Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

Development Application part 2 Planning Report MCU13/0051

of 122

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (109 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

f) Retail business Type 3;
g) Emergency service Type
2;
h) Open space Type 2;
i) Detached house;
j) Community residence;
k) Ancillary dwelling unit;
I) Multiple housing Type 1;
and
m)Visitor accommodation
Types 1,2 or 3.
8.36 Inconsistent Uses


064 The following defined       No solution provided   064 Does not comply.
                                                            -




uses and use classes are
                                                       The proposed development is identified as
inconsistent uses and are not
located in the Rural Zone-
                                                       an   Infrastructural     Use    -Type 3 ’Tower’
                                                       under the Noosa Plan 2009 and is                  an
a) Commercial business
                                                       inconsistent use within the Rural Zone.
Types 1 or 2;
b) Entertainment and dining                            However, the subject site is considered
business;                                              appropriate to accommodate the use.
c) Industrial business Type
                                                       NBN Co have identified the need for a new
1;
                                                       telecommunication          facility    within    the
d) Retail business Type 1
                                                       Cooran locality. Of the two (2)candidates
and a roadside stall
                                                       which were investigated for the facility, the
e) Retail business Types 2,
                                                       current site     was    determined to be most
4,5,6 or 7;
                                                       appropriate for the following reasons:
f) Education;
g) Emergency service Type
                                                       .    Potential visual and       amenity impacts
1;
                                                            will   be    minimised     whilst ensuring
h) Open space Type 1;
                                                            there are no detrimental effects to use
i) Wellbeing;
                                                            of the land and surrounds.
j) All Infrastructure ’Uses;
k) Multiple housing Types 2,                           .    The   site  provides an adequate
3,4 or 5; and
                                                            separation distance from community
I) Visitor accommodation                                    sensitive land       uses and      residential
Type 4.                                                     dwellings (setback         more   than 275m
                                                            from the closest residential dwelling
                                                            and    within proximity to only two
                                                            residential dwellings within a 500m
                                                            radius)
                                                       .    There is     a    sufficient buffer distance
                                                            from      environmentally    sensitive
                                                            locations and   no vegetation removal

                                                            will be required;

                                                       .    Well        removed       from      significant
                                                            transport     routes    (over     700m     from
                                                            Coles Creek         Road    and    Schreibers
                                                            Road)
                                                       .    Natural    vegetation  screening  is
                                                            provided    and    the backdrop of
                                                            ridgelines will assist with visually
                                                            integrating the monopole within its
                                                            surroundings and reducing the visual
                                                            dominance of the str cture.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
109 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Development Application part 2 Planning Report MCU13_0051.pdf · 109 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.