Original source · versioned page text
Meeting minutes
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 16 NOVEMBER 2023
2008 to cease adding fluoride to the water supply and no community consultation
has occurred with regard to this subject.
Question 2.
Is Council aware of the numerous scientific studies that explain the detrimental
health consequences of the addition of fluoride eg enzyme inhibitor, neuro toxin,
dental fluorosis, osteoporosis, plus many more, in town water and do you believe
the addition of fluoride in town water should be forced on people without consent?
Answer provided by Richard MacGillivray, Director Development and
Regulation
Council is aware there are a range of different viewpoints and research involving
accredited, unaccredited and independent studied into the potential health
benefits and effects associated with the fluoridation of town water. Council relies
on advice from Queensland Health as the Government department responsible
for public health within our State to evaluate medical research from across the
Nation and Globe and to provide clear guidance to local governments and
communities on a range of public health matters including fluoride in water
supplies. Advice from Queensland Health states that “Local governments should
note that fluoridation has been proven as a safe, effective and ethical means of
preventing tooth decay, for people of all ages and not just for children. It is
supported by peak health bodies including the National Health and Medical
Research Council, the Australia Dental Association, the Australian Medical
Association and the World Health Organization. When considering whether
fluoridation is in the best interests of a community, Queensland Health
recommends local governments consider the significant oral health benefits that
are associated with drinking water fluoridation.” In relation to statement regarding
consent I would advise that councils are bound by the legislative framework which
must be adhered to when making decisions about the fluoridation of town water.
Council will fully adhere to its obligations in this regard.
11.2. NICK COOKE
Question 1.
Can council please confirm the total sum (in dollars) of council funding and grants
given to Zero Emissions Noosa since its inception in 2017?
Answer provided byKim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment
Since 2017 Zen Inc has been successful in gaining $226,675 across the 7 years
via various Council Community, Economic and Environment Grants and funding.
Question 2.
Since the proposed lithium ‘community batteries’ to be implemented by Noosa
Council lay outside the criteria of ‘assessable development’ under the Planning
Act 2016, can Council please confirm the type of application (if any), the criteria,
processes and any risk assessments you will be using to assess the proposed
batteries before their implementation?
Answer provided by Kim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment
Noosa Council, in partnership with Zero Emissions Noosa Inc. and Yarra Energy
Foundation (YEF), have been awarded $500,000 to install a community battery in
Noosaville. Pad mounted batteries of less that 15m2 are not categorised an
assessable development under Schedule 6 of the Planning Regulation. In
accordance with Noosa Council’s Risk Management and Opportunity Framework,
the Community Battery Project has been subject to number of assessments to
identify and assess the risks across the lifecycle of the battery deployment. These
assessments have considered the technology, site assessments, planning and
environment, safety, cost.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original