Council archive · source document
Development Application Part 2 of 2 - Geotech Report and Plans - OPW13/0816
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (18.0 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
-4-
Job No. 213-15522
,
For design purposes, geotechnical design strengths
(Rct,g) of 500kPa in end bcc:-:r.g C~~
40kPa in lateral capacity would be available at not less than .5m embedment into dense. or
better, sand strata. Uplift resistance parameters can be provided once a piling system has
been considered.
The use of raked piles could also be considered for additional lateral
capacity. Buttressing
revetment rock against the revetment wall, to at least HAT levei, would also contribute to the
passive resistance of the wall, however, it is not recommended the passive resistance
afforded by the revetment rock be considered in the wall design.
A working platform would be required for the installation of
piles and construction of a
suspended footing system to support the replacement revetment/retaining wall.
Options to provide a suitable construction pad include reinstating the revetment batter with
clean sand utilising a berm of revetment rock placed along the creek
frontage
to the
support
sand backfill. Refer Option 1 I Figures 1A and 1B.
It is recommended clean sand be used as wall backfill with a
drainage layer comprising not
less than a 300mm width of 20mm clean, free draining aggregate encased in a ie.
geofabric,
Terrafix SP360 or similar, placed immediately behind the wall and to within 300mm of the
backfill surface. Refer Figure 1 C.
It is essential the wall be constructed with adequate drainage holes to ensure efficient and
long term drainage of the wall backfill. However, it is recommended the replacement wall be
designed for full height hydrostatic pressure.
The following retaining wall soil design parameters are recommended for the
replacement
wall.
Backfill Unit Weight 18kN/m3
Earth Pressure Co-Efficient-Active (Ka)0.36 (280internal friction
angle)
It is suggested piling works be carried prior to stabilising the creek bed and revetment batter
with rock protection in order to inhibit possible impediments to piling works. it is
However,
essential the stabilisation works proceed promptly to inhibit further
degradation of the revet-
ment profile, which is currently encroaching to within 2.0m of the residence, and
possible
loss of foundation support at the rear of the residence.
’#SOIL SURVEYS ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED
1-15522,2013-09-20, LR VER 0
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application Part 2 of 2 - Geotech Report and Plans - OPW13/0816Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 18.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.