Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 3 Summary of miscellaneous errors and clarification changes to Proposed Amendment No. 2
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Proposed Amendment No. 2 as
Part of Planning Scheme Errors/issues identified/Comments Recommendations
publicly notified
(b) located on a site with an area of at least 4 hectares;
(c) including no more than four guestrooms or cabins or
no more than six permanent tents
(d) accommodating no more than 12 guests or if in
permanent tents no more than 24 guest; and
(e) not incorporating conference or function facilities.
Short-term accommodation – code Administrative error – Categories of development and assessment. The draft amendment omitted to delete reference to 8. Amend Categories of development and assessment for
assessment ‘cottages’ in the assessment trigger, noting that cottage is not defined in Noosa Plan 2020 (cabin is defined and limited Short-term accommodation – code assessment to read:
to 50m2 gross floor area)). It is proposed to delete reference to ‘cottages’ to provide further clarity on the type of built form If:
expected for Short-term accommodation in the Rural zone (ie dwellings 50m2 and less)
(a) on the same site as the applicant’s principal place of
residence;
(b) located on a site with an area of at least 4 hectares;
(c) not incorporating conference or function facilities;
and
(d) within no more than four guestrooms, cabins or
permanent tents, not exceeding 200m2 total gross
floor area and accommodating no more than eight
guests.
Short-term accommodation – impact Formatting/administrative inconsistencies across code and impact row 9. Reorder impact assessment trigger as per code
assessment assessment triggers
Administrative error - typo - impact assessment (a) not otherwise acceptable development of code assessment. 10. Reword to 'not otherwise accepted development or code
assessable'
Part 5 Tables of Assessment Nature based tourism – code Administrative error – Categories of development and assessment. The draft amendment omitted to delete reference to 11. Amend Categories of development and assessment for
Table 5.5.14 Rural Residential assessment ‘cottages’ in the assessment trigger, noting that cottage is not defined in Noosa Plan 2020 (cabin is defined and limited Nature based tourism – code assessment to read:
to 50m2 gross floor area)). It is proposed to delete reference to ‘cottages’ to provide further clarity on the type of built form If:
expected for Nature-based tourism in the Rural zone (ie dwellings 50m2 and less)
(a) on the same site as the applicant’s principal place of
residence;
(b) located on a site with an area of at least 4 hectares;
(c) including no more than three guestrooms, cabins or
permanent tents;
(d) accommodating no more than 12 guests; and
(e) not incorporating conference or function facilities.
Part 5 Tables of Assessment Low Density Residential Zone Administrative error – Categories of development and assessment – accepted development subject to requirements for 12. Amend Categories of development and assessment for
Table 5.7.1 Building Work a dwelling house. The draft amendment incorrectly references AO3, which relates to Visitor Accommodation and is not Low Density Residential Zone - accepted development
relevant to a Dwelling house. Additionally, additional provisions are proposed to be added to the table of assessment subject to requirements for a Dwelling house to read:
triggers, noting that a large proportion of building works applications for dwelling houses include a total demolition and Acceptable Outcomes AO4, AO5, AO7, AO8, AO9, AO10,
rebuild, and as such provisions relating to driveways etc should be captured in the assessment process. AO11, AO12, AO13, AO14, AO15, AO16, AO17, AO18,
AO19, AO20 and AO21of the Low Density Residential
Zone Code.
Acceptable Outcomes AO2, AO3, AO5, AO6, AO7, AO8,
AO9, AO10, AO11, AO12, AO13, AO14, AO15, AO16,
AO18, AO20, AO21and AO22 of the Low Density Housing
Code.
Part 5 Tables of Assessment Driveway - If for the construction of a Administrative error – AO12 omitted from proposed amendment (proximity to Council stormwater infrastructure 13. Amend Assessment benchmarks to read:
Table 5.8.1 OPW driveway associated with a community Acceptable Outcomes AO8, AO9, AO10, AO11, A012,
residence or a dwelling house – AO13 and AO14 the Low Density Housing Code
Accepted development
Part 5 Tables of Assessment MCU, DBW & OPW - Accepted Administrative error - the current ToA triggers ALL clearing where it’s in mapped areas, even where it meets the definition 14. Add 'if exempt clearing' to the Accepted development rows
Table 5.9.2 Biodiversity development for 'exempt clearing'. in MCU, DBW & OPW sections
Part 5 Tables of Assessment MCU – Code assessment Formatting/administrative inconsistencies across the MCU and DBW rows - the MCU triggers should reference ‘involving 15. Amend to align wording across tables
Table 5.9.7 Heritage a local heritage place’ (ie the same as the wording for the building work trigger).
Part 6 Zone Codes Overall outcome 2(d) Administrative error – 2(d) references plot ratio, which is not an assessment benchmark in this zone 16. Amend to remove ‘plot ratio’
6.3.1 Low Density Residential Zone Code
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original