Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

Info response 6 may · MCU21/0212

of 5

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

    26. Amend the proposal to demonstrate compliance with AO20.2, AO20.3 and
        PO20 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code.

AO20.2 and AO20.3 seeks for buildings on sloping sites to not protrude above the
prevailing vegetation and include split level building designs. The proposal retains the 15m
landscaped setback to the coastal boundary and sits amongst the existing vegetation,
whilst also visually complementing by providing rooftop landscaping and areas for large
plantings along the setbacks.

The design is visually responsive to the natural topography and hides much of its bulk
within the site. The design appropriately steps down the slope and provides for sufficient
retaining works as described in the geotechnical reporting to stabilise the site. The high
end materials and finishes including stone, timber and vegetation give the development a
grounded feeling that complements its natural setting and integrates with the landscape
and skyline. The architecturally designed house by the award winning Shaun Lockyer
Architects provides a built form response which does not dominate its natural coastal
setting, rather the design is situated within the landscape and steps down the coastal dune
so as not to dominate adjoining neighbours, the streetscape or when viewed from
Sunshine Beach consistent with the requirements of the code.

Pursuant to the Development Assessment Rules, the applicant has given the assessment
manager the information requested. Please proceed with your assessment of the
application at your earliest convenience.

If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
myself.

Regards,




Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago MPIA MQELA
Planner/Director
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227
                                                                               Page 5 of 5

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.7 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Info response 6 may.pdf · 2.7 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.