Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Meeting minutes

of 27

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                         MINUTES


              Ordinary Meeting

          Thursday, 16 November 2023

                                 5:00 PM
             Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin




Crs Clare Stewart (Chair), Karen Finzel, Joe Jurisevic, Amelia Lorentson, Brian
Stockwell, Tom Wegener, Frank Wilkie




                      “Noosa Shire – different by nature”
Log in to download the original file

b24a415343.pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

Full text of the other 26 pages

Page 2

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023




1.          ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

            COUNCILLORS
            Cr Clare Stewart (Chair)
            Cr Karen Finzel
            Cr Joe Jurisevic
            Cr Amelia Lorentson
            Cr Brian Stockwell
            Cr Tom Wegener
            Cr Frank Wilkie

            EXECUTIVE
            Acting Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock
            Director Community Services Kerri Contini
            Director Corporate Services Trent Grauf
            Director Strategy and Environment Kim Rawlings
            Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray
            Acting Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh

            APOLOGIES
            Nil.

            Council Resolution
            Moved:       Cr Clare Stewart
            Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson
            That in accordance with Section 254K of the Local Government Regulation, Cr Wilkie
            and Cr Finzel are approved to attend the Meeting dated 16 November 2023 via
            Microsoft Teams.
            Carried unanimously?

2.          CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES



     2.1.          ORDINARY MEETING 26 OCTOBER 2023

                   Council Resolution

                   The following was presented to the meeting in relation to this item:
                   Cr Stockwell – refer to 2023-11-16 Attachment 1 to the Minutes - Cr
                   Stockwell - Public Statement
                   Moved:           Cr Brian Stockwell
                   Seconded:        Cr Joe Jurisevic
                   The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 26 October 2023 be received and
                   confirmed.
                   Carried unanimously.


3.          MAYORAL MINUTES

            Nil.

Page 3

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                          16 NOVEMBER 2023


4.            PETITIONS

              Nil.

5.            NOTIFIED MOTIONS

              Nil.

6.            PRESENTATIONS

              Nil.

7.            DEPUTATIONS

              Nil.

11.           PUBLIC QUESTION TIME




      11.1.          DEBRA WALZ

                     Question 1.
                     Given everything we know about the toxicity of fluoride, and Noosa Council being
                     only one of 21 councils of 77 councils across the State of Qld, that has adopted
                     the inclusion of fluoride in the town water supply, was there any community
                     consultation prior to fluoride being included, if so, when and how?
                     Answer provided by Richard MacGillivray, Director Development and
                     Regulation
                     Queensland Health advise that fluoridation of drinking water is the most effective
                     community-wide means of reducing tooth decay. Water fluoridation at optimal
                     levels remains one of the most significant oral health programs in Australia and is
                     supported by peak health bodies including;
                           National Health and Medical Research Council,
                           Australian Dental Association,
                           Australian Medical Association and
                           the World Health Organisation.
                     Queensland Health confirm that approximately 72% of Queenslanders receive
                     fluoridated drinking water. Fluoride is added to drinking water because it
                     strengthens tooth enamel and reduces tooth decay. The Department of Health is
                     responsible for encouraging councils in Queensland to add fluoride to drinking
                     water as well as strictly monitoring the quality and safety of potable water under
                     state law and national guidelines. Fluoridation in Queensland is regulated in
                     accordance with the Water Fluoridation Act 2008 and Water Fluoridation
                     Regulation 2008. The State Government has since devolved powers to each local
                     government in Queensland to be able to make the decision whether or not the
                     town water supplies within their area are fluoridated. Noosa’s water is treated by
                     the region’s bulk water authority Seqwater, including the addition of fluoride and
                     is then distributed to customers throughout the region by Unitywater. It is relevant
                     to note that the full costs to reverse any decision to fluoridate the water supply
                     must be borne by the relevant local council and ratepayers. I am aware that Noosa
                     along with Moreton Bay and Sunshine Coast Council’s, within Unitywater's service
                     area, have not made a decision under section 103 of the Water Fluoridation Act

Page 4

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                 16 NOVEMBER 2023


             2008 to cease adding fluoride to the water supply and no community consultation
             has occurred with regard to this subject.

            Question 2.
            Is Council aware of the numerous scientific studies that explain the detrimental
            health consequences of the addition of fluoride eg enzyme inhibitor, neuro toxin,
            dental fluorosis, osteoporosis, plus many more, in town water and do you believe
            the addition of fluoride in town water should be forced on people without consent?
            Answer provided by Richard MacGillivray, Director Development and
            Regulation
            Council is aware there are a range of different viewpoints and research involving
            accredited, unaccredited and independent studied into the potential health
            benefits and effects associated with the fluoridation of town water. Council relies
            on advice from Queensland Health as the Government department responsible
            for public health within our State to evaluate medical research from across the
            Nation and Globe and to provide clear guidance to local governments and
            communities on a range of public health matters including fluoride in water
            supplies. Advice from Queensland Health states that “Local governments should
            note that fluoridation has been proven as a safe, effective and ethical means of
            preventing tooth decay, for people of all ages and not just for children. It is
            supported by peak health bodies including the National Health and Medical
            Research Council, the Australia Dental Association, the Australian Medical
            Association and the World Health Organization. When considering whether
            fluoridation is in the best interests of a community, Queensland Health
            recommends local governments consider the significant oral health benefits that
            are associated with drinking water fluoridation.” In relation to statement regarding
            consent I would advise that councils are bound by the legislative framework which
            must be adhered to when making decisions about the fluoridation of town water.
            Council will fully adhere to its obligations in this regard.


    11.2.   NICK COOKE

            Question 1.
            Can council please confirm the total sum (in dollars) of council funding and grants
            given to Zero Emissions Noosa since its inception in 2017?
            Answer provided byKim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment
            Since 2017 Zen Inc has been successful in gaining $226,675 across the 7 years
            via various Council Community, Economic and Environment Grants and funding.

            Question 2.
            Since the proposed lithium ‘community batteries’ to be implemented by Noosa
            Council lay outside the criteria of ‘assessable development’ under the Planning
            Act 2016, can Council please confirm the type of application (if any), the criteria,
            processes and any risk assessments you will be using to assess the proposed
            batteries before their implementation?
            Answer provided by Kim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment
            Noosa Council, in partnership with Zero Emissions Noosa Inc. and Yarra Energy
            Foundation (YEF), have been awarded $500,000 to install a community battery in
            Noosaville. Pad mounted batteries of less that 15m2 are not categorised an
            assessable development under Schedule 6 of the Planning Regulation. In
            accordance with Noosa Council’s Risk Management and Opportunity Framework,
            the Community Battery Project has been subject to number of assessments to
            identify and assess the risks across the lifecycle of the battery deployment. These
            assessments have considered the technology, site assessments, planning and
            environment, safety, cost.

Page 5

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                     16 NOVEMBER 2023




     11.3.     SANIA BORIC

               Question 1.
               If a conservation park is declared over the existing FHA's, what extra powers
               exactly does that give Council that you or State departments do not already have,
               why is this necessary, or even a point for consideration IF the rivers health is at a
               critical level as suggested and urgent action is required, which would be held up
               with the need for further community consultation?
               Answer provided by Kim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment
               This is yet to be properly determined as the concept of a conservation park
               established under the Nature Conservation Act (1992) in the same areas as the
               declared Fish Habitat Area (FHA) of the Noosa River was subject to
               comprehensive consideration and investigation to determine this. This is now on
               hold and deferred until 2024.

               Question 2.
               Given that the Catchment falls within 3 different shires, one would assume that
               there is already an in principle heads of agreement on the declaration of a
               conservation park between the Shires; In terms of environmental and scientific
               significance, how is it that the rest of the Noosa River does not rate as at risk? Is
               there scientific evidence or an environmental report/ link that suggests that the
               areas of the River outside of the FHA’s are not at risk and do not require to be
               included into the Conservation Park?
               Answer provided by Kim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment
               While the catchment falls within three different shires, a very small proportion of
               the Noosa River Catchment is shared with Gympie and Sunshine Coast. Council
               however works with Sunshine Coast Council and Gympie Council on various
               projects with broader catchment management considerations. The concept of a
               Conservation Park over FHA was subject to investigation and was just one of
               many other actions in the Draft Noosa River Catchment Plan which sought to
               address a wide range of river and catchment management issues and
               opportunities.

8.           CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE REPORTS



     8.1.      PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - 7 NOVEMBER 2023

               ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

               COMMITTEE MEMBERS
               Cr Clare Stewart (Acting Chair)
               Cr Karen Finzel (vi Microsoft Teams)
               Cr Brian Stockwell

               NON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
               Cr Amelia Lorentson

               EXECUTIVE
               Acting Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock
               Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray
               Director Infrastructure Shaun Walsh

Page 6

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 NOVEMBER 2023




             APOLOGIES
             Cr Tom Wegener

             COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL


             5.1. MCU22/0118 – DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A MATERIAL
             CHANGE OF USE – SHORT-TERM ACCOMMODATION AT 94 & 142 NOOSA
             DR, NOOSA HEADS
             That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.1 be referred to the
             General Committee due to the significance of the issue.

             5.2. MCU21/0194.01 – APPLICATION FOR AN OTHER CHANGE TO A
             DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR A ROADSIDE STALL TO INCLUDE A
             FOOD AND DRINK OUTLET AT 201 MARY RIVER RD, COOROY
             That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.2 be referred to the
             General Committee due to the significance of the issue.

             5.3. MCU22/0209.01 - MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR
             A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATION AT
             515 COOROY NOOSA ROAD, TINBEERWAH

             In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson
             provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
             interest in this matter:
             I, Cr Lorentson, inform the meeting I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
             matter. My husband and I own a property at Noosa Parade, Noosa Heads. Since
             November 2020 this property has been used for Short Term accommodation
             rental. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a
             reasonable person could have a perception of bias as I have no personal
             relationship with the applicant, and although I have a STA property, I will not be
             positively or negatively impacted by the decision. Therefore, I will choose to
             remain in the meeting room, however, I will respect the decision of the meeting
             on whether I can remain and participate.
             Council Resolution
             Moved:        Cr Joe Jurisevic
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Lorentson and
             determine that Cr Lorentson participates and votes on this matter because
             Council believes that there is no personal relationship with the applicant and Cr
             Lorentson will not be positively or negatively impacted by the decision so a
             reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.
             Carried unanimously.
             Cr Lorentson did not vote on the above motion.

             Council Resolution
             Moved:       Cr Clare Stewart
             Seconded: Cr Joe Jurisevic
             That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning
             and Environment Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application No.
             MCU22/0209.01 to make a minor change to an existing approval for a
             Development Permit for a Material Change of Use – Short-Term Accommodation
             situated at 515 Cooroy Noosa Rd, Tinbeerwah and:
             A. Refuse the minor change application for the following reasons:

Page 7

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 NOVEMBER 2023


             1. The proposed change does not constitute a minor change to the development
             approval as the increase in the number of people on site constitutes ‘substantially
             different development’, as the change will increase the severity of known impacts,
             including noise and carparking.
             2. The proposed development is inconsistent with the Overall Outcomes (2)(i)
             and (j) and PO4 of the Rural Zone Code as accommodating 16 people and up to
             16 vehicles on site is not considered ‘small scale’ in the context of the subject
             site, locality and surrounding development and will likely impact on the rural
             amenity and character of the area.
             3. The proposed development is inconsistent with Overall Outcome (2)(f) and
             PO25 of the Visitor Accommodation Code as the use of the premises to
             accommodate 16 persons will unreasonably impact on the residential amenity of
             the surrounding area due to the likely increase in noise to adjoining properties
             and the scale of the use being incompatible with the character and uses within
             the surrounding area.
             B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
             Act 2016.
             Carried unanimously.


             5.4. FURTHER REPORT - MCU21/0110 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL
             CHANGE OF USE - BAR, FOOD AND DRINK OUTLET, OUTDOOR SPORT
             AND RECREATION, RESORT COMPLEX AT 61 NOOSA SPRINGS DRIVE,
             NOOSA HEADS.
             That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 5.4 be referred to the
             General Committee as there is no quorum due to proposed conflict of interest
             declarations.


             5.5. PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. D154 OF 2023 -
             ENFORCEMENT NOTICE ISSUED TO 1/5 ATTUNGA HEIGHTS, NOOSA
             HEADS.

             In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson
             provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
             interest in this matter:
             I, Cr Lorentson, inform the meeting I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
             matter. My husband and I own a property at Noosa Parade, Noosa Heads. Since
             November 2020 this property has been used for Short Term accommodation
             rental. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a
             reasonable person could have a perception of bias as I have no personal
             relationship with the applicant, and although I have a STA property, I will not be
             positively or negatively impacted by the decision. Therefore, I will choose to
             remain in the meeting room, however, I will respect the decision of the meeting
             on whether I can remain and participate.
             Council Resolution
             Moved:         Cr Joe Jurisevic
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Lorentson and
             determine that Cr Lorentson participates and votes on this matter because
             Council believes that there is no personal relationship with the applicant and Cr
             Lorentson will not be positively or negatively impacted by the decision so a
             reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.
             Carried unanimously.
             Cr Lorentson did not vote on the above motion.

Page 8

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 NOVEMBER 2023




             Council Resolution
             Moved:       Cr Joe Jurisevic
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the
             Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding
             Planning & Environment Court Appeal No. D154 of 2023 and agree to continue
             enforcement against Eugeniy Raiter and Catherine Dentsas to address the
             current breaches of The Noosa Plan.
             Carried unanimously.


             5.6. PLANNING ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO D155 OF 2023
             ENFORCEMENT NOTICE ISSUED TO 3/5 ATTUNGA HEIGHTS

             In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson
             provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
             interest in this matter:
             I, Cr Lorentson, inform the meeting I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
             matter. My husband and I own a property at Noosa Parade, Noosa Heads. Since
             November 2020 this property has been used for Short Term accommodation
             rental. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a
             reasonable person could have a perception of bias as I have no personal
             relationship with the applicant, and although I have a STA property, I will not be
             positively or negatively impacted by the decision. Therefore, I will choose to
             remain in the meeting room, however, I will respect the decision of the meeting
             on whether I can remain and participate.
             Council Resolution
             Moved:         Cr Joe Jurisevic
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Lorentson and
             determine that Cr Lorentson participates and votes on this matter because
             Council believes that there is no personal relationship with the applicant and Cr
             Lorentson will not be positively or negatively impacted by the decision so a
             reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.
             Carried unanimously.
             Cr Lorentson did not vote on the above motion.

             Council Resolution
             Moved:       Cr Joe Jurisevic
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the
             Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding
             Planning & Environment Court Appeal No. D155 of 2023 and agree to continue
             enforcement against Angela Dentsas and Vasilios Dentsas to address the
             current breaches of The Noosa Plan.
             Carried unanimously.


             6.1. PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED BY DELEGATED AUTHORITY
             SEPTEMBER 2023
             That Council note the report by the Manager, Development Assessment to the
             Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding
             planning applications that have been decided by delegated authority.

Page 9

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                              16 NOVEMBER 2023




             Council Resolution
             Moved:      Cr Amelia Lorentson
             Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
             That the report of the Planning and Environment Committee meeting dated 7
             November 2023 be received and the recommendations therein be adopted
             except where dealt with by separate resolution.
             Carried unanimously.



    8.2.    SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE REPORT - 7 NOVEMBER 2023

            ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

            COMMITTEE MEMBERS
            Cr Amelia Lorentson (Chair)
            Cr Joe Jurisevic
            Cr Frank Wilkie

            NON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
            Nil

            EXECUTIVE
            Acting Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock
            Acting Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh
            Director Corporate Services Trent Grauf

            APOLOGIES
            Cr Clare Stewart

            COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUCIL


            5.1 SUNRISE SHOPS - SHOP 6 LEASE RENEWAL
            That Council note the report by the Property Advisor - Commercial Property to
            the Services & Organisation Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023:
                A. Approve the lease renewal to Cartor Pty Ltd for Shop 6, Sunrise Shops
                   for twelve (12) months commencing 28 April 2024.
                B. Apply the exception to the requirement for tendering of the lease under
                   Section 236 (1) (c) (iii) of the Local Government Regulation as the lease
                   renewal is to the existing tenant.


            6.1 CAPITAL PROGRAM 2023/24 DELIVERY STATUS
            That Council note the report by the Acting Infrastructure Planning, Design &
            Delivery Manager to the Services & Organisation Committee Meeting dated 7
            November 2023 providing an update on the delivery of the 23/24 Capital
            Program as at 30 September 2023.

Page 10

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                    16 NOVEMBER 2023


             Council Resolution
             Moved:            Cr Joe Jurisevic
             Seconded:         Cr Clare Stewart
             That the report of the Services & Organisation Committee meeting dated 7
             November 2023 be received and the recommendations therein be adopted
             except where dealt with by separate resolution.
             Carried unanimously.



    8.3.    GENERAL COMMITTEE REPORT - 13 NOVEMBER 2023

            ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

             COMMITTEE MEMBERS
             Cr Joe Jurisevic (Acting Chair)
             Cr Amelia Lorentson
             Cr Clare Stewart
             Cr Brian Stockwell
             Cr Tom Wegener
             Cr Frank Wilkie (via Microsoft Teams)

             EXECUTIVE
             Acting Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock
             Director Corporate Services Trent Grauf
             Director Strategy and Environment Kim Rawlings
             Director Community Services Kerri Contini
             Acting Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh
             Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray

             APOLOGIES
             Cr Karen Finzel


            COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL


            5.1. MCU22/0118 – DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A MATERIAL
            CHANGE OF USE – SHORT-TERM ACCOMMODATION AT 94 & 142 NOOSA
            DR, NOOSA HEADS (Referred from Planning & Environment Committee
            dated 7 November 2023 - Item 5.1)

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wilkie
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a prescribed conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Wilkie inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in this
            matter as the applicant, RACV resort, support the Noosa Arts Theatre with an
            annual $2,500 sponsorship and I also serve as Noosa Arts Theatre President. As
            a result of this conflict of interest, I will leave the meeting room while the matter is
            decided.
            Cr Wilkie left the meeting.

Page 11

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Lorentson, inform the meeting I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter. My husband and I own a property at Noosa Parade, Noosa Heads. Since
            November 2020 this property has been used for Short Term accommodation
            rental. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a
            reasonable person could have a perception of bias as I have no personal
            relationship with the applicant, and although I have a STA property, I will not be
            positively or negatively impacted by the decision. Therefore, I will choose to
            remain in the meeting room, however, I will respect the decision of the meeting
            on whether I can remain and participate.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:         Cr Joe Jurisevic
            Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Lorentson and
            determine that Cr Lorentson participates and votes on this matter because
            Council believes that there is no personal relationship with the applicant and Cr
            Lorentson will not be positively or negatively impacted by the decision so a
            reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.
            Carried unanimously.
            Cr Lorentson did not vote on the above motion.

            Council Resolution
            Moved:        Cr Joe Jurisevic
            Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson
            That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning &
            Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application
            No. MCU22/0118 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Short-
            term accommodation, situated at 94 & 142 Noosa Dr, Noosa Heads and:
            A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
            1. The proposed development has failed to demonstrate a significant planning
            need to develop outside of Noosa Plan 2020's urban boundary, particularly at the
            density and height proposed and is inconsistent with the local landscape
            character. No overriding community benefit been demonstrated, which would
            justify approval despite its conflict with the planning scheme.
            2. Valid planning grounds have been raised by submitters that the proposal will
            result in an unacceptable impact on the biodiversity of the locality. Further, the
            development exceeds what a community member could reasonably expect to be
            developed outside of the Urban Boundary and within the Environmental
            Management and Conservation Zone.
            3.      The proposed development of the subject land is inappropriate, in
            circumstances where:
            (a) The proposed development seeks to expand the existing resort complex in
            circumstances where part of that land is located outside of the urban boundary in
            Noosa Plan 2020;
            (b) The proponent seeks to utilise the land for Short-term accommodation, which
            is an inconsistent use in the Environmental Management and Conservation zone;
            (c) The proposed development is an overdevelopment of the land at the expense
            of the natural values of the land, as the proposal would result in unacceptable
            clearing of vegetation in an ecologically important and environmentally sensitive
            area, including proposed development located on mapped Areas of Biodiversity
            Significance, Matters of State Environmental Significance (MSES) Environmental
            Values and Riparian Buffer Area under the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands
            Overlay and mapped Core Koala Habitat area;

Page 12

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


            (d) The stormwater treatment proposed is not of a sufficient size to achieve the
            water quality objectives and protection of biodiversity areas required under the
            Water Quality and Drainage Code.
            (e) The built form of the proposed development is unacceptable, being slightly
            over height in metres in the Tourist Accommodation zone and substantially over
            height in metres and storeys in the Environmental Management and Conservation
            zone.
            In respect of the above, the proposed development is inconsistent with the
            following provisions of Noosa Plan 2020:
            (i) Strategic Framework – 3.2.2, 3.2.5, 3.3.1(b) and 3.3.4(b)(p);
            (ii) Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code – 8.2.2.2(2)(a), (b), (c),
            (d), (e), (f), (g), (h) and (i) Table 8.2.23 PO1, PO3, PO6 and PO11;
            (iii) Water Quality and Drainage Code – 9.4.82(2)(a) and (b) and Table 9.4.8.3
            PO6;
            (iv) Noosa Heads Local Plan Code – Overall Outcomes (2)(b)(d)(e) and (ad)
            and Table 7.2.5.3 PO4, PO5, PO6 and PO26;
            (v)     Environmental Management and Conservation Zone Code – Overall
            Outcomes (2)(a) and (b), Table 6.7.1.3 PO1, PO5, PO7, PO8, PO9, PO11 and
            PO13;
            (vi) Tourist Accommodation Zone Code - Table 6.3.4.3 PO9 and PO10.
            4. When read as a whole, the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017
            (SEQRP) does not lend support to the proposed use of the land, as:
            4.1. the SEQRP sets a long term, 50-year vision, establishing aspirations for the
            region up to 2067. Given this, the timing and sequencing of urban development
            occurring within the Urban Footprint is a finer grained detail, the planning for which
            is implemented through local government planning schemes;
            4.2. the designation of land as being within the Urban Footprint does not imply
            that all that land with that designation can be developed for urban purposes; and
            4.3. when assessed against Noosa Plan 2020, the proposed development is not
            suitable for urban development.
            5. The following relevant matters support refusal:
            5.1. The proposed development will involve an unacceptable loss of vegetation
            in a locality which is an ecologically important and environmentally sensitive and
            serves as an important ecological linkage,
            5.2.     There is no planning, economic or community need for the proposed
            development on the subject land.
            5.3. Approval of the proposed development would not be in the public interest
            as reflected in the provisions of Noosa Plan 2020 referred to in these reasons for
            refusal.
            B. That the CEO be requested to review the zone and urban boundaries as part
            of a future review of the Planning Scheme; and
            C. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
            Act 2016.
            Carried unanimously.

            Cr Wilkie returned to the meeting.




            5.2. MCU21/0194.01 – APPLICATION FOR AN OTHER CHANGE TO A
            DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR A ROADSIDE STALL TO INCLUDE A
            FOOD AND DRINK OUTLET AT 201 MARY RIVER RD, COOROY (Referred
            from Planning & Environment Committee dated 7 November 2023 - Item 5.2)

Page 13

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                     16 NOVEMBER 2023


             Motion
             Moved:         Cr Tom Wegener
             Seconded: Cr Brian Stockwell
             That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning
             & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application
             No. MCU21/0194.01 for an other change to a Development Permit for Material
             Change of Use (Roadside Stall) to include a Food and Drink Outlet, situated at
             201 Mary River Rd, Cooroy and:
             A. App
             rove, in part, only (with amended Condition 2) and part refusal.
             B. Approve the change to Condition 2 as outlined in Attachment 1.
             C. Refuse the Food and Drink Outlet component of the application for the
             following reasons:
             1. This element of the proposal does not advance the elements and strategies
             of the South East Queensland Regional Plan as it does not value add to the site’s
             on-farm agricultural activities.
             2. This element of the proposal is contrary to the Intent and Outcomes of the
             Strategic Framework, Section 3.3.1 (e) and Section 3.3.5 (h), (v) and (w) as:
                    a) The proposal is not a rural activity or a rural enterprise and such uses
             are intended to be located in business centres to contribute to their vibrancy.
                    b) The proposal does not value add to the site’s rural activities, would be
             the primary use on the site and is in no way ancillary to the approved roadside
             stall.
                   c) The proposal predominantly caters to passing trade, largely locals in the
             area, and has only a limited tourism focus.
             3. This element of the proposal is not consistent with overall outcomes (b), (i)
             and performance outcomes PO1, PO4 and PO8 of the Local Plan Code for
             Cooroy as:
                  a) The proposed use is located outside the urban boundary and the Cooroy
             town centre.
                    b) The proposed use will adversely interrupt the landscape character and
             visual amenity of Mary River Road, being very different to uses envisaged in rural
             areas of the Shire.
             4. This element of the proposal is contrary to overall outcomes (a) & (l) and
             performance outcomes PO1, PO5 & PO13 of the Rural Zone Code as:
                 a) The proposal is not a rural activity, it is an urban activity, and will not value
             add to goods produced on site.
                    b) The proposal does not have an indelible connection to the rural or
             ecological values of the site and is more appropriately located in an urban area.
                  c) There is no overriding community benefit for the food and drink outlet to
             be located on the site, with no particular circumstances relevant that warrant the
             proposal.
                   d) The proposal will detract from the scenic amenity of Mary River Road
             being part of the major road network for the Shire.
             5. This element of the proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO1, PO2,
             PO3, PO11, PO12, PO13 of the Business Activities Code as:
                  a) The proposal is a type of business activity that is at odds and is not
             compatible with the purpose of the site’s rural zoning.
                  b) The proposal seeks to locate a business activity outside the business
             centres shown in the Noosa Shire Centres Hierarchy.
                 c) The proposed food and drink outlet is a use that is not typically expected
             to be found in the rural areas of the Shire.
                d) The proposal is adversely impacting the amenity of nearby residents, with
             its early and week-end operating hours, uncoordinated and uncontrolled
             carparking on the road reserve and coffee shop customers coming and going from
             the site.

Page 14

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


            6.     This element of the proposal is contrary to overall outcome (b) and
            performance outcome PO6 of the Driveways and Parking Code and overall
            outcome (e) and performance outcome PO16 of the Business Activities Code as
            the proposed on-site car parking is insufficient to accommodate the number of
            vehicles generated by the development.
            D. Refuse to amend Condition 4 of the development approval for the following
            reason:
            7. The proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO25 and PO26 of the
            Rural Activities Code as the requested change includes the sale of food and
            beverages that are not ancillary to a bona fide cropping or animal husbandry use
            on site.
            E. Refuse to delete Conditions 5 and 7 of the development approval for the
            following reasons:
            8. The proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO25 and PO26 of the
            Rural Activities Code as the request to delete these conditions relates to the
            proposal for a food and drink outlet to operate from the site which is not supported.
            Any provision for the tasting of foods and beverages proposed to be produced on
            site would not be ancillary to a bona fide cropping or animal husbandry use on
            site.
            F. Advise the applicant that the food and drink outlet must cease operating from
            the site within 24 months of the date of Council’s decision, with any unapproved
            structures removed.
            G. Advise the applicant that the roasting of coffee beans on site must cease
            within 24 months of the date of Council’s decision, and to lodge a subsequent
            code assessable development application for a Material Change of Use – Home-
            based Business (coffee roasting).
            H. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
            Act 2016.
            I. Authorise the CEO to work with the applicant to find an appropriate location
            for the food and drink outlet/bus.
            For:       Cr Wegener
            Against: Crs Wilkie, Lorentson, Jurisevic, Stockwell, Stewart and Finzel
            Lost.

             Motion
             Moved:       Cr Amelia Lorentson
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning
             & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application
             No. MCU21/0194.01 for an other change to a Development Permit for Material
             Change of Use (Roadside Stall) to include a Food and Drink Outlet, situated at
             201 Mary River Rd, Cooroy and:
             A. Approve, in part, only (with amended Condition 2) and part refusal.
             B. Approve the change to Condition 2 as outlined in Attachment 1.
             C. Refuse the Food and Drink Outlet component of the application for the
             following reasons:
             1. This element of the proposal does not advance the elements and strategies
             of the South East Queensland Regional Plan as it does not value add to the site’s
             on-farm agricultural activities.
             2. This element of the proposal is contrary to the Intent and Outcomes of the
             Strategic Framework, Section 3.3.1 (e) and Section 3.3.5 (h), (v) and (w) as:
             a) The proposal is not a rural activity or a rural enterprise and such uses are
             intended to be located in business centres to contribute to their vibrancy.
             b) The proposal does not value add to the site’s rural activities, would be the
             primary use on the site and is in no way ancillary to the approved roadside stall.

Page 15

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 NOVEMBER 2023


             c) The proposal predominantly caters to passing trade, largely locals in the area,
             and has only a limited tourism focus.
             3. This element of the proposal is not consistent with overall outcomes (b), (i)
             and performance outcomes PO1, PO4 and PO8 of the Local Plan Code for
             Cooroy as:
             a) The proposed use is located outside the urban boundary and the Cooroy
             town centre.
             b) The proposed use will adversely interrupt the landscape character and visual
             amenity of Mary River Road, being very different to uses envisaged in rural areas
             of the Shire.
             4. This element of the proposal is contrary to overall outcomes (a) & (l) and
             performance outcomes PO1, PO5 & PO13 of the Rural Zone Code as:
             a) The proposal is not a rural activity, it is an urban activity, and will not value
             add to goods produced on site.
             b) The proposal does not have an indelible connection to the rural or ecological
             values of the site and is more appropriately located in an urban area.
             c) There is no overriding community benefit for the food and drink outlet to be
             located on the site, with no particular circumstances relevant that warrant the
             proposal.
             d) The proposal will detract from the scenic amenity of Mary River Road being
             part of the major road network for the Shire.
             5. This element of the proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO1, PO2,
             PO3, PO11, PO12, PO13 of the Business Activities Code as:
             a) The proposal is a type of business activity that is at odds and is not compatible
             with the purpose of the site’s rural zoning.
             b) The proposal seeks to locate a business activity outside the business centres
             shown in the Noosa Shire Centres Hierarchy.
             c) The proposed food and drink outlet is a use that is not typically expected to
             be found in the rural areas of the Shire.
             d) The proposal is adversely impacting the amenity of nearby residents, with its
             early and week-end operating hours, uncoordinated and uncontrolled carparking
             on the road reserve and coffee shop customers coming and going from the site.
             6.     This element of the proposal is contrary to overall outcome (b) and
             performance outcome PO6 of the Driveways and Parking Code and overall
             outcome (e) and performance outcome PO16 of the Business Activities Code as
             the proposed on-site car parking is insufficient to accommodate the number of
             vehicles generated by the development.
             D. Refuse to amend Condition 4 of the development approval for the following
             reason:
             7. The proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO25 and PO26 of the
             Rural Activities Code as the requested change includes the sale of food and
             beverages that are not ancillary to a bona fide cropping or animal husbandry use
             on site.
             E. Refuse to delete Conditions 5 and 7 of the development approval for the
             following reasons:
             8. The proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO25 and PO26 of the
             Rural Activities Code as the request to delete these conditions relates to the
             proposal for a food and drink outlet to operate from the site which is not supported.
             Any provision for the tasting of foods and beverages proposed to be produced on
             site would not be ancillary to a bona fide cropping or animal husbandry use on
             site.
             F. Advise the applicant that the food and drink outlet must cease operating from
             the site within 3 months of the date of Council’s decision, with any unapproved
             structures removed.
             G. Advise the applicant that the roasting of coffee beans on site must cease
             within 3 months of the date of Council’s decision, and to lodge a subsequent code

Page 16

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                16 NOVEMBER 2023


            assessable development application for a Material Change of Use – Home-based
            Business (coffee roasting).
            H. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
            Act 2016.
            I. Authorise the CEO to work with the applicant to find an appropriate location
            for the food and drink outlet/bus.
            J. That Council request the CEO to expedite an investigation into the feasibility
            of the provision of a mobile coffee trader or similar at suitable locations in the
            Hinterland which may include sites such as the Noosa Botanic Gardens and
            Hinterland Adventure Playground.


            Amendment No. 1
            Moved:         Cr Joe Jurisevic
            Seconded: Cr Brian Stockwell
            That Item K be added to read:
            K. Request the CEO to investigate extending the 60km per hour speed limit on
            Mary River Road to Lawnville Road to enhance the safety of vehicle interactions
            in this location associated with the transfer station and truck movements.
            Carried unanimously.


             Council Resolution
             Moved:        Cr Amelia Lorentson
             Seconded: Cr Clare Stewart
             That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning
             & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023 regarding Application
             No. MCU21/0194.01 for an other change to a Development Permit for Material
             Change of Use (Roadside Stall) to include a Food and Drink Outlet, situated at
             201 Mary River Rd, Cooroy and:
             A. Approve, in part, only (with amended Condition 2) and part refusal.
             B. Approve the change to Condition 2 as outlined in Attachment 1.
             C. Refuse the Food and Drink Outlet component of the application for the
             following reasons:
             1. This element of the proposal does not advance the elements and strategies
             of the South East Queensland Regional Plan as it does not value add to the site’s
             on-farm agricultural activities.
             2. This element of the proposal is contrary to the Intent and Outcomes of the
             Strategic Framework, Section 3.3.1 (e) and Section 3.3.5 (h), (v) and (w) as:
             a) The proposal is not a rural activity or a rural enterprise and such uses are
             intended to be located in business centres to contribute to their vibrancy.
             b) The proposal does not value add to the site’s rural activities, would be the
             primary use on the site and is in no way ancillary to the approved roadside stall.
             c) The proposal predominantly caters to passing trade, largely locals in the area,
             and has only a limited tourism focus.
             3. This element of the proposal is not consistent with overall outcomes (b), (i)
             and performance outcomes PO1, PO4 and PO8 of the Local Plan Code for
             Cooroy as:
             a) The proposed use is located outside the urban boundary and the Cooroy
             town centre.
             b) The proposed use will adversely interrupt the landscape character and visual
             amenity of Mary River Road, being very different to uses envisaged in rural areas
             of the Shire.
             4. This element of the proposal is contrary to overall outcomes (a) & (l) and
             performance outcomes PO1, PO5 & PO13 of the Rural Zone Code as:

Page 17

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


            a) The proposal is not a rural activity, it is an urban activity, and will not value
            add to goods produced on site.
            b) The proposal does not have an indelible connection to the rural or ecological
            values of the site and is more appropriately located in an urban area.
            c) There is no overriding community benefit for the food and drink outlet to be
            located on the site, with no particular circumstances relevant that warrant the
            proposal.
            d) The proposal will detract from the scenic amenity of Mary River Road being
            part of the major road network for the Shire.
            5. This element of the proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO1, PO2,
            PO3, PO11, PO12, PO13 of the Business Activities Code as:
            a) The proposal is a type of business activity that is at odds and is not compatible
            with the purpose of the site’s rural zoning.
            b) The proposal seeks to locate a business activity outside the business centres
            shown in the Noosa Shire Centres Hierarchy.
            c) The proposed food and drink outlet is a use that is not typically expected to
            be found in the rural areas of the Shire.
            d) The proposal is adversely impacting the amenity of nearby residents, with its
            early and week-end operating hours, uncoordinated and uncontrolled carparking
            on the road reserve and coffee shop customers coming and going from the site.
            6.     This element of the proposal is contrary to overall outcome (b) and
            performance outcome PO6 of the Driveways and Parking Code and overall
            outcome (e) and performance outcome PO16 of the Business Activities Code as
            the proposed on-site car parking is insufficient to accommodate the number of
            vehicles generated by the development.
            D. Refuse to amend Condition 4 of the development approval for the following
            reason:
            7. The proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO25 and PO26 of the
            Rural Activities Code as the requested change includes the sale of food and
            beverages that are not ancillary to a bona fide cropping or animal husbandry use
            on site.
            E. Refuse to delete Conditions 5 and 7 of the development approval for the
            following reasons:
            8. The proposal is contrary to performance outcomes PO25 and PO26 of the
            Rural Activities Code as the request to delete these conditions relates to the
            proposal for a food and drink outlet to operate from the site which is not supported.
            Any provision for the tasting of foods and beverages proposed to be produced on
            site would not be ancillary to a bona fide cropping or animal husbandry use on
            site.
            F. Advise the applicant that the food and drink outlet must cease operating from
            the site within 3 months of the date of Council’s decision, with any unapproved
            structures removed.
            G. Advise the applicant that the roasting of coffee beans on site must cease within
            3 months of the date of Council’s decision, and to lodge a subsequent code
            assessable development application for a Material Change of Use – Home-based
            Business (coffee roasting).
            H. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
            Act 2016.
            I. Authorise the CEO to work with the applicant to find an appropriate location
            for the food and drink outlet/bus.
            J. That Council request the CEO to expedite an investigation into the feasibility
            of the provision of a mobile coffee trader or similar at suitable locations in the
            Hinterland which may include sites such as the Noosa Botanic Gardens and
            Hinterland Adventure Playground.
            K. Request the CEO to investigate extending the 60km per hour speed limit on
            Mary River Road to Lawnville Road to enhance the safety of vehicle interactions

Page 18

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


             in this location associated with the transfer station and truck movements.
             For: Crs Brian Stockwell, Amelia Lorentson, Joe Jurisevic, Karen Finzel,
             Frank Wilkie and Clare Stewart
             Against: Cr Tom Wegener
             Carried.

             Crs Stewart and Lorentson left the meeting.

             Council Resolution
             Moved:            Cr Brian Stockwell
             Seconded:         Cr Tom Wegener
             That Cr Jurisevic be appointed as Acting Chairperson of the meeting due to Cr
             Stewart leaving the meeting.
             Carried unanimously.


            5.3. FURTHER REPORT - MCU21/0110 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL
            CHANGE OF USE - BAR, FOOD AND DRINK OUTLET, OUTDOOR SPORT
            AND RECREATION, RESORT COMPLEX AT 61 NOOSA SPRINGS DRIVE,
            NOOSA HEADS (Referred from Planning & Environment Committee dated 7
            November 2023 - Item 5.4)

            That Council note the Further Report by the Manager Development Assessment
            to the Planning and Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2023
            regarding Application No. MCU21/0110 for a Development Permit for a Material
            Change of Use – Bar, Food and Drink Outlet, Outdoor Sport and Recreation and
            Resort Complex at 61 Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads and note that the
            applicant has made an Other Change to the application. This results in the
            application reverting to Confirmation Notice stage and no decision can be made
            on the matter today.


            6.1. 2023-2024 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM - COMMUNITY PROJECT
            GRANTS (ROUND TWO) - OVERVIEW

            That Council note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and:
               A. Approve the Round Two 2023-24 Community Grants Projects Program to
                  the total value of $99,459.67;
               B. Allocate the remaining $68,470.65 from the 23/24 Community Grants
                  budget to funding for youth initiatives made up of an out-of-round Youth
                  Grants funding program and youth focussed activities within the Living
                  Well Noosa program; and
               C. Delegate the Chief Executive Officer to authorise funding to the successful
                  applicants for the out-of-round Youth Grants projects.

            6.2. 2023-2024 COMMUNITY PROGRAM FUNDING –                             COMMUNITY
            PROJECT GRANTS (ROUND TWO) – PROGRAM/PROJECT,

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wilkie
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Wilkie, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter in relation to the funding recommendations to Cooroora Historical Society
            t/a Noosa Shire Museum. I state for the record that although general membership

Page 19

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 NOVEMBER 2023


             of an organisation does not qualify as a declarable conflict of interest, I would like
             to put on the record my general membership of the Cooroora Historical Society,
             out of abundance of caution, which is mentioned in this grant round. Although I
             have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a reasonable person would
             believe this affects my ability to make an impartial decision in this
             matter. Therefore, I choose to remain in the meeting room, however, I will respect
             the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the
             decision.
             Council Resolution
             Moved:          Cr Brian Stockwell
             Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
             That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Wilkie and determine
             that it is in the public interest that Cr Wilkie participates and votes on this matter
             because Council believes that a reasonable person would trust that the final
             decision is made in the public interest.
             Carried unanimously.
             Cr Wilkie and Finzel did not vote on the above motion.

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wilkie
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Wilkie, inform the meeting that I am declaring a conflict of interest in this
            matter in relation to the funding recommendations to NoosaCare. I would like to
            put on the record that, although it does not qualify as a declarable conflict of
            interest, I volunteer playing music at various aged care facilities in the shire,
            including at Noosa Care which is mentioned in this grant round. I am not a member
            or executive member of Noosa Care and don’t believe a reasonable person would
            see this as a conflict of interest and choose to stay in the meeting room.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:          Cr Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Wegener
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Wilkie and determine
            that it is in the public interest that Cr Wilkie participates and votes on this matter
            because Council believes that a reasonable person would trust that the final
            decision is made in the public interest.
            Carried unanimously.
            Cr Wilkie and Cr Finzel did not vote on the above motion.

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarableconflict of interest
            in this matter:
            I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter in relation to the funding recommendations to Cooroora Historical Society
            t/a Noosa Shire Museum. I state for the record that although general membership
            of an organisation does not qualify as a declarable conflict of interest, I wish it to
            be noted but do not believe a reasonable person would see this as a
            conflict. Therefore, I choose to remain in the meeting room, however, I will
            respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the
            decision.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:          Cr Brian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Finzel and determine
            that it is in the public interest that Cr Finzel participates and votes on this matter
            because Council believes that a reasonable person would trust that the final
            decision is made in the public interest.

Page 20

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


             Carried unanimously.
             Cr Finzel and Wilkie did not vote on the above motion.

            Council Resolution
            Moved:        Cr Brian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
            That Council note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and approve Round Two
            2023-24 Community Project Grants – Program/Projects provided in Attachment 1
            to this report.
            Carried unanimously.


            6.3. 2023-2024 COMMUNITY PROGRAM FUNDING - COMMUNITY PROJECT
            GRANTS (ROUND TWO) - EVENTS
            That Council note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and approve Round Two
            2023-2024 Community Project Grants - Events provided in Attachment 1 to this
            report.


            6.4. 2023-2024 COMMUNITY PROGRAM FUNDING - COMMUNITY PROJECT
            GRANTS (ROUND TWO) - INFRASTRUCTURE
            That Council note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and approve Round Two
            2023-2024 Community Project Grants - Infrastructure provided in Attachment 1 to
            this report.

            6.5. 2023-2024 COMMUNITY PROGRAM FUNDING - COMMUNITY PROJECT
            GRANTS (ROUND TWO) - EQUIPMENT

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in
            this matter as on 24 February 2020 I sought a review by the Independent Council
            Election Observer (ICEO) as to the public claims of the Future Noosa Team, of
            which Leigh McCready was publicly identified as a Campaign Manager. The
            conflict involved the application of Katie Rose Cottage as Leigh McCready is the
            Head of Fundraising and Partnerships, Although I have a declarable conflict of
            interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a perception of bias
            because the ICEO review was an advisory service, not a statutory process, and
            my queries at that time were in the public interest and neither I nor Ms McCready
            stood to personally gain or lose from that advice. Therefore, I will choose to remain
            in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on
            whether I can remain and participate in the decision.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:         Cr Tom Wegener
            Seconded: Cr Joe Jurisevic
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Stockwell and determine
            that it is in the public interest that Cr Stockwell participates and votes on this
            matter because Council believes that a reasonable person could not have a
            perception of bias because the ICEO review was an advisory service, not a
            statutory process, and Cr Stockwell’s queries at that time were in the public
            interest and neither he nor Ms McCready stood to personally gain or lose from

Page 21

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


            that advice and therefore a reasonable person would trust that the final decision
            is made in the public interest.
            Carried unanimously.
            Cr Stockwell and Finzel did not vote on the above motion.

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter in relation to the funding recommendations to Katie Rose Cottage as Leigh
            McCready who is employed as Head of Fundraising and Partnerships by Katie
            Rose Cottage was involved in a volunteer capacity with my 2020 election
            campaign where I was one of three candidates that ran as a group known as
            'Future Noosa' (which is no longer an entity). As a result of my conflict of interest
            I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on.
            Cr Finzel left the meeting.

            Council Resolution
            Moved:       Cr Brian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
            That Council note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and approve Round Two
            2023-24 Community Project Grants – Equipment provided in Attachment 1 to this
            report.
            Carried unanimously.

             Cr Finzel returned to the meeting.


            6.6. REGIONAL ARTS DEVELOPMENT                       FUND     (RADF)     -   GRANT
            RECOMMENDATIONS ROUND 20, 2023/24

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wilkie
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Wilkie, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter in relation to the funding recommendations to Zest Factor as Zest Factor
            applicant Russell Krause is a general member of Noosa Arts Theatre where I
            serve as President. Mr Krause’s grant does not involve the Noosa Arts Theatre or
            myself and I therefore don’t believe a reasonable person would see this as a
            conflict of interest. I will choose to remain in the meeting room, however, I will
            respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the
            decision.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:          Cr Brian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Wilkie and determine
            that Cr Wilkie participates and votes on this matter because Council believes that
            a reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public
            interest.
            Carried unanimously.
            Cr Wilkie did not vote on the above motion.

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Wilkie
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:

Page 22

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                 16 NOVEMBER 2023


            Cr Wilkie, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter in relation to the funding recommendations to Little Seed applicant
            Johanna Wallace, who is a general member of Noosa Arts Theatre where I serve
            as President. Their grant does not involve the Noosa Arts Theatre or myself and
            I therefore don’t believe a reasonable person would see this as a conflict of
            interest. I will choose to remain in the meeting room, however, I will respect the
            decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the decision.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:         Cr Brian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Wilkie and determine
            that Cr Wilkie participates and votes on this matter because Council believes that
            a reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public
            interest.
            Carried unanimously.
            Cr Wilkie did not vote on the above motion.

            Council Resolution
            Moved:       Cr Brian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel
            That Council note the report by the Arts and Culture Manager to the General
            Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 regarding applications to the
            Regional Arts Development Fund Round 20, 2023/24 and approve the
            recommendations of the Assessment Committee as outlined in Attachment 1 to
            the report.
            Carried unanimously.


            6.7. NON-POWERED WATER SPORTS FEASIBILTY STUDY
            That Council note the report by the Sport Strategy and Project Advisor to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 regarding the Non-
            Powered Water Sports Feasibility Study and:
                A. Accept the Non-Powered Water Sports Feasibility Study; and
                B. Refer the findings of the Study to future planning activities.


            6.8. FIRETECH SERVICE PROVIDER PANEL (ROPS) REFRESH
            That Council note the report by the Director Digital Hub and Innovation to the
            General Committee date 13 November 2023 and
            A. Award Contract No. T000078 for a Register of Pre-qualified Suppliers for the
            Provision of Firetech Services to the following two new suppliers as a result of a
            ROPS refresh for a period until August 2024:
                 BIA5 Pty Ltd; and
                 Geoneon Pty Ltd
            B. Subject to satisfactory performance of the suppliers, authorise the CEO to
            approve the option to extend the contract at the expiry of first extension term for
            a further three (3) terms of up to twelve (12) months each ending on 31 July 2027.


            6.9. TOURISM NOOSA STRATEGY 2023-2027

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in
            this matter as on 24 February 2020 I sought a review by the Independent Council

Page 23

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 NOVEMBER 2023


            Election Observer (ICEO) as to the public claims of the Future Noosa Team, of
            which Leigh McCready was publicly identified as a Campaign Manager. Leigh
            McCready is a Director of Tourism Noosa. Although I have a declarable conflict
            of interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a perception of bias
            because the ICEO review was an advisory service, not a statutory process, and
            my queries at that time were in the public interest and neither I nor Ms McCready
            stood to personally gain or lose from that advice. Therefore, I will choose to remain
            in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on
            whether I can remain and participate in the decision.
            Council Resolution
            Moved:          Cr Tom Wegener
            Seconded: Cr Frank Wilkie
            That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Stockwell and determine
            that it is in the public interest that Cr Stockwell participates and votes on this
            matter because Council believes that a reasonable person could not have a
            perception of bias because the ICEO review was an advisory service, not a
            statutory process, and Cr Stockwell’s queries at that time were in the public
            interest and neither he nor Ms McCready stood to personally gain or lose from
            that advice and therefore a reasonable person would trust that the final decision
            is made in the public interest.
            Carried unanimously.
            Cr Stockwell and Finzel did not vote on the above motion.

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
            interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter as Leigh McCready who is a Director of Tourism Noosa was involved in a
            volunteer capacity with my 2020 election campaign where I was one of three
            candidates that ran as a group known as 'Future Noosa' (which is no longer an
            entity). As a result of my conflict of interest I will now leave the meeting room while
            the matter is considered and voted on.
            Cr Finzel left the meeting.

            Council Resolution
            Moved:          Cr Frank Wilkie
            Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener
            That Council note the report by the Director Strategy and Environment to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 regarding Tourism
            Noosa's Destination Noosa Strategic Plan 2023-2027 as provided at Attachment
            1 to this report and:
                A. Endorse Tourism Noosa's Destination Noosa Strategy 2023-2027 in
                     accordance with Tourism Noosa's Funding and Performance Deed with
                     Council; and
                B. Note Tourism Noosa's Destination Noosa Strategy 2023-2027 will be
                     reviewed following the completion of the Destination Management Plan to
                     ensure alignment and to reflect any shifts required in Tourism Noosa's
                     strategic focus as specified in Tourism Noosa's Funding and Performance
                     Deed with Council.
            Carried unanimously.

            Cr Finzel returned to the meeting.

Page 24

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                16 NOVEMBER 2023


            6.10. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT – OCTOBER 2023
            That Council note the report by the Manager Financial Services (Acting) to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 outlining October 2023
            year to date financial performance against budget, including changes to the
            financial performance report with the inclusion of key financial sustainability
            indicators.


            6.11. NOOSA COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2022-2023
            That Council note the report by the Governance Manager to the General
            Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and
               A. Adopt the Noosa Shire Council 2022-23 Annual Report incorporating the
                   2022/23 Audited Financial Statements.
               B. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to make any required minor
                   amendments to the document prior to publication.


            7.1. RECYCLING
            MATERIAL PROCESSING OPTION (NEW MRF)
            That Council note the report by the Waste Manager to the General Committee
            Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and
                A. Enter into a contract with Re.CYCLE (SUNSHINE COAST) Pty Ltd for 8
                   years, in accordance with Section 235 (A) of the Local Government
                   Regulation 2012; and
                B. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate, finalise and
                   enter the contract and to approve payments to be made pursuant to the
                   contract to a maximum of $900,000 (GST excl.), per year of the term of
                   the contract.


            7.2. EMU MOUNTAIN ROAD
            SHARED PATHWAY
            That Council note the report by the Director Infrastructure Services to the General
            Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and
            A. Support the submission of a Cycle Network Local Government Grants Program
            Submission by Sunshine Coast Council for a shared path and cycleway along
            Emu Mountain Road, subject to:
                1. Further input by Noosa Council into the design by Sunshine Coast Council
                   to reduce environmental and visual impact of the proposal; and
                2. Resolving pedestrian crossing and cycle safety issues on the David Low
                   Way prior to acceptance of the final design.


            7.3. VOLUNTARY FLOOD
            RECOVERY PROPERTY ACQUISITION
            That Council note the report by the Community Connections Manager to the
            General Committee Meeting dated 13 November 2023 and
                A. Through the Commonwealth and State Resilient Home Fund, purchase
                   the property as detailed in the Report for the purposes of the voluntary
                   home buy-back program, provided that all processes have been
                   satisfactorily completed with Queensland Reconstruction Authority
                   (QRA);
                B. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to take the necessary action to
                   implement Council’s decision, including but not limited to making,
                   amending, and discharging the contractual arrangement/s; and
                C. Undertake the necessary actions to fulfil the conditions of the program.

Page 25

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                    16 NOVEMBER 2023



                Council Resolution
                Moved:       Cr Tom Wegener
                Seconded: Cr Frank Wilkie
                That the report of the General Committee meeting dated 13 November 2023 be
                received and the recommendations therein be adopted except where dealt with
                by separate resolution.
                Carried unanimously.


9.           ORDINARY MEETING REPORTS



      9.1.      OPERATIONAL PLAN 2023-24 Q1 QUARTERLY REPORTING

                Council Resolution
                Moved:            Cr Karen Finzel
                Seconded:         Cr Frank Wilkie
                That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer (Acting) to the
                Ordinary Meeting dated 16 November 2023 regarding the 2023-24 Operational
                Plan and:
                A. Note the progress report for Q1 2023-24 Operational Plan to 30 September
                   2023 provided as Attachment 1;
                B. Note the status of Council's Key Performance Indicators provided as
                   Attachment 2; and
                C. Note minor changes made to the wording of several initiatives in the
                   Operational Plan 2023-24 as shown in track changes, refer Attachment 3.

                Carried unanimously.


10.          CLOSED SESSION

             CLOSURE OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC

             Council Resolution
             Moved:      Cr Brian Stockwell
             Seconded: Cr Frank Wilkie
             That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3) (g) of the Local
             Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing:
                 10.1 CN000316B - Flood
                    Reconstruction - Package 6B - Landslide Remedial Works - Tender Award
                 10.2 CN000317B - Flood
                    Reconstruction - Package 7B - Landslide Remedial Works (Black Pinch
                    Road)
                 10.3 CN000318B - Flood
                    Reconstruction - Package 8B - Landslide Remedial Works - Tender Award
                 10.4 CN000318B - Flood
                    Reconstruction - Package 8C - Landslide Remedial Works - Tender Award
             Carried unanimously.

Page 26

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                               16 NOVEMBER 2023



            RE-OPENING OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC
            Council Resolution
            Moved:       Cr BRian Stockwell
            Seconded: Cr Finzel
            That the meeting be re-opened to the public.
            Carried unanimously.

    10.1.     CN000316B - FLOOD
              RECONSTRUCTION - PACKAGE 6B - LANDSLIDE REMEDIAL WORKS -
              TENDER AWARD

              Council Resolution
              Moved:           Cr Tom Wegener
              Seconded:        Cr Karen Finzel
              That Council note the report by the Disaster Reconstruction Coordinator to the
              Ordinary Meeting dated 16 November 2023 and:
                 A. Award Contract No. CN00316B for Flood Reconstruction - Package 6B –
                     Landslide Remedial Works to properties adjacent to #19 Bakers Road,
                     Pomona, #140 Old Ceylon Road, Ridgewood, #490 Cooroy Belli Creek
                     Road, Cooroy and #19 Happy Jack Creek Road, Ridgewood to FKG Civil
                     Pty Ltd in accordance with the approved tender;
                 B. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to negotiate,
                     finalise, execute the Contract on behalf of Council; and
                 C. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to amend the
                     contract up to 11.5% of the total contract value if or when necessary.
              Carried unanimously.



    10.2.     CN000317B - FLOOD
              RECONSTRUCTION - PACKAGE 7B - LANDSLIDE REMEDIAL WORKS
              (BLACK PINCH ROAD)

              Council Resolution
              Moved:           Cr Frank Wilkie
              Seconded:        Cr Tom Wegener
              That Council note the report by the Disaster Reconstruction Coordinator to the
              Ordinary Meeting dated 16 November 2023 and:
                 A. Award Contract No. CN00317B for Flood Reconstruction - Package 7B –
                     Landslide Remedial Works to four sites on Black Pinch Road Cootharaba
                     and to Twin Hills Lookout to HEH Civil Pty Ltd in accordance with their
                     approved tender.
                 B. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to negotiate,
                     finalise and execute the Contract on behalf of Council; and
                 C. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to amend the
                     contract up to 11.5% of the total contract value if and when necessary.
              Carried unanimously.

Page 27

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                  16 NOVEMBER 2023


      10.3.      CN000318B - FLOOD
                 RECONSTRUCTION - PACKAGE 8B - LANDSLIDE REMEDIAL WORKS -
                 TENDER AWARD

                 Council Resolution
                 Moved:           Cr Brian Stockwell
                 Seconded:        Cr Karen Finzel
                 That Council note the report by the Disaster Reconstruction Coordinator to the
                 Ordinary Meeting dated 16 November 2023 and:
                    A. Award Contract No. CN00318B for Flood Reconstruction - Package 8B –
                        Landslide Remedial Works to properties adjacent to #139 Musa Vale
                        Road, Cooroy and #179 Cooroy Belli Creek Road, Cooroy to Sunshine
                        Civil Solutions Pty Ltd in accordance with the approved tender ;
                    B. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to negotiate,
                        finalise and execute the Contract on behalf of Council; and
                    C. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to amend the
                        contract up to 11.5% of the total contract value if and when necessary.
                 Carried unanimously.


      10.4.      CN000318C - FLOOD
                 RECONSTRUCTION - PACKAGE 8C - LANDSLIDE REMEDIAL WORKS -
                 TENDER AWARD

                 Council Resolution
                 Moved:           Cr Tom Wegener
                 Seconded:        Cr Frank Wilkie
                 That Council note the report by the Disaster Reconstruction Coordinator to the
                 Ordinary Meeting dated 16 November 2023 and:
                    A. Award Contract No. CN00318C for Flood Reconstruction - Package 8C –
                        Landslide Remedial Works to landslides adjacent to properties at# 673
                        and #703 Cooroy Belli Creek Road, Black Mountain, #168 Cootharaba
                        Road, Cootharaba and #54 Simpsons Road to Civil Mining & Construction
                        Pty Ltd in accordance with the approved tender;
                    B. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to negotiate,
                        finalise and execute the Contract on behalf of Council; and
                    C. Delegate to the Acting Chief Executive Officer the power to amend the
                        contract up to 11.5% of the total contract value if and when necessary.
                 Carried unanimously.




12.           NEXT MEETING

              The next Ordinary Meeting will be held at Council Chambers, 9 Pelican St, Tewantin
              on Thursday 14 December 2023 at 5.00pm.

13.           MEETING CLOSURE

              The meeting closed at 7.56pm.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.