Original source · versioned page text
Further submission from applicant 13.10.2023
Note: 77% of the responses are ‘yes’ and ‘neutral’
UPDTATED PRIMARY RESULTS
Further improvement to support with more information:
Of those who responded ‘no’ we also asked if their position could change if concerns were addressed. Among the 86 ‘no’
responses, 44% (i.e., 38 respondents) agreed they would support the hotel development if these concerns were
addressed. So far as we are aware, all issues raised have been addressed conclusively in the development application and
experts’ reports. This is understandable given the accessibility to the large quantity of material and expert reports of the
development application.
If those respondents changed their minds after having their issues addressed, the ‘yes’ and ‘neutral’ positions would
result in 81% in favour or not bothered by the hotel development.
4
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Further submission from applicant 13.10.2023.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.