Original source · versioned page text
2019-03-12 S&O Agenda - Item 6 - Attachment 1 - Regional Facilities Plan for Difficult to Locate Sports
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Regional Facilities Plan for Difficult to Locate Sports (including Implementation Priorities) (Final Draft – February 2019)
3 RECOMMENDATIONS
This section outlines the major findings and the Plan’s recommendations for each of the four sports.
3.1 AVIATION
Activities that fall within this broad category are: General facility requirements are discipline specific and
ӹӹ Hang-gliding it is difficult to determine an arrangement that would
ӹӹ Parachuting accommodate all aviation disciplines at one regional
ӹӹ Gliding and soaring facility (for example model aero and drone use are
ӹӹ Fixed wing small aircraft and ultralights not compatible with Ultra-Light, gliding or parachute
ӹӹ Operation of Model or miniature aircraft (including sport). Similarly, the catchments for the various avia-
Drones) tion disciplines differ. Participants indicated that travel
to facilities with the required level of infrastructure is
Information from aviation related peak/ State level common.
organisations, regional associations and local clubs
indicated that current and emerging trends impacting 3.1.1 Need for Regional Competition
(or potentially impacting) on aviation sports are as Facilities
follows: Considerations for developing facilities/ sites that
ӹӹ Flyers need a formal place to fly. An airfield is the offer regional level infrastructure and competition
best option. The alternative of flying aircraft from opportunities for each discipline are:
council parks, school grounds or the beach is, in ӹӹ Identification and development of one regional
most cases, illegal; level competition model aeronautical site. A
ӹӹ Clubs that have tenure over their airfield do better regional facility could be designed to accommodate
because people are more willing to contribute if additional local clubs/ users if they were required
they have ownership; to relinquish their existing sites/ facilities. At least
ӹӹ The introduction of drones and drone competitions three clubs have indicated no desire or need to
is expanding participants within aviation sport; relocate in the short to medium term, while some
ӹӹ With the exception of model aeronautical activities, have an uncertain future due to tenure issues. A
the aviation disciplines require a launch site and a key existing competition site may need to be de-
landing site (some separate) and both with safety commissioned in the future as a result of impact
requirements that need to be met and maintained; from the Sunshine Coast Airport expansion and
ӹӹ Competitive hang-gliding/ paragliding is best issues with the security of tenure at this site due to
located in inland areas where thermals are more conflicting future land use aspirations by the State
prevalent and reliable, with coastal launching sites government and the requirements of the Sunshine
utilised for recreational and free flying; Coast Council planning scheme. An additional
ӹӹ Landing sites suitable for sport, solo and learner club is currently impacted by a site management
parachutists have declined over recent years; plan that does not envisage model aero as a
ӹӹ On average, across the aviation sports, participation continuing use. Relocation options for these clubs
is static to declining, with the exception being include moving to the preferred regional site or to
paragliding, model aero flyers and emerging drone an alternative local level site that may be found
flying, which are reported as increasing; following further investigation.
ӹӹ Airfields are the best option for most disciplines ӹӹ Requirements for launching gliding and fixed wing
(excluding model aero and drone), preferably with small aircraft, Ultra-Light and parachute transport
secure tenure; are currently catered for across the four airports/
ӹӹ Approval of sites and activities are subject to CASA aerodromes in the study area. No new regional
– in relation to safety of air navigation in the area; facility is needed.
ӹӹ Clubs are generally satisfied with their facilities,
but seeking improvements to current facilities or
security of tenure;
ӹӹ Current and any future facilities (including airfields,
launching and landing areas) are impacted by
proximity to highly populated areas and airports.
13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.