Council archive · source document
Attachment 1 SCG Response to Council RFI · OPW22/0319
Issue 3: Freeboard to Unity FFL’s Some of the nominated Unit FFLs have minimal elevation above the driveway levels and resulting surface stormwater flows. Consider improving the resilience of the units to local flooding by providing a step-up into the units from the carport and garage areas. Response: There is adequate fall away from the dwelling to protect against stormwater inundation. The driveway level referred to by Council is at one location at the high side of the driveway and will not impact. Issue 4: The applicant has not provided sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with Conditions 42-45 of MCU21/0083 Provide the required Operational Waste Management Plan that demonstrates compliance with the conditions. The plan must include but not be limited to: 4.1 Load rating on the underground tanks. Please note that refuse collection trucks weigh 23.5T 4.2 The Location and number of 1100 litre bins 4.3 The expected service levels (Refuse, Recycle and Garden) 4.4 Clarification if the pedestrian shared zone has an awning and suitable horizontal and vertical clearances are available for the whole length of the refuse collection truck route within the site Response: 4.1 The water tank is specified to be trafficable on our plans. We don’t believe this should be a concern for Council as it becomes Council infrastructure. 4.2-4.3 Response by others. 4.4 There is no overhang or impediment to vehicle movements along the pedestrian shared zone. Issue 5: The submitted plans do not provide sufficient information to demonstrate how service provision (i.e. the location of the Pad Mount Transformer, fire fighting booster pump, water, sewer, power, WSUD, loading bays, waste bin storage etc) will impact on the provision of landscape areas to meet Performance Outcomes PO1, PO2, PO3, P12 of the Landscape Code in relation to the sites general amenity, the provision of shade and a sustainable outcome Provide a Consolidated Services Plan to demonstrate how the applicable Performance Outcomes can be achieved. This may include: 5.1 A single overlayed plan to show areas of deep planting exclusive of services where trees are capable of being planted and allowed to grow to full form without management input (heavy pruning, removal, interference with infrastructure 5.2 The location of the Pad Mount Transformer 5.3 The location of the fire fighting booster pump Response: 5.1 By others. 5.2-5.3 Our understanding is there isn’t a requirement for a pad mount transformer of fire booster pump. Issue 6: The submitted plans do not demonstrate compliance with a few of the conditions MCU21/0083 Indicate on the plans the directional signage as described in Condition 27 Response: A directional sign has been shown on our revised plan attached. Issue 7: Flooding Amend the relevant plans to indicate the 2m wide footpath as described in Condition 28 SCG Consulting Engineers Page 2 of 3 SCG Ref:31030(L1)
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 1 SCG Response to Council RFI.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 312 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.