Council archive · source document
Minor Change Assessment · 132008.176.06
Attached to the e-mail Minor Change - Conditions with SARA, Updated Plans & Remove Bus Stop - 132008.176.06.
ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were
made when the change application is made would not cause—
Description / Provisions Comment / Response
A. the inclusion of prohibited No prohibited development proposed.
development in the application; or
B. referral to a referral agency, other The application triggered referral. No
than to the chief executive, if there additional referrals are required.
were no referral agencies for the
development application; or
C. referral to extra referral agencies, No extra referrals are required.
other than to the chief executive; or
D. a referral agency to assess the No additional referral assessment
application against, or have regard triggers/aspects are required.
to, matters prescribed by
regulation under section 55(2),
other than matters the referral
agency must have assessed the
application against, or have had
regard to, when the application was
made; or
E. public notification if public No change.
notification was not required for
the development application.
Accordingly, the subject change is a minor change.
CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Clause 81 (4) & (5) the responsible entity must consider the statutory
instrument, or other document, as in effect when the development application for the
development approval was properly made.
However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is
appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
(a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change
application was made; or
(b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after
the change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or
replacement instrument or document; or
(c) another statutory instrument—
(i) that comes into effect after the change application is made but before
it is decided; and
(ii) that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the
instrument had been in effect when the development application for
the development approval was properly made.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 794 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.