Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Glen Crocker - MCU18/0019
••
•• NOOSA COUNCIL
I To ensure your submission is property made you must ensure that:
1. be made to the assessment manager
2 be in writing
' 3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronica
"
4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
5. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your suppor! or oppose and why
6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period
._-----
As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website
and therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not
they are property made.
1. Application details
: File No. MCU181 0019
I Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville
~Nature of P~oposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility)
------------~
, Full name of Submitter l..r-J t\A.I 0 q
-6-
I1 Postal address --;:;1. --\:1-1'""
~Tt ----e--e.s
- - --.
~'I! I
Suburb
I Signature(s)
(J • DD S ~ Vl
.. - .- - .
I State tJ...LO ; Postcode 7;Sl£.. i
II CNe), make the fol.lo_w_in_g_s_u_b_m_is_s_io_n.: . . ~
: 1. I object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is
I Zoned Detached housing. The size and the bulk of the proposal (which is basically one continuous building taking up 11
I lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.
i 2. This immediate are is meant to be Zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility around the comer is
I inconsistent with the intention of the Noosa Plan. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished.
I
, 3. I have been finding it harder and harder to pull out of Juron St onto Goodchap St due to the constant stream of traffic
along Goodchap SI. The proposed development will generate more traffic and make this even harder.
I -------.---- _
14. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site.
: 5. I understand the need for more aged care facilities in the future on the Sunshine Coast, however, they should be
,located in more appropriately zoned areas .
. 6. Goodchap St is already under a lot of strain, with it being used as an over1low car park for the hospital. The proposed
I development will add to this problem with more and more people parking on Goodchap St and nearby side streets.
.-------
i1
I
,•._---------------------------------- ---------
i
r
Prtvacy
Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining In contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Govemment AI:;ts. Your personal information is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information Is dealt With in accordance with council's privacy policy.
www.noos8.gld.gov.au I [email protected] au T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantln Old 4565
I ABN 97 969 214121
Page 1 of 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Glen Crocker - MCU18/0019Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 524 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.