Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

Traffic Response · MCU15/0122

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0122 - Response to Information Request - inc Traffic plan & amended floor plan - Email 1 of 3.

of 25

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

10   External Works (Item 11)
Probable Solution S13.1 identifies the ‘following infrastructure components already exist at the frontage of the site or are
provided at the developer’s expense:

     a.   Full width sealed road;

     b.   Concrete kerb and channel where appropriate;

     c.   Forming and grading to footpaths;

     d.   Vehicular kerb and footpath crossings;

     e.   A constructed bikeway;

     f.   A constructed footpath;

     g.   A constructed carriageway;

     h.   Required alterations to public utility mains, services and installations;

     i.   Constructions of any required alterations to public utility mains, services or installations;

     j.   Stormwater drainage works; and

     k.   Installation of electrical conduits.’

It is noted that the site frontage already contains a full width sealed road, footpaths (on Goodchap Street), and an on-
street cycle lane/cycle awareness zone.

As part of the development proposal, the following works are recommended:

         Widen pedestrian refuge at the roundabout (southern Goodchap Street approach) to 2m;

         Repair or reinstate kerb and channel where driveways are removed, site works require the removal and/or
          impact the current condition of the existing kerb and channel;

         Construct a 2m wide footpath along the Goodchap Street frontage.

Should these recommendations be provided items a) to g) will be met. TTM cannot comment on items h) to k).

Probable Solution S13.2 requires ‘road and drainage design and construction is in accordance with Sections 3 and 4 of the
PSP5 Engineering Design Standards – Roads, Drainage and earthworks.

TTM cannot comment on Section 4 of PSP5. Section 3 relates to carriageway, path and verge design. It is TTM’s opinion
that the recommendations noted above will result in compliance with Section 3 of PSP5.

Should Council prefer the “Noosa Coastal” type of shelter, in lieu of relocation of the existing shelter, this should be at no
additional cost to the applicant.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.5 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Traffic Response.pdf · 3.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.