Original source · versioned page text
2014-01-13 Item 6.3 Appendices 1-5
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
1.1.2 Incremental annual recurring costs
Incremental annual recurring costs incurred by either the Proponent Council or the
Remaining Council are not considered a cost of de‐amalgamation. QTC has identified
these for the Proponent Council in order to highlight the ongoing extra costs associated
with operating as a separate council.
Successful Proponent Councils will be required to pay their own incremental annual
recurring costs but will not be responsible for paying costs of this nature for the
Remaining Council. Incremental annual recurring costs incurred by the Remaining Council
should be small in comparison to those of the Proponent Council, but may include costs
associated with lower purchasing power and other operating inefficiencies. These costs,
where applicable, have been considered by QTC in the forecasts determined for the
Remaining Council. To the extent that they exist, these costs may impact QTC’s
sustainability rating for the Remaining Council when compared to the Existing Council and
the average rates per rateable property of the Remaining Council when compared to the
Existing Council.
1.1.3 Summary of Proponent Council costs
Table 1 shows the estimated cost of de‐amalgamation, including incremental annual
recurring costs, to the Proponent Council (column 1). It also shows how these costs
translate into a cost per rateable property (columns 2 and 3).
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF DE-AMALGAMATION COSTS
QTC Average Annualised
Estimate Costs Costs
$ $ $
Total one-off costs 3,605,000
Average one-off costs per Proponent Council rateable property 121.34
Total one-off fixed asset costs 7,415,000
Average fixed asset costs per Proponent Council rateable property 249.57
Annualised fixed asset costs per Proponent Council rateable property 49.91
Total incremental annual recurring costs 2,631,000
Total incremental annual recurring costs per Proponent Council
88.55
rateable property
Note: Annualised fixed asset costs demonstrate the financial effect of spreading the cost of the asset over their useful life (i.e.
depreciation expense)
Table 1 indicates that the one‐off costs of de‐amalgamation per rateable property will be
$121 while the incremental annual recurring costs will be $138.
Queensland Boundaries Commissioner Report – Proposed Noosa De-amalgamation
Page 9 of 23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.