Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission - Hugh Bate - Proforma - MCU21/0110

of 1
Subject: Objection to Noosa Springs hotel MCU 21/0110
From: hbate
Date: 2021-12-20T08:26:02+00:00
To: Mailbox Council Mail

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
External sender. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual or impersonates staff.

Please find attached two petitions objecting to the proposed hotel in Noosa Springs.
I apologise for the lateness but they were sent to me by two members from Sydney and we missed sending them with the other petitions this morning.
Thank you for your attention to this and we appreciate you including them with all the other petitions.
Yours sincerely

Hugh Bate
Ph. 0417 640 241

[Attachment: Objection to Noosa hotel.pdf]
                          Obiection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs


                                                           for comment for a short period of time just before
rt has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened
                                                           away'
Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or
                                                         planning Report of the irnpact upon existing users of
No anarysis has been provided in the Adamson Town
                                                            This impact is significant. The "materialchange of
Noosa springs Resort, including members and residents.
                                                                      Parkridge, Eiysium and The Fairways {795
use,, will adversely affect every person in Noosa springs, The oasis,
properties), resort staff and members

The development fails so many tests:


                                                                                               French Quarter ln
    r   lt isn,t .,boutique", in fact it will have roughly the same nurnber of rooms as the
        Hastings Street
    . At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings
    r Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned "recreational and open space"
    e lt breaches height and setback restrictions
    e Zorring maps indicate it is a "Core Koala Habitat", "a Koala Priority Habitat" and this will be lost
        together with other fauna and flora
                                                                                                   fire evacuation
    r   With potentially ZZ4 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing
                                                                                                        discussions
        risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous rarnifications. Numerous
                                                                                                          Review of
        with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e'g. The Oasis BC
        EmergencY Evacuation Provisions
    o   The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or
                                                                                                 public transport'
        This is just not realistic
    r                                                                                                      gyrn,
        An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa,
        medical faeilities, restar.Irant etc. lt is already over capacity at peak tirnes and the Parking Studies
        iack meaningful analysis
    r   There will be increased noise and activity in an area where nnany elderly people reside and will affect
        the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentiaily their security and safety
    r    The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as avaiiable to residents and
        rnembers with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority
    o   The developers are potentially "double-dipping" as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used
        to build Parkridge.

Many of the above serve to gndermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020

I object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.




 Name                                                  Date




Address


[OCR of page images]
Objection to the Proposed Hote! at Noosa Springs

It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before

Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away.

No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of
Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is significant. The “material change of
use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795

properties), resort staff and members.

The development fails so many tests:

it isn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in
Hastings Street

At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings

Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open space”

It breaches height and setback restrictions

Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost
together with other fauna and flora

With potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation
risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions
with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis BC Review of
Emergency Evacuation Provisions

The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport.
This is just not realistic

An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym,
medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies
lack meaningful analysis

There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect
the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety

The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and
members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority

The developers are potentially “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used
to build Parkridge.

Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.

| object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.

Name

Date

Address

 

Log in to download the original (PM Submission - Hugh Bate - Proforma - MCU21_0110.msg)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.