Council archive · source document
APPROVED Decision Notice MCU17/0034
Officer: Wilhelm Koschade Direct Telephone: 07 53296215 Our Reference: MCU17/0034 Your Reference: N/A 25 July 2017 Peak Physique Yoga Noosa 2/17 Grant St NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567 Dear Sir/Madam Decision Notice Sustainable Planning Act 2009 I refer to your application and advise that on 20 July 2017, Council decided to approve the application in full subject to conditions. Details of the decision are as follows: application details Application No: MCU17/0034 Street Address: 1 Rene Street 4/1 Rene Street Noosaville Real Property Description: Lot 4 BUP 101093 Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan (28 October 2016) Decision details The following type of approval has been issued: Development Permit for Material Change of Use of Premises - Entertainment & Dining Business Type 2 - Recreation, amusement & fitness (Yoga Studio) Relevant period of approval The relevant period for this development approval is 4 years starting the day that this development approval takes effect. assessment manager conditions PLANNING When Conditions must be Complied With Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied with prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times while the use continues. Approved Plans Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date AR01-102 - Upper Floor 21/04/2017 AR01-101 - Site Plan 21/04/2017 Nature and Extent of Approved Use The maximum number of participants attending a class is limited to 12 people during 9am – 5pm Monday to Friday, and 9am – 2pm Saturday. The approved use must not operate outside the hours of 6am to 9pm Monday to Sunday. Car Parking A minimum of 5 car parking spaces must be provided and line-marked on the site and made available and accessible at all times while the use is open for business. referral agencies Not Applicable Advisory notes The following notes are included for guidance and information purposes only and do not form part of the assessment manager conditions: PLANNING Equitable Access and Facilities The plans for the proposed building work have NOT been assessed for compliance with the requirements of the National Construction Code - Building Code of Australia (Volume 1) as they relate to people with disabilities. Your attention is also directed to the fact that in addition to the requirements of the National Construction Code as they relate to people with disabilities, one or more of the following may impact on the proposed building work: the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Commonwealth); the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Queensland); and the Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards. Infrastructure Charges This Development Permit will trigger an “Infrastructure Charge Notice” to be issued in accordance with Council’s “Charges Resolution” made pursuant to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and in conjunction with the State Planning Regulatory Provision (Adopted Charges). property notes Not Applicable preliminary approval overriding planning scheme Not Applicable further development permits required Development Permit for Building Works self assessable codes Not Applicable submissions There were 1 properly made submissions about the application. In accordance with Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the name and address of the principal submitter for each properly made submission is provided and attached. reasons/grounds for approval The Assessment Manager considers the decision conflicts with the planning scheme and the following are sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict: Fitness centres and the like are generally floor area intensive and require tenancies within industrial units that are most readily found in the Industry Zone; The Overall Outcomes of the Noosaville Locality Code acknowledge that some sport and recreation uses are acceptable in the Industry Zone; The fitness centre is of a similar size and scale to other approved Entertainment & Dining Business’s Type 2 within the Noosaville Industrial area. RIGHTS OF APPEAL You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached. During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval. If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued. Only one “negotiated decision notice” may be given. Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will commence again from the start the day after you receive a “negotiated decision notice”. (Refer to Part 8 “Dealing with decision notices and approvals” - Division 1 “Changing decision notices and approvals during applicant’s appeal period” of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.) OTHER DETAILS If you wish to obtain more information about Council’s decision, electronic copies are available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au, or at Council Offices. Yours faithfully Kerri Coyle Manager – Development Assessment cc Unitywater Enc: Infrastructure Charge Notice Approved Plans/Documents List of Submitters Appeal Rights List of Submitters SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING REGULATION 2009 Only Properly Made Submissions are to be included in this notice (s335 (1) (l)) Author Address1 Address2 ND & VL Hall c/- Andrew Fogg Lawyers PO Box 162 MAROOCHYDORE QLD 4558 Appeal Rights SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING REGULATION 2009 The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Chapter 7). MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE, RECONFIGURING A LOT & OPERATIONAL WORKS Division 8 Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals 461 Appeals by applicants (1) An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following— (a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application; (b) any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242; (c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for; (d) the length of a period mentioned in section 341; (e) a deemed refusal of the development application. (2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after— (a) if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or (b) otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant. (3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made. 462 Appeals by submitters—general (1) A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against— (a) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or (b) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327. (2) To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following— (a) the giving of a development approval; (b) any provision of the approval including— (i) a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or (ii) the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval. (3) However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter— (a) withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or (b) has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii). (4) The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter. 463 Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications (1) This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies. (2) A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about a referral agency’s response made by a prescribed concurrence agency for the application. (3) However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it relates to— (a) if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (environment)—development for an aquacultural ERA; or (b) if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (fisheries)—development that is— (i) a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or (ii) operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant. (4) Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment— (a) a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive (fisheries); (b) a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2). 464 Appeals by advice agency submitters (1) Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission. (2) The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about— (a) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or (b) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327. (3) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter. (4) However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision. 465 Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals (1) For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person. (3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made. 466 Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes (1) For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval— (a) if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application— (i) the person who made the request; or (ii) an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the request; (b) if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person who made the request. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on the request under section 376. (3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made. 467 Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency (1) A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person. [word/footer1.xml] Page 7 of 7 [word/footer2.xml] PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected] TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au Page 1 of 7 [word/header1.xml] MCU17/0034 [Attachment: image3.png (image text)] K Coy fs [Attachment: image4.png (image text)] a mm NOOSA COUNCIL
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
APPROVED Decision Notice MCU17/0034Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 134 KB (small file)
- File type
- DOCX
No other editions are linked here.