Original source · versioned page text
Meeting minutes
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 17 AUGUST 2023
The proposal is of a design, layout and intensity that will not integrate with
the broader neighbourhood and allow residents to interact with the wider
community.
d. The proposed development is not appropriately sited and designed in a
manner that is compatible with the developed character of the area.
5. The proposal does not meet PO6 of the Driveways and Parking Code as the
proposal provides no car parking for likely visitors to the development.
6. The proposal has not demonstrated that safe and satisfactory roadway
configuration is achievable to the site from the Carpenters Road and Mary Street/
Jarrah Street roundabout.
7. The proposal does not meet PO6 of the Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code as it
has not been demonstrated that an efficient and safe evacuation route is available
to residents and that emergency vehicles can access the site.
8. The proposal is not consistent with actions A5.3.1 to A5.3.6, A5.6.2, A5.6.3,
and A5.7.2 of the Noosa Housing Strategy 2022 as:
a. The land is not located within the urban boundary and is more than 400m
from the town centre, school and public transport.
b. The land is located where it would have a reverse amenity impact on
industrial business and land committed for industrial purposes.
c. The proposal is not well integrated within the community and is clustered
in an isolated area.
9. The proposal is unlikely to satisfactorily deliver the social outcomes sought as:
a. The land is not suited for the proposed development it has poor
accessibility, adjoins industrial land and is not well connected to services.
b. The proposal has not been designed to integrate well with the
neighbourhood and within the community with driveways extending
around the permitter of the site and the density not consistent with the
surrounding character.
c. The applicant has provided no clear mechanisms that can be conditioned
through a development approval to achieve the proposed social/affordable
housing outcomes.
10. The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed development will not
interfere with koala habitat mapped by the state as being Core Koala Habitat Area
or that the works in this area are considered exempt works.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
Act 2016.
For: Crs Wegener, Stockwell, Wilkie, Jurisevic and Finzel
Against: Crs Lorentson and Stewart
Carried.
Cr Stockwell left the meeting.
5.3. THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANTS POLICY REVIEW
(Referred from Planning and Environment Committee dated 8 August
2023 - Item 5.3)
That Council note the report by the Economic Development Officer to the Planning
& Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 August 2023 and
A. Note the Economic Development Grants Review Report, provided at
Attachment 1 to the report;
B. Approve the amended Economic Development Grants Policy, provided at
Attachment 2 to the report; and
C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to conduct future rounds of the
Economic Development Grant Program in accordance with the amended Policy.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original