Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

PEREGIAN BEACH ACTIVE STREET - STAGE 1 PROGRESS UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS (Deferred from the Ordinary Meeting dated 19 March 2026 - Item 12.2) · 2026-06-09 ATTACHMENT 1 to Minutes of General Committee 9.06.2026 - Peregian Beach Active Street - Further Information

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

2.   Base Case Opportunities
     a.    Existing infrastructure: The project provides the opportunity to address inadequacy and
           requirement for emergent works to repair storm water assets prior to/during project
           implementation. Further project timeline delays and cost impacts.
     b.    Leverage funding structure: As the ATF grant is for construction only funding, matching
           the SEQ Liveability contribution. The potential exists to expand the scope of works using
           council reserves, matched by the ATF grant, to address emergent and repair works.
3.   Scenario Analysis

The following table further details alternative scenarios and the differentiated risks anticipated.
Scenario                    Description                      Likely Outcome
Base case - construction    Current Scope, Programme,      Re-instates programme float as stormwater
commencement mid-           Budget/funding - no mitigation renewal opportunities have been factored into
October (working                                           new programme but not recommended to
assumption: approvals of                                   proceed, project budget contingency mostly
EOT from both funding                                      consumed.
bodies)
                                                             Reputational damage associated with project
                                                             continuation in spite of immediate resident
                                                             resistance, particularly without implementing
                                                             recommended design changes influenced by
                                                             community engagement activities.
Adjust as per               Implement mitigations, actively Re-instates project float, enable more time to
recommendations             enhance opportunities           close out community interactions, minimise
                                                            Council exposure to project costs, maintain
                                                            opportunity to leverage funding structure to
                                                            deliver more at lower cost to council, and
                                                            reduces reputation damage risk by including
                                                            community requests and/or suggestions into
                                                            the project where possible.
Further recommendations Additional Community                Project will need to be fully funded by Council.
outside of those drafted by Consultation and or significant
                                                            Alternative design treatments will likely be more
staff                       change to planning and design
                                                            expensive than the currently proposed project.
                            approach
                                                            Delays to delivery of walking and cycling
                                                            infrastructure.
Do not proceed              Stop working on design and       Council will need to fund works to date at an
                            cancel planned construction      approximate value of $210k.
                            works.
                                                             May damage relationships with funding bodies
                                                             and potentially limit further funding
                                                             opportunities.
                                                             Reputational damage for not following through
                                                             with Walking and Cycling Strategy objectives
                                                             and negative impact on future projects
                                                             proposals across the shire.
                                                             Loss of funding for "practical" components of
                                                             the projects such as construction of shared
                                                             pathway and rectification of stormwater
                                                             infrastructure.
                                                             Delays to delivery of walking and cycling
                                                             infrastructure.

Following is an update to Attachment 8 (that was provided in the original report):

                                                                                                 4|Page
Log in to download the original file

2026-06-09 ATTACHMENT 1 to Minutes of General Committee 9.06.2026 - Peregian Beach Active Street - Further Information.pdf · 659 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.