Confidential Session
See the votes on this matter →
What was decided?
The minuted decision sequence
No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.
1Committee ResolutionCarried
Moved: Amelia Lorentson · Seconded: Nicola Wilson
That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to be made by Council in Item 9.1 - Contract No: CN25031 - Provision of cleaning Services for Administration Buildings, Libraries and Other Facilities.
Carried unanimously.
Official minutes · section 2
2Committee ResolutionCarried
Moved: Frank Wilkie · Seconded: Karen Finzel
That the meeting be re-opened to the public.
Carried unanimously.
Official minutes · section 8
Read complete item-specific minutes
CLOSURE OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC |
Committee Resolution |
Moved: | Cr Amelia Lorentson |
Seconded: | Cr Nicola Wilson |
That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to be made by Council in Item 9.1 - Contract No: CN25031 - Provision of cleaning Services for Administration Buildings, Libraries and Other Facilities. |
Carried unanimously. |
RE-OPENING OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC |
Committee Resolution |
Moved: | Cr Wilkie |
Seconded: | Cr Finzel |
That the meeting be re-opened to the public. |
Carried unanimously. |
This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.
What was said?
Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV
These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.
Brian Stockwell227:53I will close because there's one thing I think Councillor Wegener might be onto something and that's in terms of my thinking and his thinking combining under the concept of do we integrate around the concept of what is a regenerative future because I do think you know back prior to COVID the conversation was shouldn't we have Tourism Noosa in the room and it's probably quite clear that is now a big part of what the future involves and having people both from those who see the regenerative future as something that's happening in terms of weeds and bushes along the Coast to those who've got a more strategic about reducing emissions having that conversation is likely to drive a lot more common purpose and I think while not every environment decision can be done in a consensus fashion with all stakeholders it is a good way to get change in the community and I'll give you one example and that is the rejection of the traverson dam was as a result of all the relationships done in the formation and delivery of the Mary Integrated Catchment Management both the local, national and international networks that all came out telling the government they got it wrong. I'll put it back. Those in favour? That's unanimous. Thank you very much. Thanks. I think that might be it is it? I know we've got a confidential. So I'll have a motion to move in the confidential session if someone wants to move what is on the board. Councillor Lorentson is moving.
1 suggested discussion start time
- 13774.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.