Original source · versioned page text
Stevens Gerber Submission MCU 15 0095 115 Eumundi Noosa Road
Attached to the e-mail MCUI15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submissions Object- Principal Tracy Stevens & Others.
Annexure A
Specific Outcome of Code Applicant’s Assessment Submitter’s Assessment
RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE
O9 The subdivision layout is designed O9 Complies: Does not Comply
to facilitate linkages with adjoining The proposal will comply It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
sites in the immediate area. where reasonably applicable. how the DA complies with the Code. The
applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
details have been provided as to how the DA
achieves this specific outcome. The phrase
“reasonably applicable” is unclear and the
specific linkages with adjoining sites in the
immediate area have not been considered or
adequately addressed.
O10 Where the lots are to be used O10 Complies : Does not Comply
for Industrial business or Commercial Landscaped buffering has The layout does not provide for appropriate
business uses, the layout provides for been provided along all buffer areas, to mitigate possible impacts on
appropriate buffer areas, to mitigate boundaries adjoining the the adjacent GSLC. Landscape buffering is
possible impacts on nearby school to the east. insufficient and ineffective to mitigate the
residences or other noise sensitive negative impacts, including those of fugitive
uses emissions of the Development.
O12 An adequate and accessible S12.1- 12.2 Complies Does not Comply
water supply is provided for fire Will comply as applicable. It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
fighting purposes. how the DA complies with the Code. The
applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
details have been provided as to how the DA
achieves this specific outcome. The Applicant
has not adequately addressed the issue of
fire safety and its potential impacts,
particularly given the proximity of the
Development to the adjacent GSLC.
O32 Access easements are in S32.1 Complies Does not Comply
appropriate locations for safe access It is considered that the It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
and egress, and supply appropriate proposed access easement how the DA complies with the Code. The
widths and levels of service for the has been designed in applicant has not satisfied this criteria as
number of vehicles that will utilise accordance with Sections 2 sufficient details have not been provided as
them and 3 of PSP5 Engineering to how the DA achieves this specific
Design Standards – Roads, outcome. The proposed access is not
Drainage and Earthworks. appropriate for the DA and does not provide
safe access and egress, nor does it provide
for the appropriate level of safety of school
children given its proximity to the GSLC
29
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original