Attachment 1B - Approval 2006-2237 - Stage 2B

   2006/2237




Page 15 of 17




     Print Date: 24 April 2015, 3:55 PM


[OCR of page images]
2006/2237

 

NRW - Referral agency response-2006/012294

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1 = Approved plan: Noosa North Shore Housing — May 2006 — Deicke
Richards — UD12-P2.

Reasons for the concurrence agency conditions

A statement of reasons, which details the reasons for the inclusion of conditions in
any development approval given for the development application, is attached to, and
forms part of, this referral agency response.

Aboriginal cultural heritage information

Under section 23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 a person who carries
out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity
does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage (the “cultural heritage duty of care”).
Maximum penalties for breaching the cultural heritage duty of care are $750 000 for a
corporation and $75 000 for an individual.

Applicants will comply with the cultural heritage duty of care in relation to Aboriginal
cultural heritage if they are acting in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of
care guidelines gazetted under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003, available
on the NRW website, or in accordance with an agreement with the Aboriginal party
for the area or a cultural heritage management plan approved under part 7 of the
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003.

 

Page 2 of 7

Page 15 of 17

Print Date: 24 April 2015, 3:55 PM