Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Minor Change Assessment · 132008.176.06

Attached to the e-mail Minor Change - Conditions with SARA, Updated Plans & Remove Bus Stop - 132008.176.06.

of 10

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

     ii.     if a development application for the development, including the change, were
             made when the change application is made would not cause—

           Description / Provisions                  Comment / Response

           A. the   inclusion   of    prohibited No prohibited development proposed.
              development in the application; or

           B. referral to a referral agency, other The application triggered referral.   No
              than to the chief executive, if there additional referrals are required.
              were no referral agencies for the
              development application; or

           C. referral to extra referral agencies, No extra referrals are required.
              other than to the chief executive; or
           D. a referral agency to assess the No additional referral assessment
              application against, or have regard triggers/aspects are required.
              to,    matters     prescribed     by
              regulation under section 55(2),
              other than matters the referral
              agency must have assessed the
              application against, or have had
              regard to, when the application was
              made; or

           E. public     notification if  public No change.
              notification was not required for
              the development application.


Accordingly, the subject change is a minor change.


CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Clause 81 (4) & (5) the responsible entity must consider the statutory
instrument, or other document, as in effect when the development application for the
development approval was properly made.

However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is
appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
   (a)    the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change
          application was made; or
   (b)    if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after
          the change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or
          replacement instrument or document; or
   (c)    another statutory instrument—
          (i)     that comes into effect after the change application is made but before
                  it is decided; and
          (ii)    that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the
                  instrument had been in effect when the development application for
                  the development approval was properly made.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
794 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Assessment.pdf · 794 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.