07/1728 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.1728

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

State-controlied road matters

For more information refer to Guide 3.

Unless you answered “none of the above” to Q2,
the application triggers referral to the Department
of Main Roads (DMR) as a referral agency.

In Certain circumstances DMR will be an advice
agency, while in other circumstances DMR will
be a concurrence agency.

Schedule 2 of the IP Requlation will assist you to
determine where DMR is an advice or
concurrence agency for the application.

 

2.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
The application involves: (tick applicable box/es)
C1 (i) development on land contiguous’ to a State controlled road and for -
LD (a) material change of use assessable against the planning scheme;

C1 (b) reconfiguring a fot unless -
« the total number of lots is not increased; and
« the total number of lots abutting the State-controlied road is not increased;

(J (c) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the

planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)}—

« associated with access to a State-controlled road; or

« for filling or excavation; or

+ involving the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land, through a
pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625 cm? that directs stormwater to a
State-controlled road. ,

C1 (ii) development on land not contiguous to a State-controlled road and -

1 (a) material change of use -
* assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
« mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule;
(1 (b) reconfiguring a lot for a purpose mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP regulation
~ and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule;
(1 () operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against eo
planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)-
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule.

FE (ii) none of the above

 

~ Clearing vegetation
For more information refer to Guide 12.

Unless you answered “none of the above” to Q3,
the application requires assessment by the
Oepartment of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW).

\f an agency other than NRW is the assessment
manager for the application, NRW is a
concurrence agency for the application in relation
to this matter.

If you ticked Q3(i) or (ii), your application requires|
referral to NRW for assessment regardless of
whether vegetation clearing is proposed or not.

 

The application-involves: (tick applicable box/es)

OO (i) material change of use -

(a) assessable against the planning scheme;

(b) on a lot containing —

* acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of assessable vegetation; or
« ifthere is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot - remnant vegetation;

(c) where the existing use of the land is a rural or environmental use; and

(d) where the size of the land is 2 hectares or larger - complete Part J of Form 1

reconfiguring a lot — ,

(a) on alot containing a category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of
assessable vegetation or, if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for
the lot, remnant vegetation; @

(b) where the size of the lot before the reconfiguration is 2 hectares or larger;

{c) where 2 or more lots are created; and .

(d) where the size of any lot created is 25 hectares or smaller - complete Part J of Form 1

Oi)

OD (ii) operational work -

(a) for the clearing of native vegetation where the vegetation clearing is made
assessable under Schedule 8 of the IPA; and

(b) not associated with a material change of use assessable against the planning
scheme mentioned in {i) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii) - complete Part J of
Form 1

Ri (iv) none of the above.

 

Strategic port land
For more information refer to Guide 11.

Ifyou ticked (i) - the relevant Port Authority is the
assessment manager for the application.

Ifyou ticked (ii) Queensland Transport is a
concurrence agency for the application.

 

The application involves:

C1 (i) development on strategic port land as defined in the Transport infrastructure Act 1994 (TI
Act) - complete Part! of Form 1

(ii) a material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan approved under the
TI Act for the strategic port land - complete Part ! of Form 1

mw {iii} none of the above

 

4 Land contiguous to a State-controlled road is defined in schedule 14 of the IP Regulation to mean land - -ifpatot the land is within 100m of the State-controlled road; or that is part of a future State

contolled road.

> Page 2