Original source · versioned page text
2017-06-06 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 JUNE 2017
Issues Comments
No safe way for pedestrians to traverse Walter Hay
Drive to access shops and services, although vague
reference to pedestrian link in planning report
Non-compliance with Noosaville Locality Code
The built form of the development is not
Not compliant with Specific Outcomes:
considered to be unreasonable where the Open
O8 (max 1 storey),
Space buffer to the site’s front could be
O16 (plot ratio)
maintained. Bushfire measures however would
O89 (use)
impact on the ability to suitably screen the
O167(use)
proposed development.
Development is for double storey when zoning is for
single storey.
Will create a precedent for inappropriate
development
Bushfire Risk
Agreed
Not a suitable site for an aged care facility due to
the bushfire risk
Can residents quickly evacuate the premises
Fire management within the National Park would be
a risk to the intended aged care residents that may
suffer from the effects of bushfire smoke.
Evacuation procedures would need to be
implemented every time fire is detected within the
adjoining bushland.
Amenity
Council’s Strategic Unit has commented that
Development will create social isolation.
pedestrian connectivity to this site is poor.
No connectivity to public transport or areas for
Assisted recreation and staff movements would
recreation and medical care.
be impacted by the poor pedestrian connectivity.
Conditions to an approval could require
Environmental Sustainable Design
environmentally sustainable design elements.
No environmentally sustainable design elements
such as rainwater collection and solar panels.
5. CONCLUSION
The application for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use for Multiple Housing Type
3 - Retirement & Special Needs (Aged care facility) at 28 Eenie Creek Road Noosaville is
recommended for refusal. The proposed development is not in accordance with the Strategic
Framework and the Natural Hazards Overlay Code. The development will place people and
property at risk and unduly burden disaster management response capability. The removal of
vegetation in accordance with Bushfire requirements will result in the development having a
detrimental impact on the streetscape.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer to the Mayor & CEO Community Facilities Financial Services
Executive Support Community Development ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property & Facilities
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Office X Planning & Infrastructure
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services
Customer Service Civil Operations
Economic Development Infrastructure Planning & Design
Governance Planning & Environment
Human Resources Strategic Land Use Planning
Sustainability
Page 34 of 73
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.