Debra Walz (Felicity Dale on behalf of)
See the votes on this matter →
What was decided?
The minuted decision sequence
No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.
Read complete item-specific minutes
Question 1.
The "Say No to Fluoride" petition was tabled at the Ordinary Council Meeting in December 2023 and is yet to be actioned by the CEO. Several reasons provided for delaying this action have been given. However, the community wishes to move forward on this important issue and suggests an information session be held with Councillors on the pros and cons of consuming fluoridated drinking water. Would Councillors be open to attending such a session?
Response provided by Richard MacGillivray, Director Planning & Regulation
The petition received by Council on 14 December 2023 and tabled at the December Ordinary meeting was referred by the (then) Acting CEO to the appropriate Council Officers for response. Staff apologise for the delay with providing a response but as you may appreciate the broad scope of the petition requires Council to diligently investigate the matter involving seeking technical advice from Seqwater (The Queensland Government Bulk Water Supply Authority for the Noosa region) and Unitywater who undertake water distribution services to the residents of Noosa. We anticipate a response will be provided to the petition in the near future. In terms of your request to provide an information session to Councillors, I will leave this decision for Councillors to directly consider upon request, however I would advise that Council continues to rely on the Australian Government’s National Health and Medical Research Council statement on Water Fluoridation and Human Health in Australia (2017) as the principal source of credible public health information. Fluoridation is also supported by peak health bodies including the Australian Dental Association, the Australian Medical Association and the World Health Organisation.
Question 2.
Will Council consider abolishing dog renewal registration fees and associated late payment penalties in favour of introducing one lifelong dog registration fee for residents which is a realistic amount and one that reflects Council expenditure on services provided for dog owners?
Response provided by Richard MacGillivray, Director Planning & Regulation
The registration of domestic dogs is a requirement under Queensland law (the Animal Management Cats and Dogs Act 2008 (the Act)). I acknowledge that Council’s in other States do have lifelong dog registrations however dog registration under the Act in Queensland does not allow for lifetime registration. It’s important to highlight that registering your dog helps the council provide essential animal management services. These services include managing aggressive and barking dogs, responding to and investigating dog attacks, providing pound facilities, reuniting lost dogs with their owners, and maintaining off-leash areas, litter bins, and doggie bags where needed.
This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.
What was said?
Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV
These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.
Felicity Dale75:13
A number of questions to Council on. Fluoride have been asked in the past two years with responses personally seeking to cite legislation authorised by a range of authorities holding the same opinion to the ethics of fluoride. To ensure a balanced approach to the subject it would be beneficial to explore other peer supported reports as well. This would allow Councillors to explore all aspects and health effects to people in the Noosa Shire who are consuming fluoride through their drinking water. The say no to fluoride petition was tabled at the ordinary Council meeting in December 2023 and is yet to be activated by the CEO. Several reasons provided for delaying this action have been given. However, the community wishes to move forward on this important issue and suggests an information session to be held with Councillors on the pros and cons of consuming fluoridated drinking water. Would Councillors be open to attending such session?
Felicity Dale77:44
Okay, so my next background is by issuing adult renewal notices to residents indicates Noosa Council may be facing financial challenges and require additional funds for general purposes. This is not the case. Additionally, by not requiring dog renewal registrations can free up staff time and resources that can be allocated to other important tasks or services. By not requiring renewal dog registrations, Council can save on printing, mailing and administration. Costs in general. The benefits of applying a one-off platform dog registration include: 1. Residents can save money which is particularly beneficial for owners of multiple dogs. 2. Eliminates the need for residents to remember to renew their dog registration. 2. Eliminates the need for residents to remember to renew their dog registration. It simplifies the process and reduces the administration burden on both the resident and the Council. 3. Peace of mind for residents, knowing that their dog's registration is valid for the lifetime of their pet. 4. Residents can avoid late fees or penalties for failing to renew their dog's registration on time, therefore alleviating stress and ensuring compliance throughout the dog's lifetime. 5. A lifetime registration can help streamline record keeping for both residents and both residents and the Council, ensuring. Accurate and up-to-date information on all registered dogs in the community. 6. The revenue generated from lifelong dog registration fees can contribute to funding essential services provided by Council, such as animal control, shelter operations and. Pet welfare. Programs. Residents can feel that their contribution is making a positive impact on their community. The question is, will Council consider abolishing dog renewal registration fees and. Associated late payment penalties in favour of reducing one lifelong dog registration fee for residents? Which is a realistic amount and one that can reflect. Council's expenditure on services provided for dog owners. Was provided.
1 suggested discussion start time
- 6529.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.