Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object - James & Mary Schofield MCU16/0130

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

              a.    The proposal does not comply with the Noosa Plan;

              b.    The proposed uses are industrial and commercial        uses which should not be
                    located in a residential zone;

              c.    Insufficient information has been provided in relation to carparking and noise to
                    adequately address the developments' impact on the surrounding area;

              d.    The applicant submission that the uses are existing on the site is not correct and
                    there are significant issues with the proposal plans;

              e.    The range of uses sought as part of the application are too wide ranging and of
                    an industrial nature not suited to the area; and

              f.    The proposal provides    no justification   or community   benefit to override   the
                    planning scheme.




Yours faithfully.




Ralph Rogers
P.O. Box 1313
Noosaville 4566
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - James & Mary Schofield MCU16_0130.pdf · 1.8 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.