Appendix C - Ecological Assessment

                     ecoaccess  envlronmon/111 bncm and pqrmlls

                                                                                                                                          Notice

                                                                                         Concurrence Agency Response
                     •        The Environmental Protection Agency Is recognised as a concurrence agency under the Integrated
                              Planning Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 1998 for cqaslal management other than amenity and aestheUc
                              significance or value.                                                                 ·
                     ihe Activity for which thlS development approval ls Issued Is simply a restatement of lhe activity as prescribed In
                     the leglslatlon at the time of Issuing this development approval. Where there Is any confllot between the above
                     description of the Activity for which this development approval Is Issued and the condHions as specified In this
                     development approval as to the scale, Intensity or manner of carrying out of the AcUvlty, then such conditions
                     prevail to the extent of lhe Inconsistency.
                     This development approval autfforlses the Activity. It does not authorise environmental harm unless a
                     concurrence agenoy condition within this development approval expllclfly authorises that harm. Where there Is
                     no condition or the development approval Is silent on a melter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be
                     construed as authorising harm.

                     As part of the concurrence agency response the folowlng development conditions are lo be attached to the
                     development approval:


                     Conditions!
                     Agency Interest: Co1Jstel
                       1.    The works must be undertaken In accordance with the plan llsted below.

                     Plan:
                          •     Proposal Plan M1776-020 prepared by Jones Flint & Pike dated 21 September 2007.

                     Additional Information fQr applicants:
                         It Is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 thal If the owner or occupier of this site
                         becomes aware a NoUflable Activity (as defined under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994)
                         Is being carried out on this land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must,
                         within twenty two (22) business days after becoming aware the actlVlty Is being <::arrled ou~ give notice to the
                         Environmental Protection Agency. A 11st of Notifiable Activities Is provided within Schedule 2 of the
                         Environmental Prqteotlon Act 1994.

                 Thia concurrence response pursuant to the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and assessed against section 104
-----,et-the•Saaete/..Prstool/en-Ql'lEI-Msnagemenl-Aet-199Mees-Aet-r-emeve·the·Fteea-te-ebt~IA-aAy-f11rt1=1e,..,__ _ _ _                                ..,j

                 approvals for lhls developmenf which may be required pursuanf£61fils oroffier leglslauon, 6olfi Slafe a n c r - -
                 Commonweallh. AppHcants are advised lo cheqk with all relevant statutory authoriUes for such approvals as
                 may be required.

                     Additional information for the Assessment Manager:
                       The Environmental Protection Agency referral agency Jurisdiction for the development appllcatlon Is confined
                       to that aspect of the application Involving the trtggers Identified In the response. EPA has no referral
                       agency Jurisdiction In relatlon to other aspects of the development application.
                       In this regard It should be noted that the State Coastal Ma11ageme11I Plan 2001 and SEQ Regional Coastal
                       Management Plan 2006 which, for the purposes of making a statutory decision, has the same effect as a
                  _...~tale pl!,mnlng policy. The assessment manager Is required to give due consldemuon to the relevant State
            .4~~·,:\:;16ihnJog policies when deciding the appllcalion.
         ~/ , ~\, i:, lo,iJi'.I. •./,
       ii'-~,-.. -- ''·-~%,'~·
     l/.~f                      1;;:, \
    p~
    'I-,:            .JI..,
                                 ~\
                                 !,·· l
                                                                                           .
    \\i ~;                    of • 0      3      Version 1.1
     '-\
     . -....If;.·.
                                 I;✓ 'f
                              ./(;,/                                                                    A QueenslandGovernment
           · ·,. '.'1,7,~~l\li,m-1 Protection Agency·                                                   ~~ lnvlt0nmentalPiol1tUoaA&ency
               . --~~:!!Pll•iifd.gov,111 A8N 87 221168 786                                                     Queensland "-des and \Ylld!lf, ~•rvlte