Peregian Active Street Update
See the votes on this matter →
What was decided?
The minuted decision sequence
No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.
1MotionOutcome not confirmed
Moved: Karen Finzel · Seconded: Jessica Phillips
That Council
A. Note the report by the Project Manager to the General Committee dated 10 November 2026 regarding an update on the Peregian Beach Active Street Project;
B. Support the project 'Coastal Pathway Stage 1 - Peregian Beach South' in place of the 'Peregian Beach Active Street' project;
C. Proceed with delivering the 'Coastal Pathway Stage 1 - Peregian Beach South', (attachment 1) utilising the approved SEQ Liveability funds noting the risks associated with the recommended scenario; and
D. Pending successful outcome of Active Transport Fund (ATF), proceed with further expansion of the proposed scope as indicated in the design, as provided as Attachment 1.
Main motion followed by amendments; no separate outcome recorded here.
Official minutes · section 4
2Amendment No. 1Carried
Moved: Amelia Lorentson · Seconded: Nicola Wilson
That Items E be added to read:
E. Direct the CEO to undertake targeted engagement with residents directly adjoining the proposed section of Coastal Path at Lorikeet Dr, Peregian Beach, including release of the existing designs and report feedback verbally to the November 2026 Ordinary Meeting of Council for approval.
Carried.
Against 2 named
Official minutes · section 12
3Procedural MotionOutcome not confirmed
Moved: Nicola Wilson · Seconded: Amelia Lorentson
That General Committee Agenda Item 7.2.1 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting for further consideration and a further report.
Withdrawn by Cr Wilson with approval of Council.
The meeting adjourned at 11.15am
The meeting resumed at 11.31am
The outcome could not be confirmed from this wording: Withdrawn by Cr Wilson with approval of Council.
Official minutes · section 20
4Amendment No. 2Carried
Moved: Nicola Wilson · Seconded: Amelia Lorentson
That Item F be added to read:
F. Request the CEO to provide a report to the November Ordinary meeting, including:
• A summary of how the current draft report and recommendations have addressed the community feedback received to date;
• Estimated impacts to parking;
• More detailed diagrams to ensure councillors and public can visualise the outcomes.
Carried.
Against 0 named
Official minutes · section 27
5Amendment No. 3Carried
Moved: Amelia Lorentson · Seconded: Nicola Wilson
That Item E be amended to read:
E. Request Direct the CEO undertake targeted engagement with residents directly adjoining the proposed section of Coastal Path at Lorikeet Dr, Peregian Beach, including release of the existing designs and report feedback verbally to the November 2026 Ordinary Meeting of Council for approval.
Carried.
Against 1 named
Official minutes · section 38
6Committee RecommendationCarried
Moved: Karen Finzel · Seconded: Jessica Phillips
That Council
A. Note the report by the Project Manager to the General Committee dated 10 November 2026 regarding an update on the Peregian Beach Active Street Project;
B. Support the project 'Coastal Pathway Stage 1 - Peregian Beach South' in place of the 'Peregian Beach Active Street' project;
C. Proceed with delivering the 'Coastal Pathway Stage 1 - Peregian Beach South', (attachment 1) utilising the approved SEQ Liveability funds noting the risks associated with the recommended scenario; and
D. Pending successful outcome of Active Transport Fund (ATF), proceed with further expansion of the proposed scope as indicated in the design, as provided as Attachment 1.
E. Request the CEO undertake targeted engagement with residents directly adjoining the proposed section of Coastal Path at Lorikeet Dr, Peregian Beach, including release of the existing designs and report feedback verbally to the November 2026 Ordinary Meeting of Council for approval.
F. Request the CEO to provide a report to the November Ordinary meeting, including:
• A summary of how the current draft report and recommendations have addressed the community feedback received to date;
• Estimated impacts to parking;
• More detailed diagrams to ensure councillors and public can visualise the outcomes.
Carried.
Against 0 named
Official minutes · section 46
Read complete item-specific minutes
| Motion |
| Moved: | Cr Karen Finzel |
| Seconded: | Cr Jessica Phillips |
That Council
|
| Amendment No. 1 |
| Moved: | Cr Amelia Lorentson |
| Seconded: | Cr Nicola Wilson |
That Items E be added to read: E. Direct the CEO to undertake targeted engagement with residents directly adjoining the proposed section of Coastal Path at Lorikeet Dr, Peregian Beach, including release of the existing designs and report feedback verbally to the November 2026 Ordinary Meeting of Council for approval. |
| Carried. |
| For: | Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson |
| Against: | Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel |
| Procedural Motion |
| Moved: | Cr Nicola Wilson |
| Seconded: | Cr Amelia Lorentson |
That General Committee Agenda Item 7.2.1 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting for further consideration and a further report. |
Withdrawn by Cr Wilson with approval of Council. |
The meeting adjourned at 11.15am
The meeting resumed at 11.31am
| Amendment No. 2 |
| Moved: | Cr Nicola Wilson |
| Seconded: | Cr Amelia Lorentson |
That Item F be added to read: F. Request the CEO to provide a report to the November Ordinary meeting, including:
|
| Carried. |
| For: | Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson |
| Against: | None |
Amendment No. 3 |
| Moved: | Cr Amelia Lorentson |
| Seconded: | Cr Nicola Wilson |
That Item E be amended to read: E. Request |
| Carried. |
| For: | Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson |
| Against: | Cr Brian Stockwell |
Committee Recommendation |
| Moved: | Cr Karen Finzel |
| Seconded: | Cr Jessica Phillips |
That Council
|
Carried. |
| For: | Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson |
| Against: | None |
At 11:44 AM Cr Frank Wilkie returned to the meeting.
This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.
What was said?
Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV
These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.
All right, let me move on to the reports for action now. And the first item for action is the Peregian active street update. Item 72.5.
Madam Chair, may I have a declaration? Yes. Can we get it up the screen? Thank you. I, Councillor Frank Wilkie, inform the meeting that I have received conflict of interest for item 7.251 of the Peregian active street update on this agenda as the matter involves a proposal for a new footpath in Lorikeet drive, Peregian. And I, as a close relative to my mother, live in the nearby streets that connect onto Lorikeet drive. Although can make a decision in the public interest to avoid perceptions of a conflict of interest, I choose to leave the meeting room while the matter is discussed and voted upon.
Good morning Councillors, thank you for the opportunity to present. At the Ordinary Meeting held on the 18th of June 2026 staff presented an extensive report providing a project update and recommendations on the bridge in active street. This was on the back of extensive amount of work and community consultation undertaken as early as 2020 through the Walking and Cycling Strategy and high priority corridor study. At that meeting Councillors resolved not to proceed with the active street in its proposed form and determined whether available grant funding could be used to deliver practical infrastructure improvements consistent with priorities expressed by the community. Following this decision the staff met and developed a new scope of works utilising the feedback received through the community consultation. The revised scope of work excludes traffic calming measures, raised priority crossings, formalised car parking, protection road surface treatments and reduce speed limit measures and instead focuses on delivering an improved off-road pathway network and associated infrastructure including the new pathway, five curve build out to avoid existing utilities, vegetation and retaining structures and an upgrade to the pathway south of the lorikeet Escarpment Park bridge, Birch landscaping works, wayfinding signage and other ancillary improvements. Early discussions with the grant funding bodies indicated that they were supportive of this revised scope and subsequently Councillor staff submitted formal variation requests on the 14th of July South East Queensland funding body approved the proposed scope variation extension of time. A formal response from the Federal active transport fund remains outstanding however formal advice received on the 17th of September indicated that the proposed scope variation has been escalated to the minister's office for consideration and as a result of that determination could take up to a few months. They also indicate the project to be supported it would need to include a raised body crossing of Pitta Street and even then it was still sort of up in the air as to whether it would be approved this report is proposing that the works commence to avoid any further delays caused by waiting for the ATF funding. The program is currently scheduled with tender in January. Looking to award a contract in March and commence construction shortly after the Easter break with the aims of delivering the project before construction goes into the west season. Thank you very with the scope I'll also just touch on the exclusion is the formalised car parking with a focus on reducing the impact of car parking so.
Thank you welcome back everybody um from our short adjournment and we've returned to um an item the bridging active street update 10.2.1 and we're currently in a of a procedural motion by Councillor Wilson when it comes up on the screen.
1 suggested discussion start time
- 2391.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.





