Original source · versioned page text
Negotiated Decision Notice OPW16/0235
Officer: Mark Lewis Direct Telephone: 07 53296290 Our Reference: OPW16/0235 Your Reference: 160206 25 January 2017 Eenie Creek Holdings Pty Ltd Tte C/- Adams Sparkes Town Planning & Development PO Box 1000 BUDDINA QLD 4575 [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Negotiated Decision Notice Sustainable Planning Act 2009 I refer to your application and the representations you made in respect to the decision notice. On 23 January 2017 Council decided your representations. Details of the decision are as follows: application details Application No: OPW16/0235 Street Address: 8 Eenie Creek Rd NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566 Real Property Description: Lot 9 SP 232770 Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan (16 September 2013) Decision details Council on 3 January 2017 decided to issue the following type of approval: Preliminary Approval for Operational Work - Stormwater, Landscaping & Civil works In relation to representations, Council on 23 January 2017 decided to: A. Change the approval description/type to the following: Development Permit for Operational Works – Stormwater, Landscaping & Civil works B. Delete Condition 1 C. Include additional Conditions 2 - 29 D. Delete Advisory Note 1 E. Include additional Advisory Notes 2 – 12 Relevant period of approval The relevant period for this development approval is 2 years starting the day that this development approval takes effect. assessment manager condition Deleted. Additional Conditions 23 January 2017 APPROVED PLANS Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date 1609-LP1 B Landscape Plan prepared by Mark Baldock Landscape Architect 24 November 2016 1609-LP2 B Landscape Plan prepared by Mark Baldock Landscape Architect 24 November 2016 10609-LP3 B Landscape Notes prepared by Mark Baldock Landscape Architect 24 November 2016 216130-S1 A Proposed Industrial Building 8 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville prepared by JTC Consulting Engineers 17 October 2016 216130-S2 A Site Level Plan prepared by JTC Consulting Engineers 17 October 2016 216130-S5 A Stormwater Layout and Catchment Plan prepared by JTC Consulting Engineers 17 October 2016 216130-S6 A Concrete Joint Plan prepared by JTC Consulting Engineers 17 October 2016 216130-S7 A Concrete Details prepared by JTC Consulting Engineers 17 October 2016 216130-S11 B Carpark Layout Plan prepared by JTC Consulting Engineer 23 November 2016 PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS Engineering Tree protection fencing must be installed under the supervision of the Project Arborist. (Refer to Retention of Existing Trees Conditions) All necessary approvals from external service providers (eg Unitywater) and external parties on which the development works are proposed have been obtained and a copy supplied to Council. Copies of the approved plans, duly signed by the consultant Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) must be provided to Council’s Engineering Officer Construction at the “pre start” meeting A condition report including photographs of the frontage of the site must be completed and submitted to council at the prestart meeting / prior to any works commencing. Certificates demonstrating currency of public liability insurance and works insurance covering the works must be submitted to Council at the prestart meeting. Council must be contacted at least 5 working days prior to any works commencing to organise a prestart. The contact number to arrange a pre-start meeting is 5329 6245. The pre-start meeting must include the relevant parties for the following aspects of the works: Civil engineering works; Landscape works; A Construction Management Plan must be submitted to Council prior to the pre-start meeting and must specifically address the following: appropriate traffic signage in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) provision for safe pedestrian access across the frontage of the site both during daily construction and after daily construction has ceased. Any changes to the details associated with the supervising RPEQ or Principal Contractor during construction, must be notified to council in writing within five business days of the change occurring. Any conflict between the development and an existing or proposed service must be referred to the relevant service authority for determination prior to commencement of works. DURING CONSTRUCTION Engineering The developer must meet any costs to repair damage to any Council asset during construction, where damage is a result of the development works. Damage to assets must be repaired immediately where it creates a hazard to the community. In circumstances where the damage does not create a hazard to the community, it must be repaired immediately on completion of the works associated with the development. All works must be supervised by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) who is independent of the Developer and Principal Contractor, and they must certify that all works conform to the Operational Works permit. Where municipal works are involved, such confirmation must be submitted for the respective hold points prior to any site inspection by Council Officers. All works must be constructed and work procedure undertaken in accordance with: The approved plans/documents and conditions detailed in this Decision Notice The relevant conditions of the higher order Material Change of Use approval viz. MCU16/0095 to which this approval relates All relevant Noosa Council Planning Scheme Policies, standard drawings, standard specifications and guidelines The latest version of the Healthy Waterways document “Water Sensitive Urban Design Technical Design Guidelines for South East Queensland” for all water quality devices to be constructed on site Pavement Design and Construction Pavement design for privately owned works must be undertaken in accordance with the relevant standards. Structural integrity of the driveway and car park areas will remain the responsibility of the property owner/developer and must be certified by an RPEQ. Works within Road Reserve/Reinstatement Safe pedestrian access on all streets in the vicinity of the development must be maintained at all times. Should footpath/road closures be necessary to carry out construction works, Council’s Engineering Officer must be notified prior to the proposed closure and all requirements complied with. All frontage works must match neatly with existing road and verge/footpath features. Additional works beyond the frontage may be required to provide an acceptable transition to existing road and verge/footpath profiles. Electrical conduits or other services proposed to be installed within existing and proposed road reserves under existing sealed carriageways, concrete pathways, concrete/sealed driveways or significant vegetation must be installed by boring. Trenching is not permitted, unless specifically approved by Council. Site Access and Driveways Any existing unnecessary or redundant property accesses must be removed, and the kerb, footpath and verge area reinstated to match the existing footpath and/or verge treatments. Grassed verge areas to be reinstated must be provided with 100 mm topsoil and grass seed or turf, and must be maintained by the developer until established. The following must be complied with during the construction of the required crossover/driveway: The driveway surfacing must consist of either an approved hot mixed asphaltic concrete or patterned/plain concrete. The driveway must be constructed so as not to concentrate stormwater runoff onto neighbouring properties Underground service conduits for water supply, electricity and any other services must be provided as part of the access driveway Where there is an existing pedestrian path, a matching crossfall must be provided for the driveway on the alignment of the path, for the full width of the path The property access must be located a minimum of 1m clear of existing power poles, streetlights or other signage. The developer is responsible for any necessary relocation of existing services to provide this clearance and must contact the relevant service authorities and comply with their requirements in relation to these works. Earthworks and Retaining Walls All earthworks shall be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of AS 3798 Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and Residential Development, with geotechnical testing undertaken in accordance with Section 8 of the Standard, and to a minimum of ‘Level 1’ as defined in Appendix B. Test results as required by AS 3798, and a certificate of quality and uniformity of fill shall be provided by a RPEQ and submitted to Council prior to Council signing the Plan of Survey. Stormwater Drainage Appropriate scour protection must be provided at the outlet of all stormwater pipes including temporary outlets. Works associated with this permit must not adversely impact on the existing drainage conditions on other properties (eg by blocking or interfering with natural overland flows). Construction of all internal stormwater drainage works must comply with the relevant section/s of Australian Standard AS/NZS 3500.3. Environment Prescribed Water Contaminants (as defined in the Environmental Protection Act 1994) must not be released from the site or to waters within the site, or be likely to be released should rainfall occur, unless all reasonable and practicable measures are taken to prevent or minimise the release and concentration of contamination. Erosion and sediment control measures must be installed and maintained to minimise erosion on the site and to minimise the export of sediment and associated pollutants from the site. The erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed and maintained in accordance with current best practice standards (refer to advisory notes). Prior to the final inspection of the site all site surfaces must be effectively stabilised using methods which have achieved effective short-term stabilisation and which will continue to achieve effective stabilisation in the medium to long-term (refer to advisory notes). For the purpose of this condition, an effectively stabilised surface is defined as one that does not, or is not likely to result in visible evidence of soil loss caused by sheet, rill or gully erosion or lead to sedimentation, or lead to water contamination. Limit soil exposure on the site to a distance of no more than 2m beyond the extent of earthworks shown on the approved plans except where the exposed soil is effectively stabilised without delay and prior to rainfall occurring. Damage to Services and Assets Any damage caused to existing services and assets as a result of the development works must be repaired at no cost to the asset owner at the following times: where the damage would cause a hazard to pedestrian or vehicle safety, immediately; or where otherwise, upon completion of the works associated with the development. Any repair work which proposes to alter the alignment or level of existing services and assets must first be referred to the relevant service authority for approval. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION / PRIOR TO COUNCIL SIGNING THE PLAN OF SURVEY Certification Upon completion of the work a certificate must be issued by an RPEQ certifying that the works have been constructed in accordance with the Operational Works permit. referral agencies Not Applicable Advisory note The following note is included for guidance and information purposes only and does form part of the assessment manager conditions: Deleted. Additional Advisory Notes 23 January 2017 General Advisory Notes Council has undertaken an audit check of the Operational Works drawings in relations to the proposed works. A detailed check of the calculations and drawings has not been undertaken, as they have been certified by a RPEQ. The RPEQ bears full responsibility for all aspects of the engineering design. Council reserves the right to require further amendments and/or additions at a later date should design errors become apparent. Council reserves the right to call up any performance bond held or levy charges against the property, should emergency works be required to be undertaken by Council to make the site safe due to inactivity on the development site for extended periods of time. Should any changes or modifications to the approved plans be required as a result of construction constraints, a “Request to change an existing approval” under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 must be made. Amended plans clearly indicating the changes must be lodged with this application along with the appropriate fees. Prestart, On and Off Maintenance Inspections Request Contact Council on 5329 6245 to arrange a prestart or an inspection giving a minimum of 5 business days notice of preferred inspection time. If Council officers are required to undertake additional inspections of the same works, a reinspection fee will be applicable in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges register applicable at the time. A minimum maintenance period of 12 months will apply to all municipal works and thereafter until such time as the works are performing in accordance with the approved design unless noted otherwise Environmental Advisory Notes The Environmental Protection Act 1994 states that a person must not carry out any activity that causes, or is likely to cause, environmental harm unless the person takes all reasonable and practicable measures to prevent or minimise the harm. Environmental harm includes environmental nuisance. In this regard persons and entities, involved in the civil, earthworks, construction and landscaping phases of this development are to adhere to their ‘general environmental duty’ to minimise the risk of causing environmental harm. Erosion and Sediment Control Accepted best practice standards include: the Sunshine Coast Regional Council Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control V1.2 or other superseding document subsequently adopted by Council; Best Practice Erosion and Sediment Control, International Erosion Control Association (2008) Landscaping Qualified Person, for the purpose of: Managing Fauna protection is considered to be a certified Fauna Spotter Catcher Public amenity trees are defined as any tree located within public streets, parks or areas that will become publically owned as a result of this development. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or obtain approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003. The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that: “A person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage.” It is an offence to fail to comply with the duty of care. Substantial monetary penalties may apply to individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care. Injunctions may also be issued by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the Act can also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage. You should contact the Cultural Heritage Unit on 07 3247 6212 to discuss any obligations under the ACH Act. property notes Not Applicable preliminary approval overriding planning scheme Not Applicable further development permits required Development Permit for Operational Work – Stormwater, Landscaping & Civil Works reasons/grounds for approval Not Applicable RIGHTS OF APPEAL You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached. During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval. If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued. Only one “negotiated decision notice” may be given. Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will commence again from the start the day after you receive a “negotiated decision notice”. (Refer to Part 8 “Dealing with decision notices and approvals” - Division 1 “Changing decision notices and approvals during applicant’s appeal period” of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.) OTHER DETAILS If you wish to obtain more information about Council’s decision, electronic copies are available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au, or at Council Offices. DECISION NOTICE HISTORY Original Decision Notice 3 January 2017 Negotiated Decision Notice 23 January 2017, change the approval description, deletion of Condition 1, include additional Conditions 2 – 29, deletion of Advisory Note 1 and include additional Advisory Notes 2 - 12 Yours faithfully Mark Lewis Co-Ordinator Engineering Enc: Approved Plans/ Documents Appeal Rights Appeal Rights SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING REGULATION 2009 The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Chapter 7). MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE, RECONFIGURING A LOT & OPERATIONAL WORKS Division 8 Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals 461 Appeals by applicants (1) An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following— (a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application; (b) any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242; (c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for; (d) the length of a period mentioned in section 341; (e) a deemed refusal of the development application. (2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after— (a) if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or (b) otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant. (3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made. 462 Appeals by submitters—general (1) A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against— (a) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or (b) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327. (2) To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following— (a) the giving of a development approval; (b) any provision of the approval including— (i) a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or (ii) the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval. (3) However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter— (a) withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or (b) has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii). (4) The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter. 463 Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications (1) This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies. (2) A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about a referral agency’s response made by a prescribed concurrence agency for the application. (3) However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it relates to— (a) if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (environment)—development for an aquacultural ERA; or (b) if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (fisheries)—development that is— (i) a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or (ii) operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant. (4) Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment— (a) a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive (fisheries); (b) a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2). 464 Appeals by advice agency submitters (1) Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission. (2) The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about— (a) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or (b) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327. (3) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter. (4) However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision. 465 Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals (1) For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person. (3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made. 466 Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes (1) For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval— (a) if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application— (i) the person who made the request; or (ii) an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the request; (b) if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person who made the request. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on the request under section 376. (3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made. 467 Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency (1) A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person. [word/footer1.xml] PD-DA-FM387/1-13/04/2010 Page 10 of 9 [word/footer2.xml] PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected] TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au Page 1 of 9 [word/footer3.xml] Page 8 of 9 [word/footer4.xml] PD-DA-FM387/1-13/04/2010 Page 1 of 9 [word/header3.xml] OPW16/0235 [Attachment: image4.png (image text)] a mm NOOSA COUNCIL
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original