Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.
Item 5.1.2023-08-08 · Planning & Environment CommitteeOfficial item record

Eastern Beaches Foreshore Reserves Management Plan - Community Consultation Overview And Proposed Changes

← Meeting agenda & transcript

See the votes on this matter →

What was decided?

The minuted decision sequence

No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.

1Committee ResolutionCarried

Moved: Tom Wegener · Seconded: Clare Stewart

That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Stockwell and determine that it is in the public interest that Cr Stockwell participates and votes on this matter because Council believes a reasonable person would not consider this a conflict of interest and trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.

Carried unanimously.

Official minutes · section 4

2Committee RecommendationCarried

Moved: Brian Stockwell · Seconded: Clare Stewart

That Planning and Environment Committee Agenda Item 1 be referred to the General Committee due to the significance of the issue.

Carried unanimously.

Official minutes · section 10

Read complete item-specific minutes
Cr Frank Wilkie and Cr Amelia Lorentson left the meeting.

In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stockwell provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
I, Cr Stockwell, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as in early 2020, I received an electoral donation of $500 from Susan Francis. Susan Francis is the partner of Barry Cotterell. Barry Cotterell is the President of the Peregian Beach Community Association (PBCA). The PBCA has made submissions requesting council address illegal encroachments. Neither I nor the PBCA stand to gain personally or materially through the introduction of this shire-wide policy however I make this declaration out of an "abundance of caution” given the possible scope and interpretation of Conflict of Interest rulings. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I believe I can make an impartial decision in the public interest in this matter and l therefore choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the decision.

Committee Resolution
Moved:Cr Tom Wegener
Seconded:Cr Clare Stewart
That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Stockwell and determine that it is in the public interest that Cr Stockwell participates and votes on this matter because Council believes a reasonable person would not consider this a conflict of interest and trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.
Carried unanimously.
Cr Brian Stockwell did not vote on the above motion.


Committee Recommendation
Moved:Cr Brian Stockwell
Seconded:Cr Clare Stewart
That Planning and Environment Committee Agenda Item 1 be referred to the General Committee due to the significance of the issue.
Carried unanimously.

This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.

What was said?

Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV

These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.

Ms Coyle0:00
So, we've been on a long journey with this one. We've done several Council workshops and we've talked about this one a lot. So, the eastern beaches foreshore management plan is implementing elements of the Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan, primarily where we're looking at managing these foreshore areas as natural areas. So, we've developed a scope and a framework that focused on that alongside making sure that our public accesses worked really well for our community as well, so providing access to our gorgeous beaches, but also improving how that sits in the landscape. So, we've come to. Gone through the consultation process based on this document and we've put together some information around what we did for our consultation process, but also the results that we got and how we adapted the plan after we got that input. So primarily we conducted um three round table three community round tables and a couple of focused round tables. We ran a survey that had, I think it was something like. 204 respondents and the round tables had about 42 actual active participants and we also had 92 written submissions as well. So we got a really deep base of information. Based on a broad range of the population. So I really do feel that we got a great range of information to inform that review. Some of the main points of the input was a desire to change the scope, focus and objectives of the plan. Some community members felt that all programs and activities and planning for the eastern beaches should all be in one document. We felt that might be a bit unwieldy. A desire for consultation earlier in the process of the plan, misdirected priorities, overemphasis and exaggeration of the issues of encroachments, a desire for action on encroachments and actions tied to objectives, so making it much clearer how the management actions were achieving the objectives of the plan, and the need for more on-ground works and greater efforts to control weeds. Weight. So in response to that the primary changes, and I mean there's been lots of little changes as well, but the primary changes were the scope of the plan has been better described to how it sits in conjunction with say the Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan, implementation plan, the Coastal Monitoring Plan, the works that are being done by the infrastructure services say around say realigning creek mouths and that kind of thing. Statements about the environmental values and climate change have been better referenced so just showing exactly where we got those points from. Condition mapping, restoration targets, ecological restoration plans and all the on-ground work so this is how all of this strategic stuff gets to on-ground outcomes are better described. Objectives section being better linked to the management outcomes and we did that by including outcomes under each theme that sort of gave more detail to the primary objective that was being implemented theme and I guess one of the biggest changes is that the encroachments policy has come entirely out of the Eastern Beaches Foreshore Management Plan it's now Shire-wide it now covers all Council managed bushland land so that's probably the biggest thing from where we started.
1 suggested discussion start time
  • 129.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.