Original source · versioned page text
2020-08-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 AUGUST 2020
Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting, 21 May 2020, Item 8, Page 12
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting
dated 18 May 2020 regarding Application No. MCU20/0008 for a Development Permit for
Material Change of Use – Ancillary Dwelling Unit, situated at 1/33 Gateway Drive, Noosaville
and:
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposed development is not for an Ancillary Dwelling Unit as defined under
section 2.11.5 of the Noosa Plan because:
a) A detached house is proposed on the premises;
b) The proposed dwelling unit is not subordinate to the non-residential use;
2. The proposed development is for a detached house which under Table 11.9 of
Division 10 of the Noosaville Locality Plan is an inconsistent use in the Industry Zone
requiring impact assessment.
3. The proposed development is inconsistent with the Noosaville Locality Code in the
following respects:
a) The proposed use will be incompatible with other uses and works on the
premises contrary to 11.7.2(a)(i) of the Overall Outcomes Division 16;
b) The proposed use fails to protect the subject premises for industrial functions to
the exclusion of incompatible uses contrary to 11.7.2(vv)(ii) of the Overall
Outcomes Division 16;
4. The proposal is inconsistent with Overall Outcomes 14.51.2(a) and (b) of the
Detached House Code as land zoned industrial is not suited for residential use and
would be located in the vicinity of land uses which would adversely impact the
occupation and use of buildings and the site by residents and would result in the
residential development preventing or inhibiting the conduct of existing land uses.
5. The proposed development fails to provide sufficient car parking on site for the
dwelling unit and the non-residential use contrary to Overall Outcomes 14.110.2 c)
and d) and Specific Outcome O7 of the Driveways and Carparking Code.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016
Finance & Risk
It is premature at this stage to provide advice on the likely prospects of the appeal. There will be
costs associated with defending the appeal, particularly if the matter proceeds to trial.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Thynne Macartney – Tim Quirk, Solicitors
Internal Consultation
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer Director Director
Executive Support Community Development Financial Services
Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services x Environment & Sustainable Development Infrastructure Services
Director Director Director
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service x Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 69 of 87
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.