Original source · versioned page text
Reference Documents RAL21 0035
Development provides an effective evacuation route that
For reconfiguring a lot, development does not compromise the remains passable, with sufficient flood warning time, to The flood levels have been assessed in accordance
safety of people resulting from the flood risk associated with enable people to progressively evacuate to safe areas with the trafficability and immunity of the
events exceeding the DFE. above the PMF in the face of advancing flood or waters for evacuation route provided by Jirrima Cr. The
events that exceed the DFE. driveway has been designed to achieve this level
Y of access.
OR
AO4.2
Development provides for an area of sufficient size and
dimensions on site above the PMF that allows for safe
congregation and refuge. Y
AO4.3
Where the existing roads servicing a development provide a
specific flood immunity (as determined by the Qld
Transport Road and Drainage Design Manual, Queensland
Urban Drainage Manual and the Australian Rainfall and
Runoff Guide), all lots have access to the flood free area
identified in Table 8.2.6.5 that matches the road immunity.
Y
PO5 AO5
For reconfiguring a lot or operational works, development does
not directly, indirectly or cumulatively alter the flood In the Flood Hazard Overlay, or in areas otherwise
characteristics external to the development site for all flooding determined to be subject to the DFE or DSTE, development
and inundation events up to and including the DFE or DSTE based ensures:
on:
1. current climate conditions; and 1. there is no loss of on-site flood storage capacity; Y Flood storage is not affected
2. all changes to level, depth, duration and velocity of Some change to depth and velocities arise external
2. incorporating an appropriate allowance for the predicted floodwaters are contained within the site for all flood to the site, however the impacts are confined to
impacts of climate change. events up to and including the DFE based on current the riparian corridor and areas of biodiversity
climate and predicted impacts of climate change at 2100; insigificance therefore the changes do not
N negatively impact adjacent property owners.
3. there is no acceleration or retardation of flows, or any
retardation in flood warning times, elsewhere on the Flood warning times are not impacted by the
floodplain and to any overland flow paths; and Y development.
The proposal does not result in ponding to
4. there is no increased stormwater ponding on sites upstream or downstream properties as a result of
upstream, downstream or in the general vicinity of the site. Y the culvert crossing.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.