Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

2021-12-16 Ordinary Meeting Minutes

of 30

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                               16 DECEMBER 2021


    A.    Refuse the application for the following reasons:
          1.   The proposal is not consistent with 3.2.4 Housing to meet diverse needs of the
               community and 3.3.3 Housing Choice (n) of the Strategic Framework, as it will
               further erode the permanent housing in the area, impacting permanent resident
               amenity.
          2.   The proposal is not consistent with 6.3.2.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(a)
               and (h) of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code as:
               a.     The proposal is located in a medium density residential neighbourhood that
                      is predominately used for short term accommodation. The introduction of
                      additional short term accommodation within a duplex unit is not consistent
                      with the zone’s outcome to maintain the area as predominantly home to
                      permanent residents.
               b.     The proposal seeks to establish a new short-term visitor accommodation
                      dwelling within a duplex and is not located within a well-established resort or
                      holiday units.
          3.   The proposal is not consistent with 7.2.4.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(t)
               and Performance Outcome PO21 of the Noosaville Local Plan Code as:
               a.     Additional visitor accommodation in the area is likely to result in detrimental
                      impacts on the residential amenity of permanent residents.
               b.     While the code seeks to maintain visitor accommodation in the area, it does
                      not seek to increase the extent of visitor accommodation within the area to
                      the detriment of permanent residents.
          4.   The proposal is not consistent with 9.3.5.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (1) and
               (2)(f) of the Visitor Accommodation Code as:
               a.     The proposed visitor accommodation is not appropriately located and
                      integrated with permanent residents in the area given the number and
                      density of properties currently being used for visitor accommodation and/or
                      permitted for use as visitor accommodation.
               b.     The proposed visitor accommodation is likely to detract from the amenity
                      enjoyed by residents nearby and in the surrounding area.
          5.   The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO12 of the Visitor
               Accommodation Code and Performance Outcome PO6 of the Driveway and
               Parking Code as insufficient car parking is proposed on site to address the likely
               parking demands on site.
          6.   There is no need for additional short term accommodation in the area.
    B.    Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
                                                                                      Carried unanimously.

4   RAL21/0007 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 LOT INTO
    12 LOTS) ASSESSED UNDER THE SUPERSEDED PLANNING SCHEME AT 111 LAKE
    WEYBA DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE
    In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stewart provided the following
    declaration to the meeting of a prescribed conflict of interest in this matter:
    I, Cr Stewart, inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to this matter as
    Kirsty Millar, the ex-wife, of Mr Bob Linke, Director of Linke and Linke Surveys Pty Ltd (the Applicant),
    donated $5000 on 12/2/2020, $5000 on 6/3/2020; $1900 on 27/2/2020 and $1900 on 27/2/2020, to my
    2020 election campaign. As a result of my conflict of interest, I will now leave the meeting room while
    the matter is considered and voted on.
    Cr Stewart left the meeting.
    Cr Wilkie assumed the Chair in the absence of Cr Stewart.


                                                                                              Page 12 of 30
Log in to download the original file

2021-12-16 Ordinary Meeting Minutes(PDF, 2MB).pdf · 1.7 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.