Council archive · source document
Approved Documents · OPW11/0335
Very large file (25.2 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Matrix Projects (QLD)- Essence of Peregian, David Low Way Peregian Beach QLD 4573 Page 10 4.2 If there is cause for concern and further details are required for a full assessment then the use of diagnostic tools such as Resistograph ®, Picus®, increment borers, soil excavation for root assessment, and Fractometer® testing are used. From either the initial visual assessment or the use of diagnostic tools, failure criteria may be given for each tree assessed, and an informed decision is reached for recommendations. VTA may be used to state to what extent a defective tree is at greater risk of breaking or failure, compared with a completely sound one. In QTRA this is shown as the PoF or in retention value this may result in a lower value. Tree Protection Methods and Roots Tree protection involves the minimising of damage to the tree’s root and vascular system during activities such as construction or installation of root barriers, thus reducing the chance of tree health decline or death, and the possible damage to the structural stability of the tree from root damage. Failure to maintain a minimum tree protection zone may result in declining long term vigour, health and structural stability in a tree on a construction site. All trees to be retained on a construction site should have protected root zones that are measured off the DBH of the trunk via either the Matheny & Clark (Harris 2004, & Matheny & Clark 1998) formula, the British Standards (BS 5837:2005) for protecting trees, or the newly released Australian Standards (AS 4970-2009 Protection of Trees on Development Sites). Using the Matheny & Clarks method a previous understanding of a tree species tolerance to disturbance (good, moderate, or poor) is required to work out the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). This distance calculation is simplified under BS 5837:2005 where a trunk diameter (DBH) times 12 is used, the same for AS 4970-2009. Therefore for this report and management of the tree protection during development, the measurement of TPZ is taken from AS 4970-2009 to calculate impacts and their effects on the trees. In relation to the majority of trees across the site, where fill will be greater than 300mm the retention of trees becomes impossible. Assessment of the bulk earthworks plan indicates that fill will surround all trees, not just one side or part of their required TPZ. Generally fill over tree roots results in reduced aeration of the root zone, therefore leading to root death or dieback, and finally in most instances tree death. Although instances of fill near Melaleuca quinquenervia have been found to have a minimal effect on the tree species under the right situations (personal observations), given the overall age, poor health, and structural condition of the Melaleuca’s on the site and the extensive nature and depth of filling across the site, the result would be tree death and or increased whole tree failures in the future. Leaf and Limb Horticultural ConsultancyO Prepared by Samuel Cowie 11% of June 2009
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Approved DocumentsRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 25.2 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.