Original source · versioned page text
2021-12-16 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 16 DECEMBER 2021
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal is not consistent with 3.2.4 Housing to meet diverse needs of the
community and 3.3.3 Housing Choice (n) of the Strategic Framework, as it will
further erode the permanent housing in the area, impacting permanent resident
amenity.
2. The proposal is not consistent with 6.3.2.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(a)
and (h) of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code as:
a. The proposal is located in a medium density residential neighbourhood that
is predominately used for short term accommodation. The introduction of
additional short term accommodation within a duplex unit is not consistent
with the zone’s outcome to maintain the area as predominantly home to
permanent residents.
b. The proposal seeks to establish a new short-term visitor accommodation
dwelling within a duplex and is not located within a well-established resort or
holiday units.
3. The proposal is not consistent with 7.2.4.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(t)
and Performance Outcome PO21 of the Noosaville Local Plan Code as:
a. Additional visitor accommodation in the area is likely to result in detrimental
impacts on the residential amenity of permanent residents.
b. While the code seeks to maintain visitor accommodation in the area, it does
not seek to increase the extent of visitor accommodation within the area to
the detriment of permanent residents.
4. The proposal is not consistent with 9.3.5.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (1) and
(2)(f) of the Visitor Accommodation Code as:
a. The proposed visitor accommodation is not appropriately located and
integrated with permanent residents in the area given the number and
density of properties currently being used for visitor accommodation and/or
permitted for use as visitor accommodation.
b. The proposed visitor accommodation is likely to detract from the amenity
enjoyed by residents nearby and in the surrounding area.
5. The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO12 of the Visitor
Accommodation Code and Performance Outcome PO6 of the Driveway and
Parking Code as insufficient car parking is proposed on site to address the likely
parking demands on site.
6. There is no need for additional short term accommodation in the area.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
Carried unanimously.
4 RAL21/0007 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 LOT INTO
12 LOTS) ASSESSED UNDER THE SUPERSEDED PLANNING SCHEME AT 111 LAKE
WEYBA DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE
In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stewart provided the following
declaration to the meeting of a prescribed conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Stewart, inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to this matter as
Kirsty Millar, the ex-wife, of Mr Bob Linke, Director of Linke and Linke Surveys Pty Ltd (the Applicant),
donated $5000 on 12/2/2020, $5000 on 6/3/2020; $1900 on 27/2/2020 and $1900 on 27/2/2020, to my
2020 election campaign. As a result of my conflict of interest, I will now leave the meeting room while
the matter is considered and voted on.
Cr Stewart left the meeting.
Cr Wilkie assumed the Chair in the absence of Cr Stewart.
Page 12 of 30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.