance of the code addresses built form, streetscape, centre activities and housing within the
                        township and has limited application to a rural boundary realignment. No buildings, works or vegetation
                        clearing are proposed. Character and riparian vegetation and key views to Mt Cooroy and the Black
                        Mountain Range are unaffected by the proposal (PO5, PO6), and no ecological linkage or open space
                        corridor is fragmented (PO21, PO22). Existing effluent disposal areas are retained within the lot they serve
                        and no new access points to watercourses are created, so water quality in the Lake Macdonald catchment
                        is unaffected (PO23, PO24)


                 5.3    Rural Zone Code
                 20.    Overall outcomes (2)(c) and (2)(g) of the Rural Zone Code seek to conserve rural land, avoid fragmentation
                        and limit reconfigurations to those protecting remnant vegetation or riparian corridors. As indicated
                        above, the realignment creates no additional lots and does not change the total land area. The new
                        boundary sits clear of the mapped waterway and riparian buffer.

                 21.    Lot 2 is mapped within the Agricultural Land Conservation Area. The realignment does not reduce its
                        already limited productive capacity (PO1, PO2), and as the dwelling houses are existing, no separation
                        distances apply (AO2.4, AO8.5). Each lot retains a single dwelling house (PO3). No buildings or works are
                        proposed, so building height and scale (PO7), natural values and overland flow (PO11, PO12) and scenic
                        amenity (PO13, PO15) are unaffected. Existing buildings stay within the lot they serve and continue to
                        meet the 10 metre setbacks in AO8.4. Both lots retain safe direct access to Musa Vale Road (AO10).


                 5.4    Reconfiguring a Lot Code
                 22.    Table 9.5.1.3 of the Reconfiguring a Lot Code specifies a minimum lot size of 100ha in the Rural zone.
                        Both lots are already well below this. No additional lots are created, the total land area is unchanged, and
                        no additional dwellings can be established. The realignment satisfies A026(b), as the reconfigured lots are
                        of a more regular shape. Proposed Lot 2 reduces from 4.877ha to 4.011ha but remains a large rural lot
                        with an existing dwelling, keeping its frontage and access to Musa Vale Road and ample area for on-site
                        servicing and rural use. The realignment delivers a better planning outcome than the current
                        arrangement.


                 5.5    Overlay Codes
                 23.    The site is identified as being affected by MSES Regulated Vegetation – intersecting a watercourse, and
                        by a Riparian Buffer Area. The proposed boundary realignment does not involve any operational works,
                        earthworks or vegetation clearing and will not interfere with the environmental values of the site.
                        Furthermore, the proposed boundary does not intersect the mapped waterway or its riparian buffer.

                 24.    The site is identified within the Landslide Hazard Overlay due to the undulating topography of the area,
                        with both moderate and high hazard areas mapped over the site. No operational works or earthworks
                        are proposed as part of this application, no new building envelopes are created, and as such no further
                        assessment is required.




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                      PAGE 9 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 10

                 25.    The site is mapped within the Potential Impact Buffer of the Bushfire Hazard Overlay. No additional lots
                        are created and no new building envelopes are proposed. Both lots retain direct, practical access to Musa
                        Vale Road for emergency vehicles, and each existing dwelling retains adequate area for bushfire
                        management on its own lot. The proposal does not increase the risk to people or property from bushfire.

                 26.    The site is located within the Agricultural Land Conservation Area. The realignment does not fragment
                        agricultural land, does not reduce the total land area available for rural use and does not create any
                        additional lots. The productive capability of the land, albeit limited, is maintained.




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                   PAGE 10 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Page 11

                 6      Conclusion and Recommendations
                 27.    This report demonstrates that the proposed boundary realignment at 139 & 145 Musa Vale Road, Cooroy,
                        warrants approval subject to reasonable and relevant conditions, on the following basis:

                                   No additional lots are created, the total land area is unchanged and results in no additional
                                    dwelling opportunities;

                                   The realignment is consistent with the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area
                                    designation under the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2023;

                                   The proposal satisfies the relevant assessment benchmarks of the Cooroy Local Plan Code and
                                    the Rural Zone Code, including the outcomes directed at conserving rural land and avoiding
                                    fragmentation;

                                   The proposal satisfies the relevant assessment benchmarks of the Reconfiguring a Lot Code;

                                   The proposal satisfies the relevant assessment benchmarks of the applicable overlay codes and
                                    responds appropriately to the site constraints; and,

                                   The proposed lots are consistent with the size, shape and character of lots in the immediate
                                    area.

                 28.    On the basis of the assessment in this report, we request that Council approve the application subject to
                        reasonable and relevant conditions.



                 ADAMS + SPARKES
                 TOWN PLANNING




                 Pete Sparkes
                 DIRECTOR




                 ASTP REF: 260720                                                                                    PAGE 11 OF 11


Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026

Used in these records

About this file

File size
842 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Town Planning Report - Adams & Sparkes.pdf · 842 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.