Original source · versioned page text
2014-01-13 Item 6.3 Appendices 1-5
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
3.2.3 Incremental annual recurring costs
Table 11 shows the incremental annual cost associated with administering the proposed de-
amalgamated council.
These costs reflect the incremental annual expenditure associated with administering an
additional council. Ratepayers of the Proponent Council would bear these incremental costs
post de-amalgamation.
TABLE 11 - INCREMENTAL ANNUAL RECURRING COSTS
Existing Proponent
QTC
Council Council
Estimate $
Estimate $ Estimate $
Councillor remuneration 525,000 665,172 -
Salaries and wages costs 1,174,000 3,327,500 -
ICT costs ** 1,571,500 -
Insurance ** 515,425 -
Service delivery costs - 11,250,000 -
Diseconomies of scale for Proponent Council 932,000 - -
Total incremental annual recurring costs 2,631,000 17,329,597 -
Cost per Proponent Council rateable property $88.55
** while there will be annually recurring costs of de-amalgamation for ICT, insurance and other costs, QTC has assumed that these costs are included
in the Proponent Council’s forecasts and QTC has included only incremental costs in Diseconomies of scale for the Proponent Council in Table 11.
Key points to note from Table 11 include:
Councillor remuneration: QTC has estimated councillor remuneration based on
information in the most recent Local Government Remuneration Tribunal publication3.
QTC has assumed that the Remaining Council will remain a category 8 local government
and the Proponent Council a category 4 local government.
Salaries and wages costs: QTC has allowed for the salaries of a Chief Executive and four
additional senior executives that would be required by the Proponent Council. The Existing
Council has provided for these executives, as well as an additional 17.5 managers.
ICT costs: Existing Council has specifically identified incremental annually recurring ICT
costs however QTC and the Proponent Council has assumed no costs over and above
those that would be a usual cost of doing business and already included in the forecasts.
Insurance: Existing Council has specifically identified incremental annually recurring
insurance costs while QTC has included this assumption within its estimate of
diseconomies of scale below.
Service delivery costs: Existing Council has included additional costs for de-amalgamation
associated with the 5 to 10 per cent premium that could be incurred by the Proponent
Council and the Remaining Council for the temporary extension of existing waste collection
contracts. Existing Council has also included amounts for transportation costs in the event
that a commercial agreement cannot be reached relating to the Eumundi Road landfill.
3 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal publication - http://www.dsdip.qld.gov.au/resources/report/local-
government/full-report-2011.pdf
De-amalgamation Analysis of Sunshine Coast Regional Council Page 18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.