Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Further submission from applicant 13.10.2023

of 29

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Note: 77% of the responses are ‘yes’ and ‘neutral’

UPDTATED PRIMARY RESULTS




Further improvement to support with more information:
Of those who responded ‘no’ we also asked if their position could change if concerns were addressed. Among the 86 ‘no’
responses, 44% (i.e., 38 respondents) agreed they would support the hotel development if these concerns were
addressed. So far as we are aware, all issues raised have been addressed conclusively in the development application and
experts’ reports. This is understandable given the accessibility to the large quantity of material and expert reports of the
development application.

If those respondents changed their minds after having their issues addressed, the ‘yes’ and ‘neutral’ positions would
result in 81% in favour or not bothered by the hotel development.




                                                             4

Log in to download the original (Further submission from applicant 13.10.2023.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.