Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Tahlia Davis - MCU18/0019
ale NOOSA COUNCIL colt Notice of Submission
To ensure your submission is properly made you mustensure that: | ean |
be made to the assessment manager |
be in writing |
be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically |
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made-the submission
state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period
CPS Or
As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's
and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of yAté
they are properly made.
1. Application details
File No. MCU18 / 0019
Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville
Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility
2. Submitter details
Full name of Submitter Tol(v Dawn's
Postaladdress /"7 |v.)
Suburb a vi [le State Wha, QLDPostoode 4 5 66
Signature(s)
3. Details of Submission
| (We), make the following submission:
Cresent
| object to the proposed development for the following reasons.
Reasonable expectation
When | purchased my house in Val Crescent | had no expectation that a 90 bed aged care facility would be built in this
quiet residential street. This expectation was totally reasonable given that Val Crescent is zoned for detached houses
only.
The proposed development is in direct conflict with the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive
community consultation. The community expects that the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development
which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed development. A development that would be consistent with the
planning scheme would be expected to be 11 dwellings over 11 lots, which is a very different to a 90 bed aged care
facility which is commercial in nature.
Amenity
The proposed development will have a significant adverse impact on my amenity.
The size, mass and bulk of the proposed 90 bed aged care facility (which is basically one continuous building along the
entire side of Val Crescent) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by detached houses.
The residential character of Val Crescent and the immediate area will be substantially diminished. The proposed
development will fundamentally change the nature and character of Val Crescent which has no units or other multiple
housing, SOXii1is= PRs -p py
Privacy
Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in con act wit! Council i is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your ‘personal information i is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy a)
T 07 5329 6500
ABN 97 969 214 121
www.noosa.qid.gov.au [email protected]
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565
Page 1 of 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Traffic and e access to site As the main commercial entrance to the site will be via Val Crescent, the proposed development will have a negative traffic impact on Val Crescent as it will result in a significant increase in vehicles using the street, particularly commercial vehicles. The additional traffic generated by the proposal will include commercial vehicles such a as delivery trucks, vans ns and trade vehicles. 12.5m = heavy rigid vehicles will also need to access the: site, as well as refuse collection trucks. currently park in the street to access the hosp) The increased traffic on the street will make this more dangerous, particularly for the children and the senior citizens. The site access for commercial vehicles, staff and visitors on Val Cri is ‘inappropriate. ‘Iti is located near ‘the roundabout and. directly opposite three residential driveways. There will be an increased risk that vehicles and trucks accessing the proposed site will have an accident with other vehicles, cyclists | or pedestrians. Car parking The section of Goodchap St near the Noosa Hospital and Val Crescent are already under 2 a lot of strain in terms of car parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for the hospital's staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directly across the road which has up to 35 staff and visitors will exacerbate this problem with more and more people parking or on | Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets. While the proposed development will have a basement car park, I believe it will not be sufficient to meet the car r parking needs of the facility at peak times. Construction The Val | Crescent residents will have to endure the constant n noise, dust, st, machinery operation and trucks of building the facility for at least 14 to 16 months. This is not the building of a detached house we have to put up with, but a major construction site directly opposite our homes. This i is unreasonable given that we live i ina detached housing zone, Need | understand the need for more aged c: care facilities o on n the Sunshine Coast, however, they should be located. ona 1amore | appropriate site. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for this development. Page 2 of 2
Used in these records
PM Submission Object - Tahlia Davis - MCU18/0019Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 626 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.