Council archive · source document
07/2023 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2023
_ INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD
2.1.1 Is any part of the premises within 100m of a State-controlled road, or part of a future State-controlled road?
OD Yes
[—x] No
If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?
{_] Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
No
IP Regutahon schedule 2 tab’e 2 tems tia) and 3
ACID SULFATE SOILS
2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local government area listed? in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?
[J Ne
Yes
2 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday
ff yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises less than 20m AHD?
(D No
Yes
If yes, will the proposed use involve the following?
* Excavating more than 1,000m? of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD I No [Yes
¢ Filling the premises with 1,000m? or more of material with an average depth of — {%] No OJ Yes
0.5m on land, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD
if yes to elther or both - this application must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as
Advice Agency.
IP Regulation. schedule 2. table 3, tem 4
State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Sous section 3.6
COASTAL HANAGELIENT DISTRICT
2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?
¢ Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district —) No 01 Yes
¢ Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the [] No Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?
© Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, that is the Ez] No 0 Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?
if yes to any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 6
VEGETATION CLEARING
2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?
e Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) [x] No Yes
e = If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation fx) No Yes
IP Regulation schedu'e 2. tabie 3, item 11
CONTALINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE
2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?
(1 Yes - (Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency.
No
IP Regulation. schedule 2. table 3, tem 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/2023 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.