Original source · versioned page text
2015-03-03 Planning & Organisation Agenda
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (18.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
AGENDA
Planning & Organisation
Committee Meeting
Tuesday, 3 March 2015
commencing at 1.30pm
Committee Room, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Committee: Crs Frank Wilkie, Noel Playford, Joe Jurisevic, Tony Wellington
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of sections 2 to 88 (of 147)
Section 2
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES -
PRESENTATIONS -
PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT REPORTS 3
DA Planning & Environment 3
1 DEVELOPMENT OF A NOOSA SHIRE KOALA POLICY 3
2 MCU14/0103 MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE APPLICATION FOR A DETACHED
HOUSE IN CONSERVATION ZONE SITUATED AT 146 SOLAR ROAD, COOROY
MOUNTAIN 11
3 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR A
DETACHED HOUSE SITUATED AT 71 SEAVIEW TERRACE, SUNSHINE BEACH
- MCU14/0084 19
4 NEGOTIATED DECISION REQUEST FOR RECONFIGURING OF 3 LOTS INTO 17
LOTS - REC13/0146 SITUATED AT 55 LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE, COOROY 37
Strategic Land Use Planning 68
5 NOOSA COMMUNITY PROFILE & DEMOGRAPHIC REVIEW 68
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORTS 80
Finance 80
6 DECEMBER 2014 QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW REPORT 80
Property and Facilities 98
7 COMMUNITY PURPOSE LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE TENURE POLICY 98
EXECUTIVE OFFICE REPORTS 109
8 NOOSA BIOSPHERE RESERVE MANAGEMENT - FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS
AND LEASE OF DOONELLA HOUSE 109
Community Engagement 127
9 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY AND PROJECT OVERVIEW 127
Governance 134
10 COUNCILLOR REQUEST GUIDELINES 134
11 CONTACT WITH LOBBYISTS POLICY 139
12 PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY 143
CLOSED SESSION -
Page 2 of 147
Section 3
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT REPORTS
(Planning & Development Sections only)
DA Planning & Environment
1 DEVELOPMENT OF A NOOSA SHIRE KOALA POLICY
Author Principal Environment Officer, Peter Milne
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/Fauna Management/Koala
Attachments Noosa Shire Koala Policy-Background Paper
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There have been calls from the community over the years for Noosa Council to consider
measures to protect koala populations in Noosa Shire. The development of a Koala Policy
would build on existing state regulations and guidelines and give local level policy guidance
to future koala conservation efforts. To assist in the development of a Koala Policy for Noosa
Shire, an initial public consultation process is recommended. This will enable Council to
consider a wide range of community views prior to developing the policy. This report seeks
approval to proceed with both the public consultation and also the subsequent development
of a Noosa Shire Koala Policy 2015.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Principal Environment Officer to the Planning &
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 3 March 2015 and:
A. Undertake public consultation through Council’s ‘Your Say Noosa’ webpage to inform
the development of Noosa Shire Koala Policy and through targeted consultation with
key interest groups; and
B. Endorse the development of a Noosa Shire Koala Policy.
REPORT
Koalas are known to occur at a range of locales across the Noosa Shire. Statistics and
anecdotal information suggest that local koala numbers are declining and that additional
management action may be needed. However, more information is required to get a clearer
picture of the numbers, health and long term sustainability of populations. Koala protection
should occur in concert with a range of measures aimed at improving biodiversity throughout
the Noosa Shire. Nonetheless, there is a community expectation that koalas as a species
will receive special consideration. This expectation is reflected in a number of federal and
state government laws and policies. There are also species specific provisions in the Noosa
planning scheme.
1. Planning Instruments & Government controls.
The Australian Government has developed a National Koala Conservation and Management
Strategy 2009-14 and under national law koalas are listed as “vulnerable” in Queensland,
New South Wales and ACT. Under Queensland legislation the koala is listed as “vulnerable”
Page 3 of 147
Section 4
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
in SEQ. Under the Single State Planning Policy Guidelines local councils are required to
address koala conservation and koala habitat offsets to ensure loss of koala habitat is
avoided or compensated for.
The federal government has recently released referral Guidelines to assist proponents and
decision makers in navigating the requirements of the Environmental Protection and
Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act) as it relates to koala conservation. It is the responsibility of
the landholder, owner, business or individual to determine if any new activity or development
requires referral under national environment law.
The South East Queensland Koala Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions 2010
(SPRP) apply to local planning instruments. This is the overarching planning instrument that
regulates new development at the development assessment stage. This incorporates priority
koala assessable development areas. Parts of Noosa Shire are included in this designation.
In relation to planning and development assessment the SPRP supersedes the State Nature
Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan 2006 and Management Program 2006-2016 (koala
plan) and has retained provisions such as sequential clearing, use of a koala spotter and
other matters. The ‘koala plan’ addresses a number of issues and identifies strategies to
help avoid the decline of koalas in relation to habitat protection, controls on vegetation
clearing and reducing vehicle mortality and dog attacks. The koala plan also discusses
issues with translocation and the role of research, zoos, public education and rehabilitation
of sick, injured and orphaned koalas.
If residual impacts on Matters of State Environmental Significance (MSES), such as koalas,
cannot be avoided The Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy (2014) provides the
mechanism for the state Planning Minister to declare an area to be a Biodiversity
Development Offset Area (BDOA). Offsets provisions for koalas have already occurred in the
Noosa Shire (e.g. Settlers Cove development) and will likely occur into the future.
The State's Koala-sensitive Design Guideline: A guide to koala-sensitive design measures
for planning and development activities (2012) provides information for managers, land-use
planners, infrastructure providers and development proponents to benefit koalas. These
guidelines are referred to in the Noosa Plan Biodiversity Overlay Code as a guide for new
development to assist in the survival of koalas and provide for koala movement across the
landscape.
With the complexity of koala legislation and policy, it would be useful to have a simplified
local Noosa Shire policy to help guide koala conservation efforts for Council and the
community.
2. Developing a Koala Policy
A Sunshine Coast Koala Summit was held in September 2012. The resulting report provided
a number of recommended steps to improve conservation of koalas on the Sunshine Coast.
Various koala proponents and activists have regularly put forward ideas for helping conserve
koalas. In addition there are a number of scientists working in South East Queensland who
can provide expert advice on koala conservation. Many residents also have their own ideas
about how koalas in the Shire might be better managed.
In order to develop a Noosa Shire Koala Policy, it is proposed to utilise the Your Say Noosa
interactive portal on Council's website for the purpose of public consultation. A background
paper will be provided on the website with general information on koalas, government
requirements and what a Noosa Koala Policy may consider (see Attachment 1). Links to
National and State koala legislation, policies and plans will also be provided.
Page 4 of 147
Section 5
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Depending on the recommendations received, a range of measures might be considered by
Council for dealing with koala populations in the Noosa Shire. These may include:
a. Habitat Protection.
b. Better understanding of local koala populations.
c. Guidelines for Koala Biodiversity Offsets.
d. Infrastructure to benefit koalas such as signs, wildlife crossings etc.
e. Pest control, particularly wild dogs.
f. Community awareness and education.
As well as soliciting responses on the Noosa Council website, staff will also seek appropriate
advice from identified experts in the fields of koala research and koala conservation.
It is proposed to advertise the public consultation period. The public consultation will
continue for a period of 6 weeks beginning April 2015. Following the consultation process, a
recommended Koala Policy will come to a future Council meeting for determination.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance & Risk
The implementation of a proposed koala policy may require resourcing and consideration in
future budget deliberations.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
The development of the Koala Policy will involve consultation with key stakeholders, experts
and the community.
Internal Consultation
CEO, Director Planning & Infrastructure, Manager Planning and Environment, Principal
Strategic Planner, Executive Manager, Community Engagement Manager, Councillor Tony
Wellington.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Community Services x Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health x DA Planning
Community Facilities x Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
x Executive Office Corporate Services
x Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 5 of 147
Section 6
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1
Page 6 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1
NOOSA SHIRE KOALA POLICY BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PREAMBLE FOR YOUR SAY NOOSA WEBPAGE
Noosa Council is developing a Koala Management Policy to provide direction
for the conservation of koalas in the Noosa Shire. We understand that there is
significant public concern about the future of our local koala populations.
Noosa Council seeks your valuable contribution to this process. Council will
also be liaising with experts working in koala conservation to ensure we have
a viable and responsive Policy.
You are invited to contribute to the development of the Noosa Shire Koala
Policy. Email your thoughts to [email protected]
BACKGROUND DOCUMENT
POLICY PURPOSE
The Noosa Council acknowledges the Noosa public's concerns regarding the
viability of local koala populations. Accordingly Council aims to develop a
Koala Policy. The proposed Policy will dovetail with the Noosa Council's
broader objective of protecting and enhancing Noosa's overall biodiversity
values.
The specific objective of the Noosa Council Koala Management Policy will be:
To provide a coordinated and structured framework to effectively
manage and conserve natural free ranging koala populations across
their range within the Noosa Shire.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT KOALAS
Koalas are an iconic species. As such they attract considerable attention,
funding and effort. They are not the most vulnerable species within the Noosa
Shire, however they are the species that engenders the most concern.
There are four Australian States where koalas exist in the wild. Although it is
often claimed that koalas are nationally "endangered", in fact they are listed
under National legislation as "vulnerable" in Queensland, NSW and the ACT.
They are not declared in Victoria or South Australia. Nowhere are they
currently declared endangered.
In South Australia, particularly at locales such as Kangaroo Island and the
Adelaide Hills, koalas have been introduced and are now abundant in places
where they do not historically belong. In some Victorian locales, koalas are so
abundant that "they put unsustainable pressure on tree species, which poses
a direct threat to the health of forests." (Victorian Koala Management
Strategy)
Page 6 of 147Section 7
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 7 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
At the other end of the spectrum, koala populations in many parts of
Queensland and New South Wales are in rapid decline. The animals here
face an increasing threat from urban expansion, disease, habitat loss, vehicle
strike and predation by dogs.
Koalas are solitary animals and very territorial. They often act aggressively
towards other individuals. Males are more aggressive.
The home range of an individual koala will depend on the habitat including
available food trees. Within a socially stable group, home ranges overlap at
the edges, and that is where any social interaction takes place.
Koalas are very fussy eaters. They consume foliage of certain eucalypts,
although some non-eucalypts may contribute to the diet. Females produce
just one young per year.
It is not known how many Koalas there are in the Noosa Shire area.
Locally, koalas have been sighted at Peregian, Weyba, Sunshine Beach,
Noosa National Park, Tewantin, Tewantin National Park, Tinbeerwah,
Cooroibah, Cootharaba, Doonan, Lake Macdonald, Ringtail Creek, Yurol
Forest, Pomona, Cooran, Kin Kin, Woondum National Park and elsewhere.
Recently there have been verified reports of a koala on Noosa North Shore.
The current population of koalas in the Noosa Heads National Park Headland
section on the northern side of the Park are probably related to the two males
and three females purposely released there in 1966. These 5 koalas were
translocated from forestry sites on Bribie Island.
As the Queensland Koala Conservation Plan notes, small fragmented
populations may result in inbreeding and thus a reduction in genetic variation.
This in turn can reduce the health potential and long-term viability of
fragmented populations.
Koalas are subject to a range of diseases. Most significant and commonplace
is Chlamydiosis, which causes blindness, infertility and sometimes death.
TRANSLOCATION OF KOALAS
Translocation is controlled by the State Government. There are strict rules
that must be met. Currently, koalas must be returned in close proximity to
their place of origin. This is commonplace amongst regulations covering
rehabilitated wildlife generally. It is designed to prevent indiscriminate
translocations and to increase survival rates. Translocating animals to new
areas has the potential to upset existing territories and also spread pathogens
to new populations.
Page 7 of 147Section 8
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 8 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
However the practice of sending koalas back to where they came from may
mean that koalas in dangerous environments are returned to meet further
misfortune.
In discussions about translocation with experts at the Australia Zoo Wildlife
Hospital, it appears that:
a) Koalas tend to be faithful to their home ranges and will attempt to return if
moved out of them. Translocating koalas over 4 years of age, and
particularly males, can be problematic because they have a tendency to
want to find their original territory.
b) It is not a simple matter to transfer koalas from different habitats. For
example, koalas in seaside locales have very different nutrient loads to
those in hinterland environments. Trying to put a coastal koala into an
inland forest and vice-versa is not considered good practice. The experts
also warned that coastal koalas are considerably less healthy as a result
of the poor nutrients in trees growing on sandy soil.
Translocation is a complex issue, and rarely the easy solution that some
people may believe. Noosa Council will need to take a cautious approach to
translocation proposals.
GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS
At the national level, environment protection of the Queensland, NSW and
ACT koala populations as vulnerable species has strengthened the existing
state protections for koalas. National environment protection doesn't mean
that all activities in these areas will require federal environmental approval.
Only projects likely to have a very significant impact on the koala population in
Queensland, New South Wales and the ACT will need to be assessed under
national environment law.
The federal government has released referral Guidelines to assist proponents
and decision makers in navigating the requirements of fhe Environmental
Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act) as it relates to koala
conservation.
At the state level, the South East Queensland Koala Conservation State
Planning Regulatory Provisions 2010 (SPRP) applies to local planning
instruments. This incorporates priority koala assessable development areas.
Parts of Noosa are included in this designation. The SPRP regulates
assessable development only, where that development meets certain triggers.
There are a range of developments to which the provisions do not apply - e.g.
self-assessable developments or those that are declared to be significant
projects under the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act
1977, etc.
Page 8 of 147Section 9
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 9 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The State Government Supported Community Infrastructure Koala
Conservation Policy (2014) outlines how state public sector entities will
consider koala conservation outcomes in the planning and delivery of
government supported community infrastructure such as roads and buildings.
The Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy (2014) provides the
mechanism for the Planning Minister to declare an area to be a Biodiversity
Development Offset Area (BDOA) for the purposes of achieving a net benefit
for koala conservation. Offsets for koalas have already occurred in the Noosa
Shire (e.g. Settlers Cove development) and will likely occur into the future.
Meanwhile the state's Nature Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan (2006)
and the Nature Conservation (Koala) Management Program (2006 - 2016)
prescribe outcomes for Koala Habitat Areas and criteria against which
development in these areas must be assessed. Parts of Noosa Shire are
identified as "Koala Conservation Areas" and also "Urban Koala Areas".
Notably the mapping for these areas excludes some urban locales where
koalas are known to exist, and also ignores the bulk of the Noosa hinterland
where koalas are known to exist. The planning and development provisions in
the Nature Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan (2006) and the Nature
Conservation (Koala) Management Program (2006 - 2016) have now been
superseded by the South East Queensland Koala Conservation State
Planning Regulatory Provisions 2010 (SPRP).
Noosa Council's own planning scheme includes a biodiversity overlay that
identifies potential koala habitat areas derived from state mapping. There are
currently inconsistencies and shortcomings in this mapping. For some specific
developments this mapping may have an impact on vegetation removal,
although not in respect to the clearing for a house site for example.
Koala provisions in the Noosa Plan biodiversity overlay code requires
developments to include measures to assist the survival of koalas and provide
for koala movement across the landscape. The code calls up design
measures in the Nature Conservation Plan 2006.
As guidelines and koala mapping are revised over time, the planning scheme
will need to be updated to reflect these changes.
It is important to note that there are restrictions on what Council can and
cannot do in terms of planning decisions that may impact on koalas. Council
cannot, for example, readily prevent construction of houses on private
property where that development is in accord with other government
instruments and also in accord with aspects of the planning scheme.
WHAT THE KOALA MANAGMENT POLICY MAY CONSIDER
The Noosa Council Koala Policy may consider issues such as:
Page 9 of 147Section 10
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 10 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
1. Habitat protection - where planning instruments allow and in keeping with
other Council policies such as The Environmental Levy.
2. Improved understanding of local koala populations.
3. Improved mapping of local koala populations.
4. Consideration of koala offsets where applicable (see Qid Environmental
Offsets Policy above).
5. Infrastructure decisions - such as koala crossing signs, wildlife crossing
additions as part of new infrastructure, etc.
6. Pest control - particularly wild dogs.
7. Community awareness and education.
Page 10 of 147Section 11
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
2 MCU14/0103 MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE APPLICATION FOR A DETACHED
HOUSE IN CONSERVATION ZONE SITUATED AT 146 SOLAR ROAD, COOROY
MOUNTAIN
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Development Planner, Jack Lewis
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM / Application / MCU14/0103
Attachments 1. Proposal Plans
APPLICATION DETAILS
Applicant Carol Gordon C/ Martoo Consulting
Proposal Development Permit for Material Change of Use for a Detached
House
Properly Made Date 22 December 2014
Decision Due Date 12 March 2015
Number of Submissions Nil
PROPERTY DETAILS
Property Address 146 Solar Road, Cooroy Mountain
RP Description Lot 14 on SP223759
Land Area 4.325 ha
Existing Use of Land Vacant
STATUTORY DETAILS
SEQRP Designation Regional Landscape and Rural Production
Locality Cooroy & Lake Macdonald
Zone Rural & Open Space Conservation
Overlays Biodiversity Overlay (Riparian Buffer & Environmental Protection)
Natural Resources Overlay (Water Supply Catchment)
Natural Hazard (Bushfire Hazard)
Assessment Type Inconsistent - Impact
Page 11 of 147
Section 12
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 3 March 2015 regarding Application No. MCU14/0103 for a
Development Permit for Material Change of Use for a Detached House situated at 146 Solar
Road, Cooroy Mountain and
A. Approve the application in accordance with the following conditions:
When Conditions must be Complied With
1. Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied
with prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times
while the use continues.
Approved Plans
2. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally
comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed
in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
A101 L Cover Sheet prepared by Southern Cross 26/11/2014
Design & Drafting
A102 L Site Plan prepared by Southern Cross Design 26/11/2014
& Drafting
A104 L Ground Floor Plan prepared by Southern 26/11/2014
Cross Design & Drafting
A105 L Elevations prepared by Southern Cross 26/11/2014
Design & Drafting
Landscaping
3. Existing trees on the site and within road reserves must be retained, except
where required to be removed to accommodate the approved dwelling. In this
regard, the removal of native vegetation must not extend beyond the approved
building footprint.
Other
4. Earthworks required on site must be carried out in accordance with Council’s
Planning Scheme Policy PSP5 Engineering Design Standards, so as not to
cause the additional ponding of water on any adjoining lands or concentrate or
direct overland flow on to an adjoining property.
5. The approved dwelling must be serviced with a rainwater tank having a minimum
storage capacity of no less than 60,000 litres.
6. External colours and finishes of the building must comprise muted/environmental
tones that blend with the natural environment.
B. Find the following are sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict with
the Planning Scheme:
1. The proposed development is appropriately sited, will not require the removal of
any existing vegetation within the Open Space Conservation zone, and is within an
existing disturbed part of the site.
2. The proposed house does not conflict with any of the values intended to be
protected by the Open Space Conservation zone and will not adversely impact on
the Mount Cooroy Conservation Park.
Page 12 of 147
Section 13
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
REPORT
1. PROPOSAL
The application seeks approval for a detached house within the Open Space Conservation
zone at 146 Solar Road, Cooroy Mountain. The 4.325ha subject lot has a split zoning (Rural
and Open Space Conservation). A zoning map of the subject site is included below.
In 2008, the Open Space Conservation zoned portion of the lot was excised from the
adjoining Mount Cooroy Conservation Park by the State, so that all existing buildings,
paddocks and fences were maintained within the relevant lot. The boundary realignment
followed the existing vegetation constraints and allowed for existing stock yard structures to
be incorporated within private land rather than state land.
The applicant proposes to locate the new house within an area zoned Open Space
Conservation. The application is before Council as a detached house is an inconsistent use
within the Open Space Conservation zone.
2. SITE DETAILS
2.1. Background
On the 11 September 2008, Council issued an approval for a boundary realignment,
following the State’s agreement to do a land swap with part of lot 14 and the Mount Cooroy
Conservation Park, thereby creating the subject lot (08/1226).
2.2. Site Description
The subject site is 4.325 ha and is located 1.5km to the east of Mount Cooroy. The site
gently slopes from the top of a small spur located along the south western portion of the site
down to the north eastern boundary.
Page 13 of 147
Section 14
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The site is currently vacant with recent earthworks undertaken on the high point of the site to
establish the proposed house site area. Existing vegetation is limited to a strip along the
eastern boundary and scattered trees in the centre of the site.
Access is gained via an easement from Solar Road, which forms part of the Sunshine Coast
Council local government area.
2.3. Surrounding Land Uses
The site adjoins similar sized rural lots. To the north is the Mount Cooroy Conservation Park,
which forms a continuous parcel that contains the majority of the mountain in state
ownership.
3. ASSESSMENT
3.1. Instruments for Statutory Assessment
Under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 the application must be assessed against each of
the following statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the
development:
State Planning Policy;
the South East Queensland Regional Plan;
State Planning Regulatory Provisions; and
The Noosa Plan;
Of these, the statutory planning instruments relevant to this application are discussed in the
sections that follow.
3.2. State and Other Statutory Instruments
State Planning Regulatory Provisions
The proposal is for a single detached house within the Regional Landscape and Rural
Production Area and is consistent with the SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions.
3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The subject site is located in the Cooroy & Lake Macdonald Locality and is zoned Rural and
Open Space Conservation. The proposed use is identified as an inconsistent use in the
Open Space Conservation zone and is required to follow an impact assessable application
process.
Locality Provisions
The Overall Outcomes for the Open Space Conservation zone seek the natural
environmental values warranting conservation status are protected and appropriately
managed to the general exclusion of development.
The proposed detached house is to be located more than 40m away from the natural
bushland areas within the Mount Cooroy Conservation Park. The development is also
located within a disturbed part of the site, previously used for agricultural sheds. The
proposal is consistent with development on the adjoining rural zoned lots and includes
adequate separation to the vegetated areas to the north.
Council’s Principal Strategic Planner acknowledges that the current zoning does not reflect
the current tenure and the land exchange with the Mount Cooroy Conservation Park area,
which occurred in 2008. The current round of amendments to The Noosa Plan do not
propose to make any changes to individual zonings of properties and this matter will need to
be addressed in the new Planning Scheme.
Page 14 of 147
Section 15
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The proposed development is appropriately sited, and will not impact on the adjoining
conservation values of Mount Cooroy Conservation Park, meeting the locality outcomes.
Land Use & Works Provisions
The Detached House Code is the most applicable code relating to the application. The
development generally complies with the code. Standard conditions can be applied relating
to water storage requirements, landscaping and colours of buildings.
Overlay Provisions
The proposed detached house does not trigger assessment against any of the overlays.
4. CONSULTATION
4.1. IDAS Referral Agencies
Nil
4.2. Other Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council specialists:
Coordinator Engineering Assessment
Ecologist
4.3. Public Notification
The application was publicly notified for 15 business days in accordance with the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009. No properly made submissions were received.
5. CONCLUSION
The application is for a detached house within the Open Space Conservation Zone. The use
is identified as an inconsistent use within the zone, subject to impact assessment. No
submissions were made during the public notification period.
Despite the proposed detached house being an inconsistent use within the zone, the
application is recommended for approval for the following reasons:
1. The proposed development is appropriately sited, will not require the removal of any
existing vegetation within the Open Space Conservation zone, and is within an existing
disturbed part of the site.
2. The proposed house does not conflict with any of the values intended to be protected
by the Open Space Conservation zone and will not adversely impact on the Mount
Cooroy Conservation Park.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Community Services x Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health x DA Planning
Community Facilities x Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
Executive Office Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 15 of 147
Section 16
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 16 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1 — Proposal Plans
Sm "40: COUNTY of March
028, : Cs AREA: 4325ha
%,.
és PROPOSED .
3 f RESIDENCE GENERAL NOTES
re a %,
| oe — * B,%. * pres © ocoumencuand cf conecan
aS e %, 2. Te deniing & rot D exceed BS ative te
| POO > Neate! Gere Lm,
+t 36520-———— nog Wfrehas S3/S a Temmtied mo atice enxmsarves tobe
s Zea oe ae \ « Trenepeenpeaeanes
SS La = pw Loca fogs anets
&¥ Se SSA s a
2 pS rh WA\\\ ie SS Stamwane bone men water tw ant
< tf Sarees | \ § iy} \\ \) 2 g © Nicaareipee oe Home UIC Numb ot as
y 7. Atksmensions are m mainetes
| : Sete gi A Me 0 Heamehonte am roter Cngnma’ donagn and dete
\_ tl I | \ {i Sea \ - i 4163 C. & Mi dimeraiore to be checked prter to cormrutien
a ‘ | Ni LX 8 \iiy) ,,
38 PSs) JH} 1
39 LUT Pa,
garwemees |S y— 4, 4 fy }// } - et,
— Ss {ff “ens,
ISSA , "oN
BB oe Xe
8 ee ea
3 ‘3 HE sg
Ly SSF sa or
(PSS et ee
ge
gg
ae 4
} [Name Area |
{ [ving 844m
}
} [Pergok/deck smi
| [Verandah underroott __|54.0m?_|
! Garaget dBm?
} [Garage2_ 4B Am?
{
{ [Pool Decknoroott |2t.am?__ |
[Pool Decknoroot2 21.9? _|
4045,
4.245 Se JEntrance Portico 16.1?
™ mee [eso Se
A Grand total 7578m*
SITE PLAN
Seam 1: 1000
Orounwa Ratranw
Page 16 of 147Section 17
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 17 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
t
-
TT ie | kk
fF Nw |
3 3 1 A wTCO L, {
f AeA NNN if
EULICTINPCRPRT eM TL === TELL Ler
it! Ty “s s|\
ci —— un | \ \\
beer econ | — HN Laks |
——— ENTRANCE a 4 sf \
| PROPOSED STUDIO
PROPOSED GARAGE
{ i : —
| er
‘
Page 17 of 147Section 18
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 18 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
ed
=
Bi IN
- =
— es
i
ip ==
s / | i
, J | J
: i —
yy
©
ees 21 NER
a
i 3
meee !
VS oe >
.
AN : Q
— Ma
Page 18 of 147Section 19
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
3 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR A
DETACHED HOUSE SITUATED AT 71 SEAVIEW TERRACE, SUNSHINE BEACH -
MCU14/0084
DOCUMENT INFORM AION
Author Development Planner, Glen Conforti
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/ Application/ MCU14/0084
Attachments 1. Proposal Plans
APPLICATION DETAILS
Applicant Universal Property Company Establishment
C/ Martoo Consulting
Proposal Development Permit for a Material Change of Use for a Detached
House
Properly Made Date 29/10/2014
Information Request Date Not Applicable
Information Response Date Not Applicable
Decision Due Date 12/03/2015
Number of Submissions Not Applicable (Code Assessable)
PROPERTY DETAILS
Property Address 71 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach
RP Description Lot 1 RP 197117
Land Area 9942m²
Existing Use of Land Vacant
STATUTORY DETAILS
SEQRP Designation Urban Footprint
Locality Eastern Beaches
Zone Rural Settlement and Open Space Conservation
Overlays Biodiversity Overlay – Environmental Protection
Natural Hazards Overlay – Low Potential Acid Sulfate Soils
Natural Hazards Overlay – Landslide Hazard
Natural Hazards Overlay – Medium Bushfire Hazard
Natural Resources Overlay – Coastal Protection Area
Assessment Type Code Assessable
Page 19 of 147
Section 20
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 3 March 2015 regarding Application No. MCU14/0084 for a
Development Permit for Detached House situated at 71 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach
and approve the application in accordance with the following conditions:
PLANNING
When Conditions must be Complied With
1. Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied with
prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times while the
use continues.
Approved Plans
2. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with
the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following
table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No. Rev. Plan, prepared by Date
SK 02.02 P1 Survey Plan, prepared by NRA 23.10.2014
SK 03.01 P1 Level 1 Floor Plan, prepared by NRA 23.10.2014
SK 03.02 P1 Level 2, prepared by NRA 07.10.2014
SK 03.03 P1 Level 3 Floor Plan, prepared by NRA 23.10.2014
SK 05.01 P1 Section 1, prepared by NRA 07.10.2014
SK 05.02 P1 Section 2, prepared by NRA 07.10.2014
SK 05.03 P1 Section 3, prepared by NRA 07.10.2014
SK 05.06 P1 3D Views, prepared by NRA 07.10.2014
Building Height
3. The maximum height of the development must not exceed 8 metres above the finished
ground level and the natural ground surface and 2 storeys.
4. Certification must be submitted to Council from a Licensed Surveyor which certifies
that the building does not exceed the maximum height requirement of this Decision
Notice.
Performance Bond
5. Security in the form of a cash bond or trading bank guarantee to the sum of $40,000
must be submitted to Council, to secure performance of all conditions of this approval,
prior to the issue of a Development Permit for Operational Works. The cash bond or
trading bank guarantee will be returned on performance of the conditions of approval
less any costs incurred by Council in respect of enforcing performance of this permit.
Council reserves the right to call upon the bond or guaranteed sum to effect
compliance with conditions.
Built Form
6. The proposal must incorporate a green roof as indicated on the approved plans.
Page 20 of 147
Section 21
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Setbacks
7. Earth mounding for the green roof must not exceed 1m above the natural ground level
within the southern boundary setback area.
8. The combined height of the block wall and the beam on top of the contiguous piles
along the western boundary must not exceed 1m above the natural ground level.
9. The building must be setback 6m from the southern boundary, except for construction
elements such as contiguous piling and the ‘dry zone’ which must be setback a
minimum of 1.5m at the light court. The contiguous piling and the ‘dry zone’ to the east
and west of the light court must be setback in accordance with the approved plans.
Landscaping
10. All landscaping works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works
approval and Planning Scheme Policy PSP3 Landscaping Plants and Guidelines. A
landscape plan prepared by a suitably qualified person must be submitted and include
in particular:
a. further detail on the ‘green roof’ specific for the development
b. area of the roof that is proposed ‘green’ and areas that are proposed off form
concrete
c. species list and density of plantings
d. incorporation of screening plants along the southern boundary adjacent to the
light court and stairs
11. Existing trees on site must be retained, except where required to be removed to
accommodate the approved dwelling. In this regard, the removal of vegetation must
not extend beyond 3m of the building footprint.
12. No clearing is permitted within the Open Space Conservation zone.
13. All trees being retained and the Open Space Conservation zone must be protected
from clearing or construction activities by:
a. clearly delineating the Open Space Conservation zone boundary with protective
fencing
b. clearly marking vegetation to be retained with flagging tape
c. installing protective fencing around the drip line of the vegetation
d. restricting stockpiling, storage and vehicle parking to those areas which are
already cleared
e. using low impact construction techniques around vegetation.
Coastal Protection
14. External colours and finishes of the building must comprise muted/environmental tones
that blend with the natural environment.
Vehicle Access
15. The construction and associated activities (deliveries, parking, etc.) must not impede
the legal use of the access handle by any benefitted property or person.
Page 21 of 147
Section 22
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Construction
16. A Condition Survey must be carried out on adjoining buildings, structures and services
prior to any demolition, excavation or construction works taking place on site. If
distress already exists, a photographic survey should be undertaken, the distress
measured and a plan to monitor changes to distress must be implemented. Copies of
these surveys must be submitted to Council for its records.
17. A Construction Management Plan for the development must be submitted to and
approved by Council at least 5 working days prior to the commencement of any
Building works or at least 5 working days prior to the pre-start meeting for Operational
Works. The Construction Management Plan shall include but not be limited to:
a. site working hours
b. communication and consultation processes with surrounding premises.
c. control and suppression of –
(i) noise
(ii) vibration;
(iii) dust;
(iv) odours and exhausts control; and
(v) site working hours
d. employee and contractor induction and education processes.
18. A Traffic Management Plan for each separate construction phase of the development
must be submitted to and approved by Council at least 5 working days prior to the
commencement of any works or at least 5 working days prior to the pre-start meeting
for Operational Works. The Traffic Management Plan must include but not be limited
to:
a. limiting the routes for the heavy vehicles to the major road network and define
the route to the site
b. indicate provision for on-site and off-site parking and shuttle buses (if required)
for the required workforce
c. indicate the location of loading and unloading areas within the site
d. indicate the location of any “holding” areas for heavy vehicles
e. operating hours.
19. Construction staff must not park within Seaview Terrace, the Council carpark in
Seaview Terrace, McAnally Drive or any other surrounding street. Parking must either
be on site or at a suitable off-site location serviced via a shuttle bus. Details must be
included in the Traffic Management Plans for the site.
Earthworks
20. Earthworks required on site must be carried out in accordance with Council’s Planning
Scheme Policy PSP5 – Engineering Design Standards so as not to cause the
additional ponding of water on any adjoining lands or the blockage of, or interference
with, any natural watercourses.
21. The use of vibratory equipment of any kind is not permitted to be used (including
vibrating rollers and the use of vibrating installation techniques for sheet piling and
other construction vibrations caused by excavating, earthmoving or demolition
machinery or other similar construction techniques) unless approved and supervised
by a Certified Geotechnical Engineer. Under such circumstances the operator of such
equipment must at all times comply with the directions of the Geotechnical Engineer.
Page 22 of 147
Section 23
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
22. The excavation of the site and the construction of the proposed works must not have
any adverse effects on the stability of adjoining buildings and/or structures and/or
services and/or lands. In this respect, a Registered Professional Engineer Queensland
must supervise the excavation of the site and the construction of the new works to
determine whether any additional measures are required to protect the stability of
adjoining buildings and/or structures and/or services and/or lands.
Site Stability
23. The design and construction of the development must be carried out generally in
accordance with the Geotechnical Study prepared by Morrison Geotechnic Job:
DE14/231 dated October 2014 and the “Structural Design Concept” Job No14517
Issue B prepared by TOD Noosa dated 29 July 2014. The documents must be revised
to include the following:
a. a contingency plan and alternative design should the piled footing system as
designed not be achievable due to unsafe working conditions or unexpected
ground conditions
b. the document must be submitted to Council at the time of Operational Works
approval.
24. Should the recommendations of the geotechnical report or contingency plan require
any part of the works (including excavation, retaining structures, tie backs, etc.) to be
temporarily or permanently constructed within any adjoining property, a letter of
authority from the adjoining property owner(s) must be obtained prior to the issue of
the building permit.
25. A suitably qualified and accredited consultant must undertake a detailed check to
establish that a stable working platform has been constructed in accordance with the
design prior to the use of heavy equipment or plant likely to cause vibrations on the
site. Certification of the works to this stage must be provided to Council.
26. A suitably qualified and accredited consultant must undertake a detailed check to
establish that the screw pile and CFA piles have been installed in accordance with the
design and that the required pile capacities have been achieved. Certification of the
pile systems must be provided to Council.
27. At the completion of the development a suitably qualified and accredited consultant
must provide certification to Council that states that:
a. the development has been undertaken in accordance with the design
b. the development will not have any long term effects on the stability of the subject
site or any adjoining properties
c. the site has a minimum factor of safety against landslip of 1.5.
Stormwater
28. A detailed stormwater drainage design prepared and certified by an RPEQ must be
provided for the development. The works must be undertaken in accordance with an
Operational Works approval and must include in particular:
a. the development must not cause an increase in the volume and velocity of
waters discharged into the existing gully at the north of the house site in a Q2
(0.393AEP), Q5 (0.181AEP), Q10(0.095AEP), Q50 (0.020AEP)and Q100
(0.010AEP) rainfall event
b. all stormwater collected and outlet from the development (including the external
catchment and driveway areas) must be outlet below the level of 26m AHD
Page 23 of 147
Section 24
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
c. stormwater outlets must not have potential to create concentrated flow paths or
generate flows sufficient to erode or scour the loose surface sands
d. all stormwater outlet locations must include energy dissipaters designed in
accordance with QDUM in conjunction with level spreaders constructed parallel
to the contour to facilitate dispersed sheet to disperse flows across the site to
pre development velocities in a Q2 (0.393AEP), Q5 (0.181AEP), Q10
(0.095AEP), Q50 (0.020AEP) and Q100 (0.010AEP) rainfall event at the location
where waters discharge from the level spreaders
e. include detail design which demonstrates that drain outlets do not have any
realistic potential to create concentrated flow paths or generate flows sufficient to
erode or scour the loose surface sands
f. stormwater infiltration pits are prohibited
g. excavation/filling for stormwater infrastructure within the Open Space
Conservation zone must:
(i) be undertaken by hand and not by mechanical means
(ii) be aligned and located to avoid disturbance to existing vegetation
(iii) the exact alignment of infrastructure must be determined onsite with a
Council delegate
h. include Erosion and Sediment Control measures in accordance with industry
best practice (IECCA and the Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control Volume
1.2 by Sunshine Coast Regional Council) to demonstrate that erosion is unlikely
to occur during the construction phase of the development
29. Until such time all construction, landscaping and building works are complete and the
site is effectively stabilised, construction and vegetation clearing activities must be
managed such that appropriate emergency stabilization measures are retained on the
site and implemented prior to rainfall to prevent erosion.
30. Pool water overflow must be discharged to sewer.
31. All site fencing must be installed and maintained to facilitate natural overland flows.
Fencing must not cause collection and concentration of stormwater flows.
General
32. Any damage caused to any public utility during the course of construction must be
repaired to council’s standards and at no cost to Council.
33. Any alteration of any public utility or other facilities necessitated by the development of
the land or associated construction works external to the site must be at no cost to
Council.
34. The transportation of all materials to and from the site must be undertaken in a manner
such that no particle matter escapes onto a public road. All vehicles carrying materials
either to or from the site must be covered to prevent materials including dust being
windblown from the vehicle.
Advisory Notes
Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Levy
1. The QLeave levy must be paid prior to the issue of a development permit where it is
required. Council will not be able to issue a Decision Notice without receipt of details
that the Levy has been paid. QLeave contact: 1800 803 481 (free call) or (07) 3212
6855.
Page 24 of 147
Section 25
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Co-ordination of Operational Works Assessment
2. Additional application fees apply to Operational Work applications where the different
aspects of the works are lodged separately. Significant savings in application fees will
result if all works are lodged in a single application.
Qualified Person
3. For the purpose of preparing a Geotechnical Report, and for certifying geotechnical
stability for the development, a qualified person is considered to be a person who:
(a) is a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ); and
(b) has a degree in civil engineering or engineering geology; and
(c) has a minimum of 5 years experience in the field of geotechnical engineering or
engineering geology.
REPORT
1. PROPOSAL
The proposal is for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use – Detached House.
The 2 storey 1361m² dwelling is triangular in shape and consists of a curved ‘green roof’ and
3 levels. Level 1 includes a games room, cinema, gym, steam room, sauna,
treatment/relaxation room and an outdoor entertainment area overlooking a pool and
Jacuzzi. Level 2 consists of the kitchen, living, media room and seven bedrooms all with an
ensuite. Level 3 comprises vehicular access, 6 vehicle accommodation, office, entry and a
bedroom. The applicant has provided a Stormwater Management Report, Landscaping
Report for the Green Roof, Structural Report, Geotechnical Report and a Preliminary
Construction Management Plan addressing carparking onsite during construction. The
application is before Council as the site is a prominent location. Figure 1 below shows the
proposal inserted into a photo.
Figure 1 – Photo insert of the proposal
Page 25 of 147
Section 26
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
2. SITE DETAILS
2.1. Background
Council approved a Material Change of Use for a Detached House on 3 October 2011. The
dwelling was assessed against the superseded planning scheme and was impact
assessable. A submitter and the applicant appealed Council’s decision. The applicant
subsequently withdrew from the appeal and consequently the house was refused on 1
November 2013.
2.2. Site Description
The lot has an area of 9942m², is rectangular in shape, adjacent to the southern boundary of
Noosa National Park and accessed by approximately a 6 metre wide shared driveway
easement from the Seaview Terrace cul-de-sac. The lot slopes steeply from the western
boundary to the northeast and east toward a small valley within the Noosa National Park and
the frontal dune of Sunshine Beach. The dune within the lot generally curves around towards
the northwest. Its profile is steeply sloping between 23° and 32°, with a variety of coastal
dune vegetation coverage. A wetland fed from a stream flow from Noosa National Park
exists in the northeast portion of the lot. The location of the subject site is shown in Figure 2
below.
Figure 2 - Subject Site is the most northern residential lot adjacent to the Sunshine Beach and Noosa
National Park.
Page 26 of 147
Section 27
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
2.3. Surrounding Land Uses
The lot is bounded to the north by Noosa National Park, to the east by Sunshine Beach
(adjacent to the dog beach) and residential dwellings to the south and west.
3. ASSESSMENT
3.1. Instruments for Statutory Assessment
Under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 the application must be assessed against each of
the following statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the
development:
State Planning Policies;
the South East Queensland Regional Plan;
State Planning Regulatory Provisions;
any Structure Plan or Master Plan in place for declared areas;
any Preliminary Approval Overriding the Planning Scheme for the land;
the Planning Scheme for the local government area; and
any Temporary Local Planning Instrument in place for the local government area.
Of these, the statutory planning instruments relevant to this application are discussed in the
sections that follow.
3.2. State and Other Statutory Instruments
State Planning Policies
The proposal meets the Integrated Development Assessment requirements of State
Planning Policy 2014.
South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan 2009 - 2031
The site is located within the Urban Footprint of the SEQ Regional Plan. The proposal is
consistent with the regional policies of the SEQ Regional Plan.
State Planning Regulatory Provisions
The following State Planning Regulatory Provisions apply to the application:
SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions
The proposal is for an urban activity within the Urban Footprint and is consistent with the
SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions.
State Development Assessment Provisions
The site is mapped as being located in a Coastal Management District. In accordance with
the Sustainable Planning Regulations a Material Change of Use requires referral to the State
where building work is carried out completely or partly in coastal management district that
has a gross floor area (GFA) greater than 1000m². Therefore, the proposal with a GFA of
1361m² is subject to assessment against Module 10 of the State Development Assessment
Provisions – Tidal works, or development in a Coastal Management District State Code.
The State Code seeks to minimise the potential risks from coastal hazard inundation by
maintaining the protective functions of landforms in a coastal hazard environment. The
proposal complies with the State Code as it is setback between 115m – 200m from the
beachfront and between 60m - 120m from the seaward boundary, well above any impacts
from inundation. The native vegetation within this setback is being retained and is also
protected by the Open Space Conservation zoning and the Biodiversity Overlay of the
Page 27 of 147
Section 28
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Planning Scheme. A preliminary Stormwater Water Management Plan has been submitted
by a suitably qualified engineer to demonstrate stormwater can be addressed without
negative impacts on the dune system.
3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The subject site is located in the Eastern Beaches Locality and is zoned Rural Settlement
and Open Space Conservation. The proposed use is contained within the Rural Settlement
zone and is therefore identified as consistent use within this zone and is required to follow a
code assessable application process. No building works are proposed within the area zoned
Open Space Conservation.
Land Use & Works Provisions
The application has been assessed against the Detached House Code. The pertinent issues
arising out of the assessment against the codes are discussed below:
Setbacks
The Code requires a 6m setback to the western and southern boundaries and 20m to the
Noosa National Park boundary. Some areas of the ‘green roof’ earth mounds taper down
into the southern boundary 6m setback. These encroachments are mounded fill designed to
allow the ground level to integrate into the off form concrete ‘green roof’ sub-structure. These
encroachments raise no concern because of the landscaping nature of the encroachment.
However, a condition may be imposed to ensure the off form concrete ‘green roof’ sub-
structure maintains the required 6m and the mounded fill does not exceed 1m above the
natural ground level so not to cause any amenity issues.
The proposal complies with other boundary setback requirements apart from some proposed
structural construction elements such as contiguous piling and retaining walls located within
the western and southern setback areas. These class 10b structures are either sub surface,
at ground level or less than 1m above the natural ground level and are exempt from
Schedule 1 – Setbacks of the Planning Scheme.
The driveway is located along the western boundary within the setback. A retaining wall is
proposed along the length of the driveway to support the structural integrity of the western
neighbour’s pool and for the cut of the driveway. The proposal does not raise any amenity or
privacy concerns as the neighbouring pool deck, built close to the boundary, is considerably
higher (approximately 4m higher) than the driveway and is unlikely to be seen by the
neighbour. The structural design of the retaining wall does not allow for any landscaping
along this boundary. However, the ‘green roof’ design will provide a landscaped view from
the neighbouring property which would be softer than viewing a traditional tile or colorbond
roof finish.
Construction issues
Given the building area is located at the end of an access handle, the lot is steeply sloping
and the scale of the building, the proposal presents some significant building challenges. A
slope stability report, preliminary stormwater management plan and a preliminary
construction management plan have been submitted to demonstrate the development can
be constructed safely and can minimise impacts on the surrounding residents.
Parking raises some concern as the site has limited scope for parking contractor vehicles,
given the site constraints and that Seaview Terrace is narrow and parking is limited to only
the western side of the street. To help mitigate parking problems in Seaview Terrace and
surrounding streets, a condition may be imposed prohibiting construction vehicle parking
along Seaview Terrace or surrounds. This has been highlighted with the applicant and has
been addressed in the preliminary construction management plan.
Page 28 of 147
Section 29
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Open Space Conservation zone
Stormwater infrastructure
Given the sloping site and the sandy nature of the landform it is important that stormwater is
managed properly to maintain slope stability and negate any potential impact on the lot,
Noosa National Park and the neighbouring property. Therefore some stormwater
infrastructure is required to traverse the Open Space Conservation zone to disperse
stormwater below 26m AHD where the landform is flatter. The minor excavation required for
the infrastructure (likely to be 1 or 2 small PVC stormwater pipes) is unlikely to negatively
impact on the environmental values of the Open Space Conservation zone. To ensure the
installation does not impact on the vegetation or slope stability, a condition may be imposed
to ensure that low impact construction techniques are used. An operational works application
is required for stormwater management and installation.
Existing pathway
An existing pathway is located within the Open Space Conservation zone and a Coastal
Protection Area. The path is used for beach access and meanders through the property to
the unformed road reserve of the Esplanade and then to the beach front.
The intent of both the Open Space Conservation zone and the Coastal Protection area
overlay provisions are similar. The Coastal Protection provisions seek to ensure ‘that
development does not cause any significant adverse impacts on the coastal resources’ or
‘interrupt the natural cycles of erosion and accretion’. Over the years the path has integrated
with its surrounds and to date has not caused any significant impacts on coastal resources
or impacted on site stability. In terms of erosion and accretion, the path is constructed of
timber and finishes at the lot’s seaward boundary, which is setback approximately 70m from
the toe of the fore dune. It is therefore unlikely the path will interrupt these natural cycles into
the future, given the substantial setback to the fore dune. Retaining the pathway should not
have any adverse impacts on the environmental values of the land, Noosa National Park or
the fore dune. No works to the pathway are proposed as part of this application. Any future
works to the path would be subject to an operational works approval.
Natural Resources Overlay Code
The Natural Resources Overlay Code for Coastal Protection requires a minimum landscape
buffer of 5m to the seaward boundary and a building setback of 6m. The proposal complies
with these provisions being setback between 60m and 120m from the seaward boundary
and is retaining the existing native vegetation.
General
The proposal is sited wholly within the Rural Settlement zone of the lot where the vegetation
has been interfered with historically. The ‘green roof’ will soften the development when
viewed from Noosa National Park, the beach and surrounding properties. Although there is
some extensive cut and fill on a sloping site, the proposal steps down the slope and will
likely visually integrate into the hillside better than the surrounding traditionally designed
dwellings.
4. CONSULTATION
4.1. IDAS Referral Agencies
The application was referred to the following IDAS Referral Agency:
Concurrence
State Development, Infrastructure and Planning
Page 29 of 147
Section 30
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The Department is a concurrence agency as the proposal is for a material change of use,
being a residential use greater than 1000m² in a Coastal Management District. The
Department had no concerns with the proposal subject to conditions that minimise adverse
impacts on coastal resources and their values.
4.2. Other Referrals
The application was forwarded to Unitywater and the following internal Council specialists:
Engineering Officer
Environment Officer/Ecologist
5. CONCLUSION
The proposal is a large scale dwelling that has been designed within the parameters
contained in the Detached House Code. The applicant has provided specialist reports and
engineering drawings that demonstrate the proposal can be constructed to maintain the
stability of the site, the safety of people and property. The proposal complies with the
provisions of the Detached House Code and the Natural Resources Overlay Code and is
recommended for approval, subject to conditions.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Community Services X Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
Executive Office Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 30 of 147
Section 31
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1
Page 31 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1
v *
A
J ™~
/ ™
\>
if Se
is N
} \
if J
sia 4
Y
as, ——_—— ot ‘
=a
ee ? fe
. a 7
, slat ee, EG /
e a : a %/ oo * : ~ J i
f te if ;
= 2 ho! Dre a 7 =
als 3 a 4) OIE 1 ee , V4
pote) ee ao,
= ii ot
nr@ 2°. SSeS aus
| — |» secon romace aacrne scr | mers ee iii ompes BI | | | |
Page 31 of 147Section 32
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 32 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
5 3 ie oy tie 3 roa d, : }
ed fe ; f mea
a, Ceti, - PITTA LS | enw PF
» ae SAY SORT VST Fe 5 i .
*?) ; ¥ _ ayy iy 5
a¢, Saree ERG PD te |
Coy Oo IM NS>
a
i?
. PRELIMINARY
Page 32 of 147Section 33
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 33 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Baus
_ ys y
ry ~ 7 ape: “= 4
— Pe €
a EF bes ‘i i} = Ky . i a ‘eg
A SIG MS, -BUA
\ - = ~ nN \.! j — ron, _— n oe J ; . wawee
. o oe ee eo J
Oe ating SS an 7 all
2) theta, m 4
nra PRELIMINARY
Page 33 of 147Section 34
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 34 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
to ' a aa
a nt Pee a J _
a cs og na
“— r
mf = 9 pean ci
ey n. i ery _—— >
X — i Ca = a » Ps 2 \ ra y,
=e = OOD ay
Sea etee tt tr epeporh taeee =o" 4
i ta lee see Eat
_ —
as <= cialiaiidheiae
n ra PRELIMINARY
| a |» seven remace DINOS BRAM | wee race cael va[Soeaes BI | | | |
Page 34 of 147Section 35
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 35 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
nese J j Se ce ce ee
i i iy ¥) Pia livia | a0
ee Ma
nra Sn
| —_ [> TEAR TERRACE. TUNED BEECH | emrows ee zi i cari | | | |
Page 35 of 147Section 36
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 36 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
— - Pa |e ae,
oy, . “wed Pas | ~~
. ad ir ee Ss
7 oa -
eS ae ‘4 i
: Ff | |S. 7 ee
|
—_~«
nra PRELIMINARY
| perme fame i” OL LI
Page 36 of 147Section 37
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
4 NEGOTIATED DECISION REQUEST FOR RECONFIGURING OF 3 LOTS INTO 17
LOTS - REC13/0146 SITUATED AT 55 LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE, COOROY
Author Development Planner, Glen Conforti
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/ Application/ REC13/0146
Attachments 1. Proposal Plans
2. Playground Layout Plans
3. Infrastructure Agreement
APPLICATION DETAILS
Valkev Pty Ltd
Applicant
Negotiated Decision Request for Reconfiguring of 3 lots into 17 lots
Proposal
21/11/2013
Properly Made Date
18/12/2013
Information Request Date
06/06/2014
Information Response Date
12/03/2015
Decision Made Date
Not Applicable
Number of Submissions
PROPERTY DETAILS
55 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy
Property Address
Lots 136 & Lot 137 MCH 978 & Lot 2 RP 173883
RP Description
6.04ha
Land Area
Vacant
Existing Use of Land
STATUTORY DETAILS
Urban Footprint
SEQRP Designation
Cooroy and Lake Macdonald
Locality
Detached Housing Zone
Zone
Biodiversity Overlay – Riparian Buffer
Overlays
Cooroy and Lake Macdonald
Assessment Type
Page 37 of 147
Section 38
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 3 March 2015 regarding a request for a Negotiated Decision
Notice for Reconfiguring 3 lots into 17 lots situated at 55 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy and:
A. Agree to change the Preliminary Approval to a Development Permit with a relevant
period of 4 years;
B. Agree to issue a Negotiated Decision Notice and change Condition 1 and 15 to read
as follows:
Stormwater Detention and Flooding
1. The Development must be carried out in accordance with the revised Stormwater
Detention and Flooding Report, prepared by BSM, dated 10 February 2015.
a. Deleted
b. Deleted
Active Park
15. Active park embellishments must be provided generally in accordance with
drawing number 14/005-S01, titled Erindale Park, Cooroy Proposed Park Land
Development Concept Plan, prepared by Play Environment Consulting dated
17.11.14 and 14/005-S02, titled Erindale Park, Cooroy Proposed Park Land
Development Concept Plan, prepared by Play Environment Consulting dated
17.11.14. All works to be dedicated are “non-trunk infrastructure” for the
purposes of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.
C. Execute the Infrastructure Agreement for the provision of Park embellishments.
REPORT
1. BACKGROUND
Council issued a Preliminary Approval on the 18 December 2014 to subdivide 3 lots into 17
lots. The Preliminary Approval was issued instead of a Development Permit because the
applicant provided a flood detention strategy which raised concerns and posed unacceptable
risks to surrounding residents and to Council. A condition was imposed to ensure an
acceptable revised flood strategy was submitted prior to the issue of a Development Permit.
As part of the application the applicant requested to provide a playground in lieu of the Park
portion of the Infrastructure Charges under the provisions of the Sustainable Planning Act
2009. No park embellishments are identified in the Priority Infrastructure Plan and
consequently are not currently identified as Trunk Infrastructure. Therefore, to deliver the
Park embellishments an Infrastructure Agreement was proposed in lieu of the Park Charge
or if the Park Charges is paid, a refund of the Park Contribution amount paid.
The Park embellishments were discussed in the officer’s report at the time it was presented
to Council. The Infrastructure Agreement was not executed at the time as a draft
Infrastructure Agreement was being reviewed by Council’s solicitor.
2. PROPOSAL
The applicant seeks to upgrade this Preliminary Approval to a Development Permit through
the negotiated decision process. The applicant has provided a revised flood detention
strategy in accordance with Condition 1 of this Preliminary Approval. The Infrastructure
Page 38 of 147
Section 39
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Agreement for the Park embellishments has been checked by Council’s solicitor and signed
by the applicant.
The applicant requests:
1. that Condition 1 be deleted as a conventional flood detention strategy has been
provided;
2. the Infrastructure Agreement for Park embellishments in accordance with Condition 15
be executed; and
3. condition 15 be amended to reflect the most recent Park embellishment plans.
A copy of the proposal plans are provided as Attachment 1; the Park embellishment layout
plans provided as Attachment 2 and the Infrastructure Agreement as Attachment 3.
3. SITE DETAILS
3.1. Site Description
The site is traversed by two tributaries of Six Mile Creek, described as the eastern and
western tributaries. The western tributary runs from south to north and the eastern tributary
runs from east to the north west corner of the land. The land is pasture except for a narrow
stand of riparian vegetation along the tributaries and a low lying area to the southwest corner
of the lot. The site slopes gently from the northern boundary toward the tributaries. The
subject site is identified in Figure 1 below.
Figure 3 - Locality Plan
Page 39 of 147
Section 40
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
3.2. Surrounding Land Uses
The land adjoins Lake Macdonald Drive to the east, detached housing lots to the north and
south, parkland and undeveloped Detached Housing zoned land to the west and Community
Services land approved for detached housing lots (applications REC13/0148 and
MCU13/0226 approved on 18 December 2014). The northern portion of land is approved for
detached housing (REC14/0008 and REC14/0009 approved by Council on 18 December
2014).
4. ASSESSMENT
4.1. Instruments for Statutory Assessment
Under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 the application must be assessed against each of
the following statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the
development:
State Planning Policies;
the South East Queensland Regional Plan;
State Planning Regulatory Provisions;
any Structure Plan or Master Plan in place for declared areas;
any Preliminary Approval Overriding the Planning Scheme for the land;
the Planning Scheme for the local government area; and
any Temporary Local Planning Instrument in place for the local government area.
Of these, the statutory planning instruments relevant to this application are discussed in the
sections that follow.
4.2. State and Other Statutory Instruments
State Planning Policies
The proposal meets the Integrated Development Assessment requirements of State
Planning Policy 2014.
South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan 2009 - 2031
The site is located within the Urban Footprint of the SEQ Regional Plan. The proposal is
consistent with the regional policies of the SEQ Regional Plan.
State Planning Regulatory Provisions
The following State Planning Regulatory Provisions apply to the application:
SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions
The proposal is for an urban activity within the Urban Footprint and is consistent with the
SEQ Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions.
4.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The subject site is located in the Cooroy and Lake Macdonald locality and is zoned
Detached Housing. The proposed subdivision for detached housing is identified as
consistent within the zone and is required to follow a code assessable application process.
Condition 1 – Flooding
The applicant requests Condition 1 be deleted as a revised flood strategy has been provided
in accordance with the Condition.
Page 40 of 147
Section 41
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
A Preliminary Approval was issued instead of a Development Permit because the applicant
provided an unconventional flood detention strategy that relied upon the use of vegetation or
“roughness” of the flood plain for flood detention storage and also proposed extensive re-
profiling of the western tributary. This method was considered unacceptable, given the
unconventionality, the risk to surrounding residents and to Council.
The applicant has provided a revised strategy that uses conventional storage and detention
methods without relying on vegetation ‘roughness’ of the flood plain or extensive re-profiling
of the western tributary. Some re-profiling is still proposed but it is within acceptable limits
with the use of geo-fabric and plantings. It is not agreed to delete the whole of Condition 1
but to change Condition 1 to ensure the development is carried out in accordance with the
revised Flood Report prepared by BSM. Therefore the upgrading of the Preliminary Approval
to a Development Permit is recommended to be supported.
Infrastructure Agreement for Park embellishments
The applicant requests the Infrastructure Agreement be executed and Condition 15
reworded to reflect the most recent playground layout plans and the plans indicated in the
IA.
Infrastructure Agreement
The Reconfiguring a Lot Code requires either a Park Contribution be paid or an active Park
is provided in accordance with the Priority Infrastructure Plan. Given there is no active park
(or planned) east of the railway, the applicant sought to provide an active park to offset the
Park Contributions. This request was supported and approved as part of the Preliminary
Approval issued by Council on 18 December 2014.
Council’s Park Project Officer provided an estimated cost of playground equipment as
proposed by the applicant. The proposed playground is determined to be generally
equivalent to the apportioned Park Contribution for the developments identified in the
Infrastructure Agreement being the subject application, REC13/0148, REC14/0008 and
REC14/0009. These developments subject of the Infrastructure Agreement are shown below
in Figure 2.
Figure 2 - Subdivisions subject of IA
Page 41 of 147
Section 42
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The cost of the playground is proposed to directly offset the apportioned Park Contribution of
the Infrastructure Charges or, alternatively a refund of paid Park Contributions or a
combination of both. It has been confirmed by the Director of Corporate Services that
amounts of up to $150,000 can be refunded in the December quarter of the following
financial year after the completion of works. Balance amounts of over $150,000 can be
refunded in the December quarter in the second financial year after completion of the works.
The majority (Stage A) of the Park embellishments will be provided prior to the sealing of the
plans and the basketball half court and rebound wall (Stage B) provided prior to sealing of
the plans of the last subdivision of the 4 applications identified in the IA. Stage A of the Park
embellishments include:
Natural play activity mound including the following equipment:
o Slide
o Boulder steps
o Scramble wall
o Tyre steps
o Rope walk
Park signage, lighting and landscaping to the mound
Raised meeting point
Water supply and connection points
Double swing
Park shelter, settings and benches
Stage B will be provided prior to the sealing of the last plan of subdivision identified in the IA
and consist of:
Basketball half court
Rebound wall
At the time of the Preliminary Approval a draft Infrastructure Agreement was being reviewed
by Council’s solicitor. The Infrastructure Agreement has now been reviewed and signed by
the applicant and it is recommended that Council execute the Infrastructure Agreement. A
copy of the Infrastructure Agreement is provided as Attachment 2.
Condition 15
The applicant requests that Condition 15 be changed to reflect the most recent playground
plans which are also identified in the Infrastructure Agreement. It is recommended that
Condition 15 be amended to reflect the revised plans. Only minor changes to the plans have
occurred, such as the inclusion of an additional water connection point, staging of the works
and a location to be determined for the basketball half court and rebound wall.
5. CONSULTATION
5.1. Referrals
The representations were forwarded to the following Council specialists:
Engineering Officer
Infrastructure Planning and Design
Civil Operations
The flood Strategy was externally peered review by Hydrology & Water Management
Consulting Pty Ltd
6. CONCLUSION
The applicant has provided a conventional flood detention strategy that meets the provisions
of Condition 1 and the Planning Scheme. The Infrastructure Agreement which secures the
Page 42 of 147
Section 43
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Park embellishments has been checked by Council’s solicitor and signed by the applicant.
The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 permits the assessment manager to upgrade a
Preliminary Approval to a Development Permit as part of the Negotiated Decision process. In
this regard, it is recommended this Preliminary Approval is upgraded to a Development
Permit and the Infrastructure Agreement executed.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Community Services X Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
Executive Office Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 43 of 147
Section 44
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1
Page 44 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 1
i a : sascucry anno Pivie
LNETYPE LEGEND (3 STORMAATER GRATE,
ei enna =
TITS Ss Sic
N a wom | oF CORDWoop <= MAX WATTERSON
—— = Sy % PRIVE = +ASSOCIATES
—? — see Se, % es CONSULTING SURVEYORS
ie Ss te m2 he - & PLANNERS
= iat 2 cows} ae
—-= DO RRA 5 ES ieee ep rays
a é ae ae P| 1 Covel PO Box
— stenoonton 99 SH zone \ 3 C QO a Fy 19 Fax. (07) 54425125
— rarmay RP881900 ‘e \ NG —— Boba) s ~Emyy-~~ i Emall. [email protected]
100. eee K
DEVELOPMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING eek UN, \ \ viene & 2 Oy 1 £ cient VALKEV PTY
THE COMPLETION OF STAGES 5 & 6 AND . y eS is Ne
REC13-0148 (Subject to approval) Ye RECIS 00058 a8 &6 Lae t)\ Sang | RPITS809 3 LTD.
(\* <> YY STAGE S\. AQ\ Sf - Oo
| TA ‘Vs \ 14 NPAT PRS
“ eR *4 ‘\ c . ~ Project:
|g } ; ghar Mf orxmaway WS NUS ay ae ra PLAN OF PROPOSED
S69 a a ee Ne” poo PSE )\ RECONFIGURATION
neinnss Wal ( aed WN SE WY ae TS Cy" uy OF LOT 5 ON SP266731
55% [)) 8 8. Oos \\\ is 1.2ha <= SP _ fp §
& d A 4 ee an BRIE Lo B)\ sod cokate noe 85 6 Oo & PARTS OF LOT 137
AD / ABA \\ Sa aca ee J ON MCH978 & LOT 2
YY ik | Oo [—, 4 \\ ; w NIB\ ong / mor ON RP173883.
. vf, . iy Sf 24 mh \\ e Boxe i O53 li (STAGE 3).
i 33 a rn “y ~~ Spo Ig 8 B BR. cea ee Ff 4 PARISH: TEWANTIN
LA Une d | 4.23 659m? IT \ — SA
35 eon? § HH 4 Fs 29, | fame AL. Is aa Ue Poy Aw) Kyo COUNTY: MARCH
f 34°" i i 7) ‘Gos ag J , oe . ‘28. eo eS ae { Zi * Re, 0 HS — 5 LOCAL GOVT: NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
taf 616m? Boi ‘V/ PSTAGE 3 Ray a RNS fe —— i nn LOCALITY: COOROY
STAGE 4“, i i “omar NEW ROAD er SSS fe
a | Sip Ws AL 20 — Z SS) LY a Gi —»
: 56 Sot 3H y Ah § fe 865m* 7 Pore 4 S\SS es Scale: 1:1500 — s
55 BR 2, ¢ ey. r 2p 2.07 | L ‘ 0 S = —- <- Datum: AHD 5 rs
650m? Pon “i } } Is 19 x S e O42m* Se 3 so ant Origin; PM 178243
s 57 ii ye 660m? ¥ ¥ > 9 99": RL 108.138 .
ge |, 831m § ( Y5.16W td , ge 6 Se Cont. Int: 0.5m 030 APs
Sa hod |! Vs a A P OMe <So, is
o 6 SR HL S60 en* =| 18 4 Sy oO NOTE:
SO emxPy 00 * peed 990mg Zope naP This plan has been prepared for application
y8P218739 3) | Pare = , CA cre purposes only and may be subject to change.
7 % - | ere 7 og a wr Q100 INUNDATION LINE PLOTTED FROM STORMWATER approtiate ony and subj! to nel survey.
RESERVE OPEN SPACE | G » Z, “ ions and areas are
/ & DETENTION & FLOODING REPORT PREPARED BY
8 tM fe v BRISBANE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
“Go 9 100 ty _ PLACE & Scale 1:1500 - Lengths are in Metres
SP218739 ~
RESERVE OPEN SPACE 10 11, £ 15 0 |
Se 12 yy
219650
Page 44 of 147Section 45
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 45 of 147
COWMON NANE ZONE B] ZONE \ EASTERN TREUIARY I | pron] } 5 f ae | Callaghan & Toth
GROUND COVERS / GRASSES Ngo | | } | | ‘fh Civil, Environmental &
[___Caleenioene dubia | Soft bracken - [28 | 35 | eS | | | )y) Hiydrautie Engineers
[Dianella caeruis | Common Flax tiy | 28 | so | 50_| ~ ee | | we Poo 298
| Dedonea triquetra | ‘Hop bush | ~~‘ ast 9 CA | | yaya, sta Nats aH
[__Gobnia espero | _Sonseage | - | 26 | 36 | Be = (4 pf | prone erste fr 514804
[_____temenara Hysrtix | Creek Mat Rush | 28 | so 100_| STAGE 5] Kaba ee rrectloporantothconat
| tomenda tongifein | _Mat Rush ‘| 25 | 50 | 100_| \ ha Se STAGE 5 —I-- Tau HID DERED
a) Co N | [omnes fac] on com 2"
_TTCSd ZONECl [stace_5 | Rass N
PASSIVE ba pervs
|__Ninio caersieo | Native Gnger_—-‘[- [27 | #0 | PARKLAND \ f, 5 Ba STAGE 5 I SURED EY
| Baeknousie citrodara | Lemon Scented Myre | 20 | 25 | 40 | tom Sy owe ToP eA A MAX WATTERSION & ASSOCIATES
| Becerousio mytifoia | Cinnamon myrtle | - | 26 | 40 _| ‘ "am Fou an TORK VS RP173883 PHONE 54 426 121
| Breynia obiongitoia | Native Coffee | - | 26 | 40 _| a A
| Caticorpe pendunculata | Notive tontona | 20 | 28 | 40 _| \ oo BB | (woe
|____Cordyine rubro | Red trited polm iy | 20 | 28 | 40 _| stace 5 | aut [Stace 5 || PROPOSED 31 LOT SUBDMSION
7 ‘ - > Oba < &
|__Homalanthus nutens | Bleeding Heort ‘| - | 26 | 40 _| Greater setback — Len | ei, J] 55 LAKE MacDONALD DRIVE
|__Hibiscus neterephylus | wid Roseta | - | 26 | 40 _| ~~ ES CAG ff COOROY
| Nacaranga tanorius | Sucks Heart ———‘[ ta | 28 | 40 | acTIMifrom top of bank. So aA 10 ae,
sae 1m FROM BANK TOPRGS, = OPS uy +
[__ Meioleuca sive [| SSSCSC~iYOC*dBSC*YC | PARKLA'See Conditions " ey WA n | le
[tora 261400] 685MREC14/0008 Ya Snore TS (cian
a AD [STAGE 6] ne fe
a — — \ me ><) | VALKEV PTY LTD
— \ = , i 0 Ee
[____Aphitonia excelss | Red ash <i —~i| ——SidY | so a) ie YY +} (ey
o&% \ ZONE 8B | ROY Mag. —__/ $A
| Brochyeniton discotour | _Kurraiong «| iY SSS*| S| “4, Meo By sf i
| Cotistemon Salignus | White bottie ousn | —~(t | 40 Xe a BS 12 ae
[__Cerybia gummitera | Pink Sloodwoos | 15 | 40 | 40 _| \ GS 4 by \ 9 Revecer
|[_Cryptocarye cbovate | Penperberry Tree [15 | 40 | 40 | ‘ ee 1h _ "presi [STAGE 6] \>] | MANAGEMENT. PLAN — EASTERN
4p> x j &\ ATION & REHABILTATION
|_Groptocorya tripinenis | Three-veined Crypocna | | «| 40_—| _ 3 $e STAGE 2 | © | LIRIBUTARY STAGE 5 & 6
[__Eloccorpus grandis | Ove Quandong | | | 40 _| \ \\ 3 OMPLETED}
| Eucoyptus gronais | Flooded Gum | | | #0 _| ‘ ‘ —L
~ § gw [Ence 6) .
[Eucalyptus resinifera | ~——sRed Mohogony ———=«'15—=«| #0—«| =| . STAGE 6 | |] LOT 136 on MCH978
[____Fieus coronata | Creek Sandpiper Fig |__| 40 | 40 _| 5 \ wend
| Fieus macrepnyia | Moreton Bay fig [18 | 40 | 40 _| STAGE 3 we \ = _ &25]]| Parish of TEWANTIN
| Flindersio senottiana | __Bumpy Asn | | +t _40_| (FUTURE) Sf a “mic || County of MARCH
| Giechidion ferainanai | Cheese vee | +(| +t -40_| " CS EEE REFER TO 125-08 “<7 /| | SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
| Gmeiina ieichnarativ | White beech <i —*(| ——*«Y|— #0 EET T7100 [FoR 80 BASN oeias *"/ |) locality of LAKE MacDONALD
[__Grevites robusta [| _Siky Oe ‘(15 | | #0 _| PPARON_ MAPPING DOWSTRENN ark (i
[_vegera pseudorus | Foombok —*| ——+(| 0 | 40 | OF THIS. POINT, STREAM. BANK 7 vA
|_Leehestemon confertus | Srushtox | ——*«(t +t 40 —[eounett mPaRin OVERLAY]
USED FOR START OF BUFFER = oo ‘SOUTHERN EXTENT OF Lin,
| neisteuce Inerifois | Facieoves Popersax [18 | 40 | «0_| SS tN
| Welcope elleryona | Pink Evo Sd | Yn a “Ws OF CREEK ExcH Ste) ~~] [Soe
| Ropeneo veriabiis | _Nuttenwooa «|| iY “ZONE C - - ne ,
|___Stereulia quedrfga [Peanut wee (| —*(| ——*iY|~ #0 g |] sce us seme cna sxe sxc
ONE A sa] | My BEM wee
| —“Syncorpio glomutifers | Turpentine [15 | #0 | #0 _| SS Ra. ZONE AT (3) Ge tay diosa Pore
[_Syzyium oustraie | _Srush chery «| ——*dt aoa 3 WE CLEARER - Pr
| Waternausia toribunda | Weeping Liy Ply [15 | 40 | 40 _| vo etND ats OR.” C p ) (esos S™*~*Y
Lo tora t50 520 1000 r Bp, ; Fee]_revson details ——SSSSSC«de
24 ee A . JA | ISSUED FOR APPROVAL | 10/14)
on, Ree FL DS Sm WIDE ON BOTH pp
? ¢ 4 Se BANKS FROM CENTRE} }Po[
EGEND: : ’ BX J ~ ve . Pe
‘ND: , 5 ne oP ay ’ UNE OF CREEK — —
ZONE A (NEL PUNTING = 926m2 Seg a \ | 80 BSN” os
(EI) nr Puanmnc reoureo ror 30% OF AREA TO ACHEVE 1 PLANT/1.5m 23 SA ao, Cad ° L
REMOVE WEEDS AS REQUIRED TO SECTION 5 OF PLAN 1225-904 4 > \ 2 ge \ : O, \
-& STAGE 1 oS | a
ZONE B = INFILL PLANTING ~ 2163m2 - fore @ . — ~
- \ t SU XA\WOBS\CT Projects in progress\1225 30 lots
(EI) vey ourrer tea Punt 70% OF aneas To OMPLETED) & Vga wr »
ACHIEVE PLANT DENSITY OF 1 PLANT / 1.5m2. RAS \ = = hat
Begin 28 ce reas heaX§ PS, \ ~ ow” FOR APPROVAL
REMOVE WEEDS AS REQUIRED. OPE U2 ee é oy, Pa
[II] zone c - reveceranion pLannng - 2752m2 ES SR Ee Pom fy RA oe wd
RIPARIAN BUFFER AREA PLANT AREA TO ACHIEVE BR eer SH SF NRE
PLANT DENSITY OF 1 / 1.5m2, CURRENTLY — ~ Se PO ah te Awe Sheet 30 of 35 sheets
RIPARIAN AREA FROM TOP OF BANK UMITED TO 7 he GPO RE Growing number
GRASS, NATIVE VEGETANON PRESENT ON BANKS OF 1872 £ a = oa
WATERWAY, SPRAY GRASS, / , al x 1225-89
= == w= m= COUNCIL RIPARIAN BUFFER OVERLAY EXTENTS | ost ASection 46
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 2
Page 46 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 2
q inlay ct Legend
ee Jee. oe
x i P. 3 } sh f | ACTIVITY MOUND
Ss (1.4) > é pf : 5 PARK TABLE & SEATING
Bi) O, gigi a oer een
oe , ae (ee OOO LEE: _—
(gers CAL Leys FR mene
GON EE OO MARE
fv PF lag. “ge © me LN Tid SZ “ ) Yea! oe ei 5 5A @ mf i. L “Ns
\\ ; Hea) TL fens (ai C FHT @.N i Z 4D << LZo « Ys G@) wa RUBBER SURFACE
Yeon Oe. YASS AOA® \V' S a
OGY SA <A 46 RSE Goan ) 2
( » SEBEL?) @ ©
) WEN ce te yy Oy ano c Penn
EMO Lent AI wine
\ 7 : wo s} p y Le? Zp TA ) eee) Gs | Fey < Z a LOW LEVEL
3 bo Oe EO sc. | ye oi
me \e\ “SEI SEE ea
/3 ea es pri Le (2) VOLS ‘Oe US [SEF a5] souers
ee Spe pe LD Pe ety) x.
MO a eg “aes a. 73 ey Bed LIGHT
: ERINDALE PARK SIGN I Z se
é IX /
: a
HE THE eon d) — . . @)
bd LS ErindalePark xen |
ff PLAY ENVIRONMENT CONSULTING | | Vauxeyeryit0 ERNOALE Park, coonoy | | Mastienatueshanaeh
1 ANG i) ; 8/269 Abbotsford Road, Bowen Hills, Qld 4008 Australia con ao DEVELOPMENT | | Bottle ene mu,
Weld one! 7) XEN 65.010620927 CONCEPT PLAN Si nak poate [rae spn@an |
Page 46 of 147Section 47
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 47 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Legend \ 2 | |
Sm ae ee | /
! ACTIVITY MOUND & PY bea \ |
2 RAISED MEETING POINT lee , ta x
3 DOUBLE SWINGS a o ce
4 PARK SHELTER ee , a —
5 PARK TABLE & SEATING ; Ra aes,
6 PARK BENCH SEATS > = ’ \\ \
7 SIGNAGE, LANDSCAPE ae ; ; | |
& PATHWAY Pet le parce yl ts |
oy 4 \ \
Sy ae No RSSNe | \
AD \
jae = |
om | — |
Jammer gece a Go |
yam Gea BR SON LEED \
LEN Cee OOO, LAL \
Ed onesie 2 = | Se at) KG Bones ; \
gts td AP NS ff fo
IO TREE aU : (i Co ee 3 Gz Wie CS Sey — a eae
= Ad £2 % Oe ew O Posia7 Po 5 <i \
ama a SF IT RUB AY Se
(1, SHRUBS Re . le! O Or OS ry TEIN OXFQXe
< 2 ey gy taxa cor eh se
re LOW LEVEL ay, Veo bo )7 Oy
iF] rns @\ \ ee Ne oes) os . \
DECKS & £ se BR Z ST eZ fT. wae ¥ yu
(J PLATFORMS j 62 —* NOON a) > 4 i, _ i ‘S
ONO LE EEE ee =k |
BOULDERS 1500 Ce — S&S SON aS
J Chee N\N
—— 7 oe
TYRE STEPS a TIMBER FRAME - EF x
DRESSED CYPRESS ty
ACCESS 8 eee a | POSTS & RAILS ©, ze MG
el Jal — oe %
ERINDALE PARK SIGN g y
3] J JL
LIGHT |
aT
| i I -—Foonnes LL
|
Casal hacal a
a ~~
Pat
d) = a 4 oy y C
yy Sf
! ErindalePark soxc;s0
4 wer | PLAY ENVIRONMENT CONSULTING | | vatkev pty Ltp ERINDALE PARK, COOROY | | 2”9,010,be used ot reproduced wholy or
fm, eect ae These designs and plans are copyright and | | ™@Wing number 4 4/005-S01
/ Nite Fy} 81269 Abbotsford Road, Bowen Hills, Qld 4006 Australia Mia nee Bo hot sao tom the dawg.
Soll my Phone: (07) 3252 2262 Fax: (07) 3252 0260 CONCEPT PLAN Deregard superseded sues.
Rel ae ABN 55 010 820 327 Suavey etal ok previes scale 4:500 @A3
Lae .
Page 47 of 147Section 48
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 3
Page 48 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Attachment 3
NOOSA COUNCIL
VALKEV PTY LTD
INFRASTRUCTURE DEED IN RESPECT OF PROVISION OF PARK AND
EMBELLISHMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR: RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/S: REC13/0146, REC14/0008, REC14/0009, REC13/0148
Page 1 of 20
Page 48 of 147Section 49
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 49 of 147
U
rm
>
=a
<
za
©
0
a
Sass SsLlLSHPHRHANNNAABAAAHAAAGA9HOAAAA QF nPRWWONNN SESS BSB @
eeseeerePnis or ao po CMAN DA RWD OB ab wD = = = ie Ounb WH >
Rwh oa =
TUVUONADADAADFYFAZFAVGIAAPFPAAVGVOSOOCASSZSSZMNPSPSHFPUVUSFBZBAOVVZSOZZ ¥
SseQOQmMmMoameasw®oszpaem2ZoouLhe FLXLoFORBZFRPOROA>REVUDIACGCFA SAFO
38S 2 a8 8 ORS eT CSSA GOST RG SR ARS BI VASASISZSER a
sok s eset esse ETRE sci ea Rees ask ssi aer sade g 9
. a 3350 9 ob 9 G Ts>4236 a otra SZ ofS moc ot 307 D
oo 8 ~~ a a ow < ®a na : ° -- =a oO
cc = ocHoes oO o + > Us : oo : =: a a a> oO
cogs: 55 oo? 35 fesa2@raQgae oom: £€ DW > 925327 a. oom
e280 Be OSS soe mea OGSSZSLES GER SAA2CFOB8: SERA Q
SSS se ee SEZ OSssss 246: oF F9E SIF FBEFQZS: FBS Oo
poor Dee ® op ®@ gp OC az: ®WA: § oO: m S =e:5 Cc : 8fCp 3: : ™:i O =
if i a@i gxzaAazeSmMsSs Pp: 6: s: i: WO72GF: G2 HQ: FOB: Roi ii:
fof: : ° =o; m uv fof. : od: : QD: a : Oo: AS i: 3: :
PPP ei BE9FLomeSs eS £52 Fig: E85 FF Smo: FSH i mo: fF =
Pod Bi BSZ2S RFC, oA ds: tf iti $i F: OE: Sei aaosd: FZ26: oF: i: iii: mr)
iii *? Be@o: F%e: S39: 5:2: Bi Sims: FSi S03: Mai moi i iii: |
i iob it e@em: Pi Bi ezri i tii: &i of: SFr gzg i: aS: Moi i i i i:
Poi obo opoieaa bobo: : @ : bobo bod Gop @ : > i ie Prop rs: geiii i i: m
obo obo fo: oti: : OF RPA: i i:iii si: aS: i i:ies ari iti gi f PoP Po bo io:
ii bit FST: fi 2: B22: iit i: @; BRFi ii: SD ii: Bi ieaiiiiiioea m
u Pi ob bop ge § Mi ti wi wi ii: ii bb ii Mii bo bi B@:i i i i @i i Fi ii iiiée™
a Poi obo bop @aQMii i: Bi: io ii i bo iob i i fopoboio i big Gio: i boii io: bopioiiis =
oO rr GM: : : pei: ft ft ob fb bo f bo ob ob bob bb bt mo me tb lb mT
fob oto fo too poof f fo ¢ ¢ $ $ $f £ $$ $ F 2 £ £ t f fos ™: : $ ¢: ¢$ $ ¢: $$ ¢: f$ ¢ ¢ ff t _
N boot of ott <= W: : : Ms: : 3 fF tf bo ob bf ob ot boob blll lc lt Poot of bb Dc Et
° Por obo opo:ros Gio: io: ? Pb Po Po:iof Pop Poi por borpopo ip bo itOO:io: i io iio obo boro obo boiotoiom m
al Por of of ft wm B Por ob ob bo ob bf Poffo pop of obo bo bobo ob to opopo:p@ Zio: ft : ot to boi fr to i foi: gw
XN bib ii opBei iid: io: bid op iio bo boboi bi: bipg Pi tii bb iii pi: iipig a4
PPP? SS SAi iit ibi i: EEE EE: EPi EL EE? Si; ELPiEiEPi:ipiiia Z
Pipi? @R@iitpiiE:iibEELLEiidi:a EE: PSiiEtiEPEaEPbiaEd ia Q
Pobof ft ft @ Q@yaio: io to bobo obo pot bo obop fob bobo obo bo oboporo: 2 $ $ $ $ ¢ fb Pot :ororpriPrii:
Pio bo io: @$mi fi: bdo: boii bob boi bio: bi: bp Sio: bid b bib bio: bi >
bos ot § $ @ Ai ft f £ so fb to to ft ¢ fo: fo F Fo ft tot to ¢ fo tot Bs & Ft F fs fo & F ft Ft Fes: q@
Sr ©
iioii i Foi: i iid: bi: iid bid bib i iii bi@:i i iii iii: bi iii: m
bof ob & ft asi: i: :: : ¢ $: € § ¢ $ $ $ $ £$ $ «$ & $ «$ *£PtEgs & ft & Es $s t fis ¢ fi $s fits os
i of ob bob @ @i bt EE io: EE EP bo boE EE bobo obo oboi obit Bi bo pobo bob obo oP do obopo bo pi =
23h Oo
iioboiobo dod bobo bo bob bo bobo i boa bo bobop bib bo bobob boi@ i bib i iii bid: id: >
bobo: Popo bob bo bob oP Eo bobo boboP Po bob bop bo: bobo bobo bob @i boiobi boi iodo boi boii:
Pod ob ob bod obo op ob ob obo bop bop poi io bob bob bo oboib EE Pi :Poi bi io bi io: i bi pid
bobo Gobo dodo dod bobo bob ob obo op ob pop bobo ob bop ob Po boP Pioig i boii io io boi: bi boi:
Poof ob cb a mt
iio obo: bob ob PE Eo: Eb i pod ob obob EP iE Ed i i io: bo: Si bo bob: EP Eid: i i iit;
ss 3: $$ 8 : 38 ¢: $ & $ &$ $ $ $ $ $8 § $$ $ $ & $ $$ $ $ $ $§$ ¢ $$ SB Sst ¢ &$ §$ §$ § & §$ §$ £ §$ § & 8 8
iio bo boi bi: i i i bb bo: oid boi bob boi i i i bobbi @iob i boboi di i bib bi
a a a
Poioioio io i i bo bod boi do io: i boi od fob d bob i bid bi @ bi ibd i bi id: pid
Poi oi bobo bob bof fo: io poi op bob bE bob: Ei: iid bb i Qi: : iii bi id i: ita;
obo obo bobo obo Pbopobo bo bor bo bobo obo borbobo Po borobo obo bobo io obo boi Bio: bobo bobo oiob boi obo bobo:
a) bobo obo bob odo bob ob bob Pod obo ob EB bob ob Eo bob oPoE EP obo:Po EP :P igi i i i ii ii: bp bid: wo
2 bobo ob Po oPopopor tof Eobopo topo bopop ot bo obororo obo borobo boii @ io boioiroio bi bot t fboborpoie: 3 =
ie) Popo ob Gobo ob Popo bo bio: bo bod bobo: ob Eb io: bo doi boi dob E@ i bb id bb i bob: dob EG
© iio; oi bob ob PE boi: dodo} bo bob EP i EE: i dod bo: ob bf EE: EE Ei iid iii; >
AS SS io: of ¢ $ fo: obo otoritPbt ir: e)
© NS>S235353555000TC OC OFC OOD DH ODKDORARMRMDM BDDAMANNNNNOUAAAA QO
° <
> NO
= So
rs —
N oSection 50
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 50 of 147
” ao .
=
z aiid 5
N
O iid) =
© hull) 5
oO a °
Qa TEE
< nn)
2 =
= oe
oc TEE or
aaa
ow ul ‘o
<x tH | ©
Lu i
© i
9 cee He o
x !
< eee Tr &
e 1
O i
i
< i
E i
uu i
Ww i
Ww !
'
EF i
= i
= i
oO i
1
= Ht oO
Oo il N
— NWA 6
om
Ww AT oO
D
= a
E ¢, 3
=
ec ua
Oo
za ves ee
é fre eed
vee Pe a 3
< rere Hi
Qo. 22355
nant:
=a
555
aa 3
a @
as
S55
2%Section 51
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 51 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
THIS DEED is made on the date stated in item 1.
BETWEEN the Council
AND the Applicant
RECITALS
A The Applicant is Valkev Pty Ltd.
B The Applicant is the Owner of Lot 5 on SP266731 and Lot 8 on SP266743.
Cc The Applicant has lodged the Development Applications in relation to the
Subject Site referred to in Item 6.
D The parties have agreed that provision of park and embellishment infrastructure
is to be completed in accordance with the Special Conditions in Item 8 as
specified in Schedule 2.
IT IS AGREED
1 INTERPRETATION
1.1 Nature of Deed
This deed may be referred to in accordance with Clause 2.
1.2 | Commencement
This deed commences on the Commencement Date.
1.3 Interpretation
(a) In this deed, unless a contrary intention appears, reference to:
(i) a clause is to a clause in this deed; and
(ii) the singular includes the plural and vice versa; and
(iii) any gender includes all other genders; and
(iv) a person includes a firm, a corporation, an association and a
body, whether incorporated or not and a government or statutory
body or authority; and
(v) legislation (including subordinate legislation) includes:
(A) statutory instruments under the legislation; and
(B) consolidations, amendments, re-enactments or
replacements of the legislation; and
(vi) writing includes any mode of representing or reproducing words
in tangible and permanently visible form and includes facsimile
transmission; and
4 of 20
Page 51 of 147Section 52
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 52 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
(vii) this or any other deed includes the deed as varied or replaced
and is not affected by any change in the identity of the parties;
and
(viii) a day is to a Calendar Day.
(b) The clause headings appearing in this deed are inserted for
convenience of reference and do not affect the construction of the deed.
(c) If any words are italicised or otherwise printed differently, this has been
done for convenience only and does not affect the construction of this
deed.
(d) Whenever more persons than one constitute a party all the covenants,
deeds, conditions, restrictions and provisos on the part of that party
contained or implied in this deed bind those persons jointly and each of
them severally.
(e) This deed is in all respects to be interpreted in accordance with the laws
of the State of Queensland, and the parties irrevocably and
unconditionally submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of
that state and any courts which have jurisdiction to hear appeals from
them, and waive any right to object to proceedings being brought in
those courts.
(f) Nothing contained in this deed affects, prejudices or derogates from the
requirements of any statute or from the rights, powers and authorities of
the Council under the provision of any statute or under any declared
policy of the Council.
(g) An inclusive definition, or an example or particularization of a provision,
does not limit but may extend that definition or provision.
(h) Where a word or expression is defined, other parts of speech and
grammatical forms of that word or expression have a corresponding
definition.
(i) All schedules to this deed form part of this deed and a reference to an
item is a reference to an item in Schedule 1.
(j) Terms used in the Special Conditions which are not otherwise defined
in Clause 1.4 (Definitions) shall have the meanings assigned to them in
the Council's Planning Scheme.
1.4 Definitions
In this deed:
“Act” means the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (the “SPA’).
“Appeal” refers to an appeal made under Chapter 7 of the Act..
“Applicant” means the person described in and having its address at the place
described in item 4 and includes:
(a) successors and permitted assigns in the case of a corporation,
association or other body whether incorporated or not; and
(b) executors, administrators and permitted assigns in the case of a natural
person.
5 of 20
Page 52 of 147Section 53
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 53 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
“Calendar Day” means the period from one midnight to the following one.
“Chief Executive Officer’ means the Chief Executive Officer of the Council
and includes the person (if any) for the time being acting as Chief Executive
Officer.
“Commencement Date” means the date when this deed commences being the
date when the last party executes this deed.
“Council” means the Local Government described in Item 3 and _ its
predecessors, successors, transferees and assigns.
“Development” has the meaning given in the Act.
“Development Application” has the meaning given in the Act and refers to the
Development Applications in Item 6
“Development Permit” has the meaning given in the Act and refers to the
Development Permits in Item 7.
“Force Majeure” means an event:
(a) being a decree of the Commonwealth Government or the state
Government, an act of God, industrial disturbance, act of public enemy,
war, international blockade, public riot, lightning, flood, earthquake, fire,
storm or other event whether of a kind herein specified or otherwise;
and
(b) which is not within the control of the party claiming Force Majeure; and
(c) which could not have been prevented by the exercise by that person of
a standard of foresight, care and diligence consistent with that of a
prudent and competent person under the circumstances.
“Infrastructure Charges Notice” means the infrastructure charges notice/s
issued in respect of the Development Permits.
‘infrastructure Contribution” means:
(a) a monetary contribution for infrastructure; or
(b) a land and/or works contribution that is infrastructure.
“Local Government’ has the meaning given in the Local Government Act
2009.
“Local Government Area” has the meaning given in the Local Government Act
2009.
“Lot” has the meaning given in the Act.
“Notice” means any certificate, demand or notice to be made, given or served
by a party under this deed.
“Owner’ has the meaning given in the Act.
“Park Embellishment Infrastructure” means the works to be provided as
specified in Schedule 2
6 of 20
Page 53 of 147Section 54
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 54 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
“Planning Scheme” means the planning scheme of the Council applicable for
the subject site.
“Public Office” has the meaning given in the Local Government Act 2009.
“Purchaser” means the purchaser of the Subject Site from the Owner.
“Relevant Period” has the meaning given in the Act.
“Sell” includes transfer, dispose of and alienate and “Sale” has the
corresponding meaning.
“Special Conditions” means the conditions specified in Item 8 with which the
Owner and Applicant must comply.
“Subject Site” means the land described in Item 5 and includes:
(a) any interest or estate in, on, over or under the land; and
(b) the airspace above the surface of the land and any estate or interest in
the land; and
(c) the subsoil of the land and any estate or interest in the subsoil; and
(d) any part or parts of the land; and
(e) any estate or interest created in respect of any of the above matters
“Use” has the meaning given in the Act.
1.5 Other Expressions
If a term is not defined in this Deed it shall unless the context otherwise
requires, have the meaning given to it by:
(a) the Act; or
(b) the Macquarie Dictionary in the absence of a definition in the Act.
1.6 — Rights and Obligations Council
Where rights or obligations are in respect to contributions or works those rights
shall be rights in favour of Council and those obligations shall be obligations to
Council.
2 INFRASTRUCTURE DEED
2.1 Application of Act
This Deed is intended to constitute an infrastructure agreement under the Act.
2.2 Deed to bind successors in title
The Applicant as Owner consents to the obligations of the Applicant under this
deed being attached to the Subject Site and binding on the Applicant and the
Applicant's successors in title in accordance with Section 674 (When
infrastructure agreements bind successors in title) of the Act.
7 of 20
Page 54 of 147Section 55
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 55 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
3 APPLICANT AS OWNER
3.1 Warranty of Ownership
The Applicant warrants that, at the time of signing this deed, it has entered into
or will enter into and complete a contract to purchase Lot 135 MCH 978 at
Pearsons Road, Cooroy.
The Applicant warrants that, at the time of signing this deed, it is the owner of
Lot 5 SP 266731 at 61 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy and Lot 8 SP 266743 at
1 Wilgee Court, Cooroy.
4 APPEAL
4.1 Filing of a Notice of Appeal
The Applicant has not and does not intend to file a Notice or Notices of Appeal
in respect of the Development Application/s and wholly indemnifies the Council
in respect its costs arising out of any appeal made contrary to this clause.
5 INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTION
5.1 Infrastructure Agreement overrides Development Permit and Infrastructure
Charges Notice
This deed applies to the extent of any inconsistency with the Development
Permit/s or Infrastructure Charges Notice/s.
5.2 Indemnity for Adjustment
The Applicant wholly indemnifies the Council in respect of any adjustment to
the amount payable under an Infrastructure Charges Notice resulting from a
decision on a conversation application to convert non trunk infrastructure
relating to the Development Permit/s to trunk infrastructure.
5.3 Infrastructure Contribution
The Applicant is required to pay to the Council the amounts stated in the
Infrastructure Charges Notice/s (the infrastructure charges) triggered by the
Development Permit/s and levied on the basis of the Noosa Shire Council
Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution current at the time of issuing the
Development Permit/s; and
The Applicant is required to transfer the land shown as “PARK” in Development
Permit REC 13/0146 to the Crown without cost to the Council and to carry out
the Park Embellishment Infrastructure in accordance with the Special
Conditions in Schedule 2.
5.4 Time for Payment
The infrastructure charges are payable in accordance with the infrastructure
charge notice/s issued relating to the development permit/s.
5.5 Offset for Works Contribution
Subject to the provisions of this agreement and as specified in Schedule 2 the
dedication of land for park and the completion of the Park Embellishment
8 of 20
Page 55 of 147Section 56
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 56 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Infrastructure will wholly offset the infrastructure charge/s amount/s that is
apportioned to the Public Parks and Land for Community Facilities network
component of the Infrastructure Charge Notice/s.
6 GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
6.1 Interpretation
In this clause:
(a) expressions which are not defined but which have a defined meaning
in GST Law have the same meaning as in the GST Law.
(b) “GST Law’ has the meaning given to that expression in A New Tax
System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999.
(c) “GST Amount” means the amount referred to in Clause 6.3 (Payment
of GST).
6.2 Consideration GST exclusive
Unless otherwise expressly stated, all prices or other sums payable or
consideration to be provided under this Deed are exclusive of GST.
6.3 Payment of GST
If GST is payable by a supplier on any supply made under this Deed, the
recipient will pay to the supplier an amount equal to the GST payable on the
supply.
6.4 —_ Timing of GST payment
The GST Amount will be paid by the recipient on the same date the
consideration for the supply is to be provided under this Deed.
6.5 Tax invoices
The recipient is not required to pay the GST Amount until the supplier has
provided the recipient with a tax invoice in respect of the taxable supply. If the
supplier has not provided the recipient with a tax invoice prior to the time that
the GST Amount is otherwise payable under this clause, the recipient must pay
the GST Amount within five days of the receipt of the tax invoice.
6.6 Adjustment events
If at any time an adjustment event arises in respect of a taxable supply made
by a supplier under this Deed the supplier will provide the recipient with an
adjustment note for the adjustment immediately upon becoming aware of the
adjustment. Where such an adjustment event arises, a corresponding
adjustment will be made to the GST Amount and a payment will be made by
the recipient to the supplier or the supplier to the recipient as the case requires.
6.7 Reimbursements
Where a party is required under this Deed to pay for or reimburse an expense
or outgoing of another party, the amount to be paid by the first party is the sum
of:
9 of 20
Page 56 of 147Section 57
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 57 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
(a) the amount of the expense or outgoing less any input tax credits in
respect of the expense or outgoing that the other party is entitled to; and
(b) if the payment by the first party is consideration for a taxable supply, an
amount equal to the GST payable by the other party in respect of the
payment.
6.8 Representatives
In the event that liability for payment of GST in respect of a supply under this
Deed is imposed upon a representative of a supplier, this Clause 6 (Goods and
Services tax) shall nonetheless apply and any amounts to be calculated
pursuant to this clause shall be calculated in all respects as if the supplier was
liable for the GST imposed on such supply and entitled to input tax credits
properly allocated to the making of that supply.
6.9 Pay As You Go (“PAYG”)
PAYG instalments will be deducted from payments to be made to the Claimant
if at the time of payment the Claimant has not provided to the Council a valid
Australian Business Number or if the Council otherwise reasonably forms the
view that deductions are required to be made under Par 2-5 of the Taxation
Administration Act 1953.
7 DEFAULT BY APPLICANT
7.1 Rights of the Council on default
If the Applicant fails to duly perform and fulfil any or all of its obligations in
respect of the Infrastructure Contribution, in addition to any other of its rights or
remedies at law, the Council may recover from the Applicant the amount of any
deficiency in payment or its costs of carrying out or completing any works.
7.2. Application of money
The Council may apply any sum recovered or received by it pursuant to
Clause 7.1 (rights of the council on default) as far as the sum may extend to or
towards all or any one or more of the following:
(a) reduction or discharge of the payments or contribution payable by the
Owner under this Deed; and
(b) reimbursing itself for the cost of works done and for any damages
suffered by it.
8 NOVATION OF DEED UPON SALE
8.1 Sale of the Subject Site
The Applicant must not sell or transfer the Subject Site prior to the
performance and fulfilment of the Special Conditions as contained in this Deed
except subject to the condition that the purchaser (in this clause called “the
Purchaser’) shall enter into a deed of novation of this Deed or a replacement
Deed with the Council, whereby the Purchaser becomes contractually bound to
the Council to perform and comply with the Special Conditions, or such of them
as remain unperformed or unfulfilled by the Applicant at the time of such sale.
8.2. Applicant to remain liable
10 of 20
Page 57 of 147Section 58
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 58 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
In the event that the Applicant sells or transfers the Subject Site otherwise than
in compliance with Clause 8.1 (sale of the subject site) the Applicant must
perform and fulfil the Special Conditions at such time or times as the Council
stipulates, even if the time or times otherwise appointed for such performance
and fulfilment have not then arrived.
8.3 Release from Liability
In the event that the Purchaser enters into a deed of novation or such further
deed or agreement which contractually obliges the Purchaser to the Council to
perform the Covenants, the Owner shall be forever released from the Special
Conditions or any further liability pursuant to this Deed or otherwise arising
from its subject matter and the provisions of this clause may be pleaded as a
bar to any proceedings brought by the Council.
9 RECONFIGURATION OF THE SUBJECT SITE
9.1 Reconfigured lot no longer bound by special conditions
If the Subject Site is reconfigured under the provosions of the SPA to create a
lot which is provided with infrastructure and services necessary to enable its
use in accordance with a development approval and is not intended to be the
subject of a material change of use and/or further reconfiguration, then the
Special Conditions no longer remain attached to the reconfigured lot and the
Owner of the reconfigured lot is no longer bound by the Special Conditions.
9.2 Reconfigured lot remaining bound by special conditions
If the Subject Site is reconfigured to create a lot comprising:
(a) the Subject Site or
(b) part of the Subject Site which is not a reconfigured lot referred to in
Clause 9.1,
the Special Conditions remain attached to the reconfigured lot and the Owner
of the reconfigured lot remains bound by the Special Conditions
10 SERVICE
10.1 Service by prepaid post
A Notice is sufficiently made, given or served by a party if left at or forwarded
by prepaid post in an envelope addressed to the other party or any of them
(where there are more persons than one person comprising the other party) at
the address of that party specified in Schedule 1.
10.2 Deemed service
A Notice if sent by prepaid post is deemed to have been made, given or served
at the time when in the due course of the post it would be delivered at the
address to which it is directed whether or not it is actually received.
10.3. Proof of service
In proving service of a Notice made, given or served by the Council it is only
necessary for the Council to certify to that effect under the hand of the Chief
Executive Officer.
11 of 20
Page 58 of 147Section 59
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 59 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
10.4 Form of Notice
(a) A Notice given by a party must be in writing and signed by the party.
(b) A Notice given by a party may be signed by an officer of that party or
the solicitor for that party.
(c) A party receiving a Notice is not obliged to enquire as to the authority of
the person signing the Notice.
11 MISCELLANEOUS
11.1 Payment of costs
Each party shall pay their own costs, charges and expenses of and incidental to
the negotiation, preparation, execution, completion and stamping of this Deed,
all counterparts of it and any other document required under this Deed.
11.2. Time
Time is, in all cases, of the essence.
11.3 Place for payment of monies
All monies payable to a party under this deed are payable free from all
deductions at the address of that party specified in Schedule 1.
11.4 Waiver
No waiver by the Council of any breach by the Owner of any of the provisions
of this Deed shall be implied against the Council or be otherwise effective
unless it is in writing under the hand of the relevant Chief Executive Officer.
11.5 Laches and delay
No laches or delay by the Council at any time or times in enforcing any of its
rights, powers and the like under this Deed prejudice or affect those rights or
powers.
11.6 Severance
If any provision of this Deed cannot be given effect or full force and effect by
reason of statutory invalidity that provision shall be served or read down but so
as to maintain and uphold so far as possible the remaining provisions of this
deed.
11.7. Warranty of authority
Any person signing this Deed:
(a) as attorney of any party warrants to the other parties that at the date of
execution that person has not received any notice or information of the
revocation of the power of attorney appointing that persons; and
(b) as an authorised officer, agent or trustee of any party warrants to the
other parties that at the date of execution that person has full authority
to execute this deed in that capacity.
12 of 20
Page 59 of 147Section 60
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 60 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
11.8 Further assurances
Each party agrees at its cost to do everything reasonably necessary to give
effect to this deed.
11.9 Force Majeure
(a) If a party is unable by reason of an event of Force Majeure to carry out
its obligations under this Deed, that party must give a Notice to the
other party advising of the event of the Force Majeure as soon as it is
reasonably practicable after the event of a Force Majeure.
(b) If a party gives a Notice advising of an event of Force Majeure, that
party’s obligations will be suspended during the period for which the
event of Force Majeure or its effect extends.
(c) Where the obligations of the Council are dependent upon the
occurrence of specified circumstances, then the Council will be relieved
of its obligations for so long as there is a change or deviation or non-
occurrence of those circumstances arising from a matter beyond the
Council's Control.
11.10 Amendment of deed
(a) Despite any provision of this deed, the parties may at any time agree to
vary the terms of this Deed
(b) No modification, variation or amendment of this Deed is of any force or
effect unless:
(i) it is in the form of an amendment Deed and has been signed by
the parties; and
(ii) where relevant the amendment Deed complies with the
requirements of the Act.
13 of 20
Page 60 of 147Section 61
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 61 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
SCHEDULE 1
Deed Details
ITEM 1 Date Commencement Date in accordance with
Clause 1.4 - Definitions
ITEM 2 Name of Deed Infrastructure Deed In Respect of Provision of
Park and Embellishment Infrastructure for a
Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a
Lot.
ITEM 3 Council Noosa Shire Council
9 Pelican Street, Tewantin in the State of
Queensland
PO Box 141, Tewantin QLD 4565
ITEM 4 Applicant Valkev Pty Ltd
ACN 160 921 059
220 Lonehand Rd EUMUNDI QLD 4562
ITEM 5 Subject Site Lot 5 SP 266731,
61 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy, QLD 4563
and
Lot 8 SP 266743
1 Wilgee Court, Cooroy, QLD 4563
and subject to Schedule 2, Special Condition 7,
Lot 135 MCH 978
Pearsons Road, Cooroy
Locality of: Cooroy
ITEM 6 Development REC13/0146, REC14/0008, REC14/0009
Applications and subject to Schedule 2, Special Condition 7,
REC13/0148
ITEM 7 Development Development Permits for Reconfiguration of a
Permits Lot: REC13/0146, REC14/0008, REC14/0009
and subject to Schedule 2, Special Condition 7,
REC13/0148.
ITEM 8 Special Conditions Provision of Park and Park Embellishment
Infrastructure requirements and Offset of
Infrastructure Charges to be fulfilled in
accordance with Schedule 2
ITEM 9 Appeal Not Applicable
14 of 20
Page 61 of 147Section 62
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 62 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
SCHEDULE 2
Special Conditions
1. A Development Permit for Operational Works for park landscaping and
embellishment infrastructure is to be issued prior to commencing construction;
2. Park and Park Embellishment Infrastructure to be provided
Park Embellishment Infrastructure are to be provided by the Applicant/owner as
follows:
a. generally in accordance with plans prepared by Play Environment
Consulting contained in SCHEDULE 3 consisting of:
i. Concept Plan - drawing number 14/005-S01 dated 17.11.2014 as
annotated by Council;
ii. Concept Plan - drawing number 14/005-S02 dated 17.11.2014;
b. Table 1: Park Embellishment Details:
Minimum | Park
Quantity | Stage
Park Signage, In accordance with The Noosa Plan, Planning Scheme
Landscaping 1 A .
ee and Operational Works Approval
and Lighting
e Compacted fill in accordance with Australian Standards
to above Q100 flood level;
e Play equipment (or similar):
Activity Mound 1 A o Slide,
o Boulder Steps;
o Scramble wall;
o Tyre Steps;
o Rope walk
Raised 1 A e Compacted fill in accordance with Australian Standards
Meeting Point to above Q100 flood level
Water Suppl e 2x Water Connection Points with hose cock
Pply e 1x Drinking Fountain (water mark product with the
& Connection 3 A . . : .
Points waste to be discharged into a rubble pit designed by a
geotechnical engineer
Double Swing 1 A e To be constructed from hardwood timber with 4 metre x
3 metre rubber ware pad
e Landmark Pro - 402 Portland 4 x 4m shelter (Hard wood
or pine);
e Concrete slab to be 5 metres x 5 metres x 125mm
Park Shelter 1 A concrete slab broom finish;
e Structure colour to be Noosa Green;
e Roof to be Colorbond classic cream;
e One shelter to be located on the Raised Meeting Point.
Park Table e Page Furniture Seaside Range;
Setting e Aluminium Frames with timber or perforated aluminium
Park Bench table top and seating;
Seat 4 A e Concrete slab to suit.
e In accordance with Sunshine Coast Council Open
Rebound Wall 1 Space Landscape Infrastructure Manual (LIM) Sports
and Games
Basketball Half 1 In accordance with Sunshine Coast Council Open Space
Court Landscape Infrastructure Manual (LIM) Sports and Games
15 of 20
Page 62 of 147Section 63
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 63 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
3. Other Requirements:
a. All Playground equipment and soft fall surfacing is to be certified to comply
with Australian Standards: AS4685.1:2014 to AS4685.6:2014 and be
provided with a minimum 5 year warranty.
b. A level 3 comprehensive playground safety audit, all warranties and
maintenance manuals are to be provided on handover of park and
playground equipment;
c. Boulders/Rocks to be rounded with no sharp edges;
d. Soft fall to be Bassett Bark, Takura Bark or Rubber soft fall (EDPM) and
certified;
4. — Time for Completion
The Park Embellishment Infrastructure may be provided in stages as detailed in
special condition 2 of this Schedule 2and must be completed in accordance with
the following:
a. Park Stage A: before the local government releases the survey plan for the
last plan of subdivision relating to the Development Applications and Permits
REC13/0146, REC 14/0008 and REC14/0009;
b. Park Stage B: before the local government releases the survey plan for the
plan of subdivision for Development Application and Permit REC 13/0148.
5. Payment and Offset of Infrastructure Charges
a. Infrastructure charges are to be paid in accordance with the infrastructure
charges notice/s issued applicable to the relevant Development Permits;
b. The Infrastructure Contribution for the dedication of Park relevant to REC
13/0146 and provision of Park Embellishment Infrastructure — will wholly
offset the amount apportioned to the Public Parks and Land for Community
Facilities network component specified in the Infrastructure Charge Notice
for each Development Permit; and
c. The offset will only apply after dedication of the Park and completion of the
Park Embellishment Infrastructure and hand over of the park asset to
Council in accordance with special condition 4.
6. Refund of Infrastructure Charge Payments Subject to Offset
Payment amounts received by Council relating to special condition 5b above will
be refunded in accordance with the following:
a. for amounts up to $150,000: the refund will occur in the December quarter in
the financial year following completion of the works contribution and hand
over of the park asset to Council;
b. for balance amounts over $150,000: the refund will occur in the December
quarter in the second (2") financial year following completion of the works
contribution and hand over of the park asset to Council.
7. Applicability Infrastructure Agreement to Lot 135 MCH 978, Pearsons Road,
Cooroy, REC13/0148 and Park Stage B
This infrastructure agreement will only apply to Lot 135 MCH 978, Pearsons
Road, Cooroy, REC13/0148 and Park Stage B on the provision that the
Applicant becomes the Owner of Lot 135 MCH 978, Pearsons Road, Cooroy in
accordance with Clause 3.1 Warranty of Ownership.
16 of 20
Page 63 of 147Section 64
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 64 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
SCHEDULE 3
Concept Plans
v4 EIS MICPMORBOOMEIIR «4
a zt 4 6 PRG a a 322 Ss ezPzEER
oe PY PGE PRET EP at aE
S08 - 208, 000 a eigzee
52 _ aa peeves
eg re | “2 4
ag Mm ae oot i on
36 2 : oe ll
gt a Rees Pitts :
eRe 3 Le sce * a
ase Zz “1 (">
sky = |—~—__ 3 a Bgze ce FA
a rs ahem Fat ee kes a oo
eee tt pete a
RSF Q Gerke Roo |
ge 9 28: ga A ees ge a oN ee
88 3 |g fr)
a> Cc 2 = PN tat. tt 48 dt
rs ie Se Maas nS |
=e is ; x Dees Ao
* 2 ip ah “a Be eiitete aod 6
a ry : Bad en a4 4 fs
i= <Beag Sea. Cpe ews ;
eye] : / | oA ie Be eter my »
Som 448 a Pree ema SY oR
fas | UMMM St
zz OMI (eee ne
ees | | ere. [Tf
J = pens pet Std eeatys
| | ie uo
= gan Aa hy fe Ro Sta
9323} Se ea * aes Pe AL a tfns ee ed
ange Prieto atd PERERA Geo
BQne We a ae ae oe NO ee aL ee 3 ieee sta g 6d eg:
Be Lit oo ae ee as
SB] fe fi LEN Oe ML
fae ol ed SN ZZ
agttpis oe eh, ee . ce" 4 ‘ .
ea 4 fens —— re — % a ht ) P L
Bn Fe Festa! et
ee |
Hr ¢ ‘ ‘ ‘ ; Parca wt aT or \ i
fet ‘ ’ +. te Cae : \
: oo a : \
ou See a ¢ . 4 < « ew \
t § i} ‘ rie eZ \ ee
i = i é 4 ty w= rma
eye a af
a g ea ae
b ve € — _ a
= rr. Z Pe a, Uae —
Ta sie sey | |
17 of 20
Page 64 of 147Section 65
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 65 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
es —= ~ eas Sy eg ae ee -
5 , , Es ssa
SAX. 1 Gees x : a = € € ‘ * €
ay = he ere :
ce | a share ——
= / pesos ~ i 5 o re é rsa . |
y || (es Ah. A SESS >
8S || 7 @»" G RD: eae <
Holl FEET CR SSO a
2 < 3 2 Mae ten CORY AR
at ord & n Pot ECE . SA Sy iy é- fj ge
Ses £ EP E Se <p RSS Fe) enh eS eae
in 2 28 (OR et Toh BSW) Seas.
288 O Os ag ‘\\ yet eae ee | é z
ane Z Sys Hehe OD RE forte SSRN
ake = Se RCE Ne SN YDS Ec yre S €
gus 1 2” RRR AED Noe t ee ETE E TS
st: 4 SVS eM OO\ «
SSF o eel Sh Bee SL ee ah es € :
~ \ RRR RR ne hacer
geo ag Se RCA NC)
se Q aS Tt I Ve) = a pea | ee oh
¢ |: Che ae jy eG
"ES |B) RY.
# Zip ETS BU SAG SS RAO ~y NV Es
@ | 5S SSSR ae RD a ee he)
Sr BRS SSs Wie < *
myst] § E: Sel ea eet RPO Lc
eset) Fh: RES PRIS oO)
555 £ 4 ee $ fone Rat TR. cen bor 1° Ls eS ihe ty € €
Bas Were REP SAS AN Sey, 5
Ko ARSE YS thee NIKO fe, RI ‘
be: | |’ REE EES SEEN |.
z° 5 ENR a ee ee DO ae
: EP OO
. = RES RS SS, Se oN oy a ‘a €
' Ai SERN RO e's 4
Co RE RRL
gBaz Ee BRS Qi 5 4S RR stl) > x Ae €
25 i RS t eat AS OO aes aes Peon) .
88 ae a ey SOR RY Sole
" RSS _ ROS Rul ea =
Son ESS CX OH PR Cy
425 Ay ey € NOX SP — he ‘
3 C roe G Soe at @:. x€ ore \@ e ~~
HRI 7 SOO <F: .
< Ie € \" es / € € a
jae. . saa) «| |
a4 se : € is € o" € «| Vee F €
Hi aie - € . i € \ te ' € gia * |:
betes | & « -« iy . aes €. ‘@- €.° 4%
seat ¢ « qe = ti: 9 é <
i : « ~ « de « ¢ € f €
*8 € < « . a « « € ‘
\(.. - SS0C0BRORROEA ~~
5 é a : ¢ 3 2 € § FB E FePEPeee
: i 3 § i j : z i i q i > 4 = He
- j § | Bihows
5 Z2eG 2
a “FOmozZ
‘ n° 83
#3 3
6 4
18 of 20
Page 65 of 147Section 66
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 66 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
EXECUTED AS A DEED.
This deed dated this day of 2014
BETWEEN NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL a Local Government duly constituted under
the provisions of the Local Government Act 2009
(“Council”)
AND VALKEV PTY LTD ACN 160 921 059
(“the Applicant” )
SIGNED SEALED AND DELIVERED by the delegated officer )
for and on behalf of the NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL: )
ihiamey re
(ignaturey ee
Daisy ee
In the presence of Witness being a Justice of the Peace: )
ihvamey rr
(igngturey Oe
19 of 20
Page 66 of 147Section 67
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 67 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
“the Applicant”
Executed by VALKEV PTY LTD ACN 160 921 059 )
In accordance with Section 127 of the Corporations Act 2007: )
(DirectoriCornpany Secrelany (Directoy
Signature) Signature)
Cateye Date
In the presence of Witness being a Justice of the Peace: )
ihiamoy rr
ignaturey ee
20 of 20
Page 67 of 147Section 68
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Strategic Land Use Planning
5 NOOSA COMMUNITY PROFILE & DEMOGRAPHIC REVIEW
Author Principal Strategic Planner, Rowena Skinner
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM /Project: Community profile / Subject: Statistics
Attachments 1. Community Profile Noosa Shire - AEC Group
(76 page document - provided separatately to this Agenda,
2 hard copies available in the Councillors’ Room)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides demographic information on Noosa Shire and brings forward a
community profile prepared by AEC Group. This material provides an important foundation
for various forward planning projects including the social plan, economic plan, housing
needs analysis and the next planning scheme.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Principal Strategic Planner to the Planning &
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 3 March 2015 and endorse the Community Profile
prepared by AEC Group for use in policy preparation.
REPORT
1. Statistical Geography
As a consequence of local government boundary realignments in 2004, 2008 and 2014
there has been a disconnect between the boundaries of Noosa Shire Council and the
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) census localities from both the 2006 and 2011 census
counts.
From the 2006 census Noosa Shire was generally contained within the four Statistical Local
Areas of Noosa Hinterland, Tewantin, Noosa - Noosaville and Sunshine - Peregian.
However this excluded “South Peregian” which was transferred to Noosa Shire in 2004.
In July 2011 (just before the last census) the ABS adopted a new Australian Statistical
Geography Standard in which the Sunshine Coast Region was a local government area.
At the 2nd level Statistical Area (SA2) Noosa Shire is included within the following areas:
• Tewantin
• Noosaville
• Noosa Heads
• Sunshine Beach
• Peregian
• Noosa Hinterland
However for the latter two, only part of the SA2 is within Noosa Shire. The Queensland
Government Statistician's Office has applied the following concordance to enable the
release of various estimates for Noosa Shire Council (2014).
Page 68 of 147
Section 69
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Peregian SA2 316051436 49.1247812% to Noosa
Peregian SA2 316051436 50.8752188% to Sunshine Coast
Noosa Hinterland SA2 316041433 83.9975047% to Noosa
Noosa Hinterland SA2 316041433 16.0024953% to Sunshine Coast
This has been done without consideration of factors which might affect demographic or
socio-economic data. For instance there is no differentiation between the new master
planned greenfield community of Peregian Springs and the established beachside
communities of Peregian Beach and Marcus Beach.
At the 1st (smallest) level, there are 149 SA1s making up Noosa Shire. These Statistical
Areas align with the Noosa Shire local government area with the exception of one (being
31604143356 at Doonan) where only 22.695% is assigned to Noosa Shire. This equated to
only 22 houses at the time of the 2011 census, and 30 now.
As previously discussed with Councillors, for the purpose of the community profile the Shire
has been divided into 9 localities. These are:
Boreen Point, Kin Kin and Cootharaba
Federal to Ringtail Creek (including Pomona and Cooran)
Cooroibah
Noosa North Shore
Ridgewood to Tinbeerwah (including Cooroy)
Tewantin
Noosaville and Doonan
Noosa Heads
Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach
While there are many different ways this could have been done it was necessary to build up
from SA1 level and the resultant localities are by no means equivalent in size or population,
but broadly represent communities of interest. Readers of the report are cautioned that
because of the low number of Noosa North Shore residents interpreting results for this
locality can be problematic.
AEC Group was commissioned to produce a Community Profile which compared data for the
9 localities and also compared Noosa Shire with both South East Queensland, and the
State. Their report is attached and is summarised in the following sections.
2. People
The AEC report advises that since 2006 the Noosa Population has been increasing at a
slower rate than both South East Queensland’s and the State’s. Noosa’s estimated
residential population at June 2013 was 52,419 people.
From the mid 1970s to the mid 1990s Noosa Shire experienced rapid population growth.
The average annual growth rate over the 12 years from 2001 to 2013 was 2.0% and more
recently the average annual growth rate over the 2011-2013 two year period was 1.3%.
Growth over time is summarised in Figure 1 below.
Page 69 of 147
Section 70
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Figure 4 Estimated Resident Population Noosa Shire 1976-2011
60,000 20.0%
Estimated residential population Ann. Av. Growth (%)
54,000 18.0%
Estimated Resident Population (No.)
48,000 16.0%
Annual Average Growth (%)
42,000 14.0%
36,000 12.0%
30,000 10.0%
24,000 8.0%
18,000 6.0%
12,000 4.0%
6,000 2.0%
0 0.0%
1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
While Queensland is aging, Noosa is aging at a faster rate and at 45.9 (in 2011) Noosa’s
median age is higher than that for either SEQ or the State. Locally the highest median age
was 54.0 at Noosa North Shore followed by Noosa Heads at 50.0 years. Even the lowest
median age at 42.3 for Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach was higher than Queensland’s at
36.0 or SEQ’s at 38.1 years.
Figure 2 below shows that since 1991, the Shire has seen a significant increase in the
proportion of residents aged 45 years and over. Residents aged 45 years and over
accounted for 50.9% of the population in 2011.
The proportion of residents aged 65 years and over has grown from 16.5% of the Shire’s
population in 1991 to 19.3% in 2011. Looking forward 1, almost a third of all residents in the
Shire are projected to be aged 65 years and over by 2036. The proportion of residents aged
85 years and over rose from 0.9% in 1991 to 2.2% in 2011 and is forecast to be 5.5% by
2036.
Since 1991, both the number and proportion of the Shire’s residents aged between 25 and
34 years has decreased.
1
SA1 population projections by five year age group 2013 edition provided by Queensland Treasury &
Trade
Page 70 of 147
Section 71
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Figure 5 Residents by Age Bracket, Noosa Shire 1991-2036
Locally, Tewantin is particularly well represented by people 75 years and over, followed by
Noosa Heads, Noosa North Shore and Noosaville and Doonan. Federal to Ringtail Creek,
Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach and Cooroibah had the highest proportion of children up
to 14 years of age.
The rate of natural increase in the Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach area is reasonably
sound at 8 persons per 1,000 local residents (although still below the State figure of 9.9 per
1,000) but it is considerably less in other areas and in Noosa Heads and Tewantin it is
actually negative.
Page 71 of 147
Section 72
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Only a very small proportion of Noosa’s population identified as Indigenous and of these the
majority were Aboriginal.
Approximately 72.5% of the Shire’s population were born in Australia. The figure was over
80% for the hinterland localities and as low as 70.6% for Noosaville and Doonan. The most
common places of birth outside of Australia were the United Kingdom and New Zealand.
Most localities reported having over 95% of residents speaking only English in the home.
Aside from English, generally German, French and Italian were most commonly spoken.
3. Households and Families
The AEC report shows that the most prominent family category across all localities in 2011
was “couple families with no children”. At 47.9% almost half of all families in the Shire fell
into this category, well above regional and state proportions. There was significant variance
with the highest proportions at Noosa Heads (60.0%) followed by Noosa North Shore and
Noosaville and Doonan, reflective of the high number of “empty nesters” attracted to these
localities.
Accordingly the rate of “couple families with children under 15” was less than SEQ and
Queensland rates. The highest proportions of couple families with children under 15 were in
Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach and in Cooroibah. The highest proportion of one parent
families was reported in Tewantin.
Cooroibah reported the highest 2011 average household size at 2.8 persons per household.
At the lowest end the figure was 2.2 persons for Noosa Heads and Noosaville & Doonan.
The Shire average was 2.4 while the SEQ region and state averages were both 2.6 persons.
Noosa has a high proportion of people living on their own. Census data has shown that the
number of occupied private dwellings with usually one resident has risen from 1,802 in 1991
to 4,661 in 2011. At 2011 25.2% of Noosa households were recorded as lone person
households with the comparative State figure 22.8%.
Tewantin had close to 1,200 lone person households which represented the highest of
localities in both number and proportion. In general the proportion of lone person
households was lower in the hinterland.
Figure 3, not from the AEC report, shows the composition of households in persons for all
occupied private dwellings from the census years 1996 – 2011, for Noosa Shire. While there
has been an increase in each category, one and two person households account for roughly
two thirds of all households by 2011 and the proportion of households with three or more
residents has decreased from 37.9% to 33.6% over that time.
Page 72 of 147
Section 73
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Figure 6 Number of households over time by number of occupants
25,000
20,000
5 or more
15,000
4
3
10,000
2
1
5,000
-
1996 2001 2006 2011
4. Housing
In 2011 the Shire reported a considerably high representation of unoccupied private
dwellings (19.3% of all dwellings) compared with 10.3% for the State.
Separate houses were generally the most common dwelling type across localities and
particularly in the hinterland where expectedly there were less attached or semi-attached
housing.
For Councillors’ interest our data shows that of building approvals issued for 12 months
since 1 January 2014, some 94% of residential approvals were for detached houses. There
were a few secondary dwellings, eleven approvals for duplexes and a total of 22 units
approved through four projects. The average floor area for new houses was close to 300m 2
and there were 39 with a floor area of over 400m2. The median project construction cost
was $279,000. Despite small household size the housing being constructed is not small.
In 2011, a high proportion of dwellings across localities were “owned outright” (more so than
State and Regional rates), this was particularly the case in Noosa North Shore, Ridgewood
to Tinbeerwah and Boreen Point, Kin Kin and Cootharaba. Some 49.3% of dwellings in
Cooroibah and 46.3% of dwellings in Federal to Ringtail Creek are “owned with a mortgage”.
There is quite a correlation between location of mortgages and location of families with
children with a slight exception for the beaches. Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach
recorded that over a third of dwellings (36.8%) were being rented.
The median house price in the Shire has remained higher than the State between 2001 and
2014, however the gap is closing. In 2014 the Median house price in the Shire was
$481,410, while in the State was $405,000, this difference was at its lowest in 12 years.
Median mortgage repayments and median rents varied across the Shire but both were the
highest In Noosaville and Doonan locality and both at their lowest on Noosa North Shore.
Page 73 of 147
Section 74
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Median mortgage repayments were lower in Noosa ($1,770 per month) compared to the
SEQ Region ($1,794) and the State ($1,850). However, median rents were higher in the
Shire ($1,445 per month) compared to the SEQ Region ($1,283) and the State ($1,300).
Median rents for flats & units in Noosa generally remained higher than the State between
2001 and 2006. Although from 2007 onwards, the median rent in Noosa was equal to, or
slightly below, that of the State (with the exception of 2014 where median rents were $340
and $330 per week respectively).
Median rents for houses in Noosa remained higher than the State between 2001 and 2014.
In 2014 the median rent for houses in the Shire was $400 per week compared to $350 per
week for the State. This 2014 difference of $50 per week was at its highest in that 13 year
period.
5. Connectedness
Not surprisingly car dependency is greater in areas lacking public transport with higher rates
of families. Cooroibah recorded the highest average number of motor vehicles per dwelling
(2.2) while Tewantin and Noosa Heads were 1.5, just lower than Noosaville and Doonan.
Internet connection is quite good in Noosa Shire with each locality having between 70% and
80% of dwellings broadband connectivity.
The rates of volunteering are slightly higher in the hinterland, followed by the beaches.
Overall Noosa Shire enjoys a slightly higher than average rate of volunteering compared to
the state or SEQ.
Compared to the State or the SEQ there is a higher proportion of residents in need of
assistance with a core activity. In terms of the nine localities there is strong correlation with
the age of residents. Tewantin has 862 residents in need of assistance but it also has the
highest proportion of residents over the age of 75 years.
6. Education
The AEC report shows that residents of Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach and Noosa
Heads (over the age of 15 and no longer at school) were over 60% likely to have finished
year 12 or equivalent. Noosaville and Doonan had the next highest rate.
Compared to the state Noosa residents were as likely to have finished year 12 or above but
the figure is slightly higher for SEQ. Residents of Noosa Shire were less likely to have only
completed year 8 or below than the state or SEQ.
Of non-school qualification, certificate level qualifications are by far the most prevalent in all
localities across Noosa. 55.9% of respondents stated their highest non-school qualification
was certificate level. Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach and Noosa Heads had the highest
rates of bachelor degrees and post graduate degrees. On the whole however the
percentage of bachelor and post graduate qualifications in Noosa Shire is lower than that of
the state or SEQ.
The most common fields of study were management and commerce, engineering and
related technologies and health.
Post school education options in Noosa Shire are somewhat limited. Not surprisingly, the
2011 census showed a relatively low proportion of Noosa Shire residents currently studying
Page 74 of 147
Section 75
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
at a university or other tertiary institution when compared to the state or the SEQ region.
Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach and Noosa Heads had the highest proportions at around
15% of resident students.
Noosa Shire offers a range of government, catholic and independent primary schools and
secondary schools as well as the Flexible Learning Centre at Sunrise Beach. In 2013 the
State Government released School Infrastructure Demand Maps which display the average
annual growth of projected primary and secondary school age persons by SA2 level. These
projected growth rates (shown below) are very low and in some instances in the negatives.
Primary Schools Secondary Schools
SA2 2011-2021 2021-2031 2011-2021 2021-2031
Noosa Hinterland -1% to less than 1% -1% to less than 1% 1% to less than 2% -1% to less than 1%
Tewantin less than -1% -1% to less than 1% 1% to less than 2% less than -1%
Noosaville -1% to less than 1% less than -1% -1% to less than 1% less than -1%
Noosa Heads 1% to less than 2% less than -1% 1% to less than 2% -1% to less than 1%
Sunshine Beach less than -1% -1% to less than 1% 1% to less than 2% less than -1%
Peregian less than -1% -1% to less than 1% 2% or more 1% to less than 2%
7. Employment
The AEC report includes a table of Employment by Industry based on Place of Usual
Residence. It shows the relative dominance of the following industries across nearly all
localities:
Retail trade;
Accommodation and food services;
Health care and social assistance; and
Construction
Exceptions to the above were Boreen Point, Kin Kin and Cootharaba where 10.8% of
respondents were employed in Agriculture, forestry and fishing, and Noosa North Shore
where 11.2% were employed in Education and training.
Benchmarked against SEQ region and Queensland, Noosa residents are noticeably more
likely to be employed in retail trade or in accommodation and food services. By comparison
they are far less likely to be employed in manufacturing or public administration and safety.
In Noosa, the 2006-2011 period saw a noticeable increase in people employed in health
care and social assistance and to a lesser extent professional, scientific and technical
services and education and training. There was an increase of 212 residents employed in
the mining industry.
Data suggests that Noosa’s knowledge industries (which provides technical and specialist
services to local residents), particularly professional, scientific and technical services and
administrative and support services, reported noticeable growth in employment between
2006 and 2011.
In terms of occupations of employed residents, professionals were well represented in all
localities, as were technicians and trade workers. There were high proportions of managers
in Noosa Heads, Boreen Point, Kin Kin and Cootharaba, Noosaville and Doonan and Noosa
North Shore.
Page 75 of 147
Section 76
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The AEC report suggests there are clear links between occupations and key industries
across localities in the Shire. For instance high proportions of professionals are evident in
localities with stronger employment in health care and social assistance, education and
training and professional, scientific and technical services; high proportions of technicians
and trades workers are evident in localities with stronger employment in construction,
accommodation and food services, manufacturing and agriculture.
The highest proportion of white collar workers was reported in Noosa Heads, followed by
Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach and Noosaville and Doonan. The highest proportion of
blue collar workers was reported in Cooroibah, followed by Boreen Point, Kin Kin and
Cootharaba and Federal to Ringtail Creek.
Comparatively significant occupations of employment for the Shire in 2011 were
Professionals, Technicians and trade workers and Managers. Compared to the state and
regional figures Noosa was over represented by managers, sales workers and community
and personal service workers, and under represented by clerical and administrative workers
and machinery operators and drivers.
The highest number of registered businesses in 2013 across SA2s in the Shire was reported
for Noosa Hinterland, followed by Noosaville and Noosa Heads.
The highest proportion of businesses employing five or more employees in 2013 was at
Noosaville (at over 15% of local businesses) and Noosa Heads (12.4%). The highest
proportion of non-employing businesses in 2013 was Sunshine Beach (at 70.0% of local
businesses) and Noosa Hinterland (66.7%).
Businesses in the Shire were less likely to employee five or more staff (with 9.9% of
businesses doing so in 2013) when compared to the SEQ Region (11.8%) and the State
(12.2%).
Businesses employing five or more employees were most commonly in population driven,
lower value industries such as accommodation and food services, retail trade and
manufacturing (often associated with a high proportion of part time staff).
8. Socio-economics
Median household and personal incomes were the highest in Sunshine Beach to Peregian
Beach ($1,071.2 and $584.9 per week respectively) and Noosa Heads ($1,039.0 and $580.0
per week respectively). Household incomes were also high in Cooroibah ($1,055.8 per
week).
In 2011, the Shire reported a median household income almost $200 below the SEQ
Region’s and almost $300 below the State’s. Personal incomes were also below the
benchmarks but not as significantly.
The highest rate of unemployment was recorded in Noosa North Shore (at 12.2%), followed
by Boreen Point, Kin Kin and Cootharaba (9.3%) and Cooroibah (9.2%). The lowest rate of
unemployment was recorded in Noosaville and Doonan (6.1%). The Shire’s unemployment
rate (7.5% in 2011) was slightly higher than the SEQ region (6.4%) and the State (6.1%).
Noosa Shire recorded approximately 3.6 families per 1,000 local residents having no parent
employed. This was higher than the SEQ region (3.1 families per 1,000) and the State (3.2
families per 1,000). Cooroibah and Federal to Ringtail Creek both had comparatively high
rates at 11.8 and 10.2 families per 1,000 residents respectively.
Page 76 of 147
Section 77
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
The ABS has developed Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). One of these, the
Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD) summarises variables that indicate
relative disadvantage. This index ranks areas on a continuum from most disadvantaged to
least disadvantaged. A low score on this index indicates a high proportion of relatively
disadvantaged people in an area. A high score has a relatively low incidence of
disadvantage2.
When applied collectively across the nine localities it shows a small level of variance
between localities. In 2011 those localities considered to be more disadvantaged were
Noosa North Shore, Boreen Point, Kin Kin and Cootharaba, Tewantin and Federal to Ringtail
Creek. Scoring between 955.9 and 976.5 these were all lower than the Australian average
being 1,000.
Areas reporting lower levels of relative disadvantage were Noosa Heads, Noosaville and
Doonan and Sunshine Beach to Peregian Beach.
Noosa Shire as a whole had a score of 1,000.9 suggesting it is slightly more disadvantaged
than the SEQ region which scored 1,015.2.
Importantly however, within each of the 9 localities there is considerable variation and there
are several SA1s where the score was below 920, as low as 843 in a couple of SA1s. By
comparison there are SA1s with scores over 1100, going as high as 1145.
The ABS acknowledges that as measures of socio-economic conditions, the indexes are
best interpreted as ordinal measures that rank (order) areas and recommend using the index
rankings and deciles for analysis, rather than using the index scores. For that reason a map
has been included in the appendix of the AEC report rather than the table of scores.
For Councillors’ information the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and
Disadvantage (IRSAD) summarises variables that indicate either relative advantage or
disadvantage. This index ranks areas on a continuum from most disadvantaged to most
advantaged. An area with a high score on this index has a relatively high incidence of
advantage and a relatively low incidence of disadvantage.
Due to the differences in scope between this index and the IRSD, the scores of some areas
can vary substantially between the two indexes. For example, in an area that has parts
containing relatively disadvantaged people, and other parts containing relatively advantaged
people (as can occur through regeneration of an older suburb) it may have a low IRSD
ranking, due to its pockets of disadvantage. However, its IRSAD ranking may be moderate,
or even above average, because the pockets of advantage may offset the pockets of
disadvantage. For this reason it might be a truer reflection of the area but disguise the level
of disadvantage present for some.
While the AEC report includes the IRSD a comparative map of the IRSAD is provided below.
Both indexes could be included if Council prefers and individual maps are available for each
of the 9 localities.
2
This is a useful index for identifying pockets of disadvantage because there is no “contamination” by
measures of advantage, however it might not give the best overall representation of a community.
Page 77 of 147
Section 78
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Figure 7 IRSAD map of Noosa Shire
Page 78 of 147
Section 79
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Previous Council Consideration
Nil
Finance & Risk
Nil
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil
Internal Consultation
Various parts of Council including those responsible for the social plan and economic plan
reviewed and commented on a draft version of the AEC report before it was finalised.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
X Community Services X Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
X Executive Office Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
X Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 79 of 147
Section 80
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Finance
6 DECEMBER 2014 QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW REPORT
Author Manager Financial Services, Wayne Jensen
Corporate Services Department
Index ECM/ Subject/ 7.06 2014/2015 Budget
Attachments 1. Schedule of Proposed Budget Adjustments
2. Revised Budget Financial Statements
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A full review of budget performance of all activity areas has been undertaken based on
actual income and expenditure for the 6 months to 31 December 2015, and including
additional information that has come to light since the first quarter budget review.
In summary, the forecast operating position has improved by $11,666 and the capital
program has reduced by $560,770. The proposed changes have no significant impact on
any of Council’s 3 long term financial sustainability indicators.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Manager Financial Services to the Planning &
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 3 March 2015 and approve the requested changes
to the budget for the 2014 / 2015 financial year, as outlined in the attached Budget Financial
statements.
REPORT
Section 170 (3) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 allows Council, by resolution, to
amend the budget at any time before the end of the financial year. Consequently, formal
reviews are undertaken quarterly in addition to monthly monitoring and reporting. These
reviews take into consideration any new information received and account for trending
movements in different budget areas based on the actual income and expenditure incurred
to date.
The revised budget statements identify statement line items that have been affected by the
proposed budget adjustments, and also show the long term impact on the financial position
and sustainability ratios for Council. The schedule of proposed budget adjustments provides
a more detailed analysis for each variance.
1. Operating Budget Adjustments
There have been a number of changes to the operating budget based on the half-yearly
operating position, and to account for changes in accounting treatment for some line items
and for areas not included in the original budget.
Page 80 of 147
Section 81
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Significant changes for key elements include:
Operating Revenue
Rates, levies and charges
o Change in the accounting treatment for prepaid rates following the
recommendation of Council’s external Auditors
o Noosa Waters Lock & Weir levy refund of accumulated surplus
Fees and Charges
o Additional parking revenue
o Reduction to landfill revenue following removal of the Carbon Tax
o Reduction to animal licencing revenue (original figures overstated)
o Additional revenue for planning applications
o Additional revenue for campgrounds due to increased patronage (partially offset
by increased commission payable)
Interest received
o Increase in forecast revenue due to higher levels of cash on hand
Sales & other revenue
o Additional lease revenue following lease of Pelican Place
o Recovery of water charges from leased properties
Grants and subsidies – operating
o Commonwealth financial assistance grant significantly less than originally
forecast due to revised funding allocation methodology
Contributions and donations
o Contribution from developer for revegetation offset under State legislation
Operating Expenditure
Employee benefits
o Additional costs associated with systematic animal inspection program
o Salary savings due to transition to permanent organisational structure and review
of position descriptions
o Increase in casual staffing for customer service area to maintain required levels
of service
o Reduction in budget for salary point progression
o Employment of in-house electrician (fully funded from anticipated savings in
contractor payments)
Materials and Services
o Contribution towards Cooran sports facility lighting
o Removal of Carbon Tax liability (payment of funds collected)
o Contribution for Noosa River environmental protection
o Re-branding for Noosa Community Care (funded from reserves)
o Legal costs budget increased for planning appeals
o Fleet operational costs reduced following restructure of light vehicle fleet
o Water charges payable not included in original budgets
Depreciation and amortisation
o Reduction in depreciation following the revaluation (decrement in asset values)
for significant asset classes; with a corresponding decrease in the capital works
program for renewal and refurbishment.
2. Capital Budget Adjustments
There have been a number of changes to the capital program following completion of some
projects, additional State Government funding received, revised delivery options and
emergent works required.
Page 81 of 147
Section 82
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Details of the proposed changes to the capital program are outlined in the attached
schedule.
The proposals include a net reduction to the renewals program of $1,602,466; including the
$1,444,310 offset to depreciation, and deferral of a range of projects that could not be
commenced within the current year. The Upgrade program has been increased by
$1,150,696 (offset by State grants of $160,000) to accommodate new projects and the initial
design stage for works to be included in future year programs.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil
Finance & Risk
The underlying imperative for this review was that there should be no degradation of the
budgeted operating result and sustainability ratios, including consideration of funding for the
capital works program and the ability to deliver projects in a timely manner.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil
Internal Consultation
All business areas within Council have been consulted in compiling the proposed changes.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
x Community Services x Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
x Executive Office x Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 82 of 147
Section 83
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 83 of 147
Budget Review 3 - Summary of Requests by Department
Capital
Proposed Variance
Renewal/Upgrade ae Cost Centre/Project Pes eyes inoue Grand Total
Bara Bridges Girraween Bridget Joint Replacement Girraween Bridge Joint Replacement - Renewal $50,000 $50,000
Bridges Total $50,000 $50,000
Coastal Canals and Waterways Munna Point Foreshore Stabilisation Additional Geofabric Groyne - Increase $45,000 $45,000
Sunshine Beach - beach access 35 Sunshine Beach - beach access 35 - Completed -$29,304 -$29,304
Teewah Beach - southern dunal restore Teewah Beach - southern dunal restore - Completed -$5,344 -$5,344
Coastal Canals and Waterways Total $10,353 $10,353
Community Facilities NAC learn to swim pool — replacement pool cover NAC learn to swim pool — replacement pool cover - $18,000 $18,000
Renewal
Noosa Aquatic Centre - pool cleaner Noosa Aquatic Centre - pool cleaner - Completed $o so
Noosa Aquatic Centre 50m Pool Blanket Winch Noosa Aquatic Centre 50m Pool Blanket Winch - $1,747 $1,747
Completed
Noosa Leisure Centre - concertina door Noosa Leisure Centre - concertina door - Completed -$25,000 -$25,000
Noosa Leisure Centre — design and detail Noosa Leisure Centre — design and detail - Offset $o so
Noosa Leisure Centre -upstairs flooring Noosa Leisure Centre -upstairs flooring - Offset -$60,000 -$60,000
Noosa River Holiday Pk- Internal refurb Noosa River Holiday Pk- Internal refurb - Deferred -$60,000 -$60,000
Sunshine Beach Skate Park - block wall Sunshine Beach Skate Park - block wall - Completed $3,999 $3,999
Tewantin Spray Park Shade Sail Tewantin Spray Park Shade Sail - Completed $1,210 $1,210
Whole of Shire - community light poles Whole of Shire - community light poles - Reduction -$80,000 -$80,000
Community Facilities Total -$200,044 -$200,044
Environmental Assets Cudgerie - Cedar Gully Pk water feature Cudgerie - Cedar Gully Pk water feature - Completed $27,332 $27,332
Environmental Assets Total $27,332 $27,332
Holiday Parks Boreen Point Campground - wastewater Boreen Point Campground - wastewater - Completed $4,201 $4,201
Boreen Point Tennis Courts Renewal Stage | Boreen Point Tennis Courts Renewal Stage | - -$20,166 -$20,166
Deferred
RV Stopover Cooroy RV Stopover Cooroy - New $45,000 $45,000
Holiday Parks Total $29,036 $29,036
Information Technology Whole of Shire - corporate website Whole of Shire - corporate website - No Budget -$112,760 -$112,760
Required
Information Technology Total -$112,760 -$112,760
Parks & Playgrounds Peregian Beach - Victory Park table Peregian Beach - Victory Park table - Completed -$300 -$300
Page 83 of 147Section 84
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 84 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Budget Review 3 - Summary of Requests by Department
Capital
Proposed Variance
Renewal/Upgrade Program Cost Centre/Project pelt Expense iter Grand Total
Parks & Playgrounds Peregian Beach Pk - 3 phase switchboard Peregian Beach Pk - 3 phase switchboard - Completed -$367 -$367
Tewantin - Martin Park skate facility Tewantin - Martin Park skate facility - Completed $5,334 $5,334
Whole of Shire - BBQ renewal Whole of Shire - BBQ renewal - Completed -$4,953 -$4,953
Whole of Shire - park shelters Whole of Shire - park shelters - Completed -$2,369 -$2,369
Parks & Playgrounds Total $2,656 -$2,656
Pathways & Enabling Facilities Pomona School Road ( Pomona State School ) footpath renewal Pomona School Road ( Pomona State School ) $80,000 $80,000
footpath renewal - Emergent Project
Pathways & Enabling Facilities Total $80,000 $80,000
Public Transport New Noosa Bus Shelters - Design New Noosa Bus Shelters - Design - Increase $10,000 $10,000
Public Transport Total $10,000 $10,000
Sealed Roads Emergent all infrastructure renewal Reduce unallocated portion of funding for emergent -$98,000 -$98,000
projects
Reduce unallocated portion of funding due to -$1,444,310 -$1,444,310
reduction in depreciation charge
Noosa Heads - Noosa Parade Master Plan Noosa Heads - Noosa Parade Master Plan - Deferred -$100,000 -$100,000
Sealed Roads Total -$1,642,310 -$1,642,310
Sports Grounds and Facilities Girraween Sports Ground irrigation Girraween Sports Ground irrigation - Completed $1,583 $1,583
Sports Grounds and Facilities Total $1,583 $1,583
Stormwater Drainage Marcus Beach Tristania Drive Stormwater Pipe Renewal Marcus Beach Tristania Drive Stormwater Pipe $18,000 $18,000
Renewal - Emergent Project
Stormwater Drainage Total $18,000 $18,000
Transport and Infrastructure Whole of Shire - Road Directional Signs Whole of Shire - Road Directional Signs - Deferred -$40,000 -$40,000
Transport and Infrastructure Total -$40,000 -$40,000
Fleet Fleet Plant and Workshop Operations Sale of assets below anticipated amounts $109,000 $109,000
Fleet Total $109,000 $109,000
Upgrade Coastal Canals and Waterways Noosa Waters revetment walls - Stage 2a Noosa Waters revetment walls - Stage 2a - -$90 -$90
Completed
Coastal Canals and Waterways Total -$90 -$90
Commercial Land Peregian Beach Land Acquistion Peregian Beach Land Acquistion Stamp Duty - $38,771 $38,771
Increase
Rufus Street Precinct Design Rufus Street Precinct Design - New $130,000 $130,000
Commercial Land Total $168,771 $168,771
Community Facilities Bicentennial Community Hall - additional school toilet (purchase le Bicentennial Community Hall - additional school toilet $24,000 $24,000
(purchase leased facility) - New
Page 84 of 147Section 85
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 85 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Budget Review 3 - Summary of Requests by Department
Capital
Proposed Variance
Renewal/Upgrade Program Cost Centre/Project PCE flats Revenue Grand Total
LU} sy-arevelc) Community Facilities Cooroy butter Factory - condition assess Cooroy butter Factory - condition assess - deferral - -$5,000 -$5,000
Deferred
Lifeguards Storage Shed Lifeguards Storage Shed - No Budget Required -$10,000 -$10,000
Lifeguards Storage Shed - To Operating $10,000 $10,000
Noosa Regional Gallery Access Noosa Regional Gallery Access - Deferred $3,460 $3,460
Noosaville Leisure Centre Reception - Construction ($10k from des Noosaville Leisure Centre Reception - Construction
($10k from design project & $60k additional) - New
Community Facilities Total $22,460 $22,460
Pathways & Enabling Facilities Noosaville State School Precinct Pathways - TIDS funding 50/50 —_ Noosaville State School Precinct Pathways - TIDS $85,000 -$42,500 $42,500
funding 50/50 - New
Sunshine Beach State School Precinct Pathways - TIDS funding 50/! Sunshine Beach State School Precinct Pathways - TIDS $25,000 -$12,500 $12,500
funding 50/50 - New
Sunshine Beach State School Safety Improvements2 Sunshine Beach State School Safety Improvements2 - -$1,313 -$1,313
Completed
Tewantin State School Precinct Pathways - TIDS funding 50/50 Tewantin State School Precinct Pathways - TIDS $210,000 -$105,000 $105,000
funding 50/50 - New
Pathways & Enabling Facilities Total $318,687 -$160,000 $158,687
Planning Scheme Economic Promotion & Industry Assistance Economic Study - New $50,000 $50,000
Planning Scheme Total $50,000 $50,000
Sealed Roads Dr Pages - Kinmond Creek Road Initial planning & design Dr Pages - Kinmond Creek Road Initial planning & $150,000 $150,000
design - New
Tewantin Cooroy Noosa Rd Stages 2-6 Design Only Tewantin Cooroy Noosa Road Stages 2-6 Design Only - $150,000 $150,000
New
Sealed Roads Total $300,000 $300,000
Stormwater Drainage Seaview Ck - open drain civil works Seaview Ck - open drain civil works - Completed -$3,067 -$3,067
Stormwater Drainage Total -$3,067 -$3,067
Transport and Infrastructure Eenie Creek Road / Langura Street Intersection safety upgrad Eenie Creek Road / Langura Street Intersection safety -$0 -$0
upgrad - Completed
Transport and Infrastructure Total -$0 -$0
Waste-Waste Management Noosaville Landfill Noosaville Landfill Bio Basin Construction savings. -$43,823 -$43,823
Noosaville Landfill Sediment Control Additional $217,758 $217,758
Expense.
Noosaville Landfill Sediment Control Dosing and $120,000 $120,000
Montitoring Equipment Additional Expense.
Waste-Waste Management Total $293,935 $293,935
Page 85 of 147Section 86
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 86 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Budget Review 3 - Summary of Requests by Department
Capital
Renewal/Upgrade Program Cost Centre/Project preter b 12.1: T ae Revenue Grand Total
Grand Total -$620,770 -$51,000 -$671,770
Page 86 of 147Section 87
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 87 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Budget Review 3 - Summary of Requests by Department
Capital / Operating Operating
Se eel eR ray Revenue / Expense
Department leet ec iaee) sat Details eel tani-d teva} Grand Total
Animal Control $130,000 $58,131 $188,131
$120,000 $120,000
Cost associated with systematic inspection program - to engage contract/agency staff
Original budget of $420k overstated incorrect volume data used. Adjustment to revenue based $58,131 $58,131
on forecast - forecast registrations $197k, new registrations $15k, systematic inspections
$150k
Computershare - animal renewal notices postage, printing and inserts in rates notice not $10,000 $10,000
included in original budget
Community , Culture and Sport $30,000 $30,000
$30,000 $30,000
Additional funding Council Contribution towards lighting upgrade Cooran Sports Facilty
Savings resulting from FT Project officer filled PT -$8,063 -$8,063
Social Plan data - Noosa Shire Community Profile - AEC consulting costs shared with Strategic $8,063 $8,063
Land Use Planning
Community Culture and Sport $0 $0
Contribution to Pomona Community House (sale proceeds offset written down book value) $o 0)
budget savings in employee costs offset
Library Program / “Dollars Making Sense" FINLIT Grant -$16,667 -$16,667
New grant - Financial Literacy Australia $46k over three years -$16,667 -$16,667
Library Program / "Noosa's War Front" QAC Grant $5,800 -$10,861 -$5,061
New grant - Queensland Anzac Centenary Grants Program - Noosa War Front project $14,481 $5,800 $5,800
expense 2014/15 40% then 2015/16 60%
New grant - Queensland Anzac Centenary Grants Program - Noosa War Front project $14,481 -$10,861 -$10,861
revenue 75 % 2014/15 then 25% 2015/16
Lifeguard Services $10,000 $10,000
Capital to operating reclassification - Originally 10K capital towards design & approvals for $10,000 $10,000
lifeguard storage shed with construction funded ($65k) by SLSQ. Shed won't be a Council asset
so now the 10K needs to be operational funding
Management Community Facilities -$10,000 -$10,000
Revenue & expense offset - Venue Hire budget was challenging when developed and will not -$5,000 -$5,000
be achieved - indirect savings identified to offset
Revenue & expense offset - Venue Hire budget was challenging when developed and will not -$5,000 -$5,000
be achieved - savings identified to offset
Noosa Aquatic Centre so so
so so
Expense reclassification - Fitness Instrutors are enagaged as either contractor or casual staff.
Trend this year for more casual staff than contractors hence the change
Noosa Community Care Projects - Rebranding and Planning $50,000 $50,000
$50,000 $50,000
Transfer from Noosa Community Care Reserves for rebranding, business and marketing
planning as per NCC Quarterly Report (I&SC Meeting 11 November 2014).
Noosa Leisure Centre -$6,000 $6,000 so
$6,000 $6,000
Revenue & expense offset - Café Sales budget challenging and will not be achieved
Page 87 of 147Section 88
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Page 88 of 147
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3 MARCH 2015
Budget Review 3 - Summary of Requests by Department
Capital / Operating Operating
Sum of Proposed Variance LCT Wels)
Pes ecu s9 Cost Centre/Project Details Tees ieee Grand Total
Revenue & expense offset - Café Sales budget challenging and will not be achieved, therefore -$6,000 -$6,000
Community Services Noosa Leisure Centre COGS expense is also being adjusted accordingly
Parking -$188,131 -$188,131
Increased revenue forecast offsets changes in animal revenue and expense -$188,131 -$188,131
Public Health $20,000 -$20,000 $o
Increase casual budget to cover ytd overspend from extended staff leave $20,000 $20,000
Increase revenue based on YTD actuals trend -$20,000 -$20,000
The J -$10,000 $20,000 $10,000
Revenue & expense offset - Venue Hire budget was challenging when developed and will not -$10,000 -$10,000
be achieved - indirect savings identified to offset
Revenue & expense offset - Venue Hire budget was challenging when developed and will not $20,000 $20,000
be achieved.
Bicentennial Community Centre -$10,000 -$10,000
Revenue & expense offset - Venue Hire budget was challenging when developed and will not -$10,000 -$10,000
be achieved - indirect savings identified to offset
Waste Collection $149,851 $149,851
Revenue reduced to recognise Council Owned Property Offset Waste Collection $149,851 $149,851
Waste Holding Tanks $13,221 $13,221
Revenue reduced to recongnise Council Owned Property Offset Liquid Waste $13,221 $13,221
Noosaville Landfill Eumundi Road -$334,000 $70,000 _-$264,000
Landfill Cost Reduction Carbon Tax Removal -$334,000 -$334,000
Landfill Fee Loss Due to Carbon Tax Removal $70,000 $70,000
Community Facilities -$31,255 -$31,255
-$31,255 -$31,255
Operational responsibiility for Tewantin Splash Park moved to Parks from Buildings
Community Land Use Permits $2,140 $2,140
Higher Duties for backfill position during period of extended leave $2,140 $2,140
Community Properties $100,000 -$46,000 $54,000
Water charges not budgeted for, partly recovered $100,000 -$46,000 $54,000
Council Buildings and Facilities $0 $0
Water & Sewerage adjustments for Public Amenities and Parks - nil overall impact $o $o
Council Lease Management $12,753 $12,753
Backfill operational position during period of extended leave $12,753 $12,753
Financial and Accounting Services -$240,000 -$240,000
Additional Interest Revenue $240,000 — -$240,000
Fleet Plant and Workshop Operations -$109,000 -$109,000
12 SES Trailer received by fleet to maintain and upgrade. $6,000 $6,000
Tyres budget estimate allowed for 2 changes of tyres with only 1 required -$75,000 -$75,000
Leased vehicles have been returned -$40,000 -$40,000
Pelican Place Lease -$18,182 -$18,182
Pelican Place new lease -$18,182 -$18,182
Public Amenities $15,000 $15,000
Septic Pump out charges initially budgeted for recovery can not be oncharged to property $15,000 $15,000
owners
Page 88 of 147The text continues on section 89.