Meeting papers

Affordable housing will adversely impact Agreed on the basis of the zoning and how the
on a small residential estate and should be land is intended to be developed.
spread throughout the community and not
in concentrated pockets.

The development should be run like a An on-site manager could assist the management
caravan park with onsite facilities, of the site, in terms of general and bushfire
restricted access and an onsite manager. maintenance, but this could be otherwise carried
                                         out by the land owner.

The proposal is too dense, should be for      Agreed, the proposal does not align with sites
permanent occupation only by families or      zoning and the intent for the area. One dwelling
private rental with the number of persons     and one secondary dwelling are the extent of
limited.                                      permanent residential development permitted on
                                              the site.
                                              It is also noted that the Nature based tourism code
                                              details a maximum of one cabin per hectare for
                                              land in the rural residential zone.

There is limited parking proposed and Car parking demands are likely to be able to meet
during holidays for those receiving visitors, on site, though the applicant has not identified
street car parking is likely to be used, spaces for visitors to park on site.
impacting others.

Pets need to be restricted.                   Noted

The current population is already straining Upgrades to infrastructure are required for the
all local services, infrastructure and proposed development.
intersections and so such a large increase
in residents is not appropriate.

The housing crisis is not sufficient reason Agreed, as while the proposal attempts to address
to approve the development given the the housing crisis, the land and its location is not
impacts for local residents.                suitable for the proposed development.

Stormwater must be managed to ensure The applicant has provided a stormwater
no impacts on other properties.      management plan which is generally satisfactory
                                     subject to some additional details on the bio
                                     retention basins

The proposal meets Noosa Council’s The proposal is contrary to the planned
strategy for the area, is ecologically sound development for the area and the land is not
and provides the right direction for suitable for the proposed development
affordable housing.

It will deliver significant ecological, social, The land is not suitable for the proposed
economic and community benefits.                development and is not expected to satisfactorily
                                                deliver the stated benefits. The site does not have
                                                good access to urban services required for this
                                                type of housing and the impacts on the
                                                surrounding community are not appropriate.

The project will provide liveable places The land is not suitable for the proposed
through good design, providing dwellings development being adjacent industrial zoned
for those suffering from domestic violence, land, with access to services, public transport and

                                                                                     Page 24 of 26

                                                                                            Page 286 of 476