Council archive · source document
Properly made submission (object) Ralph Rogers MCU13/0092
"
21. The traffic impacts on the area will be significant for residents in Woodland Drive and
those near the David Low Way intersection. Impacts will include increased heavy
vehicles manouevring and breaking which will not be able to be controlled by conditions.
22. Residents in the surrounding area would not have envisaged a commercial use such as a
shopping centre as being permitted on Open Space zoned land.
23. The shopping centre will result in the use of the Council carpark on the David Low Way
for carparking associated with the shopping centre as patrons from the south will find it
easier to access this carpark. The use of this carpark will reduce the carparking available
for community uses.
24. The location of the shopping centre on the very edge of the Peregian township is not
desirable as there is limited vehicular access to the site and provides limited integration
with the existing neighbourhood centre. This will therefore have significant impacts on the
area as the proposed centre will operate in direct conflict to the existing centre.
25. The applicant’s consultant’s submission that the Eastern Beaches Locality Plan is no
longer applicable is ludicrous and illogical. The consultant’s reference to the 1997
Strategic Plan which is no longer in force is irrelevant and seeks to misinform and
deceive the general public. The application is to be assessed against the current 2006
Noosa Plan. This 2006 plan was not ’updated’ as referenced by the consultant but was a
new scheme for the whole of the Shire. The consultants attempt to discredit the validity of
the planning documents are not able to be substantiated or therefore able to be used as
a sufficient ground for the conflict with the planning scheme.
26. The reference to specific applications as precedence for non compliance with the
planning scheme and undermining of the neighbourhood centre is irrelevant and
misleading as the projects specifically mentioned have been assessed on their merits
noting:
o Peregian Beach Caravan Park closure and subsequent approval for units
and shops. Comment 2006 Noosa Plan indicated that Visitor
-
Accommodation and offices were a consistent use on this site. Does not
undermine planning scheme.
o Closure of Peregian Bowls Club. Comment -
Closure has nothing to do
with Planning Scheme or Council. No impact on Planning Scheme.
o Peregian Beach Hotel -
Comment -
This site was previously a hotel
and continues to be a hotel No impact on validity of the Planning
Scheme.
o Office development on David Low Way Comment -
Offices consistent
use as defined by the planning scheme. No impact on validity of the
Planning Scheme.
o Closure of supermarket in square Comment
-
Closure has nothing to
-
do with Planning Scheme or Council. No impact on validity of the
Planning Scheme.
27. The proposed shopping centre does not fit the Peregian Beach character which states
development is in keeping with the surrounding streetscape and landscape qualities. The
construction of a building that has a 50 metre long wall and incorporates 2.5 to 3.5 metre
high noise barriers is not a desirable solution and does not fit in with the natural
beach side character desired for the area.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Properly made submission (object) Ralph Rogers MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.6 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.