OPW15/0038 Approved Decision Notice

Officer:	Mark Lewis
Direct Telephone:	5329 6290
Our Reference:	MLEWIS:OPW15/0038
Your Reference:	29shorehaven

24 March 2015

Pile-It Pty Ltd T/A Noosa Jetty Builders
PO Box 672
NOOSAVILLE  QLD  4566

[email protected]

Dear Sir/Madam

Decision Notice
Sustainable Planning Act 2009

I refer to your application and advise that on 23 March 2015, Council decided to approve the application in full subject to conditions.

Details of the decision are as follows:
1.	APPLICATION DETAILS

Application No:	OPW15/0038
Street Address:	29 Shorehaven Dr NOOSAVILLE  QLD  4566
Real Property Description:	Lot 133 RP 839222
Planning Scheme:	The Noosa Plan (16 September 2013)

2.	DECISION DETAILS

The following type of approval has been issued:
Development Permit for Operational Works (Jetty)

3.	RELEVANT PERIOD OF APPROVAL

The relevant period for this development approval is 2 years starting the day that this development approval takes effect.

4.	ASSESSMENT MANAGER CONDITIONS

Approved Plans
Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No.	Rev.	Plan/Document Name	Date
25095-J1		Jetty Plan and Details Lot 133 (No 29) Shorehaven Drive, Noosa Waters Prepared by SCG Consulting Engineers	March 2015
All structures must be designed and constructed such that they are free standing within the waterway and are not connected to or behind the revetment wall
All structures must have no detrimental effects on stormwater drains and/or easements.
Jetties must have a level-walking surface of R.L 1.000 A.H.D or be level with the top of the revetment wall.
A rigid handrail must be fitted on one side of the walkway.
No posts or vertical supports of the proposed jetty are to extend vertically from the structure unless they provide support for the handrail.
No boatlifting devices are to be attached or moored at the jetty structure for the purpose of elevating a vessel above the water without Council approval.
There must be no electrical reticulation system carrying electricity in excess of 24 volts beyond the revetment wall unless all switches and power outlets are positioned above the 1%AEP flood level.
Lighting associated with the use must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with Section 3 of AS4282 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Rock scour protection, wrapped in geotextile, extends from 750mm up to approximately 5000mm from the face of the revetment wall in Noosa Waters. Piles are to be:
Located clear of this rock protection where applicable, or alternatively
Where the scour protection extends beyond 750mm:
Prior to driving piles, the rocks are to be removed to expose the geotextile and the geotextile cut neatly to allow it to be turned back. During pile driving, care is to be taken to ensure the geotextile is not damaged. At the completion of pile driving, the fabric is to be turned down around the pile and the rocks replaced around the piles
The jetty is to be used for private purposes only with no commercial operations to be undertaken.
Boat repair activities are not permitted on site.
Wastewater and sullage must only be disposed of at approved pumpout facilities.
The mooring facility must not be utilised for live-aboard purposes.
Any construction and post construction activity is not to impact on the condition of the waterway, and is to be conducted so as not to breach the Environmental Protection Act EPA (1994) and the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009.
Certification by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland that states that the jetty is constructed in accordance with best practice methods and is structurally sound must be submitted to Council. This certification must be submitted to Council within three (3) months of the completion of the works.  A final inspection and approval of the structure by Council’s Inspector is also required.  Please contact Council’s Planning Assessment Section (Development Audit & Response Officer 0428738563) to arrange the inspection.
This approval lapses where the construction of the jetty has not commenced within two (2) years of the date of issue of the approval, unless application is made and approved by Council for an extension.
After completion, the proposed works must be maintained in a sound state of repair in accordance with the approved plans

5.	REFERRAL AGENCIES

Not Applicable.

6.	ADVISORY NOTES

The following notes are included for guidance and information purposes only and do not form part of the assessment manager conditions:

General Advisory Notes
Council has undertaken an audit check of the Operational Works drawings in relations to the proposed works.  A detailed check of the calculations and drawings has not been undertaken, as they have been certified by a RPEQ.  The RPEQ bears full responsibility for all aspects of the engineering design.  Council reserves the right to require further amendments and/or additions at a later date should design errors become apparent.
The approval or conditions do not absolve the owner of the land from complying with all the conditions of this approval and/or relevant Council By-Laws and Policies and/or relevant statues and/or statutory regulations in the execution and/or performance of said works.
Council reserves the right to call up any performance bond held or levy charges against the property, should emergency works be required to be undertaken by Council to make the site safe due to inactivity on the development site for extended periods of time.
Should any changes or modifications to the approved plans be required as a result of construction constraints, a “Request to change an existing approval” under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 must be made. Amended plans clearly indicating the changes must be lodged with this application along with the appropriate fees.

Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or obtain approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003.
The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that:  “A person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage.”   It is an offence to fail to comply with the duty of care.  Substantial monetary penalties may apply to individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care.  Injunctions may also be issued by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the Act can also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
You should contact the Cultural Heritage Co-ordination Unit on 07 3239 3647 to discuss any obligations under the ACH Act.

7.	PROPERTY NOTES

Not Applicable.

8.	PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OVERRIDING PLANNING SCHEME

Not Applicable.

9.	FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED

Not Applicable

10.	SELF ASSESSABLE CODES

Not Applicable.

13.	SUBMISSIONS

Not Applicable.

14.	REASONS / GROUNDS FOR APPROVAL DESPITE CONFLICT WITH SCHEME

Not Applicable.

15.	RIGHTS OF APPEAL

You are entitled to appeal against this decision.  A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached.
During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval.  If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued.  Only one “negotiated decision notice” may be given.  Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will commence again from the start the day after you receive a “negotiated decision notice”.

16.	OTHER DETAILS

If you wish to obtain more information about Council’s decision, electronic copies are available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au, or at Council Offices.

Yours faithfully

Mark Lewis
COORDINATOR - Engineering

Enc:	Approved Plans/Documents
Appeal Rights

	Appeal Rights SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING REGULATION 2009

The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009  (Chapter 7).
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE, RECONFIGURING A LOT & OPERATIONAL WORKS

Division 8 	Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals

461 	Appeals by applicants
(1) 	An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following—
(a) 	the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application;
(b) 	any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242;
(c) 	the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for;
(d) 	the length of a period mentioned in section 341;
(e) 	a deemed refusal of the development application.
(2) 	An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after—
(a) 	if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or
(b) 	otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant.
(3) 	An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made.

462 	Appeals by submitters—general
(1) 	A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against—
(a) 	the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) 	the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(2) 	To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following—
(a) 	the giving of a development approval;
(b) 	any provision of the approval including—
(i) 	a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or
(ii) 	the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval.
(3) 	However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter—
(a) 	withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or
(b) 	has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii).
(4) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter.

463 	Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications
(1) 	This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies.
(2) 	A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about a referral agency’s response made by a prescribed concurrence agency for the application.
(3) 	However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it relates to—
(a) 	if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (environment)—development for an aquacultural ERA; or
(b) 	if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (fisheries)—development that is—
(i) 	a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or
(ii) 	operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant.
(4) 	Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment—
(a) 	a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive (fisheries);
(b) 	a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2).

464 	Appeals by advice agency submitters
(1) 	Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission.
(2) 	The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about—
(a) 	any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) 	any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(3) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter.
(4) 	However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision.

465 	Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals
(1) 	For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.
(3) 	Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4)	An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.

466 	Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes
(1) 	For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval—
(a) 	if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application—
(i) 	the person who made the request; or
(ii) 	an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the request;
(b) 	if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person who made the request.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on the request under section 376.
(3) 	Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4)	An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.

467 	Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency
(1) 	A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.

[word/footer1.xml]
Page 2 of 7

[word/footer2.xml]
Page 1 of 7

[word/header1.xml]
OPW15/0038

[Attachment: image1.jpeg (image text)]
 

NOOSACOUNCIL Pest 2iopss2esm ——atgroxagngoas
aoe TowotNaoeses — Florssvessi — atoomagagara


[Attachment: image3.png (image text)]
 
 
 

 
 
 

a
mm

  

NOOSA
COUNCIL